EDIBLE BEAN AGRONOMY AND PEST MANAGEMENT RESEARCH RESULTS C.L. GILLARD S. WILLIS D. DEPUYDT

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "EDIBLE BEAN AGRONOMY AND PEST MANAGEMENT RESEARCH RESULTS C.L. GILLARD S. WILLIS D. DEPUYDT"

Transcription

1 EDIBLE BEAN AGRONOMY AND PEST MANAGEMENT RESEARCH RESULTS 2009 C.L. GILLARD S. WILLIS D. DEPUYDT

2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements. 3 Chemtura and Norac Fusarium Seed Treatment 4 Chemtura and Norac Rhizoctonia Seed Treatment 5 Head-to-Head Anthracnose Seed Treatment.. 6 Syngenta Foliar Anthracnose (cv. Kippen) 7 Syngenta Foliar Anthracnose (cv. OAC Rex) 8 Syngenta Seed Treatment Anthracnose (cv. Kippen). 9 Syngenta Seed Treatment Anthracnose (cv. OAC Rex). 10 Chemtura/Norac Seed Trt Anthracnose., 11 Anthracnose Mechanical Dispersal 12 Bacterial Blight Seed Treatment (1 st Planting) 13 Bacterial Blight Seed Treatment (2 nd Planting). 14 Head-to-Head White Mold Foliar Fungicide (1 st Planting) 15 Head-to-Head White Mold Foliar Fungicide ((2 nd Planting). 16 Desiccation Glyphosate Tank Mix 17 Nitrogen Response in White Beans.. 18 Nitrogen Response in Cranberry Beans Nitrogen Response in Kidney Beans Kippen Dry Bean Variety Summaries Major Coloured Bean Registration and Performance 21 Cran and Kidney Preliminary Yield.. 22 White Bean Registration and Performance White Bean Preliminary Yield.. 24 Black and Misc. Preliminary Yield Pinto Preliminary Yield 26 Blyth Dry Bean Variety Summaries White Bean Registration and Performance White Bean Preliminary Yield.. 28 Black and Misc. Preliminary Yield Thorndale Dry Bean Variety Summaries Major Coloured Bean Registration and Performance Cran and Kidney Preliminary Yield. 31 Strip Trial Dry Bean Variety Summaries Donnelly Sand vs Loam 32 Martin Cranberry.. 34 Willis White. 35 Dry Bean Variety Visual Quality Summaries Black Bean 36 Cranberry Bean. 37 White Bean 38 Dark Red Kidney Bean. 39 Light Red Kidney Bean 40 Top Picks in Dry Bean Varieties.. 41 Quadris/Headline for Plant Health 42 Marsh Spot Summary for Registration/Performance Trials. 47 Marsh Spot Summary for Preliminary Yield Trials. 52

3 Agronomy and Pest Management Research Results for Dry Edible Beans 2009 This report is a compilation of agronomy and pest management research results in dry edible beans at Ridgetown College and the Huron Research Station for It has been produced as a reference for growers and industry personnel. A number of the pesticides that are included in this report are not currently registered for use in dry edible beans in Ontario. Always follow label directions when applying pesticides. Acknowledgments Funding for this research was received from: Agricultural Adaptation Council Ontario Coloured Bean Growers Assoc. BASF Canada Bayer Crop Protection Norac Concepts UAP Canada NuFarm Canada Syngenta Crop Protection Ontario White Bean Producers Dupont Canada Chemtura OMAFRA The Bean Team Steve Willis Chris Gillard Don Depuydt Student Assistance by: Laura McKenzie Justine Vanesbroeck Brent Schuster Malora Mackey Elise Stacey Broad Copyright by University of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus Ridgetown Ontario Canada N0P 2C0 Telephone: (519) Facimile (519) cgillard@ridgetownc.uoguelph.ca 3

4 Chemtura&Norac Fusarium Seed Treatment Trial Rating Data Type Emergence Emergence Emergence Vigour Vigour Primary Root Primary Root Average Basal Plant Dry Yield 100 Seed Pick Seed Quality $ value Rating Unit %emerged %emerged %emerged 1-10 (1=best) 1-10 (1=best) External Internal & Tap Root Weight lbs/ac. Weight % 1-5 (1=best) per acre Rating Date 6/15/2009 6/22/2009 6/29/2009 6/29/2009 8/01/ (1=best) 1-5 (1=best) 1-5 (1=best) 7/20/2009 Crop Stage VC VC V1 V1 V8-R2 7/17/2009 7/17/2009 7/17/2009 g./plant Crop Stage Scale 1.5 WAP 2.5 WAP 3.5 WAP 3.5 WAP 8 WAP Trt Treatment No. Name 1 Untreated Unin.Check 80 a a c c Apron Maxx RTA 67 bc a bc bc Rancona Summit 74 ab a ab ab Caption FL (TPM)(Half) 72 b a a a Caption FL(TPM)(Standard) 74 ab a c c Untreated Inoc.Check 62 c b abc ab LSD (P=.05) 8 n/a 7 n/a 0.8 n/a n/a 0.9 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a CV Grand Mean Treatment Prob(F) ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) (d) (f) (g) Footnotes Trial Summary Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Design: RCBD Seeding Rate: 20 seeds / m. infected seed Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolouration Row Width:30 inch (75 cms) Planting Date: June 5 determination was modeled on industry norms. Number of Rows Per Plot: 4 Fertilizer: lbs/ac.npk lbs actual Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: No. of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 2 row 5 lbs/ac. Zinc lbs actual [yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($.25/lb)*** Plot Length: 6m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Bonanza 1.5L/ha *** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Harvest Length: 4m. Harvest Date: Sept

5 Chemtura&Norac Rhizoctonia Seed Treatment Trial Rating Data Type Emergence Emergence Emergence Vigour Vigour Primary Root Primary Root Plant Dry Yield 100 Seed Pick Seed Quality $ value Rating Unit %emerged %emerged %emerged 1-10 (1=best) 1-10 (1=best) External Internal Weight lbs/ac. Weight % 1-5 (1=best) Rating Date 6/15/2009 6/22/2009 6/29/2009 6/29/2009 8/01/ (1=best) 1-5 (1=best) 7/20/2009 Crop Stage VC VC V1 V1 V8-R2 7/17/2009 7/17/2009 g./plant Crop Stage Scale 1.5 WAP 2.5 WAP 3.5 WAP 3.5 WAP 8 WAP Trt Treatment No. Name 1 Untreated Unin.Check 83 a 96 a 98 a 2.8 bc 1.3 c 1.2 c 1.1 b a Apron Maxx RTA 57 c 90 ab 95 ab 3 bc 2.6 b 1.4 c 1.3 b b Rancona Summit 68 b 95 a 101 a 2.3 c 1.6 c 1.5 c 1.4 b b Caption FL (TPM)(Half) 42 d 81 b 87 b 2.8 bc 2.5 b 2.2 b 2.2 a ab Caption FL(TPM)(Standard) 46 d 85 b 87 b 3.3 b 2.8 b 1.4 c 1.4 b a Untreated Inoc.Check 11 e 57 c 68 c 4.3 a 3.6 a 2.9 a 2.5 a a LSD (P=.05) n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.86 n/a CV Grand Mean Treatment Prob(F) ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) (d) (f) (g) Footnotes Trial Summary Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Design: RCBD Seeding Rate: 20 seeds / m. infected seed Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolouration Row Width:30 inch (75 cms) Planting Date: June 5 determination was modeled on industry norms. Number of Rows Per Plot: 4 Fertilizer: lbs/ac.npk lbs actual Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: No. of Rows Harvested Per Plot: m 5 lbs/ac. Zinc lbs actual [yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($.25/lb)*** Plot Length: 6m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Bonanza 1.5L/ha *** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Harvest Length: 4m. Harvest Date: Sept

6 Head to Head Anthracnose Seed Treatment Trial Lesions Observations Emergence Vigour (c) Incidence of Incidence of Severity of Pod Yield 100 Seed Wt. (e) Seed Quality %emerged 1-5 Veins Infected Pods Infected Lesions Index (d) grams lbs/ac. beforedockage 3 WAP 3 WAP 10.5 WAP 10.5 WAP 13 WAP adj. for moist Trial ID: 09DPAFE Pick (g) Value (h) $ per acre Trt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit 1 Cruiser ST 50 G A/100 KG 94 a a 1477 cd ab bc 2 Cruiser ST 50 G A/100 KG 105 a abc 1648 abc c ab DCT (Standard) G A/100 KG 3 Cruiser ST 50 G A/100 KG 92 a bc 1760 ab c a ApronMaxx ST 6.25 G A/100 KG Dynasty ST (Standard) 1 G A/100 KG 4 Cruiser ST 50 G A/100 KG 105 a bc 1600 bc bc ab ApronMaxx ST 6.25 G A/100 KG Dynasty ST (High) 2 G A/100 KG 5 Cruiser ST 50 G A/100 KG 101 a ab 1330 d a c Trilex AL 9 G A/100 KG 6 Cruiser ST 50 G A/100 KG 107 a c 1789 a c a Rancona Summit G A/100 KG NCF (TPM) (Half) 3.08 G A/100 KG LSD (P=.05) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.0 n/a n/a CV Grand Mean Treatment Prob(F) ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) Dockage (f) Additional Value ($ per acre) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (g) Footnotes Vigour Rating 1-5, 1 = plants uniform size healthy green colour, 5 = plants irregular size and colour Trial Summary Severity of Pod Lesion Index calculated as a percentage of the total pod area with lesions. Design: RCBD Planting Date: June 15 Variety: Kippen This index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Row Width: 17 inch (43 cms) Fertilizer: lbs/ac. NPK actual ppi given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Number of Rows Per Plot: lbs/ac. NPK actual post Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 3 rows 5 lbs/ac. Zinc actual ppi Dockage seed that falls through a 10 X 3/4 screen (excluding clean white splits)as per industry standards Plot Length: 6m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 2.5L/ha (May 20) Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolouration Harvest Length: 4m. Insecticide: Lagon 1L/ha [leafhopper control] (July 16,Aug 2) determination was modeled on industry norms. Seeding Rate: 21 seeds / m. infected seed Fungicide: Ronilan [white mold control] 1.5 kg/ha (Aug 2) Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: Fungicide: Allegro [white mold control] (Aug 25) [yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 1- dockage (%)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($.25/lb)*** Harvest Date: Oct.11 *** dockage is removed as a straight percentage *** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Two blanket foliar applications were applied to maintain treatment differences (Aug 2,14) 6

