Peanut Variety and Quality Evaluation results 2005

Transcription

1 Peanut and Quality Evaluation results I. AGRONOMIC AND GRADE DATA 005

2

3 005 PEANUT VARIETY AND QUALITY EVALUATION RESULTS I. Agronomic and Grade Data Dennis L. Coker Research Scientist, Department of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences Technical : Hugh G. Pittman, Research Specialist F. Bryant, Research Technician Pamela A. Copeland, Office Services Specialist L. M. Harrell, Agricultural Technician C. Daughtrey, Agricultural Technician Brenda Kennedy, Agricultural Technician Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center Suffolk, Virginia 006 Reviewed by: Maria Balota, Extension specialist, Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center Acknowledgments The author expresses appreciation for the technical support provided by Hugh Pittman, Pam Copeland, and Franklin Bryant. The author also thanks and recognizes the dedicated efforts of Carolyn Daughtrey, Brenda Kennedy, Linda Harrell, and Julie Simmons in the processing of numerous samples. Thanks to Willy Beale and Stephen Glasscock for their help beginning at planting and continuing through the fall. The assistance of each individual in the collection of data, processing of samples, quality control, and preparation of these reports is collectively important to making this information available. Special thanks go to Josh Gaddy for his assistance with the Sampson County test, to David Jordan and Josh Gaddy for their help in coordinating summer and fall tours of Peanut and Quality Evaluation Results (PVQE) plots in North Carolina, and to Rex Cotton, Pat Phipps, and Joel Faircloth for their reviews of the manuscript. Thanks are also due others who contributed the products, equipment, land, and funds needed to conduct this research. The cooperation of the following contributors is sincerely appreciated: AMVAC Fumigant Amadas Industries Equipment Aventis Insecticide BASF Corporation Fungicide and Herbicide Bayer Cropscience Fungicide and Seed Treatment Coastal Chemical Corporation Fertilizer and Spray Adjuvant Dow Agro Sciences LLC Herbicide and Insecticide DuPont Insecticide Monsanto Herbicide Nitragin Inoculant Syngenta Fungicide, Herbicide, and Seed Treatment Valent USA Corporation Herbicide and Insecticide Virginia Peanut Growers Association Grant Virginia-Carolina Peanut Association, Inc. Grant 005 PEANUT VARIETY AND QUALITY EVALUATION results i

4 Table of Contents List of Tables III List of Figures IV Introduction Experimental Procedures Seasonal Conditions and Summary of Yield Cooperators Agencies Sponsoring Varieties s Definitions of Data Terms Small Plot Tests 5 Cultural Practices Results by Location Two-year Averages by Location 5 Three-year Averages by Location 7 Four-year Averages by Location 8 Five-year Averages by Location PEANUT VARIETY AND QUALITY EVALUATION results ii

5 List of Tables. Breeding lines and varieties evaluated in Precipitation (inches) at each of the five test sites during Cooperators, soil types, and planting, digging, and combining dates for Cultural practices used in Martin County, North Carolina Cultural practices used in Columbus County, North Carolina Cultural practices used in Southampton County, Virginia Cultural practices used in Suffolk, Virginia Cultural practices used in Sampson County, North Carolina Plant growth habit (GH) and plant height (inches) Disease ratings at North Carolina and Virginia locations Percentage of jumbo and fancy pods based on farmers stock grades, Dig I Percentage of jumbo and fancy pods based on farmers stock grades, Dig II Pod brightness measurement (Hunter L Score) for Columbus County and Sampson County, North Carolina, and the City of Suffolk, Virginia, averaged across locations, Dig I Pod brightness measurement (Hunter L Score), Dig II Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Martin County, North Carolina, Dig I Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Martin County, North Carolina, Dig II Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Columbus County, North Carolina, Dig I Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Columbus County, North Carolina, Dig II Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Southampton County, Virginia, Dig Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Southampton County, Virginia, Dig II Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in the City of Suffolk, Virginia, Dig I Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in the City of Suffolk, Virginia, Dig II Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Sampson County, North Carolina, Dig I Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Sampson County, North Carolina, Dig II Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines averaged across all locations, Dig I Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines averaged across all locations, Dig II Ranked value () by variety or line and location, Dig I Ranked value () by variety or line and location, Dig II Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Martin County, North Carolina, Dig I two-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Martin County, North Carolina, Dig II two-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Columbus County, North Carolina, Dig I two-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Columbus County, North Carolina, Dig II two-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Southampton County, Virginia, Dig I two-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Southampton County, Virginia, Dig II two-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in the City of Suffolk, Virginia, Dig I two-year averages PEANUT VARIETY AND QUALITY EVALUATION results iii

6 6. Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in the City of Suffolk, Virginia, Dig II - two-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines averaged across all locations, Dig I two-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines averaged across all locations, Dig II two-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Martin County, North Carolina, Dig I - three-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Martin County, North Carolina, Dig II - three-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Columbus County, North Carolina, Dig I - three-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Columbus County, North Carolina, Dig II three-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Southampton County, Virginia, Dig I three-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Southampton County, Virginia, Dig II three-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in the City of Suffolk, Virginia, Dig I three-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in the City of Suffolk, Virginia, Dig II three-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines averaged across all locations, Dig I - three-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines averaged across all locations, Dig II three-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Martin County, North Carolina, Dig I four-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Martin County, North Carolina, Dig II four-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Columbus County, North Carolina,- Dig I four-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Columbus County, North Carolina, Dig II four-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Southampton County, Virginia, Dig I four-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Southampton County, Virginia, Dig II four-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in the City of Suffolk, Virginia, Dig I four-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in the City of Suffolk, Virginia, Dig II four-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines averaged across all locations, Dig I four-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines averaged across all locations, Dig II four-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Martin County, North Carolina, Dig I five-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Martin County, Virginia, Dig II five-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Columbus County, Virginia, Dig I five-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Columbus County, North Carolinia, Dig II five-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Southampton County, Virginia, Dig I five-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in Southampton County, Virginia, Dig II five-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in the City of Suffolk, Virginia, Dig I five-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines in the City of Suffolk, Virginia, Dig II five-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines averaged across all locations, Dig I five-year averages Grade characteristics, yield, and value of lines averaged across all locations, Dig II five-year averages List of Figures Figure. Major Peanut Producing Couties of Virginia and North Carolina PEANUT VARIETY AND QUALITY EVALUATION results iv

