GUIDELINES TO DETERMINE THE EFFECT OF FUNGICIDAL AGRICULTURAL REMEDIES ON FERMENTATION PROCESSES AND WINE QUALITY

Similar documents
Study of unintentional effects of plant protection products on fermentation processes and characteristics of wine

Oregon Wine Advisory Board Research Progress Report

AN ENOLOGY EXTENSION SERVICE QUARTERLY PUBLICATION

Effect of Rehydration Temperature of Active Dried Yeast on Wine Production and qualityl)

WINE GRAPE TRIAL REPORT

TEBUFENOZIDE EXPLANATION

Viniflora PRELUDE Product Information

Appendix 2. Food Safety Plan Worksheets

STANDARD FOR BLACK, WHITE AND GREEN PEPPERS CXS Adopted in 2017.

Oregon Wine Advisory Board Research Progress Report

Presented during the Performance BIB meetings in Bristol, England 24 & 25 October By: Tony Hoare

AN ENOLOGY EXTENSION SERVICE QUARTERLY PUBLICATION

MLF co-inoculation how it might help with white wine

In the preparation of this Tanzania Standard assistance was derived from:

Forestry, Leduc, AB, T9E 7C5, Canada. Agriculture/Forestry Centre, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada. *

Post-harvest prevention and remediation of ladybug taint

The generation of chlorantraniliprole residue data in beans, peas and sweet corn

myclobutanil 987 MYCLOBUTANIL (181)

Seabuckthorn Puree (- Seabuckthorn Pulp -) Organic grade

VQA Ontario. Quality Assurance Processes - Tasting

Figure 1: Quartely milk production and gross value

Co-inoculation and wine

DRAFT EAST AFRICAN STANDARD

Licensed exclusively to SABS. Copying and network storage prohibited. Mayonnaise, salad cream and salad dressing

EAST AFRICAN STANDARD

RESIDUE AND ANALYTICAL ASPECTS

Taste Testing of Water in Sports Bottles

Inovace studijních programů AF a ZF MENDELU směřující k vytvoření mezioborové integrace CZ.1.07/2.2.00/

A Practical Guide to Biocidal Products and Articles

World of Wine: From Grape to Glass

Test sheet preparation of pulps and filtrates from deinking processes

Issued by the Registrar: Act No. 36 of 1947, Private Bag X343, Pretoria 0001

PYRAZOPHOS (153) Table 1. Pyrazophos - registered use rates and patterns. Nearly all formulations used are 30% EC; a very few are 15% WP mixtures.

LAST PART: LITTLE ROOM FOR CORRECTIONS IN THE CELLAR

The Purpose of Certificates of Analysis

COLOUR PACKING SIZE MAIN INGREDIENTS CHARACTERISTICS / BENEFITS

ORGANOLEPTIC EVALUATION OF RECIPES BASED ON DIFFERENT VARIETIES OF MAIZE

Influence of climate and variety on the effectiveness of cold maceration. Richard Fennessy Research officer

INDUSTRY FACT SHEET. Vintage Wine and Application of Enhanced Allergen Regulations July 2012

HOME ROASTER COMPETITION ENTRY FORMS GENERAL REGULATION

GOVERNMENT NOTICES GOEWERMENTSKENNISGEWINGS

GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF FRESH BAKER S YEAST

30 YEARS OF FUEL ETHANOL PRODUCTION IN BRAZIL: identification and selection of dominant industrial yeast strains.

Clause 1. Clause 2 Clause 3. Clause FDA, MOPH.

Vintner s Quality Alliance Ontario

OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER MARCH 2015 OHIO QUALITY WINE SENSORY EVALUATION (OQW)

means any vehicle or container in which bulk sunflower seed is transported or stored;

Sour Beer A New World approach to an Old World style. Brian Perkey Lallemand Brewing

MLF tool to reduce acidity and improve aroma under cool climate conditions

Botector Product User Manual

SALTED CREAMERY BUTTER GDT Specification - Fonterra NZ

Appendix 1 fees for biocidal active substances and products. A. Fees for evaluation of applications* Active substances fees

New range of yeasts: L Authentique. Yeasts for the elaboration of authentique red wines that highlight the expression of prestigious terroirs.

Effect of Storage Period and Ga3 Soaking of Bulbs on Growth, Flowering and Flower Yield of Tuberose (Polianthes Tuberosa L.) Cv.