7 Observations Syngenta Foliar Kippen Anthracnose Incidence of Incidence of Incidence of Incidence of Severity of Pod Yield 100 Seed Wt. (e) Seed Quality Veins Infected Pods Infected Veins Infected Pods Infected Lesions Index (d) grams lbs/ac. beforedockage 9.5 WAP 9.5 WAP 11 WAP 11 WAP 12 WAP adj. for moist Trial ID: 09DPAAE Pick (g) Value (h) $ per acre Trt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit 1 Infected Untreated Check 7.6 a 6.0 ab 67.0 a 20.8 a 35.2 a 575 d 19.9 b 4.1 ab d 2 Quadris 125 G A/HA 2.0 b 1.0 c 4.8 c 6.0 c 9.5 c 1139 b 21.8 a 3.4 bc bcd A7402 (Inspire)(Low) 39 G A/HA 5.8 a 7.3 a 26.4 b 17.8 a 23.3 b 850 c 20.3 b 4.0 ab cd A7402 (Inspire)(High) 78 G A/HA 3.0 b 4.0 abc 18.2 b 13.6 b 18.9 b 854 c 20.3 b 4.3 a cd Quadris Top 203 G A/HA 1.5 b 1.0 c 3.3 c 2.7 cd 9.7 c 1281 b 21.9 a 3.4 bc bc Quadris 125 G A/HA 1.3 b 1.9 bc 0.3 c 1.0 d 5.4 cd 1249 b 22.1 a 3.8 ab b Turbocharge (High) 7 Quadris 125 G A/HA 0.6 b 0.5 c 0.6 c 1.1 d 2.0 cd 1202 b 22.3 a 2.9 cd ab Turbocharge (Very High) 8 Headline 100 G A/HA 0.6 b 0.5 c 0.5 c 1.1 d 1.5 d 1518 a 22.4 a 2.4 d a LSD (P=.05) n/a n/a CV Grand Mean Treatment Prob(F) ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) Dockage (f) Additional Value ($ per acre) Footnotes Trial Summary (d) Severity of Pod Lesion Index calculated as a percentage of the total pod area with lesions. This index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Design: RCBD Planting Date: June 15 Variety: Kippen given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Row Width: 17 inch (43 cms) Fertilizer: lbs/ac. NPK actual ppi (e) Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Number of Rows Per Plot: lbs/ac. NPK actual post (f) Dockage seed that falls through a 10 X 3/4 screen (excluding clean white splits)as per industry standards Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 3 rows 5 lbs/ac. Zinc actual ppi (g) Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolouration Plot Length: 6m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 2.5L/ha (May 20) determination was modeled on industry norms. Harvest Length: 4m. Insecticide: Lagon 1L/ha [leafhopper control] (July 16,Aug 2) (g) Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: Seeding Rate: 21 seeds / m. infected seed Fungicide: Ronilan [white mold control] 1.5 kg/ha (Aug 2) [yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 1- dockage (%)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($.25/lb)*** Harvest Date: Oct.11 *** dockage is removed as a straight percentage *** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Treatments were applied twice due to the heavy anthracnose pressure (Aug 6, Aug 21) All treatments had Cruiser,ApronMaxx and Dynasty (2g.ai) applied to them to reduce better reduce the distortions due to hotspots. This also replicates what happens in the field. 7

8 Observations Syngenta Foliar OAC REX Anthracnose Incidence of Incidence of Incidence of Incidence of Severity of Pod Yield 100 Seed Wt. (e) Seed Quality Veins Infected Pods Infected Veins Infected Pods Infected Lesions Index (d) grams lbs/ac. beforedockage 9.5 WAP 9.5 WAP 11 WAP 11 WAP 12 WAP adj. for moist Trt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit 1 Infected Untreated Check a 10.6 a 23.1 a 1383 d 22.4 bc 2.9 a 5.5 ab 11.4 a d 2 Quadris 125 G A/HA bc 0.8 bc 2.7 bc 2230 ab 23.7 ab 1.3 c 3.8 a-d 3.0 cd a A7402 (Inspire)(Low) 39 G A/HA ab 5.5 b 7.8 b 1778 c 22.2 c 2.6 ab 5.3 abc 6.5 bcd bc A7402 (Inspire)(High) 78 G A/HA abc 4.4 bc 17.9 a 1632 cd 22.0 c 2.5 ab 5.9 a 8.4 ab cd Quadris Top 203 G A/HA bc 0.6 c 0.8 c 2138 ab 23.9 a 1.9 bc 3.8 a-d 7.6 abc ab Quadris 125 G A/HA bc 0.3 c 0.4 c 2232 a 24.5 a 1.4 c 1.8 d 3.1 cd a Turbocharge (High) 7 Quadris 125 G A/HA bc 0.6 c 1.8 bc 1916 bc 24.0 a 1.6 c 2.7 cd 4.1 bcd ab Turbocharge (Very High) 8 Headline 100 G A/HA c 0.2 c 0.4 c 2218 ab 24.3 a 1.1 c 3.0 bcd 2.8 d a LSD (P=.05) n/a n/a CV Grand Mean Treatment Prob(F) ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) Trial ID: 09DPABE Dockage (f) Pick (g) Value (h) $ per acre Additional Value ($ per acre) (d) (e) (f) Footnotes Trial Summary Severity of Pod Lesion Index calculated as a percentage of the total pod area with lesions. This index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Design: RCBD Planting Date: June 15 Variety: Kippen given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Row Width: 17 inch (43 cms) Fertilizer: lbs/ac. NPK actual ppi Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Number of Rows Per Plot: lbs/ac. NPK actual post Dockage seed that falls through a 10 X 3/4 screen (excluding clean white splits)as per industry standards Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 3 rows 5 lbs/ac. Zinc actual ppi (g) Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolouration Plot Length: 6m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 2.5L/ha (May 20) determination was modeled on industry norms. Harvest Length: 4m. Insecticide: Lagon 1L/ha [leafhopper control] (July 16,Aug 2) (g) Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: Seeding Rate: 21 seeds / m. infected seed Fungicide: Ronilan [white mold control] 1.5 kg/ha (Aug 2) [yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 1- dockage (%)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($.25/lb)*** Harvest Date: Oct.11 *** dockage is removed as a straight percentage *** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Treatments were applied twice due to the heavy anthracnose pressure (Aug 6, Aug 21) All treatments had Cruiser,ApronMaxx and Dynasty (2g.ai) applied to them to reduce better reduce the distortions due to hotspots. This also replicates what happens in the field. 8

9 Syngenta Seed Treatment Kippen Anthracnose ONLY 3 REPS Observations Emergence Vigour (c) Incidence of Incidence of Severity of Pod Yield 100 Seed Wt. (e) Seed Quality %emerged 1-5 Veins Infected Pods Infected Lesions Index (d) grams lbs/ac. beforedockage 3.5 WAP 3.5 WAP 9.5 WAP 9.5 WAP 12 WAP adj. for moist Trial ID: 09DPACE Pick (g) Value (h) $ per acre Trt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit 1 Infected Seed Check bc 0.1 b bc Cruiser 5FS 50 G A/100 KG 2 CruiserMaxx Bean G A/100 KG bc 0.5 b bc CruiserMaxx Bean G A/100 KG bc 0.5 b cd Dynasty 1 G A/100 KG 4 Mertect 7.5 G A/100 KG bc 0.1 b bcd Cruiser 5FS 50 G A/100 KG 5 Mertect 15 G A/100 KG bc 0.4 b bcd Cruiser 5FS 50 G A/100 KG 6 Mertect 30 G A/100 KG bc 0.4 b bc Cruiser 5FS 50 G A/100 KG 7 A15120C 19.5 G A/100 KG c 0.4 b cd Cruiser 5FS 50 G A/100 KG 8 A15120C 39 G A/100 KG c 0.1 b d Cruiser 5FS 50 G A/100 KG 9 Gaucho 62.5 G A/100 KG a 0.5 b a Trilex AL 9 G A/100 KG 10 BASF Product 4 G A/100 KG bc 1.3 a ab Cruiser 5FS 1.82 G A/100 KG 50 G A/100 KG 11 CruiserMaxx Bean G A/100 KG ab 0.6 b bc Agress G A/100 KG 12 CruiserMaxx Bean G A/100 KG bc 0.3 b bc Agress G A/100 KG LSD (P=.05) CV Grand Mean Treatment Prob(F) ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) Dockage (f) Additional Value ($ per acre) (c) (d) (e) (f) Footnotes Vigour Rating 1-5, 1 = plants uniform size healthy green colour, 5 = plants irregular size and colour Trial Summary Severity of Pod Lesion Index calculated as a percentage of the total pod area with lesions. Design: RCBD Planting Date: June 15 Variety: Kippen This index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Row Width: 17 inch (43 cms) Fertilizer: lbs/ac. NPK actual ppi given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Number of Rows Per Plot: lbs/ac. NPK actual post Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 3 rows 5 lbs/ac. Zinc actual ppi Dockage seed that falls through a 10 X 3/4 screen (excluding clean white splits)as per industry standards Plot Length: 6m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 2.5L/ha (May 20) (g) Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolouration Harvest Length: 4m. Insecticide: Lagon 1L/ha [leafhopper control] (July 16,Aug 2) determination was modeled on industry norms. Seeding Rate: 21 seeds / m. infected seed Fungicide: Ronilan [white mold control] 1.5 kg/ha (Aug 2) (g) Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: Fungicide: Allegro [white mold control] (Aug 25) [yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 1- dockage (%)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($.25/lb)*** Harvest Date: Oct.11 *** dockage is removed as a straight percentage *** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Two blanket foliar applications were applied to maintain treatment differences (Aug 2,14) 9

10 Syngenta Seed Treatment OAC REX Anthracnose Observations Emergence Vigour (c) Incidence of Incidence of Severity of Pod Yield 100 Seed Wt. (e) Seed Quality %emerged 1-5 Veins Infected Pods Infected Lesions Index (d) grams lbs/ac. beforedockage 3.5 WAP 3.5 WAP 9.5 WAP 9.5 WAP 12 WAP adj. for moist Trial ID: 09DPADE Pick (g) Value (h) $ per acre Trt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit 1 Infected Seed Check ab 3.8 a 9.0 ab 1537 d 24.3 bc 2.0 a abc d Cruiser 5FS 50 G A/100 KG 2 CruiserMaxx Bean G A/100 KG abc 3.0 ab 1.0 cd 1736 bcd 24.2 bc 1.6 ab bcd bcd CruiserMaxx Bean G A/100 KG cd 0.1 d 0.0 d 1926 a-d 24.9 ab 1.0 c d abc Dynasty 1 G A/100 KG 4 Mertect 7.5 G A/100 KG bcd 0.8 cd 4.0 bcd 2029 abc 24.2 bc 1.8 ab a-d bc Cruiser 5FS 50 G A/100 KG 5 Mertect 15 G A/100 KG bcd 0.7 cd 5.0 bcd 2064 abc 24.6 ab 1.5 abc a-d abc Cruiser 5FS 50 G A/100 KG 6 Mertect 30 G A/100 KG d 0.3 d 1.0 cd 2332 a 25.2 ab 1.0 c d a Cruiser 5FS 50 G A/100 KG 7 A15120C 19.5 G A/100 KG d 0.2 d 2.0 cd 2234 a 25.7 a 1.5 abc a-d ab Cruiser 5FS 50 G A/100 KG 8 A15120C 39 G A/100 KG bcd 1.3 bcd 4.0 cd 2138 ab 25.0 ab 1.6 ab cd ab Cruiser 5FS 50 G A/100 KG 9 Gaucho 62.5 G A/100 KG a 2.6 abc 11.0 a 1713 cd 23.3 c 1.9 a ab cd Trilex AL 9 G A/100 KG 10 BASF Product 4 G A/100 KG bcd 2.1 a-d 6.0 bc 2043 abc 24.8 ab 1.9 a a bcd Cruiser 5FS 1.82 G A/100 KG 50 G A/100 KG 11 CruiserMaxx Bean G A/100 KG bcd 1.0 bcd 4.0 cd 1963 abc 24.0 bc 1.5 abc bcd abc Agress G A/100 KG 12 CruiserMaxx Bean G A/100 KG d 0.2 d 1.0 cd 1988 abc 24.8 ab 1.3 bc d abc Agress G A/100 KG LSD (P=.05) CV Grand Mean Treatment Prob(F) ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) Dockage (f) Additional Value ($ per acre) Footnotes Trial Summary (c) Vigour Rating 1-5, 1 = plants uniform size healthy green colour, 5 = plants irregular size and colour (d) Severity of Pod Lesion Index calculated as a percentage of the total pod area with lesions. Design: RCBD Planting Date: June 15 Variety: OAC REX This index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Row Width: 17 inch (43 cms) Fertilizer: lbs/ac. NPK actual ppi given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Number of Rows Per Plot: lbs/ac. NPK actual post (e) Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 3 rows 5 lbs/ac. Zinc actual ppi (f) Dockage seed that falls through a 10 X 3/4 screen (excluding clean white splits)as per industry standards Plot Length: 6m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 2.5L/ha (May 20) (g) Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolouration Harvest Length: 4m. Insecticide: Lagon 1L/ha [leafhopper control] (July 16,Aug 2) determination was modeled on industry norms. Seeding Rate: 21 seeds / m. infected seed Fungicide: Ronilan [white mold control] 1.5 kg/ha (Aug 2) (g) Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: Fungicide: Allegro [white mold control] (Aug 25) [yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 1- dockage (%)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($.25/lb)*** Harvest Date: Oct.11 *** dockage is removed as a straight percentage *** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Two blanket foliar applications were applied to maintain treatment differences (Aug 14,25) 10