7 Introduction Peanut producers in Virginia and northeastern North Carolina generally grow the same peanut varieties. This is due to the geographic location of the two-state production area, associated industries for processing and marketing, and the historical large-seeded Virginia-type peanut. In view of these similarities, the two states work through a joint program to evaluate advanced breeding lines and standard varieties throughout their respective production areas. This report contains the agronomic and grade data for the 005 evaluations. Experimental Procedures Breeding lines that previously exhibited potential as new varieties may be evaluated in this program. Recommendation for inclusion in PVQE Program tests is based upon Table. Breeding lines and varieties evaluated in 005 Pedigree NC-V (Fgt x NC 5) x (Fgt x Valencia) Gregory NC 7 x NC 9 NC C NC 7 x NC 9 VA 98R VA 8B x VA 78089P Wilson VA 786 x PI 4768 Perry (NC 7 x Florigiant) x N900 CHAMPS VA 895 x VA-C 9R Phillips N9004E x N904 N990ol (9) NC 9 / X90047 (F-S-S-8: F05) VT 976 VA-C 9R x VA 860 Brantley X9656 (BCF-0: F0) / NC 7 N00098ol (Gre) X960 (BCF-0: F0) / Gregory N0005J N9000E / N900 N0054 N9000E / VA 906 N008 N9054E / VA 906 VT N9004E / VA 9B VT 006 NC C / Wilson VT 0059 NC C / VA 9B VT 0067 N900E / VA 9008 VT 008 N9054E / VA 9008 VT N9000E / VA 9008 VT 004 N900E / VA 906 VT N907 / VA 9008 N00T PI 785 / *N9000E N0005 Gregory / N9040 Indicates advanced line is the result of a cross to a released variety. data submitted by the breeder supporting meritorious performance of the lines. The breeding lines and standard varieties tested in 005 are listed along with their pedigrees (Table ). Seasonal Conditions and Summary of Yield At planting, rainfall was adequate but the accumulation of heat units was below normal at test sites in southeast Virginia and throughout the Coastal Plain of North Carolina in 005. Subsequently, the season generally became droughty as flowering and pod set occurred. Rainfall and cool temperatures did not permit planting of tests in all locations during the first half of May, which is the normal planting time in the Virginia-Carolina area. Although some of the tests were planted during the latter half of May, seedling emergence was strong and uniform stands were obtained at all test locations. Pedigree N0006 Gregory / N9040 N0007 Gregory / N9040 N0009 Gregory / N9040 N000 Gregory / N9040 N000J N900E / Gregory N0060ol (Per) X964 (BCF-0-04: F0) / Perry VT 009 N907 / VA 9008 VT 0094 N9008 / VA 9008 VT N9054E / Wilson VT N907 / VA 9008 VT 0405 VA 98R // X980 (F), Perry / N96076L N0005J NC C* / N96076L N0006J Perry* / N96076L N000E VA 98R // X980 (F), Perry / N96076L N00EF VA 98R // X980 (F), Perry / N96076L N008T NC C* / N96076L N0088T NC C* / N96076L N0089T NC C* / N96076L N0090T NC C* / N96076L N009T Gregory // X98006 (F), N9000E / Tamrun 98 VT 005 VA 98R // X980 (F), Perry / N96076L VT Wilson* / Tamrun 98 VT VA 98R // X980 (F), Perry / N96076L VT Wilson* / N9500C 005 PEANUT VARIETY AND QUALITY EVALUATION RESULTS

8 Rainfall was less than adequate at most locations during the 005 growing season. Compared to other test locations, Southampton received the least amount of monthly rainfall during the growing season and the lowest total rainfall. All other locations were either at or below normal rainfall, particularly during July, August, and September. August and September also had above average daily temperatures, which resulted in delayed pod development and maturity at harvest. Accumulated heat units in late September did not correlate well with observations of pod maturity as a result of drought stress. Weather conditions at harvest were near normal; however, the duration and frequency of rainfall events delayed digging at several locations. At the Martin and Southampton sites, heavy rainfall followed by extended cloud cover delayed the harvest of peanuts that were in windrows and resulted in the growth of sooty molds on pods and reduced quality. In locations with significant disease pressure, unusually warm temperatures and wet weather in October led to a noticeable decrease in yield from the second dig date as plant foliage deteriorated and additional pods were lost. Complete rainfall data for 005 are shown in Table for the growing season (planting through harvest) and show a range of a season high of 5.9 inches at Suffolk to a season low of 4.4 inches at Whiteville. The considerable variation in soil textures, soil fertility and ph, tillage practices, crop rotations, elevation, and seasonal accumulation of heat units exists among locations may have affected yield and quality. Two inches of irrigation water were applied at Suffolk (only location with available supplemental water); whereas, irrigation was not available at the remaining test locations. As a result, the percent of farmer-stock fancy pods, percent of extra large kernels, pod yield, and value per acre (across dig dates and entries) was considerably higher at Suffolk compared to thesouthampton, Martin, Sampson, and Columbus county test sites. Cooperators Tests in Southampton County, Virginia, and in Martin and Sampson counties, North Carolina, were conducted on privately owned farms. Other tests were conducted at the Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center at Suffolk, Virginia, and the Border Belt Tobacco Research Station in Columbus county, North Carolina, near Whiteville. The cooperative spirit and civic-minded service rendered by the farmers and university farm staff during the duration of these tests are greatly appreciated. The test sites for 005 are shown in Figure. Cooperators for each test location were as follows: Columbus County, North Carolina Border Belt Tobacco Research Station, Ty Marshall, Farm Manager Martin County, North Carolina Taylor Slade Farm, Taylor Slade, Owner Sampson County, North Carolina Hudson Farms, Jart Hudson, Owner Southampton County, Virginia Pond Farm, Jack Pond, Owner Suffolk, Virginia Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Bobby Ashburn, Farm Manager Agencies Sponsoring Varieties s In 005, the following agencies sponsored varieties or lines for evaluation: North Carolina Agricultural Research Service Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station Table. Precipitation (inches) at each of the five test sites during 005 Location May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Normal Columbus Martin Sampson Southampton Suffolk PEANUT VARIETY AND QUALITY EVALUATION RESULTS

9 Figure. Major Peanut Producing Counties of Virginia and North Carolina 005 PEANUT VARIETY AND QUALITY EVALUATION RESULTS

10 Definitions of Data Terms The following data were collected at all test locations: market grade factors, price per hundred weight, yield, and value per acre. The data presented in this report are averages across replications. Statistical analyses were performed and reported for digging dates and. Data Terms Used. Grade Sample: a 500-g (approx. -lb) subsample of pods dried to 0 percent moisture after collection during combining operations on both yield rows in each plot.. Loose Shelled (): the percentage of peanut kernels or portions of kernels completely separated from hulls.. Foreign Material (): anything other than peanuts found in the sample, including dirt, vines, sticks, stones, insects, broken shells that contain no peanut kernels, raisins, etc. Raisins are defined as extremely immature undeveloped peanuts with badly shriveled and shrunken shells that cannot be shelled by machinery. 4. Moisture: moisture content of the peanut kernels at grading as determined by an electronic moisture tester. 5. Fancy: in shell peanuts that ride the 4/64-inch spacing set on the sizer. 6. : all kernels in the shelling sample, including sound mature kernels, sound splits, other kernels, and damaged kernels. 7. Extra Large (): kernels that ride a.5/64-x--inch slotted screen. 8. Sound Splits (): split or broken kernels that are not damaged. Portions less than /4 of a whole kernel are not included but go into other kernels. 9. Other (): kernels which pass through a 5/64-x--inch slotted screen. Splits and broken pieces /4 kernel or larger that pass through this screen are picked out and put with sound splits or damaged kernels, depending upon their condition. 0. Damaged (): any kernels which are moldy, decayed, or have been affected by insects, weather conditions, or skin and flesh discoloration.. Sound Mature (): the whole kernels which ride a 5/64-x--inch slotted screen. Splits that ride this screen are placed with the splits, either sound or damaged as the case may be.. (): based on a standard loan price ($5.5 per ton for Virginiatype and $56.06 per ton for runner-type peanuts) taking the various grade factors into consideration.. Yield (): plot weights were obtained for each plot and converted to an acre basis. All yields are net, adjusted to a standard 7 moisture with foreign material deducted. 4. (): computed by the following formula: * = (Yield - ( )(Yield)( /lb)) + Yield( ).07/lb * Determination of value ignores loan deductions for kernels with damage greater than.5 (Seg ) in 005 and in previous seasons. 005 Small Plot Tests Three small plot tests were located in North Carolina and two in Virginia. Nine check varieties and 40 advanced breeding lines entered by public breeders were evaluated. Test cooperators, locations, soil types, and dates on which planting and harvesting were performed are listed in Table. Cultural practices were performed according to Virginia and North Carolina recommendations for producing high yields and acceptable quality (Tables 4-8). Each plot consisted of two 40-foot rows spaced 6 inches apart. All plots were planted (three seeds per foot of row) with a two-row planter. Two dates of digging were arranged in adjacent studies, each replicated twice in a randomized complete block design. All plots were dug and combined with commercial machinery. Plant growth habit and plant height (main stem) were taken in early August with the results reported in Table 8. These data reflect the growth habit and/or plant height of varieties and breeding lines as influenced by environment or soil type. Some disease was present at all locations. The symptoms of severely yellow or dead plants were typical of tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) and/or Cylindrocladium black rot (CBR). Ratings based on the percentage of linear feet of row with severe disease symptoms at digging are reported in Table 9 for each location as well as the mean for all locations. These data show differences among varieties and breeding lines with some breeding lines identified that have less disease than some commercial varieties. The percentage of jumbo and fancy pods based on farmers stock grades are presented for individual locations in Tables and for Dig I and Dig II, respectively. Pod brightness as determined by colorimeter readings (Hunter L scores) are presented in Table for Dig I and Dig II in 005. These data indicate that pod size and pod color vary among breeding lines and varieties. Yield and grade data for 005 are presented by location in tabular form. Since the genetic expression of a variety or line is influenced by the environment, varieties or lines react differently at different locations. Therefore, more emphasis should be placed on individual locations than averages across locations. 005 PEANUT VARIETY AND QUALITY EVALUATION RESULTS 4

