A complex data set: 7 malt parameters x 3 locations x 3 nitrogen rates x 5 varieties x 2 labs = 210 possible combinations

Similar documents
Great Lakes Hop & Barley Conference Barley Contributions to Beer Flavor: Flavor Fields and The Oregon Promise

Quality of New Canadian Malting Barley Varieties

Breeding Better Barley

CMBTC 2017 Crop MALTING BARLEY QUALITY ASSESSMENT Preliminary Report


Evaluation of the Malting and Brewing Performance of the New Canadian Malting Barley Variety Norman

Is Malt The New Hops?

Malting Barley Development at OSU. Scott Fisk Cascadia Grains Conference January 12, 2013

Colored Malt Products June 23, 2012 Robert Seggewiss 3/07/2012 1

Identifying Spring Malting Barley Varieties for the Craft Brewing Industries 2017 Final Report

EFFECT OF TOMATO GENETIC VARIATION ON LYE PEELING EFFICACY TOMATO SOLUTIONS JIM AND ADAM DICK SUMMARY

Evaluation of Malting Barley Potential for Atlantic Canada. Prepared for the Atlantic Grains Council December, 2013

Evaluation of the Malting and Brewing Performance of the New Malting Variety CDC Meredith

40 TH Barley Improvement Conference. Hacienda Hotel, San Diego, California January 11-12, 2015

Evaluation of the Malting and Brewing Performance the new Canadian Two Row Variety Cerveza

Evaluation of desiccants to facilitate straight combining canola. Brian Jenks North Dakota State University

2-ROW MALTING BARLEY 2017 SEED GUIDE

PNWHBC 2017 Barley varieties and your home brew

Barley Research at Aberdeen. Gongshe Hu USDA-ARS Aberdeen, Idaho

DANISH MALTING BARLEY. Catalogue 2018

Malting barley prices Basis FOB Swedish /Danish Port Basis Oct 14/15/16/17/18/19 EUR/mt 230

FERMENTATION. By Jeff Louella

Pilot Malting and Brewing Trials with 2011 Crop CDC Meredith Barley

2012 Crop CDC Meredith Malting and Brewing Trials

Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board January 11, Delaware Soybean Board

GENOTYPIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ON BREAD-MAKING QUALITY OF WINTER WHEAT IN ROMANIA

2012 Crop CDC Kindersley Malting & Brewing Trials

EU Cereals Trade 2017/18 Marketing Year July - March. AGRI G 4 Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets 31 May 2018

A.M.Z. Chamango 1, Gomonda, R.W.J. 1, Mainjeni, C.E.D. 1, Msangosoko K.R. 1 and Kumwenda, R.L.N. 1

Guidelines and Suggestions for Starting Maltsters

PRODUCT PORTFOLIO 2017/18

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

An Investigation of Methylsufonylmethane as a Fermentation Aid. Eryn Bottens, Jeb Z Hollabaugh, and Thomas H. Shellhammer.

AN OVERVIEW OF THE BREWING PROCESS. Jared Long Head Brewer Altitude Chophouse and Brewery

FOOD PRODUCTION - BEVERAGES Demonstrate knowledge of brewhouse operations and wort production

Incremental Record Linkage. Anja Gruenheid!! Xin Luna Dong!!! Divesh Srivastava

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

GROWING MALTING BARLEY IN NY. M. Stanyard

Meatless is a pioneer and front runner in the field of hybrid products

Title: Control of Wild Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) in 'Jubilee' Sweet Corn in the Willamette Valley, 1987.

Australia s Label Integrity Program

PRODUCTION OF BEER Page 1

The malting process Kilned vs. roasted Specialty grains and steeping Malt extract production

Steve Rockhold Director Brewing Materials Procurement MBAA Rocky Mountain District April 22, 2010

Structures of Life. Investigation 1: Origin of Seeds. Big Question: 3 rd Science Notebook. Name:

Developing Markets for Heritage Malts. Chris Ridout John Innes Centre

2014 Crop Merit 57 Pilot Malting and Brewing Trials

Influence of Cultivar and Planting Date on Strawberry Growth and Development in the Low Desert

Mashing! How? Why? To what extent?!