11 Chemtura & Norac Anthracnose Seed Treatment Trial Lesions Observations Emergence Vigour (c) Incidence of Incidence of Severity of Pod Yield 100 Seed Wt. (e) Seed Quality %emerged 1-5 Veins Infected Pods Infected Lesions Index (d) grams lbs/ac. beforedockage 4 WAP 5 WAP 9.5 WAP 9.5 WAP 13 WAP adj. for moist Trial ID: 09DPAEE Pick (g) Value (h) $ per acre Trt No. Treatment Name Rate Rate Unit 1 Infected Seed Check a 1582 d a d 2 Apron Maxx RTA 6.25 G A/100 KG b 2049 bc bc abc Rancona Summit b 1866 c bc cd Apron Maxx RTA 6.25 G A/100 KG b 2038 bc cd abc Dynasty 1 G A/100 KG 5 NCF (TPM)(Third) 2.1 G A/100 KG b 2318 a cd a NCF (TPM)(Half) 3.08 G A/100 KG b 1977 bc cd abc NCF (TPM)(Standard) 6.15 G A/100 KG b 2074 abc d ab NCF (TPM)(Half) 3.07 G A/100 KG b 1973 bc ab bc UBI Rancona Summit b 2118 abc cd ab NCF (TPM)(Third) 2.1 G A/100 KG 10 Rancona Summit b 2201 ab bc ab NCF (TPM)(Half) 3.07 G A/100 KG 11 Caption FL (TPM)(Half) 36.5 G A/100 KG b 2015 bc bc abc Caption FL(TPM)(Standard) 73 G A/100 KG b 2017 bc ab abc Caption CT (TPM)(Half) 36.4 G A/100 KG b 2132 abc ab abc Caption CT(TPM)(Standard) 72.8 G A/100 KG b 2084 abc bc abc LSD (P=.05) 14 n/a n/a n/a n/a CV Grand Mean Treatment Prob(F) ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) Dockage (f) Additional Value ($ per acre) (c) (d) (e) (f) Footnotes Vigour Rating 1-5, 1 = plants uniform size healthy green colour, 5 = plants irregular size and colour Trial Summary Severity of Pod Lesion Index calculated as a percentage of the total pod area with lesions. Design: RCBD Planting Date: June 15 Variety: Kippen This index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Row Width: 17 inch (43 cms) Fertilizer: lbs/ac. NPK actual ppi given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Number of Rows Per Plot: lbs/ac. NPK actual post Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 3 rows 5 lbs/ac. Zinc actual ppi Dockage seed that falls through a 10 X 3/4 screen (excluding clean white splits)as per industry standards Plot Length: 6m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 2.5L/ha (May 20) (g) Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolouration Harvest Length: 4m. Insecticide: Lagon 1L/ha [leafhopper control] (July 16,Aug 2) (g) determination was modeled on industry norms. Seeding Rate: 21 seeds / m. infected seed Fungicide: Ronilan [white mold control] 1.5 kg/ha (Aug 2) Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: Fungicide: Allegro [white mold control] (Aug 25) [yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 1- dockage (%)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($.25/lb)*** Harvest Date: Oct.11 *** dockage is removed as a straight percentage *** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Two blanket foliar applications were applied to maintain treatment differences (Aug 2,14) 11

12 Mechanical Dispersal T9905 Anthracnose lbs/ac. beforedockage 11.5 WAP 11.5 WAP 13.5 WAP 15.5 WAP adj. for moist Trt No. Treatment Name 1 Denim Dry c c 2451 a a 2 Denim Wet a bc 2164 bc abc 3 Leather Dry abc bc 2182 bc bcd 4 Leather Wet ab ab 2211 abc a-d 5 Rubber Dry c bc 2333 ab ab 6 Rubber Wet bc bc 2214 abc a-d 7 Painted Metal Dry c bc 2037 c d 8 Painted Metal Wet ab a 2038 c cd LSD (P=.05) CV Grand Mean Treatment Prob(F) ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) (c) Rating measuring the spread within the middle 3 rows 1-10 ( 1=none, 10=total) (d) (e) (f) (g) (g) Observations Incidence of Incidence of Severity of Severity of Pod Yield 100 Seed Wt. Veins Infected Pods Infected Pods Infected Lesions Index (d) grams Trial Summary Seed Quality (e) Severity of Pod Lesion Index calculated as a percentage of the total pod area with lesions. This index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Design: RCBD Planting Date: May 23 Variety: T9905 given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Row Width: 15 inch (38 cms) Fertilizer: Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 2.5L/ha (May 20) Dockage seed that falls through a 10 X 3/4 screen (excluding clean white splits)as per industry standards Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 3 rows Multiple insecticides and fungicides were applied to Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolouration Plot Length: 6m. minimize distortions in the data determination was modeled on industry norms. Harvest Length: 5 m. Harvest Date: Sept. 12 Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: Seeding Rate: 21 seeds / m. infected seed [yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 1- dockage (%)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($.25/lb)*** All treatments had Cruiser,ApronMaxx and Dynasty (1g.ai) applied to them to reduce better *** dockage is removed as a straight percentage reduce the distortions due to hotspots. This also replicates what happens in the field. *** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it (f) Dockage Pick (g) Value (h) $ per acre 12

13 Bacterial Blight Trial Early Planted Trial Rating Data Type Emergence Emergence Emergence Vigour Vigour Vigour Leaf Infection Leaf Infection 100 Seed Pick Seed Yield $ value Rating Unit %emerged %emerged %emerged 1-10 (1=best) 1-10 (1=best) 1-10 (1=best1-100% 1-100% Weight % Quality lbs/ac. Rating Date 6/19/2006 6/22/2009 6/26/2009 6/22/2009 6/26/2009 7/6/2009 8/11/2009 8/19/2009 g. Crop Stage VC VC VC/V1 VC VC/V1 V3 Crop Stage Scale 2 WAP 3 WAP 4 WAP 3 WAP 4 WAP 5 WAP 8 WAP 9 WAP Trt Treatment No. Name 1 Infected Seed Check 75 ab abc 4.3 b 2.8 b 2.3 bcd ab 449 abc 2 Apron Maxx RTA 80 ab ab 4.5 b 3.3 b 2.8 b c 395 cd Dynasty 3 Agress 77 ab bc 4.3 b 2.8 b 2.5 bc bc 384 d 4 Apron Maxx RTA 74 b c 4.0 b 2.6 b 1.8 d a 481 a Dynasty Agress 5 Cruiser 84 a a 3.3 b 2.6 b 2.0 cd abc 437 a-d Apron Maxx RTA Dynasty Agress 6 Apron Maxx RTA 77 ab bc 4.3 b 2.8 b 1.9 d a 460 ab Ag-Streptomycin 7 Apron Maxx RTA 63 c c 6.0 a 4.0 a 3.6 a abc 413 bcd Kocide 2000 LSD (P=.05) CV Grand Mean Treatment Prob(F) ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) (d) (f) (g) Footnotes Trial Summary Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Design: RCBD Seeding Rate: 22 seeds / m. infected seed Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolourationrow Width:30 inch (75 cms) Planting Date: June 5 determination was modeled on industry norms. Number of Rows Per Plot: 4 Fertilizer: lbs/ac. Zinc lbs actual Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: No. of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 2 rows [yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($.25/lb)*** Plot Length: 6m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Bonanza 1.5L/ha *** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Harvest Length: 4m. Harvest Date: Oct.6 13

14 Bacterial Blight Trial Late Planted Trial Rating Data Type Emergence Emergence Emergence Vigour Vigour Leaf Infection Leaf Infection 100 Seed Pick Seed Yield $ value Rating Unit %emerged %emerged %emerged 1-10 (1=best) 1-10 (1=best) 1-100% 1-100% Weight % Quality lbs/ac. Rating Date 6/26/2009 6/30/2009 7/07/2009 7/06/2009 7/23/2009 8/11/2009 8/19/2009 g. Crop Stage VC VC V1 V1 Crop Stage Scale 1.5 WAP 2 WAP 3 WAP 3 WAP 5 WAP 8 WAP 9 WAP Trt Treatment No. Name 1 Infected Seed Check 61 b 70 b a Apron Maxx RTA 68 b 78 b bcd Dynasty 3 Agress 63 b 75 b bcd Apron Maxx RTA 70 b 76 b cd Dynasty Agress 5 Cruiser 83 a 88 a d Apron Maxx RTA Dynasty Agress 6 Apron Maxx RTA 65 b 75 b abc Ag-Streptomycin 7 Apron Maxx RTA 62 b 73 b ab Kocide 2000 LSD (P=.05) CV Grand Mean Treatment Prob(F) ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) (d) (f) (g) Footnotes Trial Summary Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Design: RCBD Seeding Rate: 22 seeds / m. infected seed Pick is a percentage of discoloured seeds by weight on a representative 100 seeds. The discolourow Width:30 inch (75 cms) Planting Date: June 16 determination was modeled on industry norms. Number of Rows Per Plot: 4 Fertilizer: lbs/ac.npk lbs actual Value per acre determined using the following formula for each plot: No. of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 2 rows 5 lbs/ac. Zinc lbs actual [yield (lbs/ac.)] * [ 2 * [1- pick(%)]] * value of a pound of beans ($.25/lb)*** Plot Length: 6m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Bonanza 1.5L/ha *** pick is doubled not only to allow for the discoloured seed but also the cost of removing it Harvest Length: 4m. Harvest Date: Oct.1 14

15 White Mold Foliar Fungicide Head-to-Head Study - 1 st Planting 2009 Seed 100 Seed Phyto Disease Severity (%) Disease Incidence (0-1) Quality Weight Pick Yield Yield - Pick No. Treatment Nane Rate Units (1-10) 11 DAA 14 DAA 21 DAA 39 DAA 11 DAA 14 DAA 21 DAA 39 DAA (1-5) (g) (%) (kg/ha) (kg/ha) 1 Untreated 0 19 a 26 abc 57 a 85 a 1.0 a 1.0 a bc 29.2 bc bcd 1366 bcd 2 Lance (70% DF) 2 Appl 392 G A/HA 0 7 bc 12 cd 40 b 58 cd 0.7 bc 1.0 ab bc 30.6 ab abc 1841 abc 3 Lance (70% DF) 1 Appl 540 G A/HA 0 5 c 11 d 37 bc 50 de 0.8 ab 1.0 ab abc 30.7 ab abc 1874 abc 4 Lance (70% DF) 2 Appl 540 G A/HA 0 7 bc 15 bcd 40 b 48 de 0.9 ab 1.0 a ab 29.1 bc abc 1795 abc 5 Allegro 500F 2 Appl 500 G A/HA 0 3 c 6 d 31 bc 47 de 0.7 bc 1.0 ab c 31.0 ab a 2167 a 6 Serenade 2 Appl 4 l/ha 0 16 ab 26 ab 53 a 70 bc 0.9 ab 1.0 a ab 26.4 cd cd 1288 cd 7 Serenade 2 Appl 4 l/ha 0 3 c 9 d 33 bc 38 e 0.8 ab 0.9 ab ab 31.2 ab a 2335 a Lance (70% DF) 2 Appl 392 G A/HA 8 Bayer Exp 1 Appl 250 G A/HA 0 2 c 4 d 25 c 37 e 0.5 c 0.7 c abc 28.8 bc a 2141 a 9 Bayer Exp 2 Appl 150 G A/HA 0 3 c 6 d 32 bc 46 de 0.7 bc 1.0 a abc 31.1 ab ab 1943 ab 10 Bayer Exp 2 Appl 250 G A/HA 0 4 c 5 d 30 bc 46 de 0.7 bc 0.8 bc a 32.8 a a 2207 a 11 Calcium Chloride 2 Appl 874 G A/HA 0 25 a 40 a 63 a 81 ab 1.0 a 1.0 a bc 24.6 d d 839 d 12 Senator 2 Appl 1210 G A/HA 0 7 bc 12 cd 37 bc 55 d 0.8 ab 1.0 ab bc 32.5 a a 2057 a LSD (0.05) CV Mean Pr>F Trial Summary Design: RCBD Planting Date: June 15 Variety: Beryl Row Width: 15 inch (38 cm) Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 2.5L/ha (June 4) Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Insecticide: Lagon 1L/ha [leafhopper control] (July 31) Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 4 rows Sclerotia applied Feb 17, Ascospores applied Aug 5 Plot Length: 6m. Irrigation water applied Aug. 5, 10, 13, 17, 23 Harvest Length: 4m. Fungicide Application A: Aug. 6 (30% bloom), B: Aug. 19 (full bloom) Seeding Rate: 15 seeds / m CO 2 sprayer, Air Bubblejet flat fan, 300 l/ha, 310 Kpa 15