11 For 005, an additional PVQE test location was added in Sampson County, North Carolina, and other PVQE tests were planted in different locations than previous years. Until 00, the North Carolina locations included Northampton County. However, in 005, the Columbus County site continued to replace the one in Northampton County as it did in 004. In 005, a PVQE test was planted back in the original Martin County location, which had been replaced by a location in Bertie County (Lewiston, 0 miles apart) in 004. For Tables 7, 8, 47, 48, 57, 58, 67, and 68, the two-, three-, four-, and five-year averages across locations will represent the above mentioned changes. There has been no change in test locations from previous seasons in Virginia for 005. The data presented have been analyzed statistically by digging dates at each location. In 005, peanuts were first dug when the early- to mid-maturing lines had reached their optimum maturity (determined by 60 to 70 percent of whole pods with mesocarp tissue either brown or black). A second dig date was initiated when mid- to late-maturing lines had reached optimum maturing, also denoted by 60 to 70 percent of whole pods with mesocarp tissue either brown or black. Statistical comparisons should not be made between digging dates; however, statistical comparisons may be made between varieties or lines within the same digging date. The data for 005 characters described under definition of data terms are presented in Tables 5 through 4 for the individual counties. The averages across locations in 005 are presented in Table 5 for the first digging date and Table 6 for the second digging date. Statistical differences were recorded among the varieties and lines for each location and averages across locations for each of the two digging dates. Each location and digging date should be reviewed separately and decisions based entirely within that location and digging date. Tables 7 and 8 contain the value () ranked from highest to lowest variety or line by location and digging date. Two, three, four, and five-year averages for individual locations by digging dates and averages across all locations are presented in Tables 9 through 68. These multiple-year data for each location and average across locations should aid in evaluating the overall merit of varieties or lines tested for more than one year. Table. Cooperators, soil types, and planting, digging, and combining dates for 005 Cooperator City of Suffolk, Virginia Bobby Ashburn, Farm Manager Tidewater Research Farm Suffolk, Virginia Southampton County, Virginia Jack Pond Sedley, Virginia Martin County, North Carolina Taylor Slade Williamston, North Carolina Columbus County, North Carolina Ty Marshall Border Belt Tobacco Research Station Whiteville, North Carolina Soil Type Planting Date Digging Date Combining Date I II I II Eunola LFS May September October 6 October October 6 Emporia FSL May September 8 October 8 October 8 November Norfolk LFS May 7 September 7 October 7 October 7 November Norfolk FSL May 9 September 6 October October 4 October 0 Sampson County, North Carolina Jart Hudson Warsaw, North Carolina Norfolk A LS May 8 September 6 October October 5 October PEANUT VARIETY AND QUALITY EVALUATION RESULTS 5

12 Cultural Practices Table 4. Cultural practices used in Martin County, North Carolina 005 Planting Date: May 7, 005 Previous Crop: cotton Soil Type: Norfolk loamy fine sand Soil Test Results: index index index index Soil Fumigant: none Herbicides Preemergence: Postemergence: ph P K Ca Mg Zn Mn //05 7//05 Cultivation: 6/8/05 & 7/8/05 Nematicide: 5/7/05 - Nemacur 5G Insecticides In-Furrow: Rootworm: Contact: 5/7/05 7/8/05 8/4/05 9//05 - Dual Magnum pt/a + Gramoxone 5.5 oz/a + Basagran pt/a + Induce 4 oz/a - Dual Magnum pt/a + Basagran pt/a + AgriDex 6 oz/a - Temik 5G 7 - Lorsban - Danitol pt/a - Danitol 0.6 oz/a Landplaster: 7/8/ Boron: 7//05 7/9/05 Manganese: 7/9/05 8//05 Disease Control: 7//05 7/9/05 8//05 8/4/05 9//05-0 Liquid qt/a - 0 Liquid qt/a - 5 Liquid qt/a - 5 Liquid qt/a - Bravo W.S..5 pt/a - Folicur 7. oz/a + Induce.8 oz/a - Folicur 7. oz/a + Induce.8 oz/a - Headline 9 oz/a - Bravo W.S..5 pt/a + Omega 500.5pt/A 005 PEANUT VARIETY AND QUALITY EVALUATION RESULTS 6

13 Table 5. Cultural practices used in Columbus County, North Carolina 005 Planting Date: May 9, 005 Previous Crop: tobacco Soil Type: Noboco fine sandy loam Soil Test Results: Soil Fumigant: none Herbicides: Preplant: Preemergence: Cultivation: Irrigation: Insecticides In-Furrow: Rootworm: Contact: index index index index ph P K Ca Mg Zn Mn /8/05 5/6/05 mid-june not available 5/9/05 None 6//05 - Sonolan pt/a + Vernam pt/a - Strongarm 0.45 oz/a - Temik 5G 6 - Orthene 6 oz/a Landplaster: 7// Boron: 8/0/05 - Solubor 0.5 Manganese: 8/0/05 - EleManganese.5 pt/a Disease Control: 7//05 7/7/05 8//05 8/6/05 - Bravo.5 pt/a - Folicur 7 oz/a - Bravo.5 pt/a + Tracer oz/a - Omega pt/a + Tilt oz/a 005 PEANUT VARIETY AND QUALITY EVALUATION RESULTS 7

14 Table 6. Cultural practices used in Southampton County, Virginia 005 Planting Date: May, 005 Previous Crop: corn Soil Type: Emporia fine sandy loam Soil Test Results: ppm ph P K Ca Mg Zn Mn Soil Fumigant: 4/0/05 - Vapam 8.6 gal/a Herbicides Preplant: Preemergence: 4/9/05 4/6/05 5//05 Cultivation: 6/7/05 & 7/7/05 Irrigation: Insecticides In-Furrow: Rootworm: Contact: not available 5//05 7/7/05 5//05 8//05 9//05 - Prowl qt/a - Dual Magnum pt/a - Strongarm 0.45 oz/a + Intro qt/a - Temik 5G 7 - Lorsban - Orthene 6 oz/a - Danitol pt/a - Danitol 0.6 oz/a Landplaster: 6// Boron: 4/6/05 8//05 Manganese: 7/9/05 8//05 Disease Control: 7/5/05 7/9/05 8//05 8//05 9//05-0 Liquid qt/a - 0 Liquid qt/a - 5 Liquid qt/a - 5 Liquid qt/a - Folicur 7. oz/a + Induce.8 oz/a - Folicur 7. oz/a + Induce.8 oz/a - Folicur 7. oz/a + Induce.8 oz/a - Headline 9 oz/a - Equus 70.5 pt/a + Omega pt/a 005 PEANUT VARIETY AND QUALITY EVALUATION RESULTS 8