AZINPHOS-METHYL (002)

Timing of Treatment O 2 Dosage Typical Duration During Fermentation mg/l Total Daily. Between AF - MLF 1 3 mg/l/day 4 10 Days

PRODUCT REGISTRATION: AN E-GUIDE

Process standardization of low-calories and low-sugar kalam

Effects of Capture and Return on Chardonnay (Vitis vinifera L.) Fermentation Volatiles. Emily Hodson

5. Supporting documents to be provided by the applicant IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER

COMPETITION ENTRY FORMS GENERAL REGULATION

Evaluation of Gouda cheese available in the Egyptian market.

2. Materials and methods. 1. Introduction. Abstract

Elderberry Ripeness and Determination of When to Harvest. Patrick Byers, Regional Horticulture Specialist,

TURKISH FOOD CODEX COMMUNIQUÉ ON FERMENTED MILK PRODUCTS (DRAFT/2015)

Guidelines on the registration of national guides to good practice. In accordance with Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 852/2004

Exploring Attenuation. Greg Doss Wyeast Laboratories Inc. NHC 2012

QUARTELY MAIZE MARKET ANALYSIS & OUTLOOK BULLETIN 1 OF 2015

Draft for comments only - Not to be cited as East African Standard

Studies on Fortification of Solar Dried Fruit bars

Wine LIST A a w r a ds

Streptomycin Residues and Resistance. David Tanner GM Psa Innovation ZESPRI/KVH R&D Programme

Development and characterization of wheat breads with chestnut flour. Marta Gonzaga. Raquel Guiné Miguel Baptista Luísa Beirão-da-Costa Paula Correia

Cyprodinil CYPRODINIL (207)

INSTRUCTIONS FOR CO-INOCULATION

# 2649 POP A LOT CANOLA OIL

Production, Optimization and Characterization of Wine from Pineapple (Ananas comosus Linn.)

LACTIC ACID BACTERIA (OIV-Oeno , Oeno )

TRIAL SESSIONS : Multi-winery studies of Pinot Noir vinification methods. 60-ish winemakers from across Victoria

Novel methods for the amelioration of smoke tainted wine

Category for 2018 is Chardonnay

Tea Research Foundation Central Africa

FROZEN CHEDDAR CHEESE

2018 Little Italy Amateur Wine Competition Entry Deadline Friday, August 31 st Competition date: September 8 th

2,4-D (020) The 2001 Meeting received information on GAP and supervised residue trials for the postharvest use of 2,4-D on lemons and oranges.

World of Wine: From Grape to Glass Syllabus

WORLDWIDE SYMPOSIUM ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS

FAIRTRADE LABELLING ORGANIZATIONS INTERNATIONAL. FOR Honey FOR. Small Producers Organizations. Current version:

Evaluating forage quality by visual appraisal, ph, and dry matter content

Category for Red Wines

Management of Sour Rot and Volatile Acidity in Grapes. Ontario Grape and Wine Research Incorporated, Project # Pillar 1

Fedima Position Paper on Labelling of Allergens

REPORT to the California Tomato Commission Tomato Variety Trials: Postharvest Evaluations for 2006

ISO 9844 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Oil of bitter orange (Citrus aurantium L.) Huile essentielle d'orange amère (Citrus aurantium L.)

EDICT ± OF GOVERNMENT

RESOLUTION OIV-OENO MONOGRAPH ON GLUTATHIONE

Technology Trends Driving the Adoption of UV LED Curing

DEVELOPMENT OF A RAPID METHOD FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF PHENOLIC MATURITY IN BURGUNDY PINOT NOIR

Tomato Product Cutting Tips

YOUNG CHEDDAR CHEESE GDT Young (for processing)

Transcription:

GUIDELINES TO DETERMINE THE EFFECT OF FUNGICIDAL AGRICULTURAL REMEDIES ON FERMENTATION PROCESSES AND WINE QUALITY Issued by the Registrar: Act No. 36 of 1947, Private Bag X343, Pretoria 0001, Republic of South Africa Tel: +27 12 319 7000 / Fax: +27 12 319 7179 JULY 2018