16 White Mold Foliar Fungicide Head-to-Head Study - 2 nd Planting Seed Phyto Disease Severity (%) Disease Incidence (0-1) Weight Pick Yield Yield - Pick No. Treatment Nane Rate Units (1-10) 12 DAA 24 DAA 42 DAA 12 DAA 24 DAA 42 DAA (g) (%) (kg/ha) (kg/ha) 1 Untreated 0 41 ab 79 a 87 a e 292 d 2 Lance (70% DF) 2 Appl 392 G A/HA 0 32 abc 68 abc 73 a-d cde 394 cd 3 Lance (70% DF) 1 Appl 540 G A/HA 0 30 a-d 67 abc 73 bcd b-e 470 bcd 4 Lance (70% DF) 2 Appl 540 G A/HA 0 21 cd 60 bcd 67 cde a-d 676 a-d 5 Allegro 500F 2 Appl 500 G A/HA 0 17 cd 54 cd 65 cde abc 810 ab 6 Serenade 2 Appl 4 l/ha 0 29 a-d 70 abc 77 abc b-e 515 a-d 7 Serenade 2 Appl 4 l/ha 0 29 a-d 63 a-d 72 bcd b-e 529 a-d Lance (70% DF) 2 Appl 392 G A/HA 8 Bayer Exp 1 Appl 250 G A/HA 0 20 cd 56 cd 67 cde abc 754 abc 9 Bayer Exp 2 Appl 150 G A/HA 0 17 cd 49 d 56 e a 891 a 10 Bayer Exp 2 Appl 250 G A/HA 0 14 d 49 d 61 de ab 838 ab 11 Calcium Chloride 2 Appl 874 G A/HA 0 42 a 76 ab 85 ab de 320 d 12 Senator 2 Appl 1210 G A/HA 0 24 bcd 58 cd 62 de a-e 636 a-d LSD (0.05) na na na na na CV Mean Pr>F Trial Summary Design: RCBD Planting Date: June 29 Variety: Beryl Row Width: 15 inch (38 cm) Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 2.5L/ha (June 4) Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Insecticide: Lagon 1L/ha [leafhopper control] (July 31) Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 4 rows Sclerotia applied Feb 17, Ascospores applied Aug 17 Plot Length: 6m. Irrigation water applied Aug. 5, 10, 13, 17, 23 Harvest Length: 4m. Fungicide Application A: Aug. 19 (30% bloom), B: Aug. 31 (full bloom) Seeding Rate: 15 seeds / m CO 2 sprayer, Air Bubblejet flat fan, 300 l/ha, 310 Kpa 16

17 Desiccation in Kidney Beans (Red Hawk) with Glyphosate Tankmixes Description Plant Response to Desiccant Residue Analysis Part Rated leaf leaf pod pod stem stem YIELD Adjusted Seed Quality glyphosate AMPA glofos Diquat Carfen flumiox Rating Date 5 DAA 10 DAA 5 DAA 10 DAA 5 DAA 10 DAA KG/HA 100 seed 1-5 inate trazone azin Rating Data Type % leaf drop % leaf drop % pod % pod % stem % stem wt 1=excellent ammon ethyl Rating Unit or brown or brown yellow yellow brown brown 5=poor Trt Treatment Rate No. Name Rate Unit 1 Untreated check 80 f 94 c 84 de f 41 f glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 88 e 100 a 93 bc ef 75 bcd ab diquat (Reglone) 300 G A/HA 98 abc 99 ab 98 ab cde 80 a-d AgSurf 0.1 % V/V 4 diquat (Reglone) 550 G A/HA 100 a 100 a 100 a ab 95 a AgSurf 0.1 % V/V 5 glufosinate ammonium (Ignite) 370 G A/HA 98 abc 100 a 93 bc def 91 ab glufosinate ammonium (Ignite) 450 G A/HA 98 abc 100 a 94 abc bcd 90 ab carfentrazone-ethyl (AIM) 17.5 G A/HA 84 ef 98 b 83 e f 44 f AgSurf 0.25 % V/V 8 carfentrazone-ethyl (AIM) 28 G A/HA 86 e 100 a 90 cd ef 50 ef AgSurf 0.25 % V/V 9 flumioxazin (Valtera) 53.6 G A/HA 96 a-d 100 a 98 ab bcd 68 de Merge 0.5 % V/V 10 flumioxazin (Valtera) 71.4 G A/HA 99 ab 100 a 96 abc cde 69 cde Merge 0.5 % V/V 11 saflufenacil (Kixor) 25 G A/HA 100 a 100 a 98 ab abc 79 a-d Merge 0.5 % V/V 12 saflufenacil (Kixor) 50 G A/HA 99 ab 100 a 100 a a 98 a Merge 0.5 % V/V 13 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 95 bcd 100 a 94 abc cde 85 a-d d diquat (Reglone) 300 G A/HA AgSurf 0.1 % V/V 14 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 100 a 100 a 100 a b-e 89 ab d diquat (Reglone) 550 G A/HA AgSurf 0.1 % V/V 15 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 96 a-d 100 a 95 abc c-f 95 a bcd glufosinate ammonium (Ignite) 370 G A/HA 16 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 99 ab 100 a 98 ab cde 95 a d glufosinate ammonium (Ignite) 450 G A/HA 17 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 94 cd 100 a 93 bc b-e 83 a-d cd carfentrazone-ethyl (AIM) 17.5 G A/HA AgSurf 0.25 % V/V 18 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 93 d 100 a 93 bc cde 85 a-d ab carfentrazone-ethyl (AIM) 28 G A/HA AgSurf 0.25 % V/V 19 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 100 a 100 a 96 abc cde 89 ab d flumioxazin (Valtera) 53.6 G A/HA Merge 0.5 % V/V 20 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 100 a 100 a 95 abc a-d 94 ab abc flumioxazin (Valtera) 71.4 G A/HA Merge 0.5 % V/V 21 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 99 ab 100 a 98 ab def 88 abc a saflufenacil (Kixor) 25 G A/HA Merge 0.5 % V/V 22 glyphosate (Weathermax) 900 G A/HA 99 ab 100 a 100 a a-d 95 a abc saflufenacil (Kixor) 50 G A/HA Merge 0.5 % V/V LSD (P=.05) n/a n/a n/a n/a NA NA NA NA NA CV NA NA NA Grand Mean Treatment Prob(F) All desiccant applications were made on Sept. 8 when all the plots on average had 80% of the pods yellow (a pod is defined as yellow if 95% of the pods is yellow) MRL Glyposate Glufosinate Diquat Carfentrazone Flumioxazin Trial Summary Ignite Reglone Aim Valtera Design: RCBD Seeding Rate: 100,000 seeds / acre EU Row Width:30 inch (75 cms) Planting Date: June 16 Japan Number of Rows Per Plot: 4 Fertilizer: lbs/ac.npk lbs actual US n/a No. of Rows Harvested Per Plot: mid 2 rows 5 lbs/ac. Zinc lbs actual Canada Plot Length: 6m. liquid actual at seeding (June 16) Harvest Length: 3.5 m. Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Bonanza 1.5L/ha Harvest Date: Oct.4&5 17

18 Impact of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Root Rot (Fusarium) Narrow Row Whites (T9905) Trial ID: 09DPFNAH Emergence Emergence Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Dry Weight (b) Plant Height 100 Seed Wt. Seed Quality (e Days to Yield Observations %emerged %emerged kg/m2 cm grams 1-5 Maturity Kg/Ha Trt No. Nitrogen Rate Kg/Ha Seed Trt. 12 DAP 21 DAP 12 DAP 21 DAP 39 DAP 57 DAP 75 DAP 91 DAP 85 DAP adj. for moist (Factor A) (Factor B) c 7.4 c abc 7.8 abc ab 8.0 ab a 8.3 ab ab 8.5 a ab 7.4 c Untreated 75 b Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty 79 a /1 0 Untreated b-e ab /1 35 Untreated abc a /1 70 Untreated c ab /1 105 Untreated b ab /1 140 Untreated b ab /1 175 Untreated a-d ab /2 0 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty ab ab /2 35 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty a-d b /2 70 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty a ab /2 105 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty b ab /2 140 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty e ab /2 175 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty a-e ab Mean PR>F (A) PR>F (B) PR>F (A X B) LSD(0.05) (A) 0.45 N/A 0.05 N/A 0.16 N/A 0.18 N/A N/A 0.55 N/A 0.99 N/A N/A 0.52 N/A 0.63 N/A LSD(0.05) (B) 4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A LSD(0.05) (A X B) N/A 8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.4 N/A N/A ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) (a) (b) (e) Footnotes Vigour Rating 1-10, 1 = plants irregular size and colour 10 = uniform size healthy green colour Trial Summary Dry Weigh calculated in kilograms of the top foliage of plant dried (1 metre of row). Design: Factorial Planting Date: June 6 - Variety T9905 This index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Row Width: 15 inch (38 cms) Fertilizer: Urea-Ammonium Nitrate (28-0-0) at Treatment Rates (June 7th) given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha., Bonanza 1.5L/ha (May 25) Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 rows Insecticide: Lagon 1L/ha., Matador 50 ml [Bean Leaf Bettle control] (June 26/July 31) Plot Length: 6m. Fungicide: Lance [white mold control] 565 g/ha (July 31) Soil Sampling Harvest Length: 4m. Harvest Date: Sep. 19 Seeding Rate: 17 seeds / m DAP - Composite - May 25 by Hand Planting - Treatment 1 - June 5 by Tractor mounted Probe Harvest - All Treatments - September 23 by Tractor mounted Probe 18

19 Impact of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Root Rot (Fusarium) Light Kidneys (Pink Panther) Trial ID: 09DPFNBH Observations Trt No. Nitrogen Rate Kg/Ha Seed Trt. (Factor A) (Factor B) Emergence Emergence Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Dry Weight (b) Plant Height 100 Seed Wt. Days to Yield %emerged %emerged kg/m2 cm grams Maturity Kg/Ha 13 DAP 22 DAP 13 DAP 22 DAP 39 DAP 57 DAP 91 DAP 85 DAP adj. for moist bc abc ab ab a c Untreated Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty /1 0 Untreated /1 35 Untreated /1 70 Untreated /1 105 Untreated /1 140 Untreated /1 175 Untreated /2 0 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty /2 35 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty /2 70 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty /2 105 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty /2 140 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty /2 175 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty Mean PR>F (A) PR>F (B) PR>F (A X B) LSD(0.05) (A) 0.88 N/A 0.79 N/A 0.94 N/A 0.58 N/A 0.48 N/A 0.20 N/A N/A 0.59 N/A LSD(0.05) (B) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A LSD(0.05) (A X B) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A (a) (b) (e) Footnotes Vigour Rating 1-10, 1 = plants irregular size and colour 10 = uniform size healthy green colour Trial Summary Dry Weigh calculated in kilograms of the top foliage of plant dried (1 metre of row). Design: Factorial Planting Date: June 6 - Variety Pink Panther This index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Row Width: 30 inch (75 cms) Fertilizer: Urea-Ammonium Nitrate (28-0-0) at Treatment Rates (June 7th) given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha., Bonanza 1.5L/ha (May 25) Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 rowinsecticide: Lagon 1L/ha., Matador 50 ml [Bean Leaf Bettle control] (June 26/July 31) - 15 DAP - Composite - May 25 by Hand Planting - Treatment 1 - June 5 by Tractor mounted Probe Harvest - All Treatments - September 14 by Tractor mounted Probe Plot Length: 6m. Fungicide: Lance [white mold control] 565 g/ha (July 31) Soil Sampling Harvest Length: 4m. Harvest Date: Sep. 8 Seeding Rate: 21 seeds / m. 19