15 Table 7. Cultural practices used in Suffolk, Virginia 005 Planting Date: May, 005 Previous Crop: corn Soil Type: Eunola loamy fine sand Soil Test Results: ppm ph P K Ca Mg Zn Mn Soil Fumigant: 4/8/05 - Vapam 8 gal/a Herbicides Preplant: Preemergence: 4/6/05 5/0/05 Cultivation: 6/5/05 & 7/6/05 Irrigation: 9/7/06 9/8/06 Insecticides In-Furrow: Rootworm: Contact: 5//05 7/6/06 5/0/05 8/5/05 9/9/05 - Dual Magnum pt/a - Strongarm.45 oz/a + Intrro qt/a - one inch - one inch - Temik 5G 7 - Lorsban - Orthene 6 oz/a - Asana XL 6 oz/a - Danitol 0.6 oz/a Landplaster: 6// Boron: 4/6/05-0 Liquid qt/a Manganese: 7/8/05 8//05 Disease Control: 7/5/05 7/8/05 8//05 8/5/05 9/9/05-5 Liquid qt/a - 5 Liquid qt/a - Folicur 7. oz/a + Induce.8 oz/a - Folicur 7. oz/a + Induce.8 oz/a - Folicur 7. oz/a + Induce.8 oz/a - Headline 9 oz/a - Bravo W.S..5 pt/a + Omega pt/a 005 PEANUT VARIETY AND QUALITY EVALUATION RESULTS 9

16 Table 8. Cultural practices used in Sampson County, North Carolina 005 Planting Date: May 8, 005 Previous Crop: corn Soil Type: Norfolk A Loamy Sand Soil Test Results: Soil Fumigant: Herbicides Preplant: Preemergence: Postemergence: Cultivation: Irrigation: Nematicide: Insecticides In-Furrow: Rootworm: Contact: Landplaster: Boron: Manganese: Disease Control: index index index index ph P K Ca Mg Zn Mn none Roundup.5 pt/a + Prowl qt/a Valor oz/a Cadre.4 oz/a +,4D-B pt/a disked, then ripped and bedded; No cultivation after planting not available Temik (in-furrow) 5 Temik 5 none Asana oz/a Broadcast applied bulk landplaster at rate of ton/a Solubor.5 Techmangum.5-4 Bravo.5 pt/a, followed by Folicur 7oz/A, then Folicur 7 oz/a, followed by Bravo.5 pt/a, followed by Bravo PEANUT VARIETY AND QUALITY EVALUATION RESULTS 0

17 005 Results by Location Table 9. Plant growth habit (GH) and plant height (inches) 005 Martin Co., N.C. Columbus Co., N.C. Sampson Co., N.C. Southampton Co., Va. City of Suffolk, Va. GH Height (") GH Height (") GH Height (") GH Height (") GH Height (") NC-V R 7.7 j-n IR.5 abc R.9 a-f R 5. k R.0 i-o Gregory IR 8.9 a-n IR, IB. abc IR.9 a-f IR, R 7.5 a-h IR 5.6 ab NC C IR 0.4 a IR, IB.9 abc IR, R 5.7 abc IR, R 7.7 a-g IR 6.6 a VA 98R R 7.7 j-n IR 9.9 c R.4 def R 6. f-k R. g-o Wilson IR 8. d-n IR.0 abc IR. def IR 6.9 b-k IR. h-o Perry IB 8.6 c-n R, IR.6 abc IB. b-f IR, R 7. b-j IB.4 f-o CHAMPS R 8.0 f-n IR.7 abc R, IR.5 def R 6.7 b-k R.8 e-o Phillips R 8.6 b-n IR.5 abc R, IR.4 a-f R 7. a-i R 4.6 a-h N990ol (9) R 9.6 a-h IR. abc R.0 c-f R, IR 6.8 b-k R.0 c-n VT 976 IB 8.4 c-n IR, IB 0.9 abc IB.4 def IB, IR 7.0 b-j IB.8 j-o Brantley IR 8. e-n IR, IB.6 abc IR, IB.0 c-f IR 7.5 a-h IR.9 d-n N00098ol (Gre) IR 7.7 i-n IR.7 abc IR. a-f IR, R 7.9 a-e IR 4. a-j N0005J IR 8.9 a-n IR.4 abc IR. c-f IR 7. a-i IR 5. a-e N0054 IR 7.6 k-n IR, IB 9.9 bc IR, IB.0 c-f IR 7. a-j IR.4 k-o N008 IR 8.7 b-n IR.4 abc IR, IB.7 a-f IR, R 7. a-i IR.7 e-o VT R 7.4 lmn IR, IB 0.8 abc R, IR.6 a-f R 6.4 d-k R.9 i-o VT 006 IR 9.7 a-f IR, IB. abc IR.4 def IR, R 7.0 b-j IR 4. a-j VT 0059 IR 8.6 b-n IR, IB.9 abc IR 4. a-f IR, R 6.9 b-k IR 4.5 a-i VT 0067 R 8. c-n IR.5 abc IB, IR. a-f R 6.9 b-k R.9 c-n VT 008 R 7.7 i-n R.5 abc R, IR.5 a-f R 6. e-k R. l-o VT IR 7.9 g-n IR. abc IR 0.9 ef IR 6. e-k IR.0 mno VT 004 R,IR 9.4 a-i IR, IB 4. a IR, IB.4 a-f R 7.4 a-i IR 4.4 a-j VT IR 8.9 a-n IR, IB.9 a IR.6 a-f IR, R 7.7 a-g IR 4. a-j N00T IB 9. a-k IB.4 abc IB 6. a IB, IR 8.7 a IR, IB 4.7 a-g N0005 IB 0.0 abc IB 0.8 abc IB 5.9 ab IR 8. abc IB 5.4 a-d N0006 IR 8.9 a-m IB.6 abc IR.4 a-f IR 6.6 c-k IR 4. a-j Plant growth habit (GH): B=bunch, IB=intermediate bunch, IR=intermediate runner, and R=runner. Main stem height in inches. Each mean within a location is an average of eight plants. Duncan s New Multiple Range Test (0.05). Means sharing the same letters within a column are not significantly different. 005 PEANUT VARIETY AND QUALITY EVALUATION RESULTS

18 Table 9. Plant growth habit (GH) and plant height (inches) 005 (cont.) Martin Co., N.C. Columbus Co., N.C. Sampson Co., N.C. Southampton Co., Va. City of Suffolk, Va. GH Height (") GH Height (") GH Height (") GH Height (") GH Height (") N0007 IR 9. a-k IR, IB. abc IR.9 a-f IR 6.9 b-k IR. b-n N0009 IR 9.9 a-d IB. abc IR 4.8 a-d IR 8.0 a-d IR 4.9 a-f N000 IB 9. a-j IR, IB.0 a-c B.6 a-f IB, IR 7. a-i IB 4. a-j N000J IR 9.6 a-g IR, IB.6 ab IR. b-f IR, R 8. ab IR 6.6 a N0060ol(Per) R 9.7 a-e R, IR. a-c R.4 a-f R 7. a-i R 4.7 a-h VT 009 R 0. ab IR.0 a-c R 4.4 a-f R 7. a-j R 5.5 a-c VT 0094 IB 8.4 c-n IR.4 a-c IR, IB.4 a-f IB, R 6.9 b-k IB. i-o VT IR 7. n R, IR. a-c IR.8 def IR, R 6. f-k IR. i-o VT R 8.7 b-n IR, IB. a-c R, IR.4 a-f R 7. a-j R.4 k-o VT 0405 IB 8.4 c-n R, IR.0 a-c R.9 a-f IB, IR 6.7 b-k IB.9 d-n N0005J IR 8.8 a-n IR, IB. a-c R, IR.9 a-f IR, IB 7.7 a-g IR.6 b-l N0006J R 8.9 a-m R. a-c R. a-f R, IR 7.8 a-f R 4.0 b-j N000E R 7.7 j-n IR, IB 0.7 a-c R 0.8 f R, IR 5.6 jk R 0.4 o N00EF IR 7.7 j-n IR. a-c IR 0.9 ef IR, R 6.9 b-j IR.6 b-l N008T IR 8.4 c-n IR.9 a-c IR. b-f IR 7.5 a-h IR.8 e-o N0088T IR 8.8 a-n R.9 a-c IR.7 a-f IR, R 6.9 b-k IR.8 b-k N0089T IB 9.5 a-h IR.5 a-c IB, IR.6 a-f IB, IR 8. a-c IB 4.4 a-j N0090T IR 9. a-l IR, IB 4. a IR 4.7 a-e IR 6.9 b-k IR.8 b-k N009T IR 9.7 a-g IR.9 a-c IR.7 a-f IR 7.4 a-i IR 5.0 a-e VT 005 IR 8. e-n R, IR.5 a-c IR, R 0.9 ef IR, IB 6.0 h-k IR.0 i-o VT IB 7. mn B, IB 0.7 a-c IB, IR. b-f IB 6. g-k IB 0.7 no VT IB 7.8 h-n R.8 a-c IB, IR.6 a-f IB, IR 5.8 ijk IB.4 b-m VT IB 7. mn IR, IB. a-c IB, IR.6 a-f IB, R 6.4 d-k IB.8 e-o Mean CV () Plant growth habit (GH): B=bunch, IB=intermediate bunch, IR=intermediate runner, and R=runner. Main stem height in inches. Each mean within a location is an average of eight plants. Duncan s New Multiple Range Test (0.05). Means sharing the same letters within a column are not significantly different. 005 PEANUT VARIETY AND QUALITY EVALUATION RESULTS