Style of the Quarter. English Mild

Rich Horsley Department of Plant Sciences North Dakota State University

CARTHAMUS TINCTORIUS L., THE QUALITY OF SAFFLOWER SEEDS CULTIVATED IN ALBANIA.

Passionate about malt for over 90 years. Meet your specific requirements

wine 1 wine 2 wine 3 person person person person person

CMBTC 2015 MALTING BARLEY CROP QUALITY ASSESSMENT Preliminary Report

Malt Specifications for the Practical Brewer. Ashton Lewis Technical Sales Manager Central Midwest

CONTENTS. Whisky recipes...7-8

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

``Exploring Brewing Enzymes``

Blame the Maltster. John Mallett National Homebrewers Conference

Monophenols in beer. by Femke Sterckx. XIVth Chair J. De Clerck 14 September 2012

Malting and Brewing Trials with 2011 Crop Barley Samples of CDC PolarStar and AC Metcalfe

EVALUATION OF FOURTEEN TOMATO CULTIVARS IN SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN Ron Goldy & Virginia Wendzel Southwest Michigan Research and Extension Center

DISCOVERING THE WORLD OF MALT

Response of malting barley cultivars to increasing nitrogen rates in western Canada

Global barley marketing issues. John Stuart 25 February 2013

2013 Crop AAC Synergy Pilot Malting and Brewing Trials

DISCOVERING THE WORLD OF MALT. Distributed by:

1. Title: Identification of High Yielding, Root Rot Tolerant Sweet Corn Hybrids

HOW TO ACHIEVE A SUCCESSFUL PRISE DE MOUSSE

SOUR WORTING. Rick Seibt 1/4/2016

Brewhouse technology

Developing Machine-Harvestable Fresh Market Tomatoes; and other Highlights from the UF Breeding Program

Big Data and the Productivity Challenge for Wine Grapes. Nick Dokoozlian Agricultural Outlook Forum February

Viking Malt Barley News Crop 2017

Impact of Vineyard Practices on Grape and Wine Composition

PROJECT REPORT No. 283 PROCESSABILITY OF MALTS MADE FROM UK-GROWN BARLEY (2001/2002)

Beer Clarity. Brad Smith, PhD

CS 322: (Social and Information) Network Analysis Jure Leskovec Stanford University

2014 Evaluation of Sweet Corn Varieties, Jay, Florida

Qualifications. The General Certificate in Malting (GCM) Examination Syllabus June 2013

Delivering Great Cocktails Through Full Serve Testing. Jean A. McEwan and Janet McLean Diageo Innovation

Mechanical Canopy and Crop Load Management of Pinot Gris. Joseph P. Geller and S. Kaan Kurtural

The State of the Craft Beer Raw Material Supply Sector; or Beer, Hops and Barley

AGRONOMY 375 EXAM III. December 11 and 13, points possible

Warminster maltings ltd. Adding terroir to Your Pint

Effects of seeding rate, nitrogen rate and cultivar on barley malt quality

The Organic Backyard Vineyard: A Step-by-Step Guide To Growing Your Own Grapes PDF


CERTIFIED SUSTAINABLE ANNUAL REPORT 2017

In pursuit of flavor

RISK MANAGEMENT OF BEER FERMENTATION DIACETYL CONTROL

A new acetolacte decarboxylase for diacetyl control

Correlation of the free amino nitrogen and nitrogen by O-phthaldialdehyde methods in the assay of beer

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

BMBRI/AIP Two Row Malting Barley Improvement at AAFC. Dr. Bill Legge & Dr. Ana Badea Brandon Research and Development Centre, Brandon, MB

Virginia Tech. Research and development of winter malt barley varieties for the eastern US

Effect of Sowing Rate on Seed Yield and Yield Components of Narbon Vetch (Vicia narbonensis L.) Under Rainy Condition in Semi-Arid Regions of Turkey

Vegan Ice Cream with Similar Nutritional Value to Dairy-based Ice Cream

Angel Rebollar-Alvitar and Michael A. Ellis The Ohio State University/OARDC Department of Plant Pathology 1680 Madison Avenue Wooster, OH 44691

Transcription:

A complex data set: 7 malt parameters x 3 locations x 3 nitrogen rates x 5 varieties x 2 labs = 210 possible combinations To simplify: Treated labs as reps and averaged across nitrogen rates within locations justified by lack of variety x nitrogen rate interaction for agronomic traits Since grain protein reported by only one lab, used total wort protein (reported by both labs) as a surrogate In the following slides Means for each variety at each of the three locations presented, along with AMBA adjunct and all-malt (in text boxes and as thresholds in the graphs) LSD(.05) Standard deviation for the trait Succinct summary of key findings An attempt to integrate multiple traits by Summing number of met for all 7 malt traits Spider plots based on all adjusted/standardized values 7 malt traits

Adjunct Two-Row 12.8% All Malt Two-Row 11.8% All varieties meet adjunct and all malt All varieties meet adjunct and all malt All varieties meet adjunct specification and all but Full Pint within range of all-malt

Adjunct Two-Row >81% All Malt Two-Row >81% All varieties meet adjunct and all malt, or within range All varieties meet adjunct and all malt, or within range Only Genie meets/within range of adjunct and all malt

Adjunct Two-Row >120 All Malt Two-Row 110-150 Only Full Pint meets adjunct and all malt All varieties meet or within range for adjunct and all malt All varieties meet or within range for adjunct ; only Expedition and Explorer meet all-malt

Adjunct Two-Row >50 All Malt Two-Row 40-70 All varieties meet or within range for adjunct and all malt All varieties meet or within range for adjunct and all malt All varieties meet or within range for adjunct and all malt

Adjunct Two-Row 40-47% All Malt Two-Row 38-45% All varieties meet adjunct and all malt All varieties but Copeland meet or within range of adjunct and all malt All varieties meet or within range of adjunct and all but Copeland and Genie meet or within range of all malt

Adjunct Two-Row < 100 All Malt Two-Row < 100 Only Explorer and Genie meet or within range of adjunct and all malt All varieties except Full Pint meet or within range of adjunct and all malt All varieties meet adjunct and all malt

Adjunct Two-Row >210 All Malt Two-Row 140-190

Meeting expectations for adjunct 2-row (X = meet) Site Lebanon Grande Ronde Klamath Trait/Var C Ee El F G C Ee Ex F G C Ee Ex F G Sum ME x x x x x x x x x x x 11 DP x x x x x x x x x x x 11 AA x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 15 TWP x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 15 S/T x x x x x x x x x 9 BG x x x x x x x x x x x x 12 FAN x x x x x x x x x x x x 12 Sum 5 3 5 6 5 6 6 7 7 7 5 6 6 5 6 Sum of meeting across locations Copeland 16 Expedition 15 Explorer 18 Full Pint 18 Genie 18 Meeting expectations for all malt 2-row (X = meet) Site Lebanon Grande Ronde Klamath Trait/Var C Ee El F G C Ee Ex F G C Ee Ex F G Sum ME x x x x x x x x x x x 11 DP x x x x x x x x x 9 AA x x x x x x x x x x x x x 13 TWP x x x x x x x x x x x 11 S/T x x x x x x 6 BG x x x x x x x x x x x 11 FAN x x x 3 Sum 5 5 6 5 6 5 5 5 4 5 2 3 3 1 4 Sum of meeting across locations Copeland 12 Expedition 13 Explorer 14 Full Pint 10 Genie 15

Conclusions All varieties met many AMBA for adjunct and/or all-malt 2-row at the three locations: no variety or location met all Adjunct were met more often than all-malt Specifications were most often met at Grande Ronde Changes in management and/or malting regime could potentially assist in meeting for more varieties and in more environments In terms of overall modification, Full Pint was at the under-modified end of the spectrum and Genie at the over-modified end of the spectrum Tailoring crop management and malt protocols could assist in optimizing modification Communication between growers, maltsters and brewers essential to ensure maximum satisfaction from all parties: two examples from the production and brewing ends of the chain a grower may wish to produce a variety that maximizes agronomic satisfaction (e.g. Explorer) but a maltster might prefer Copeland or Expedition due to familiarity, seed cost, and/or established customer preference A brewer might prefer Full Pint due to contributions to beer flavor but the maltster might prefer Genie due to ease of modification following standard malting regimes