20 Impact of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Root Rot (Fusarium) Cranberry Beans (Etna) Observations Trt No. Nitrogen Rate Kg/Ha Seed Trt. (Factor A) (Factor B) a 84 a b bc 79 b b bc 84 a a bc 80 b a ab 85 a ab ab 82 ab ab 1 Untreated b 7.3 b Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty a 7.8 a /1 0 Untreated c ab /1 35 Untreated bc ab /1 70 Untreated a ab /1 105 Untreated a ab /1 140 Untreated ab b /1 175 Untreated b ab /2 0 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty ab ab /2 35 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty a b /2 70 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty a b /2 105 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty a a /2 140 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty a ab /2 175 Cruiser Maxx Bean/Dynasty a ab Mean PR>F (A) PR>F (B) PR>F (A X B) LSD(0.05) (A) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A LSD(0.05) (B) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A LSD(0.05) (A X B) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.8 N/A N/A 1.9 N/A N/A ** Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) Trial ID: 09DPFNCH Emergence Emergence Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Vigour (a) Dry Weight (b) Plant Height 100 Seed Wt. Days to Yield %emerged %emerged kg/m2 cm grams Maturity Kg/Ha 13 DAP 22 DAP 13 DAP 22 DAP 39 DAP 57 DAP 91 DAP 85 DAP adj. for moist (a) (b) (e) Footnotes Vigour Rating 1-10, 1 = plants irregular size and colour 10 = uniform size healthy green colour Trial Summary Dry Weigh calculated in kilograms of the top foliage of plant dried (1 metre of row). Design: Factorial Planting Date: June 6 - Variety Etna This index is the weighted average of destroyed pods (100% destroyed) with the remaining pods Row Width: 30 inch (75 cms) Fertilizer: Urea-Ammonium Nitrate (28-0-0) at Treatment Rates (June 7th) given a percent of the total pod area with lesions based on the percentage of total pods destroyed. Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha., Bonanza 1.5L/ha (May 25) Seed Quality Rating 1-5 1= uniform size white colour, 5=irregular size and colour Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 rowinsecticide: Lagon 1L/ha., Matador 50 ml [Bean Leaf Bettle control] (June 26/July 31) - 15 DAP - Composite - May 25 by Hand Planting - Treatment 1 - June 5 by Tractor mounted Probe Harvest - All Treatments - September 9 by Tractor mounted Probe Plot Length: 6m. Fungicide: Lance [white mold control] 565 g/ha (July 31) Soil Sampling Harvest Length: 4m. Harvest Date: Sep. 2 Seeding Rate: 21 seeds / m. 20

21 09DVCAK Major Coloured Bean R. & P. Trial - Kippen Seed Blight Blight 100 Treatment Treatment Type Yield Yield Yield/ Quality Seed Days to Maturity Number Name Rank (kg/ha) D.A.P. (1-5) Aug10 Sept.10 Weight Maturity 7 OAC 07-6D1 DRK M 6 Majesty DRK M 5 OAC Derkeller (05-D2) DRK L 8 GTS 104 DRK M 9 HR DRK M 1 Montcalm DRK M 4 OAC Redstar DRK M 2 AC Calmont DRK M 3 Red Hawk DRK E 10 SVS-700 DRK M Average OAC 07-L1 LRK L 13 Pink Panther LRK M 17 HR LRK L 14 OAC Lyrik LRK E 15 OAC 06-L1 LRK E 11 AC Elk LRK M 12 Red Kanner LRK L 23 HR LRK M Average Hooter Cran M 22 HR Cran L 24 filler (Messina) Cran M 21 Red Rider Cran M 18 HR Cran M 20 Etna Cran E Average Mean Mean Seed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor C.V PR > F LSD(0.05) Maturity: <93=E, 93-97=M, >97= L 95 check variety 94 Trial Summary Design: RCBD (nearest neighbour) Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seed Fertilizer: NPK, actual ppi Row Width: Wide = 30 inch (75 cms) Dynasty.2 ml./1kg.seed liquid actual at seeding (June 12) Number of Rows Per Plot: 2 Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 1.25L/ha (June 5) Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 2 Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during the Plot Length: 6m. season to minimize distortions in the varietal differences Harvest Length: 4m. Planting Date: June 12 Seeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. Harvest Date: Sept.17,Oct.1 21

22 09KPYTK Cran. Kidney & Misc. PYT - Kippen Seed White Mold Pick 100 Treatment Treatment Type Yield Yield Yield/ Quality 1-10 % Seed Days to Maturity Number Name Rank (kg/ha) D.A.P. (1-5) Sept 10 Weight Maturity 1 Red Kanner LRK L 2 CORN 18-V96 LRK M 3 CORN 773-V98 LRK M 4 CORN 1062-V98 LRK M 5 Blush LRK M 6 Clouseau (SEM07146) LRK E 7 ADML LRK E 8 CU612 LRK E 9 CORN NY118 LRK M 10 COB DRK E 11 USDK-CBB-15 DRK E 12 COB 419X-03 DRK E 13 ADMD DRK E 14 Majesty DRK M 15 filler (October) CRAN E 16 Etna CRAN E 17 ADMC CRAN E 18 ADMC CRAN E 19 SEM0928 CRAN M 20 SEM0929 CRAN E 21 Capri CRAN M 22 Crimson (BD 1003) CRAN E 23 HR 168B CRAN M 24 HR 167 CRAN M 25 T9905 Navy L 26 Condor Black L 27 Merlot SRM M 28 Sedona Pink E 29 Beluga WK L 30 filler (ISB 519W) WK L 31 Erimo Adzuki L 32 Hime Otebo M 33 Fuji Otebo M 34 Peruano Yellow L 35 SEM0863 Yellow L 36 PT 99195MR Pinto L 37 AC Harosprout Mung Bean L 38 HDC Exp #1 Mung Bean L Mean Mean Seed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor C.V White Mold: 1 = good 10 = poor PR > F LSD(0.05) Maturity: <95=E, 95-99=M, >99= L #REF! check variety 103 Trial Summary Design: RCBD (nearest neighbour) Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seed Fertilizer: NPK, actual ppi Row Width: Wide = 30 inch (75 cms) Dynasty.2 ml./1kg.seed liquid actual at seeding (June 12) Number of Rows Per Plot: 2 Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 1.25L/ha (June 5) Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 2 Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during the Plot Length: 6m. season to minimize distortions in the varietal differences Harvest Length: 4m. Planting Date: June 12 Seeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. Harvest Date: Sept.17,Oct.1 22

23 09DVWBK White Bean Registration and Performance - Narrow Row- Kippen Seed 100 Suitability Treatment Treatment Yield Yield Percentage Yield / Quality Seed Lodging Harvestibility For Direct Days to Maturity Number Name Rank (kg/ha) of Average Maturity (1-5) Weight Harvest Maturity 6 OAC E 104 L 17 HR E 99 M 8 OAC E 98 M 1 Thunder G 98 M 28 T VG 102 M 7 OAC VG 103 M 27 Gts VG 101 M 4 OAC Dublin (05-2) G 98 M 29 T G 101 M 24 Reliant VG 99 M 36 Filler #1 (Medalist) E 97 M 21 HR E 106 L 3 Rex VG 106 L 30 T E 104 L 12 OAC E 102 M 13 AC Compass VG 90 E 18 HR VG 108 L 11 OAC E 102 M 2 Lightning E 97 M 15 AC Mast G 101 M 34 T VG 104 L 16 AC Cruiser G 99 M 5 OAC G 94 E 9 OAC G 93 E 19 HR VG 107 L 26 Gts VG 93 E 10 OAC VG 98 M 31 T G 92 E 22 HR VG 105 L 20 HR G 107 L 14 Nautica E 107 L 25 Viscount VG 102 M 23 Vista E 101 M 32 T G 93 E 33 HY G 94 E 35 Cirrus P 91 E Seed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor Mean Mean +/- one half LSDof yield C.V PR > F LSD(0.05) Trial Summary Maturity: <97=E, =M, >103= L Suitability for Direct Harvest <2.1=Excellent, =VeryGood, =Good, >4.0= Poor Design: RCBD (nearest neighbour) Fertilizer: NPK, actual ppi (early May) Row Width: Narrow = 15 inch (37 cms) liquid actual at seeding (June 12) Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 1.25L/ha (June 5),Reflex 1L./ha. (July 14) Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during the Plot Length: 6m. season to minimize distortions in the varietal differences Harvest Length: 4m. Planting Date: June 12 Seeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. Harvest Date: direct harvested Oct.18 Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seed Dynasty.2 ml./1kg.seed 23

24 09NPYTK Navy PYT - Narrow Row- Kippen Seed 100 White Suitability Treatment Treatment Yield Yield Percentage Yield / Quality Seed Mold Lodging Harvestibility For Direct Days to Maturity Number Name Rank (kg/ha) of Average Maturity (1-5) Weight (1-10) Harvest Maturity 3 COOP01054 (HMS Medalist) VG 98 M 1 T VG 101 M 6 COOP E 99 M 4 COOP VG 96 E 5 COOP E 104 L 8 ADM E 97 M 7 COOP VG 101 M 2 MSUN VG 99 M 13 ADMN P 101 M 11 Avalanche VG 97 M 9 ADM E 98 M 12 ADMN VG 99 M 10 COB G 96 E 14 SEM P 100 M Seed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor Mean White Mold : 1 = good 10 = all plants infected Mean +/- one half LSDof yield C.V PR > F LSD(0.05) 273 n/a Trial Summary Maturity: <97=E, =M, >101= L Suitability for Direct Harvest <1.6=Excellent, =VeryGood, =Good, >2.6= Poor Design: RCBD (nearest neighbour) Fertilizer: NPK, actual ppi (early May) Row Width: Narrow = 15 inch (37 cms) liquid actual at seeding (June 12) Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 1.25L/ha (June 5),Reflex 1L./ha. (July 14) Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during the Plot Length: 6m. season to minimize distortions in the varietal differences Harvest Length: 4m. Planting Date: June 12 Seeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. Harvest Date: direct harvested Oct.18 Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seed Dynasty.2 ml./1kg.seed 24

25 09BPYTK Black and Misc. PYT- Narrow Row- Kippen Seed 100 White White Suitability Treatment Treatment Type Yield Yield Percentage Yield / Quality Seed Mold Mold Harvestibility For Direct Days to Maturity Number Name Rank (kg/ha) of Average Maturity (1-5) Weight Sept.14 Sept.30 Harvest Maturity 2 S10B7 Soybean E 112 L 4 COOP05222 Black E 101 M 11 MSUB04554 (Zorro) Black E 104 M 23 La Paz Pinto E 98 E 12 COB Black G 100 M 20 Merlot SR G 99 E 8 Black Velvet Black E 106 L 16 COOP06252 Black VG 102 M 1 T9905 White VG 101 M 3 COOP00044 (Loreto) Black E 101 M 9 ADMB (Shania) Black VG 109 L 5 CORN Black VG 103 M 6 Eclipse Black E 98 E 13 Jet Black Black VG 108 L 21 Erimo Adzuki E 107 L 19 Blackjack Black P 101 M 7 Condor Black G 103 M 15 COB Black G 105 L 22 Hime Otebo G 97 E 25 filler (GN03138) GN VG 102 M 17 COOP05226 Black VG 94 E 10 ADMB Black VG 102 M 14 SEM0963 Black E 100 M 18 MSU Black VG 102 M 26 HDC Exp #1 Mung P 103 M 24 AC Harosprout Mung E 107 L Seed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor Mean Mean +/- one half LSDof yield C.V White Mold 1=none 10= total PR > F LSD(0.05) Maturity: <100=E, =M, >104= L Suitability for Direct Harvest <2.2=Excellent, =VeryGood, =Good, >4= Poor Trial Summary Design: RCBD (nearest neighbour) Fertilizer: NPK, actual ppi (early May) Row Width: Narrow = 15 inch (37 cms) liquid actual at seeding (June 12) Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 1.25L/ha (June 5),Reflex 1L./ha. (July 14) Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during the Plot Length: 6m. season to minimize distortions in the varietal differences Harvest Length: 4m. Planting Date: June 12 Seeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. Harvest Date: direct harvested Oct.18 Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seed Dynasty.2 ml./1kg.seed 25