19 Table 0. Disease ratings at North Carolina and Virginia locations 005 Martin Co., NC Sampson Co., NC Suffolk, VA Southampton Co., NC Columbus Co., NC Dig I Dig II Dig I Dig I Dig II Dig I Dig II Dig I NC-V 5.0 d-h 6.5 b-d 9.5 a 4.0 b-i 6.0 d-f 5.5 ef 7.0 a-d 6.0 c-f Gregory.0 h.0 b-d 4.5 a-g.0 d-i.5 ef 8.0 a-f.0 b-e 8.5 c-f NC C 8.0 c-h 5.0 bc 4.0 a-g.5 d-i.0 f.5 a-f 5.5 b-e 5.0 d-f VA 98R 8.0 c-h.5 b-d.0 b-g 9.5 f-i 8.5 c-f.0 a-f 4.0 b-e 8.0 c-f Wilson 8.5 c-h 6.0 b-d 5.5 a-g 0.0 b-f 6.0 d-f 9.5 a-f 5.0 b-e 7.0 c-f Perry 8.5 c-h.5 b-d 7.0 a-f 5.5 b-i 8.0 a-d 9.5 a-f 9.5 a-c 4.5 d-f CHAMPS 4.5 e-h.0 b-d 8.5 a-c.0 e-i 9.0 c-f 7.5 b-f 6.0 b-e.0 c-f Phillips 8.0 c-h 6.0 bc 7.5 a-e 8.5 b-g 5.0 d-f.0 a-f 4.5 b-e 8.0 c-f N990ol (9).0 cd 6.5 b 8.0 a-d 4.5 b 9.5 c-f.0 a-f 9.0 a-d 4.5 d-f VT c-h 7.0 b-d 7.0 a-f 7.5 b-i 6.0 d-f 8.5 a-f 7.5 a-d 0.0 c-f Brantley 9.5 c-h 9.0 b-d 8.5 a-c 7.0 b-i 6.0 d-f 4.0 a-d 4.0 b-e 7.5 c-f N00098ol (Gre) 0.5 c-g.0 b-d 5.0 a-g 4.0 bc.0 b-f.5 a-f.0 c-e 5.0 b-d N0005J 6.5 c-h.5 b-d 7.0 a-f 6.5 i.0 f 8.5 a-f 0.5 a-c 9.0 c-f N d-h.0 b-d 5.0 a-g 0.0 f-i 7.0 d-f 5.0 f.0 b-e 7.0 c-f N c-h 4.0 b-d 9.0 ab.5 e-i.5 b-f 6.5 c-f 7.0 a-d 9.0 c-f VT c-e 0.0 b-d 8.0 a-d 7.0 b-i 6.0 d-f 7.5 b-f 8.0 a-d 6.5 c-f VT c-h 7.0 b-d 5.5 a-g 6.0 b-i 5.5 d-f 9.0 a-f.5 c-e 8.0 c-f VT cd 8.5 b-d 7.5 a-e.0 e-i 7.0 d-f 9.5 a-f 8.5 a-d.5 c-f VT gh.0 b-d 4.5 a-g.0 d-i 6.0 d-f 6.0 d-f 5.0 b-e 7.0 c-f VT c-e 5.5 b-d.0 d-g 4.0 b-i 6.0 d-f.5 a-e 8.0 a-d 5.0 d-f VT c-h 4.5 b-d 4.5 a-g.5 e-i 6.0 a-f 6.5 c-f.5 b-e 7.0 a-c VT c-h 5.5 b-d 4.0 a-g 9.5 b-g 5.5 a-f.5 a-f 7.5 a-d 9.5 c-f VT c-h 0.0 b-d.5 a-g.0 c-i 4.0 d-f.5 a-f.5 a-c.5 c-e N00T 7.5 c-h.5 b-d.0 d-g 5.5 b-i 8.5 c-f 9.0 a-f 5.0 b-e 7.5 c-f N c-h.0 b-d 0.5 g.5 d-i.5 ef 7.0 c-f.5 b-e.0 f N c-h.5 b-d 4.5 a-g.0 c-i 7.0 d-f 9.0 a-f.0 b-e 5.0 d-f N d-h 5.0 b-d.0 d-g 6.5 i 4.0 ab 7.5 b-f.0 b-e 9.0 c-f N f-h 0.0 b-d.5 c-g.0 e-i 8.5 c-f 9.5 a-f.0 b-e 6.5 c-f Diseases at these locations were a mixture of web blotch, leaf spot, TSWV and CBR. Ratings represent the percentage of linear feet with severe disease symptoms at digging. Duncan s New Multiple Range Test (0.05). Means sharing the same letters within a column are not significantly different. 005 PEANUT VARIETY AND QUALITY EVALUATION RESULTS

20 Table 0. Disease ratings at North Carolina and Virginia locations 005 (cont.) Martin Co., NC Sampson Co., NC Suffolk, VA Southampton Co., NC Columbus Co., NC Dig I Dig II Dig I Dig I Dig II Dig I Dig II Dig I N c-g.0 b-d.0 b-g 8.5 g-i.0 a-c 7.0 c-f 4.5 b-e 4.0 d-f N000J 7.0 c-h.5 b-d 8.0 a-d 8.5 g-i 7.0 d-f 4.0 a-d 4.0 b-e 7.0 a N0060ol (Per) 9.0 b 4.0 b-d 5.0 a-g 9.0 f-i 8.5 a 4.5 a-c 8.0 a-d.0 f VT c 4.5 bc 4.5 a-g.0 b-d 7.5 d-f 5.5 ab 0.5 a-c 5.0 d-f VT c-h.0 b-d 8.0 a-d 0.0 b-f 7.0 d-f 4.0 a-d.5 ab.5 c-e VT c-h 4.5 b-d 4.5 a-g 5.0 b-i 7.5 d-f.0 a-f 6.0 b-e 7.5 c-f VT c-f.5 b-d 6.5 a-g.5 b-e 8.0 a-d 6.0 a 7.0 a 8.5 c-f VT c-h.5 b-d 4.5 a-g.5 b-i 8.0 c-f 7.0 c-f.5 b-e.0 ef N0005J 6.5 c-h 7.0 cd 4.0 a-g 5.5 b-i 0.0 c-f.0 a-f 9.0 de.5 d-f N0006J 7.0 c-h 4.5 b-d 8.5 a-c 7.0 b-i 6.0 a-f 0.0 a-f 6.5 b-d 5.0 d-f N000E 0.0 c-h 0.5 b-d.5 e-g 8.0 b-h 7.5 a-e 9.5 a-f 6.0 b-e 5.5 c-f N00EF 9.5 c-h 5.0 b-d.0 fg.5 b-e.0 f 7.5 b-f 6.0 b-e 5.0 ab N008T 4.0 f-h 5.0 d.0 d-g.0 d-i 5.0 d-f 4.0 f 6.0 e.5 f N0088T 8.0 c-h.0 b-d 7.5 a-e 4.5 b-i.5 b-f 7.0 c-f 5.0 b-e.0 ef N0089T 8.0 c-h.5 b-d.5 a-g 7.0 hi 0.0 c-f 8.0 a-f 5.5 b-e 7.0 c-f N0090T 6.0 c-h 0.5 b-d 4.5 a-g 4.0 b-i 6.0 d-f 8.5 a-f 7.0 a-d 5.5 c-f N009T 9.0 c-h 8.5 b-d 5.5 a-g 9.0 f-i 6.5 d-f 6.0 d-f.5 b-e 6.0 c-f VT c-h 8.5 b-d.0 d-g.5 d-i 0.5 b-f 6.0 d-f 8.0 a-d 4.5 c-e VT a 68.5 a 4.0 a-g 4.5 a 5.0 d-f 5.5 ab.0 a-c 0.5 c-f VT c-h 5.0 b-d 4.5 a-g 8.0 b-h 6.0 d-f 5.0 f 6.0 b-e 8.5 c-f VT c-h.5 b-d 4.0 a-g.0 e-i 5.5 d-f.5 a-f 7.0 a-d 7.5 c-f Mean CV () Diseases at these locations were a mixture of web blotch, leaf spot, TSWV and CBR. Ratings represent the percentage of linear feet with severe disease symptoms at digging. Duncan s New Multiple Range Test (0.05). Means sharing the same letters within a column are not significantly different. 005 PEANUT VARIETY AND QUALITY EVALUATION RESULTS 4