Scope These guidelines describe the procedure to evaluate the unintentional effects of fungicidal and including bio-fungicides products, on the fermentation processes and final wine quality in accordance with Act No 36 of 1947 as issued by the Registrar (2016), Department: Agriculture, Forestry & Fisheries of the Republic of South Africa. These guidelines supersede any guidelines published before by the office of the Registrar and shall be implemented effective from the 1 st of September 2018. Trials are required for a product containing an active substance known to have caused unintentional effects, or chemically similar to one known to cause unintentional effects on fermentation processes and final wine quality and refer to the following categories of plant protection products intended for application on wine grapes after flowering: any fungicide containing a new active ingredient that is not yet registered for use on winegrapes. any new formulation(s) or a generic of a registered product(s) where the PHI is 7 days or less. 1. Experimental field trial design Experimental field trials should be designed as set out in the Guidelines on residue study requirements for registration of agricultural remedies and setting of maximum residue limits (MRL s) in South Africa in Act No 36 of 1947 as issued by the Registrar (2016), Department: Agriculture, Forestry & Fisheries of the Republic of South Africa, except that treatments must be replicated as indicated herein. 2. Grape cultivars Experimental trials should be performed on commonly grown Vitis vinifera crops, from both white and red varieties from any winemaking region. All field trials should be conducted on healthy grapes. It is not advised to use fragrant cultivars such as Bukkettraube, Muscat d Alexandrie and Gewürtztraminer as these cultivars could mask possible negative effects of the chemical agent on the wine quality. 2.1. White cultivars that can be used are: Chenin Blanc, Cape Riesling, Colombar or Clairette Blanche. 2.2. Any red cultivars can be used.

Optimum ripeness or degree of ripeness of the grapes can be ascertained by sending samples to a laboratory capable of analysing the sugar and total acidity content prior to harvesting. 3. Sample requirements Each experiment must include a control / reference sample and a treatment: 3.1. The control must be untreated or treated with a known / registered agent. 3.2. The treatment must be applied at the highest rate and the maximum number of applications with the shortest application intervals and up to the shortest pre-harvest interval indicated on the product label (cgap). 3.3. Each treatment, as well as the control, must have at least three (see Annex A). 3.4. A random sample of minimum 2 x 22 kg healthy grapes for each replicate must be taken, i.e. a total mass of 44 kg grapes per replicate and 264 kg per treatment used for the wine making. 4. Vinification process Wine quality must be monitored by a suitably qualified laboratory. 4.1. Grape must from the different treatments must be analysed for Sugar, ph, Total Acidity (TA). 4.2. White and red wines must be made according to a standard winemaking protocol using commercial active dried wine yeast (ADWY) Saccharomyces cerevisiae such as VIN 7, VIN 13 for white and WE372 red wines, respectively. 4.3. The progress of the alcoholic fermentation must be monitored throughout the fermentation process until fermentation is complete. 4.4. Malo-lactic fermentation status in red wines must be measured using paper chromatography. 4.5. The bottled wines made from the different treatments must be analysed for the following parameters: Total sugar Alcohol concentration ph TA Volatile acidity (VA) SO 2 Optical Density 420, 520, 620 ()

5. Laboratory-scale fermentations Laboratory-scale fermentation studies must be conducted on grape must from one white and one red grape variety using 4 representative yeast strains (for example: VIN13 plus 3 other appropriate strains for white and WE372 plus 3 other appropriate strains for red wines). 5.1. Two litres of grape must from the control/reference and the treatments must be divided into 250 ml aliquots. 5.2. The ADWY should be rehydrated and inoculated according to the manufacturer s instructions. 5.3. The fermentations should be monitored by weighing the bottles every second day to determine the CO2 weight loss and continued until there is no further weight loss. 6. Sensory evaluation The sensory quality of the wines produced must be evaluated by a panel of between 6-10 judges 4-5 months after bottling. The treated wines must be compared to the control/reference wine with regards to any off-odours, wine foreign or chemical taint attributes. The intensity of the detected attributes will be further assessed by making use of a 10 cm unstructured line-scale where the type of differences will be quantified. 7. Results The results should be reported in a systematic format which includes the analyses and evaluations conducted. References Anonymous (2016). Act No. 36 of 1947, Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of the Republic of South Africa, pg 1 36. Anonymous (2002). Methods of analyses for wine laboratories. South African Wine Laboratories Association (SAWLA). OEPP/EPP (2010). EPPO Standard PP 1/268 (1) Study of unintentional effects of plant protection products on fermentation processes and characteristics of wine. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 40, 260 265. OEPP/EPP (2014). EPPO Standard PP 1/242 (2) Taint tests. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 44(3), 284 291. OEPP/EPP (2014). EPPO Standard PP 1/243 (2) Effects of plant protection products on transformation processes. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 44(3), 292 293.

ANNEX A Fermentation trial layout White cultivar Untreated control Treatment (at HRR / #applications) Red cultivar Untreated control Treatment (at HRR / #applications) HRR = highest recommended rate and total number of applications A total of 6 samples (bottles) of wine per cultivar should be prepared. Tasting should be conducted in an identical manner for each cultivar