26 09PPYTK Pinto PYT - Narrow Row- Kippen Seed 100 Suitability Treatment Treatment Yield Yield Percentage Yield / Quality Seed Lodging Harvestibility For Direct Days to Maturity Number Name Rank (kg/ha) of Average Maturity (1-5) Weight Harvest Maturity 6 Lariat VG 99 M 1 GTS P 96 M 5 La Paz VG 99 M 2 GTS P 97 M MR VG 98 M 3 Medicine Hat VG 91 E Seed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor Mean White Mold : 1 = good 10 = all plants infected Mean +/- one half LSDof yield C.V PR > F LSD(0.05) 215 n/a Trial Summary Maturity: <94=E, =M, >100= L Suitability for Direct Harvest <1.8=Excellent, =VeryGood, >4.0= Poor Design: RCBD (nearest neighbour) Fertilizer: NPK, actual ppi (early May) Row Width: Narrow = 15 inch (37 cms) liquid actual at seeding (June 12) Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: Pursuit 200ml/ha. Rival 1.25L/ha (June 5),Reflex 1L./ha. (July 14) Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during the Plot Length: 6m. season to minimize distortions in the varietal differences Harvest Length: 4m. Planting Date: June 12 Seeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. Harvest Date: direct harvested Oct.18 Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seed Dynasty.2 ml./1kg.seed 26

27 09DVWBB White Bean Registration and Performance - Narrow Row- Blyth Seed 100 White Suitability Treatment Treatment Yield Yield Percentage Yield / Quality Seed Pick Mold Lodging Harvestibility For Direct Days to Maturity Number Name Rank (kg/ha) of Average Maturity (1-5) Weight (%) (1-10) Harvest Maturity 7 OAC VG 108 M 36 Filler #1 (Medalist) VG 106 M 19 HR VG 113 L 3 Rex VG 112 L 8 OAC VG 102 E 13 AC Compass VG 98 E 6 OAC VG 110 L 20 HR VG 114 L 1 Thunder VG 106 M 11 OAC E 112 L 25 Viscount VG 110 L 16 AC Cruiser VG 102 E 27 Gts VG 104 M 22 HR VG 114 L 21 HR VG 113 L 4 OAC Dublin (05-2) G 106 M 34 T E 107 M 17 HR VG 107 M 12 OAC VG 112 L 30 T VG 111 L 18 HR VG 112 L 28 T VG 103 E 9 OAC VG 103 E 14 Nautica VG 113 L 2 Lightning VG 104 M 15 AC Mast G 106 M 32 T VG 98 E 23 Vista VG 106 M 24 Reliant VG 108 M 5 OAC VG 99 E 26 Gts VG 99 E 33 HY VG 101 E 10 OAC VG 107 M 35 Cirrus P 98 E 29 T G 106 M 31 T VG 97 E Seed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor Mean Mean +/- one half LSDof yield C.V Pick consists of distorted seed as a PR > F result of blight,white mold etc. damage LSD(0.05) White Mold : 1 = good 10 = all plants infected Maturity: <104=E, =M, >108= L Suitability for Direct Harvest <1.9=Excellent, =VeryGood, =Good, >4.8= Poor Trial Summary Design: RCBD (nearest neighbour) Fertilizer: NPK, actual ppi Row Width: Narrow = 15 inch (37 cms) liquid actual at seeding (June 13) Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: ppi. Dual.7 L/ha Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Herbicide: post Basagran Forte 1.75 L/ha, Reflex.58 L/ha (July 8) Plot Length: 6m. Planting Date: June 13 Harvest Length: 4m. Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during the Seeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. season to minimize distortions in the varietal differences Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seed Harvest Date: Hand Harvested Oct. 11& 15 Dynasty.2 ml./1kg.seed 27

28 09NPYTB Navy PYT - Narrow Row- Blyth Seed 100 White Suitability Treatment Treatment Yield Yield Percentage Yield / Quality Seed Pick Mold Lodging Harvestibility For Direct Days to Maturity Number Name Rank (kg/ha) of Average Maturity (1-5) Weight (%) (1-10) Harvest Maturity 3 COOP01054 (HMS Medalist) VG 103 M 4 COOP VG 102 M 13 ADMN P 101 M 5 COOP VG 108 L 7 COOP VG 104 M 6 COOP E 106 L 2 MSUN VG 106 L 1 AC Compass G 100 E 9 ADM E 106 L 8 ADM E 107 L 12 ADMN VG 102 M 10 COB VG 101 M 14 SEM G 99 E 11 Avalanche VG 104 M Seed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor Mean Mean +/- one half LSDof yield C.V Pick consists of distorted seed as a PR > F result of blight,white mold etc. damage LSD(0.05) White Mold : 1 = good 10 = all plants infected Maturity: <101=E, =M, >105= L Suitability for Direct Harvest <1.7=Excellent, =VeryGood, =Good, >3.4= Poor Trial Summary Design: RCBD (nearest neighbour) Fertilizer: NPK, actual ppi Row Width: Narrow = 15 inch (37 cms) liquid actual at seeding (June 13) Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: ppi. Dual.7 L/ha Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Herbicide: post Basagran Forte 1.75 L/ha, Reflex.58 L/ha (July 8) Plot Length: 6m. Planting Date: June 13 Harvest Length: 4m. Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during the Seeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. season to minimize distortions in the varietal differences Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seed Harvest Date: Hand Harvested Oct. 8 Dynasty.2 ml./1kg.seed 28

29 09BPYTB Black & Misc. PYT- Narrow Row- Blyth White Mold White Mold Percent Seed 100 Sept.11 Pod Drop Suitability Treatment Treatment Type Yield Yield of Ave. Quality Seed (1-10) Oct.3 Lodging Harvestibility For Direct Days to Maturity Number Name Rank (kg/ha) (1-5) Weight (1-10) Harvest Maturity 3 MSUB04554 (Zorro) Black E 109 L 5 COOP00044 (Loreto) Black VG 106 M 2 COB Black VG 106 M 9 ADMB (Shania) Black E 111 L 12 La Paz Pinto VG 106 M 7 Condor Black VG 106 M 8 Black Velvet Black E 113 L 10 Blackjack Black G 108 M 6 COOP05222 Black G 109 L 1 AC Compass White VG 102 E 4 Eclipse Black E 108 M 14 Etna Cranberry VG 95 E 13 Hime Otebo P 102 M 11 Jet Black Black VG 113 L Seed Quality: 1 = good 5 = poor Mean Lodging: 1 = straight up 5 = flat C.V &- 1/2 the LSD of Yield PR > F LSD( n/a Maturity: <105=E, =M, >107= L Suitability for Direct Harvest <2.1=Excellent, =VeryGood, =Good, >4.0= Poor Site Summary Design: RCBD (nearest neighbour) Fertilizer: NPK, actual ppi Row Width: Narrow = 15 inch (37 cms) liquid actual at seeding (June 13) Number of Rows Per Plot: 6 Herbicide: ppi. Dual.7 L/ha Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 4 Herbicide: post Basagran Forte 1.75 L/ha, Reflex.58 L/ha (July 8) Plot Length: 6m. Planting Date: June 13 Harvest Length: 4m. Multiple Fungicide/Insecticides were applied during the Seeding Rate: 17 seeds / m. season to minimize distortions in the varietal differences Seed Treatment: CruiserMaxx 1.95 ml./1kg.seed Harvest Date: Oct. 8 Dynasty.2 ml./1kg.seed 29

30 09DVCAT Ontario Coloured Bean Variety Registration and Performance Major Thorndale Seed 100 Seed Treatment Market Treatment Yield Yield Quality Weight Days to Marsh Number Class Name Rank (kg/ha) (1-5) (g) Maturity Spot (%) 1 DRK Montcalm Check 2 DRK AC Calmont Check 3 DRK Red Hawk DRK OAC Redstar DRK OAC Derkeller DRK Majesty DRK OAC 07-6D DRK GTS DRK HR DRK SVS Average LRK AC Elk Check 12 LRK Red Kanner Check 13 LRK Pink Panther Check 14 LRK OAC Lyrik LRK OAC 06-L LRK OAC 07-L LRK HR LRK HR Average Cran Hooter Check 20 Cran Etna Check 21 Cran Red Rider Cran HR Cran HR Cran Messina Average 2153 Mean C.V PR > F LSD(0.05) Planting Date: June 5 Herbicide: 1 L/ha July 7 Harvest Dates: September 11 & 18 Fungicide: 0.4 L/ha July 30 Yields adjusted to 18 % moisture. Insecticide: Cygon 1.0 L/ha July 30 Seeding Rate 17 seeds / m Seed Quality: 1=good 5=poor Insecticide: CruiserMaxx 195 ml/100 kg of seed Design: Nearest Neighbour Dynasty 20 g./100 kg of seed Number of Rows Per Plot: 2 Fertilizer: N 85 kg actual N / ha May 25 Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 2 Herbicide: Pursuit 200 ml/ha May 25 Plot Length: 5 metres Frontier 1.25 L/ha May 25 Harvest Length: 4 metres Prowl 2.5 L/ha May 25 30

31 09DVPAT Kidney and Cranberry Bean Preliminary Yield Trial Thorndale Seed 100 Seed Treatment Treatment Market Yield Yield Quality Weight Days to Marsh Number Name Class (kg/ha) Rank (1-5) (g) Maturity Spot (%) 1 Red Kanner LRK CORN 18-V96 LRK CORN 773-V98 LRK CORN 1062-V98 LRK Blush LRK Clouseau (SEM07146) LRK ADML LRK COB DRK USDK-CBB-15 DRK COB 419X-03 DRK ADMD DRK Majesty DRK filler (Black Jet) Black Etna Cran ADMC Cran ADMC Cran SEM0928 Cran SEM0929 Cran Capri Cran Crimson (BD 1003) Cran HR 168B Cran HR 167 Cran T9905 Navy Condor Black Merlot SRM Sedona Pink Beluga WK filler (ISB 519W) WK Erimo Adzuki Hime Otebo Fuji Otebo Peruano Yellow SEM0863 Yellow PT 99195MR Pinto AC Harosprout Mung MP 36 HDC Exp #1 Mung MP Messina Cran Mean C.V PR > F LSD(0.05) Planting Date: June 5 Herbicide: 1 L/ha July 7 Harvest Dates: September 11, 18 & 24 Fungicide: 0.4 L/ha July 30 Yields adjusted to 18 % moisture. Insecticide: Cygon 1.0 L/ha July 30 Seeding Rate 17 & 20 seeds / m Seed Quality: 1=good 5=poor Insecticide: CruiserMaxx 195 ml/100 kg of seed Design: Nearest Neighbour, removed Rep 1 in analysis Dynasty 20 g./100 kg of seed Number of Rows Per Plot: 2 Fertilizer: N 85 kg actual N / ha May 25 Number of Rows Harvested Per Plot: 2 Herbicide: Pursuit 200 ml/ha May 25 Plot Length: 5 metres Frontier 1.25 L/ha May 25 Harvest Length: 4 metres Prowl 2.5 L/ha May 25 31