21 Table. Percentage of jumbo and fancy pods based on farmers stock grades, Dig I 005 Martin Co., NC Columbus Co., NC Sampson Co., NC Southampton Co., VA City of Suffolk, VA Jumbo, Fancy Jumbo Fancy Jumbo Fancy Jumbo Fancy Jumbo Fancy NC-V 7.50 l-o a-i 9 p-s 5 a-e.0 q-v 49.5 a-f 4.00 p-r 5.50 a 9.0 q-u 55.0 c-f Gregory a-c 7.00 o-q 68 bc qr 80.5 a-c.5 n-q a-d.50 p-r 8.0 abc.0 r-t NC C 9.00 f-m 7.00 i-o 5 e-h 0 l-q 4.0 m-t 8.0 e-m 4.50 g-m 5.00 g-m 66.5 d-i.5 l-r VA 98R 7.50 l-o a-h 8 q-s 5 ab.0 q-v 46.5 a-h 6.00 o-r 4.00 b-j 8.0 q-u 59.5 a-e Wilson 7.00 g-n a-h j-q 50 a-f 5.5 o-v 50.5 a-f g-m 4.50 b-j 7.5 n-r 5.5 c-f Perry 8.50 l-o b-k 5 n-r 4 b-k 9.0 n-u 44.0 a-i 0.50 qr a-e 5.0 o-r 5.0 c-f CHAMPS.00 i-o b-j 0 k-q 50 a-f.0 q-v 56.0 a d-l 6.50 f-l 4.0 m-q 49.0 e-h Phillips.50 j-o b-k 4 n-r 5 a-d.0 r-v 5.5 abc 6.00 l-p 4.50 b-h 4.0 k-o 49.5 e-g N990ol (9) 5.50 l-o b-l p-s 5 ab 5.5 t-v 5.5 a-d.50 m-q a-f 8.0 u-w 6.0 a-c VT k-o 4.50 d-m 4 i-p 4 b-k 4.5 m-t.5 h-o g-m 4.50 h-n 4.5 k-o 44.0 f-i Brantley c-h 8.50 g-o 49 f-i 5 j-o 59.5 e-m 0.5 i-p f-m.50 i-o 76.0 cde 9.0 o-r N00098ol (Gre) b-d.50 m-p 5 d-h 6 h-o 6.5 e-l 8.5 j-q b-g 6.50 m-q 7.0 c-f 0.0 m-r N0005J a.00 q 85 a 0 s 84.5 ab 9.5 rs a-c.50 p-r 90.5 ab 6.0 st N b-d 5.00 l-o 65 b-f 5 o-r 7.5 a-f.0 n-q 5.50 c-j.00 j-o 66.0 d-i 8.5 j-p N b-f 6.50 j-o 57 c-g 5 o-r 76.5 a-e 7.0 q-s 5.50 c-i 5.00 o-q 78.5 a-d 6.5 q-s VT b-f 5.50 k-o 50 f-i 4 j-p 6.5 e-l 6.0 l-q d-l 5.00 g-m 6.5 e-i 0.5 j-o VT o a-e p-s 58 a.5 p-v 46.5 a-h 9.00 j-o 4.00 b-i 9.5 p-u 60.5 a-e VT ab 7.00 o-q 67 b-d p-r 66.5 b-i 6.0 l-q c-h 9.00 k-p 7.5 c-f 4.5 l-q VT g-o a-g 8 h-o 45 b-j 48.5 i-r 4.0 b-j 6.50 l-p a-g 55.5 h-k 40.0 g-j VT d-j 4.50 d-m 65 b-e 7 n-q 70.5 a-g.5 o-r b-e 8.50 l-p 74.0 c-f.5 l-r VT c-g 4.00 f-n 57 c-g 0 l-q 65.5 c-j 5.5 m-q d-l.50 i-o 74.5 cde.0 m-r VT b-f 6.00 j-o 49 f-i 5 i-o 6.0 c-k 7.0 k-q 4.00 h-m 4.00 b-j 74.5 cde 9.5 n-r VT a.50 pq 8 a 0 s 86.0 a 8.0 s 7.00 a 6.00 r 9.0 a 5.5 t N00T 4.00 c-g 4.50 l-o 56 c-g 9 m-q 67.5 b-h 5.5 m-q 4.00 h-m 7.00 e-l 78.0 bcd 7.0 pqr N b-e 7.50 h-o 9 h-n 46 b-j 50.5 h-q 9.5 d-l 4.50 h-m 4.50 b-j 6.0 f-j.0 i-l N b-d 7.00 i-o 5 d-h 9 e-m 6.0 d-k.0 i-p e-m 8.50 d-j 76.5 c-e 9.5 n-r N d-i 9.50 f-n 50 e-h k-q 6.0 d-k.5 i-p 4.00 h-n 4.00 b-j 65.5 d-i.0 j-n N c-g 4.50 f-n 9 h-n 45 b-j 5.0 h-p 9.5 d-l h-n 9.50 c-j 6.0 e-i.5 j-m Pods that rode a 8/64-inch opening on the pre-sizer. Duncan s New Multiple Range Test (0.05). Means sharing the same letter(s) are not significantly different. Pods that fell through a 8/64-inch opening but rode a 4/64-inch opening on the pre-sizer. 005 PEANUT VARIETY AND QUALITY EVALUATION RESULTS 5

22 Table. Percentage of jumbo and fancy pods based on farmers stock grades, Dig I 005 (cont.) Martin Co., NC Columbus Co., NC Sampson Co., NC Southampton Co., VA City of Suffolk, VA Jumbo, Fancy Jumbo Fancy Jumbo Fancy Jumbo Fancy Jumbo Fancy N c-g f-n 5 d-h 7 g-n 5.0 g-o 5.5 g-n 5.00 c-k 8.00 d-k 70.0 c-g 5.5 k-q N000J ab 0.00 n-q 77 ab 5 rs 80.0 a-d 6.0 q-s ab 8.00 qr 8.0 a-c 4.0 q-t N0060ol (Per) 5.50 g-o 4.50 d-m 9 h-o 4 d-l 4.0 l-t 4.5 a-i 6.00 o-r a-f 55.0 h-l 8.0 h-j VT l-o b-l 7 m-r 47 a-h 7.0 t-v 50.0 a-f 5.00 l-p 8.50 d-j 6.0 o-r 57.5 b-e VT e-l c-m 0 k-q 5 a-e 6.0 o-v 5.5 a-e d-l 9.00 c-j 57.0 g-j 6.0 i-k VT b-d 7.00 i-o 6 b-f 8 m-q 74.5 a-e 9.5 p-s b-f 5.50 n-q 67.0 d-h 8.5 j-p VT e-m 9.50 f-n j-q 4 c-l.5 p-v 44.0 a-i d-l 4.00 h-o 56.5 h-j 6.5 i-k VT m-o a-i 4 rs 54 ab.0 uv 5.0 a-d 8.00 qr a-f.5 vw 67.0 ab N0005J 0.00 o 4.00 e-m 4 rs 5 a-c 8.5 v 54.5 ab 4.00 p-r a-e 0.0 vw 56.5 b-e N0006J 4.50 h-o 5.50 a-f k-q 45 b-j.0 p-v 47.5 a-g 8.00 n-r a-c 8.0 q-u 60.5 a-e N000E.00 no ab 9 s 45 b-j 7.5 v 5.0 a-d 4.50 r a-f 6.5 w 68.0 ab N00EF.50 i-o b-k 7 m-r 50 a-f 7.5 n-u 5.0 a-f 6.00 o-r a-e.5 o-t 56.5 b-e N008T 7.50 l-o 5.50 a-f o-s 45 b-j.0 uv 5.5 a-c 4.50 l-p a-f 0.0 s-v 6.5 a-c N0088T.50 i-o 6.00 a 4 g-l 4 b-k 5.5 h-p 40.0 c-k 9.50 i-o 8.50 d-j.5 o-s 56.5 b-e N0089T 6.00 g-o a-d 45 g-l 9 e-m 46.5 k-s 4.5 a-i 5.00 c-k.50 j-o 6.5 r-u 6.5 a-d N0090T 0.00 e-m a-d 46 g-k 4 d-l 48.5 i-r 44.0 a-i g-m 7.50 e-l 7.0 r-u 6.5 a-c N009T 4.50 h-o a-c j-q 5 a-d 5.5 g-o 40.0 c-k 4.00 h-m 4.00 b-j 8.5 t-w 70.0 a VT b-f 9.00 g-o 47 g-j 9 f-m 56.0 f-n 5.5 g-n.50 m-q 4.50 b-h 4.5 l-p 50.5 d-g VT l-o b-l 7 q-s 49 a-g 8.0 s-v 47.5 a-g.50 p-r a-d 9.5 p-u 49.5 e-g VT c-g 4.50 f-n 4 g-m 4 d-l 5.5 h-p 7.5 f-m 6.00 o-r ab 5.5 i-m 40.0 g-j VT d-k b-m 0 l-r 47 a-i 47.0 j-r 44.0 a-i 7.00 k-p c-j 49.5 j-n 9.5 g-j Mean CV () Pods that rode a 8/64-inch opening on the pre-sizer. Duncan s New Multiple Range Test (0.05). Means sharing the same letter(s) are not significantly different. Pods that fell through a 8/64-inch opening but rode a 4/64-inch opening on the pre-sizer. 005 PEANUT VARIETY AND QUALITY EVALUATION RESULTS 6

23 Table. Percentage of jumbo and fancy pods based on farmers stock grades, Dig II 005 Martin Co., NC Columbus Co., NC Sampson Co., NC Southampton Co., VA City of Suffolk, VA Jumbo, Fancy Jumbo Fancy Jumbo Fancy Jumbo Fancy Jumbo Fancy NC-V 0.00 o-u 49 a-g.50 t-w a-f 8.00 m-q a-f 9.50 l-o a-e 4 pq 55 a-h Gregory 6.50 ab 4 mn cde 7.50 lmn 6.50 bc 4.50 k b-e 5.00 k-o 84 ab uvw NC C.00 h-q 9 f-k 8.50 i-s 8.00 e-l 9.50 e-j d-i e-k 4.00 e-l 57 f-j 7 m-s VA 98R 7.50 e-m 40 e-k.00 uvw a-i 5.50 n-q b-h 4.50 nop a-d 8 nop 54 b-h Wilson 0.00 o-u 55 ab 7.00 q-w 5.50 a 5.50 j-p a-g 7.00 j-m a-e 9 m-p 56 a-g Perry 8.00 o-u 45 a-j.50 m-u a-h 9.50 l-q 4.50 c-h 4.00 nop 4.50 a-f 8 nop 56 a-f CHAMPS 7.50 k-t 47 a-i.50 n-v 5.00 a-d 9.00 h-n a-f e-k 8.50 b-i 4 klm 46 e-k Phillips 9.50 o-u 47 a-h.50 l-u 5.50 ab 4.00 opq a 5.50 k-n a-h 4 k-o 47 d-j N990ol (9) 6.00 q-u 5 a-e 9.00 o-w a-h 0.00 l-q a-d 8.50 h-l 8.50 b-i 0 pqr 64 ab VT m-u 45 a-j.50 h-p a-i 8.50 h-n 7.00 g-j 7.50 i-m 6.50 c-j 4 k-n 45 f-k Brantley 4.50 d-i 4 j-m 7.50 f-l 9.00 d-l 4.00 d-i 8.00 e-i 5.00 d-g 0.50 g-m 74 bcd 9 r-u N00098ol (Gre) b-f klm 6.50 g-m 9.50 d-k 4.00 d-h 7.00 g-j abc.50 mno 68 c-f q-u N0005J a 9 n a 6.50 no a.50 l 7.50 a 6.00 o 9 a 6 w N b-e 4 j-m bcd 9.50 j-m bcd 4.00 h-k b-e 6.50 j-o 70 c-f 6 n-s N d-j 8 f-k d-g 7.50 lmn 6.00 bc 4.00 k d-i 5.00 k-o 76 bcd 7 s-v VT d-k 40 e-k f-j 8.00 e-l 4.50 d-h 7.00 g-j b-f 9.00 h-n 59 e-i l-q VT r-u 5 abc 0.00 n-w a-f 0.00 l-q a-d 4.50 f-l a-h 9 m-p 59 abc VT abc 6 lmn ab.00 mno bc 0.00 ijk 6.50 a-d 8.00 i-n 68 c-f 5 o-t VT i-r 47 a-i 0.00 n-w a-g.50 g-m a-g 8.00 i-m 9.50 a-i 5 h-l 4 i-l VT b-f 9 f-k d-g 4.00 h-l 4.50 d-h 4.50 c-i abc.50 l-o 69 c-f 7 m-s VT bcd klm 7.00 g-m.00 i-l d-g 8.00 e-i d-i 5.00 d-k 74 bcd q-u VT e-l 40 d-k 8.50 f-k 8.50 e-l 7.50 e-j d-i e-k 5.50 d-k 70 c-f 4 p-t VT a n a.00 o 8.00 a 4.00 l a 8.50 no 89 a 7 vw N00T c-h klm.00 h-p 5.50 g-l c-f.00 h-k e-k.00 f-m 7 bcd 0 r-u N b-g 8 f-k 4.50 h-n 4.00 a-i 4.50 d-i 4.50 c-h e-k 5.00 d-k 69 c-f 6 o-t N bcd 6 h-l 5.50 def 4.00 h-l 5.00 cde 7.50 f-i d-j 5.00 d-k 7 b-e q-u N b-g 5 i-m 4.00 e-i c-k 4.00 d-i 4.00 c-i g-l 7.00 b-j 64 d-h 0 l-r N f-n 4 b-k 8.00 j-t a-f.50 g-l a-f 4.00 e-k 7.50 b-j 59 e-i 5 k-p Pods that rode a 8/64-inch opening on the pre-sizer. Duncan s New Multiple Range Test (0.05). Means sharing the same letter(s) are not significantly different. Pods that fell through a 8/64-inch opening but rode a 4/64-inch opening on the pre-sizer. 005 PEANUT VARIETY AND QUALITY EVALUATION RESULTS 7