32 Sand and Sandy Loam Strip Trial Objective Evaluate different bean types using a strip trial format. Sand and Sandy loam soils present unique challenges for growers. Upright top yielding varieties from the plot trials were selected for each DRK, Pinto, White, Black, Adzuki, Cranberry Type. A top yielding soybean variety was used for comparison between types. A mung bean variety was also included due to it s ability to deal well with the lighter ground. Variety trials have a more controlled environment with minimal disease, weed and insect pressure in order to minimize distortions. These strip trials will test the new variety under more field-like conditions. The two trials were stacked back to back with the soils changing from a sandy loam to a coarse sand. Background Cooperator: Mike Donnelly-Vanderloo Planting Date: May 28/2009 County: Middlesex Seeding Rate: 6 seeds/ft. Soil Type: Huron and Perth Clay Loam Row Width: 30 inch Tillage: No-Till Herbicides: Pre- Dual&Roundup, Post- Assure,Reflex&BasagranRival Soil Test: N/A Harvest Date: Sept 17 / 2009 Fertilizer Rate: lbs actual NPK Previous Crop: Corn Methods This trial was planted with a JD air seeder with a variety in each unit. Each strip was approx. 200 feet in length centered off the head lands. Four reps. of 4 metres were cut and bagged. These bagged plants were spread out to dry, combined and analysed. A yield was calculated based on these weights. Results Sandy Loam General Comments: * there was a lot of white mold pressure on all the varieties however there seemed to be a lot of plant damage to the Etnas at harvest. * the Mung Beans stand was non existent on the loam soils due planting too deep * the Etna could have been harvested earlier to reduce some split pods. Sand General Comments: * the Mung Beans were relatively flat compared to the other types. * there was a considerable amount of very late maturing Erimo plants that did not yield. 32

33 Sandy Loam Yield Entry Entry Lbs Per Ac. No. Name (18.0% moisture) 1 Dark Red Kidney (Majesty) 2159 d 2 Mung Bean (HDC #1) n/a 3 Pinto (La Paz) 3368 a 4 White (T9905) 2934 b 5 Black (Black Jet) 2475 cd 6 Adzuki (Erimo) 2077 d 7 Soybean (S10-B7) 2664* c 8 Cranberry (Etna) 2304 d LSD (P=.05) 399 CV 10.4 Grand Mean 2592 Treatment Prob(F) 0.00 Sandy Soil Yield Entry Entry Lbs Per Ac. No. Name (18.0% moisture) 1 Dark Red Kidney (Majesty) 1411 b 2 Mung Bean (HDC #1) 714 c 3 Pinto (La Paz) 1994 a 4 White (T9905) 2016 a 5 Black (Black Jet) 1740 a 6 Adzuki (Erimo) 783 c 7 Soybean (S10-B7) 1909* a 8 Cranberry (Etna) 1379 b LSD (P=.05) 308 CV 13.9 Grand Mean 1508 Treatment Prob(F) 0.00 * standard moisture was set at 13% Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL. 33

34 Cranberry Dry Bean Strip Trial Objective Evaluate the new cranberry type dry bean variety Crimson (BS 1003) in a strip trial format. Etna was used as the standard for comparison. In previous Preliminary Yield variety Trials Crimson has yielded consistently among the top varieties. Variety trials have a more controlled environment with minimal disease, weed and insect pressure in order to minimize distortions. These strip trials will test the new variety under more field like conditions. Background Cooperator: Brad Martin Planting Date: June County: Middlesex Seeding Rate: 69,000 seeds/ac. Soil Type: Sandy Loam Row Width: 30 inch Tillage: Ploughed, cultivated 2x Herbicides: Pre Treflan,Eptam,Pursuit Fertilizer Rate: lbs actual NPK Harvest Date: hand harvested Oct 15 Previous Crop: Corn Methods A White 6100 planter units was used to plant the the Crimson strips within the field of Etnas. Four representative random samples were hand harvested, bagged and threshed with an Almaco 40 plot combine. Results Cool and wet conditions throughout the growing season provided excellent conditions for white mold. While the yields were excellent considering the year the seed quality suffered. The harvested seed was also appraised by a grader from Cooks and seemed to follow the Seed Quality rating in the chart below. Crimson had higher pick and lower seed quality however the seed quality was still acceptable. Martin Strip Trial Entry Name YIELD (cwt) 100 seed wt (g.) Pick % Seed Quality* Etna 14.9 b 70.9 b 14 b 2.9 a Crimson 16.2 a 75.6 a 18 a 3.3 a LSD (P=.05) CV Grand Mean Treatment Prob(F) Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P=.05, LSD) Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL. *Seed Quality (1-5, 1= excellent and 5 = small, discoloured and/or shriveled seed coat) 34

35 White Bean Dry Bean Strip Trial Objective Evaluate two new white dry bean varieties Medalist and Reliant in a strip trial format. Thunder was used as the standard for comparison. In previous Variety Trials these two new varieties have yielded consistently among the top varieties. Variety trials have a more controlled environment with minimal disease, weed and insect pressure in order to minimize distortions. These strip trials will test the new variety under more field-like conditions. Background Cooperator: Marwood Willis Planting Date: June 14/2009 County: Huron Seeding Rate: 172,500 plants/ac. Soil Type: Huron and Perth Clay Loam Row Width: 15 inch Tillage: Ploughed, cultivated 2x Herbicides: PPI Pursuit&Rival Soil Test: N/A Harvest Date: Sept 25 / 2009 Fertilizer Rate: lbs actual NPK and 1.22 Previous Crop: Soybeans of Zinc Methods This trial was planted with a JD 8300 with every other unit plugged. Each strip was.55 acres in size centered off the head lands. The strips were harvested using a JD 6600 and placed in totes. These totes were taken and weighed at the local Kirkton Cooks. A yield was calculated based on these weights. Pick numbers determined by the graders is also included. Results Early in the growing season Thunder emerged the quickest with excellent early vigour. There were no obvious height differences by July. Cool and wet conditions throughout the growing season provided conditions excellent for white mold and anthracnose. The Thunder and Reliant seemed to be the hardest hit of the three varieties for White Mold. The final yield numbers (see table 1) show a large clear advantage for Thunder. Table #1 Kirkton White Bean Strip Trial Variety Moisture Pick Yield Name (%) (lbs/ac.) Thunder Medalist Reliant Average

36 Visual Quality Survey Summary (Black Bean Varieties) Variety Company/Gov./ University Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Overall Colour Colour Shape Size Dullness Shiney 1 COOP00044 (Loreto) AmeriSeed ######## ***** * **** *** 2 COOP05222 AmeriSeed #### **** ** ** 3 CORN Cornell ######## * **** ***** 4 Eclipse NDSSD ####### ** * * 5 Condor MSU ###### * *** **** 6 Black Velvet Seminis ######### ** ** ** ***** 7 ADMB (Shania) ADM ######### * **** ***** ** 9 MSUB04554 (Zorro) MSU ######## *** * * **** 10 COB Gen-Tec #### ** * ** ** 11 Blackjack 1 Gen-Tec ####### * ** ***** ***** 12 Jet Black Patterson (Idaho Bean) ##### ** * * selected in the top 10 by 8 or more elevators # indicates the number of elevators (HDC, Cooks, Patterson's Elevator,Fieldcrest) that had the variety in their top 10 list (max ########) for 2007,2008 & 2009 * indicates an elevator had the variety in their top 5 for that criteria 1 Blackjack was the top variety in 2007 rated #1 for colour,size and shape however in 2008 & 2009 due strictly to it's purple hue (evident at Blyth as well) it was near the bottom. Determining whether the purple hue of the black was a 1 year in 3 or 5 or 10 year event will only become evident with data from multiple years. Note: This data is a summary of only 3 years from 1 location. The Kippen location has a clay loam based soil with the plots were planted in 15 inch rows (1 seed every 2 inches) which may or may not influence visual quality. This framework provides one part of an initial evaluation of varieties for the Preliminary Yield Trials. 36

37 Visual Quality Survey Summary (Cran. Bean Varieties) Variety Company/Gov./ University Ranking Ranking Ranking Ranking Overall Colour Colour Size White Red 1 Hooter Seminis ###### ** ***** ****** 2 HR AAFC Harrow #### *** *** ****** 3 HR B AAFC Harrow ######## ******** ******* ********* 4 HR (Red Rider) SeCan ## ** *** 5 filler (Messina) Rogers 6 filler (October) SSE ######### ******** ****** **** 7 Etna 1 Seminis ###### ****** ** *** 8 ADMC ADM ###### ***** ****** ** 9 ADMC ADM 10 Capri MSU * *** 11 BD 1003 (Crimson) Basin Seeds ### ** ** ** selected in the top 10 by 6 or more elevators # indicates the number of elevators (HDC, Cooks,,Fieldcrest,Harrow Research Station) that had the variety in their top 10 list for * indicates an elevator had the variety in their top 5 for that criteria 1 Etna was a top variety in 2008 &2009 rated among the top varieties for colour,size and shape however in 2007 the early maturing varieties (eg.etna ) could not rebound from early season drought conditions. Determing whether this was a 1 year in 3 or 5 or 10 year event will only become evident with data from multiple years Etna in the past been known for it's higher visual seed quality. Note: This data is a summary of only 3 years from 1 location. The Kippen location has a clay loam based soil with the plots were planted in 30 inch rows (1 seed every 2.7 inches) which may or may not influence visual quality. This framework provides one part of an initial evaluation of varieties for the Preliminary Yield Trials. 37

38 Summary of 2008 & 2009 Navy Bean Varieties Visual Ranking Variety Company/Gov./ University Ranking Overall Thunder Lightning Rex OAC Dublin (05-2) OAC 06-2 OAC 07-2 OAC 07-3 OAC 07-4 OAC 09-1 OAC 09-2 OAC 09-3 OAC 09-4 AC Compass Nautica AC Mast AC Cruiser HR HR HR HR HR HR Vista Reliant Viscount Gts 544 Gts 564 T9905 T9903 T10303 T10501 T10601 HY4181 T10307 Cirrus MSUN05324 COOP01054 (HMS Medalist) COOP02084 COOP03019 COOP COOP ADM ADM COB Avalanche ADMN ADMN SEM1010 OAC(SeCan) OAC(HDC) OAC(GCBC) OAC(Bolton&Rosebank) OAC OAC OAC OAC OAC OAC OAC OAC Cook's SeCan Advantage HDC AAFC AAFC AAFC AAFC AAFC AAFC Gentec Gentec Gentec Gentec Gentec Hyland Hyland Hyland Hyland Hyland Hyland Hyland Hyland MSU AmeriSeed AmeriSeed AmeriSeed AmeriSeed AmeriSeed ADM ADM Gen-Tec NDSU ADM ADM Seminis indicates the number of elevators (HDC, Cooks, W.G.Thompsons) that had the variety in their top list Note: This data is a summary of only 2 years from 1 location. The Kippen location has a clay loam based soil with the plots were planted in 15 inch rows (1 seed every 2.0 inches) which may or may not influence visual quality. This framework provides one part of an initial evaluation of varieties for the Preliminary Yield Trials. 38

39 DRK Coloured Bean Varieties Summary Variety Company/Gov./ University Ranking Ranking Ranking Overall Colour Size Montcalm Public ## * AC Calmont GCBC # * Red Hawk Hyland ## * OAC Redstar OAC * OAC 05-D2 OAC ### * ** Majesty HDC ** OAC 07-D1 OAC # * * OAC 07-6D1 OAC # ** GTS 104 Gentec # * * HR AAFC Harrow * SVS-700 Hyland # * COB Gentec ### *** * COB Gentec #### *** * Fiero WSU ADM ADM ## * USDK-CBB-15 ARS #### *** * selected in the top 5 by 3 or more elevators 39

40 LRK Coloured Bean Varieties Summary Variety Company/Gov./ University Ranking Ranking Ranking Overall Colour Size AC Elk AAFC Harrow ## Red Kanner Hyland ### **** Pink Panther Seminis # * ** OAC Lyrik OAC # * * OAC 06-L1 OAC OAC 07-L1 OAC #### *** ** CORN 18-V96 Cornell ### ****** CORN 773-V98 Cornell # ** CORN 1062-V98 Cornell * * Blush WSU ##### *** *** SEM07146 (Clouseau) Seminis ## * **** selected in the top 5 by 3 or more elevators # indicates the number of elevators (HDC,WG Thompsons) that had the variety in their top 5 list * indicates an elevator had the variety in their top grouping 40