24 Table. Percentage of jumbo and fancy pods based on farmers stock grades, Dig II 005 (cont.) Martin Co., NC Columbus Co., NC Sampson Co., NC Southampton Co., VA City of Suffolk, VA Jumbo, Fancy Jumbo Fancy Jumbo Fancy Jumbo Fancy Jumbo Fancy N b-g 7 g-l.00 h-p a-e e-i b-h 5.50 d-g 5.50 d-k 67 d-g 7 m-s N000J 7.00 a n abc.00 mno b 6.00 jk a 9.00 no 8 abc 5 t-w N0060ol (Per) 8.00 j-s 4 c-k.50 l-u 9.50 d-k.50 g-m b-g 9.50 l-o 8.00 b-j 54 g-k 7 j-n VT p-u 45 a-j.50 m-u a-i 9.00 m-q a-g e-k 7.50 b-j 8 nop 6 abc VT i-r 49 a-g.50 l-u 4.00 a-i 0.50 k-q 5.00 a-d d-j 8.50 b-i 45 jkl 44 h-k VT h-p 4 c-k bcd 9.00 klm bc 4.00 h-k ab.50 mno 56 f-j 6 j-o VT g-o 4 c-k 5.00 s-w a-g 8.00 m-q 4.50 c-h b-e 8.00 i-n 5 h-l 4 i-l VT tu 5 abc 7.50 vw 4.00 b-j 8.50 q 4.50 c-i 5.00 p a-e 6 pqr 6 ab N0005J 8.00 u 49 a-g 6.50 w a-f.00 pq ab 6.00 m-p ab qr 59 abc N0006J 5.00 r-u 50 a-f 8.50 p-w 5.00 abc 8.00 m-q a-g 9.50 l-o 4.50 a-f 0 pqr 65 ab N000E.50 stu 5 a-e 6.50 w 4.00 a-i 9.50 q 5.00 a-d 6.00 p a-e 8 r 66 a N00EF 8.50 o-u 5 a-d 6.50 r-w a-f 7.50 i-o b-g 0.00 l-o a 8 nop 56 a-f N008T.50 n-u 50 a-f.50 uvw a-h 5.50 n-q a-d 0.00 l-o 4.00 a-g pq 57 a-d N0088T.00 n-u 56 a.00 h-r a-f 6.50 f-j a-e 5.50 c-f.50 g-m 4 pq 6 ab N0089T 7.00 l-t 5 abc e-h 7.50 f-l 4.50 g-k 5.50 a-d 5.00 d-g.50 e-m 0 m-p 57 a-e N0090T.50 n-u 56 a 9.00 f-k a-f.50 g-m 5.00 abc 4.50 e-k a-h pq 64 ab N009T 4.50 l-t 57 a.00 h-p a-e.50 g-m 5.50 a-d 5.00 d-h 4.00 e-l 7 op 6 ab VT h-o 48 a-g.50 h-o 4.50 a-i 0.00 g-n 4.00 c-h 4.50 f-l a-h 46 i-l 45 g-k VT p-u 50 a-f.00 uvw 4.50 a-i 5.50 n-q 8.00 e-i 8.50 op abc 6 pq 5 c-i VT d-j 4 c-k 4.50 k-u a-h 8.00 e-j b-h g-l a-e 54 g-k 8 j-m VT f-n 4 c-k.50 h-q 9.00 d-l 9.50 l-q b-g 4.00 f-l 6.00 d-k 40 l-o 47 d-j Mean CV () Pods that rode a 8/64-inch opening on the pre-sizer. Duncan s New Multiple Range Test (0.05). Means sharing the same letter(s) are not significantly different. Pods that fell through a 8/64-inch opening but rode a 4/64-inch opening on the pre-sizer. 005 PEANUT VARIETY AND QUALITY EVALUATION RESULTS 8

25 Table. Pod brightness measurement (Hunter L Score) for Columbus County and Sampson County, North Carolina, and the City of Suffolk, Virginia, averaged across locations, Dig I 005 Columbus Co., NC Sampson Co., NC City of Suffolk, VA Average Across Locations Jumbo Fancy Jumbo Fancy Jumbo Fancy Jumbo Fancy NC-V 4.6 b-f 4.9 b-l 4.4 a-g 40. c-i 4.9 abc 4. b-h 4. d-i 4.4 g-m Gregory 4.8 b-f 9. lmn 40.9 fg 4.0 a-f 4.7 ab 4.0 e-h 4. e-i 40.8 k-n NC C 4.8 a-e 4.7 a-k 4.4 a-g 4.0 a-f 4.6 ab 4. c-h 4. a-g 4. c-k VA 98R 4.6 a-e 4.4 a-h 4. b-g 4. a-e 44.8 ab 4.7 a-e 4.5 a-g 4. a-g Wilson 44.0 a-e 44.4 ab 4.4 a-g 4. b-h 44.6 ab 45. ab 4.7 a-g 4.5 a-e Perry 4.5 a-f 4. a-i 4.8 a-g 4.5 a-h 4.8 ab 4.7 a-e 4.0 a-h 4.8 a-j CHAMPS 4.9 a-e 4.5 a-h 4.6 a-g 45. a 44.7 ab 44.5 a-d 4.7 a-g 44.4 a Phillips 44.6 abc 4.4 a-h 4.6 a-g 4. a-e 4.7 ab 4.6 a-e 4.6 a-g 4. a-g N990ol (9) 4.5 a-e 44.7 a 4.7 a-g 4.9 a-e 44.8 ab 44.8 abc 4.7 a-g 44. ab VT b-f 4.5 d-m 4. b-g 40. b-i 44.0 ab 4.7 a-f 4.6 b-h 4.5 g-m Brantley 4.5 b-f 4. f-m 4.4 a-g 8.4 f-i 4.9 bc 4.4 e-h 4.9 f-i 40. lmn N00098ol (Gre) 4.0 a-f 4. a-k 44. a-d 4.9 ab 4.6 ab 9.7 ghi 4.6 a-g 4.0 e-l N0005J 44. a-e 9.9 k-n 4.4 efg 8.5 f-i 44.6 ab 9.4 hi 4.4 a-g 9. n N a-d 4.6 a-g 4. a-f 4. b-h 4.8 ab 4. a-e 4.8 a-f 4.7 a-j N a-f 4.0 g-m 4.6 a-f 4. b-h 44. ab 4.6 a-f 4.5 a-g 4.6 f-m VT a-f 40.6 i-m 40. g 7.9 hi 44.0 ab 4. e-h 4. e-i 9.9 mn VT a-e 4. a-k 4. b-g 40. c-i 4. abc 4.5 a-g 4.8 a-h 4.6 f-m VT a-d 40.6 i-m 4.8 a-e 4.6 a-e 4. abc 4.0 c-h 4.5 a-g 4.7 f-l VT a-e 4. a-i 4. a-g 4.0 b-h 4.8 ab 44.7 abc 4.4 a-g 4.0 a-i VT a-e 4. a-i 4. a-f 4.8 a-g 44. ab 4.6 a-e 4.8 a-f 4.9 a-j VT def 9.0 mn 4. efg 8. ghi 4.9 bc 4. e-h 4.4 hi 9.4 n VT a-f 4.8 b-l 44.9 ab 4. b-h 45. ab 4. a-e 44.4 ab 4. e-l VT c-f 7.7 n 4.7 d-g 6.8 i 4.8 abc 8.0 i 4.9 ghi 7.5 o N00T 44.0 a-e 4. a-k 4.5 a-g 9.5 d-i 4.7 ab 4.9 c-h 4.4 a-g 4. j-m N ab 44.0 a-e 4.7 a-g 4.6 a-e 44. ab 4.5 a-e 4.9 a-e 4.4 a-f N a-f 4.0 a-j 4.8 a-g 4.0 a-e 44. ab 40. f-i 4. a-g 4.0 e-l N a-f 44.0 a-e 4. a-f 4.4 a-e 44. ab 4. a-e 4. a-g 4. a-g The higher the number the brighter the peanut color. Duncan s New Multiple Range Test (0.05). Means sharing the same letter(s) are not significantly different. 005 PEANUT VARIETY AND QUALITY EVALUATION RESULTS 9