41 Top Level Varieties in the R&P and PYT Trials Type Trial Yields Visual Appraisals Thorndale Kippen Blyth Kippen LRK R&P OAC 07-L1 *** OAC 07-L1 *** OAC 07-L1 *** OAC 06-L1 *** PYT CORN 18-V96 ** CORN 18-V96 ** Red Kanner *** CORN 773-V98 ** ADML W Blush *** CORN 1062-V98 ** CORN 18-V96 *** ADML95138 W DRK R&P OAC 07-6D1 *** OAC 07-6D1 *** OAC Derkeller (05-D2) *** HR *** Majesty ** GTS104 ** OAC Derkeller (05-D2) ** PYT COB ** ADMD W COB *** COB *** USDK-CBB-15 *** CRAN R&P HR *** Hooter *** Hooter *** HR W HR * Etna *** HR B *** PYT Crimson (BD1003) *** Crimson (BD1003) *** ADMC *** ADMC ** October *** BLACK PYT Zorro *** Zorro *** Zorro *** COB ** COOP05222 *** Black Velvet *** Loreto (COOP00044) ** Black Velvet *** Loreto (COOP00044) *** Black Velvet ** COB ** Shania *** Shania ** Loreto (COOP00044) ** CORN *** COOP05222 ** Shania ** White R&P OAC 7-2 *** AC Compass *** OAC Compass *** Thunder *** OAC Thunder ** Thunder *** OAC 07-3 ** OAC Rex ** OAC Dublin (05-2) ** Reliant ** AC Mast ** HR ** OAC Dublin (05-2) * OAC Dublin (05-2) ** GTS 544 * GTS # 564 * AC Cruiser ** T9905 * Lightning * T9903 * T10303 * OAC 07-3 * T10307 * OAC 09-4 * PYT HMS Medalist ** HMS Medalist *** Avalanche * ***-- excellent variety over a number of years ** -- excellent variety over a more limited number of years * -- above average variety over a number of years W---- excellent for only one year 41

42 PMR REPORT # SECTION J: CEREAL, FORAGE, AND OILSEED CROPS CROP: Edible beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), cv. OAC Rex, T9905, Red Hawk, Etna NAME AND AGENCY: GILLARD C L, DEPUYDT, D and WILLIS, S. Ridgetown College, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, Ontario, N0P 2C0 Tel: (519) Fax: (519) cgillard@ridgetownc.uoguelph.ca TITLE: EVALUATION OF QUADRIS AND HEADLINE TO INCREASE YIELDS WHEN DISEASE PRESSURE IS NOT PRESENT WITH AND WITHOUT DEFOLIATION DAMAGE IN DRY EDIBLE BEANS AT THE HURON RESEARCH STATION 2009 MATERIALS: CRUISER MAXX BEANS 288 FS (thiamethoxam+ metalaxyl-m + fludioxonil, 22.61% + 1.7% %); HEADLINE (pyraclostrobin 100g ai/ha); QUADRIS 250 SC (azoxystrobin 125g ai/ha). METHODS: The seed for the experiments was treated with Cruiser Max Beans, at label rates, for protection against early season seedling diseases and insects. The experiment was planted June 1, 2009 using a four row conemounted planter mounted on a John Deere Max Emerge planter. The seeding rate was 20 seeds per metre of row for the white bean varieties and 17 seeds for the large seeded kidney and cranberry beans. An experimental unit contained 4 rows 0.75 m apart, 6 m in length, arranged in an RCBD design with 4 replications. All of the assessments and yields were obtained from a harvest area 4 m long and 2 rows wide. The experiment was divided into two that being either hailed or left untreated. The simulated hail was performed at the crops 1 st flower, and was accomplished with and Echo weed trimmer with string attachment the Headline/Quadris treatment was then applied the next day. All the hailed treatments were defoliated about 50%. The spray treatments were applied once during the growing season, when a single flower was present on the majority of plants in that variety. The experiments were hailed on July 28 th & sprayed on July 29th (58 DAP) for the Red Hawk and Etna and August 4 th and 5 th (65 DAP) for the white bean varieties. The spray was applied using a CO 2 pressurized sprayer with a three Airbubble nozzles spaced at 50 cm, at 277 kpa (40 psi) in 200 L/ha water. The treatments were assessed for any disease and notes were made before harvest. The Etna experiments (non-hailed/hailed) were harvested on September 11 th and September 25 th. Red Hawks were harvested on September 15 th and the 25 th. The non-hailed T9905 were harvested on September 24 th with the remaining white bean experiments being harvested on October 8 th. Visual seed quality was determined using a scale of 1-5 (1 = excellent seed quality, 5 = poor seed quality). Seed weight was determined by recording the weight of 100 randomly selected seed from each plot. Pick percentage (discoloured and/or misshapen seed) were calculated for each plot. Yield and seed weights were adjusted to the standard storage moisture of 18%. RESULTS: See Tables 1-8. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were seen in yield with or without the use of Headline or Quadris in combination with defoliating of the canopy in these eight experiments (Table 1-8). 42

43 Table 1. Headline/Quadris Evaluation White Beans (OAC Rex) - Huron Research Station, Exeter, Ontario Treatment G A/HA % V/V Seed Weight (g/100 seeds) Seed Quality Crop Assessment % Pick Yield (kg/ha) Yield Pick (kg/ha) 1 Untreated Check Headline (Half Rate) Headline (Full Rate) Quadris (Half Rate) Quadris (Full Rate) Mean C.V PR>F LSD (P=.05) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Table 2. Headline/Quadris Evaluation White Beans (OAC Rex) Hailed- Huron Research Station, Exeter, Ontario Treatment G A/HA % V/V Seed Weight (g/100 seeds) Seed Quality Crop Assessment % Pick Yield (kg/ha) Yield Pick (kg/ha) 1 Untreated Check Headline (Half Rate) Headline (Full Rate) Quadris (Half Rate) Quadris (Full Rate) Mean C.V PR>F LSD (P=.05) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 43

44 Table 3. Headline/Quadris Evaluation White Beans (T9905) - Huron Research Station, Exeter, Ontario Treatment G A/HA % V/V Seed Weight (g/100 seeds) Seed Quality Crop Assessment % Pick Yield (kg/ha) Yield Pick (kg/ha) 1 Untreated Check Headline (Half Rate) Headline (Full Rate) Quadris (Half Rate) Quadris (Full Rate) Mean C.V PR>F LSD (P=.05) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Table 4. Headline/Quadris Evaluation White Beans (T9905) Hailed- Huron Research Station, Exeter, Ontario Treatment G A/HA % V/V Seed Weight (g/100 seeds) Seed Quality Crop Assessment % Pick Yield (kg/ha) Yield Pick (kg/ha) 1 Untreated Check Headline (Half Rate) Headline (Full Rate) Quadris (Half Rate) Quadris (Full Rate) Mean C.V PR>F LSD (P=.05) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 44

45 Table 5. Headline/Quadris Evaluation Kidney Beans (Redhawk) - Huron Research Station, Exeter, Ontario Treatment G A/HA % V/V Seed Weight (g/100 seeds) Seed Quality Crop Assessment % Pick Yield (kg/ha) Yield Pick (kg/ha) 1 Untreated Check Headline (Half Rate) Headline (Full Rate) Quadris (Half Rate) Quadris (Full Rate) Mean C.V PR>F LSD (P=.05) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Table 6. Headline/Quadris Evaluation Kidney Beans (Redhawk) Hailed- Huron Research Station, Exeter, Ontario Treatment G A/HA % V/V Seed Weight (g/100 seeds) Seed Quality Crop Assessment % Pick Yield (kg/ha) Yield Pick (kg/ha) 1 Untreated Check Headline (Half Rate) Headline (Full Rate) Quadris (Half Rate) Quadris (Full Rate) Mean C.V PR>F LSD (P=.05) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 45

46 Table 7. Headline/Quadris Evaluation Cranberry Beans (Etna) - Huron Research Station, Exeter, Ontario Treatment G A/HA % V/V Seed Weight (g/100 seeds) Seed Quality Crop Assessment % Pick Yield (kg/ha) Yield Pick (kg/ha) 1 Untreated Check Headline (Half Rate) Headline (Full Rate) Quadris (Half Rate) Quadris (Full Rate) Mean C.V PR>F LSD (P=.05) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Table 8. Headline/Quadris Evaluation Cranberry Beans (Etna) Hailed- Huron Research Station, Exeter, Ontario Treatment G A/HA % V/V Seed Weight (g/100 seeds) Seed Quality Crop Assessment % Pick Yield (kg/ha) Yield Pick (kg/ha) 1 Untreated Check Headline (Half Rate) Headline (Full Rate) Quadris (Half Rate) Quadris (Full Rate) Mean C.V PR>F LSD (P=.05) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 46

47 TITLE: EVALUATION OF MARSH SPOT IN DRY EDIBLE BEANS VARIETY TRIALS 2009 (THORNDALE, KIPPEN, MONKTON, ELORA AND ST. THOMAS) CROP: PEST: Edible beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), cv. as per treatment Marsh Spot NAME AND AGENCY: GILLARD C L, WILLIS, S. and DEPUYDT, D Ridgetown College, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, Ontario, N0P 2C0 Tel: (519) Fax: (519) cgillard@ridgetownc.uoguelph.ca MATERIALS: CRUISER MAXX BEANS 288 FS (thiamethoxam+ metalaxyl-m + fludioxonil, 22.61% + 1.7% %) METHODS: Cranberry beans are prone to a disorder known as marsh spot, which discolours the interior of the cotyledon and can create marketing issues. Seed samples were collected from the Ontario Dry Bean Performance Trials to determine if any of the cranberry varieties are susceptible to Marsh Spot. These varieties were compared to Messina, a highly susceptible variety of cranberry beans, which was also seeded at each location. Seed was treated with DCT and Cruiser 5FS at registered rates, for protection against early season seedling diseases and insects. Five locations were planted across southern Ontario; Thorndale, Kippen, Monkton, Elora and St. Thomas. The experiments were part of the Ontario dry bean variety registration and performance trials. The experiments were arranged as a RCBD design with 4 replications. Samples of seed harvested from these experiments were sent to the Huron Research Station, and scored for marsh spot incidence and severity. Fifty seeds were split and each half was rated for marsh spot incidence. The percentage incidence was then calculated for each variety. If Marsh Spot was present, its severity was visually rated on a scale of one to five, using the standards found in Figure 1. RESULTS: See Tables 1-5. CONCLUSIONS: Marsh spot scores for cranberry bean varieties at the five locations are presented in Tables 1-5. Marsh spot occurred at each location, with the St. Thomas location having the highest incidence x severity (I x S) scores with a four fold increase over the next highest. HR was the same (4 locations) and significantly worst than Messina at Thorndale. had an average incidence of 11.9%, which was significantly worst than any other variety in all the trials. The commercial varieties of Etna and Hooter had consistently low marsh spot incidence except at the St. Thomas location. 47

48 Figure 1: Marsh Spot Severity Ratings 48

49 Table 1: Marsh Spot Analysis of Cranberry Bean Varieties from Thorndale, Ontario Marsh Spot Analysis Treatments Average Severity Incidence x Severity % Incidence (0 5) (0 5) 1 Hooter 0.8 b 0.6 b 0.01 cd 2 Etna 3.5 b 1.7 a 0.07 bc 3 Red Rider 0.3 b 0.3 b 0.00 d 4 HR b 0.0 b 0.00 d 5 HR a 1.9 a 0.40 a 6 Messina 4.0 b 1.9 a 0.09 b Mean C.V PR>F LSD(.05) Table 2: Marsh Spot Analysis of Cranberry Bean Varieties from Kippen, Ontario Marsh Spot Analysis Treatments Average Severity Incidence x Severity % Incidence (0 5) (0 5) 1 Hooter 0.0 c 0.0 b 0.00 b 2 Etna 0.5 bc 0.5 ab 0.00 b 3 Red Rider 0.3 c 0.3 b 0.00 b 4 HR c 0.0 b 0.00 b 5 HR ab 1.1 a 0.06 a 6 Messina 5.5 a 1.1 a 0.07 a Mean C.V PR>F LSD(.05)

50 Table 3: Marsh Spot Analysis of Cranberry Bean Varieties from Monkton, Ontario Marsh Spot Analysis Treatments Average Severity Incidence x Severity % Incidence (0 5) (0 5) 1 Hooter Etna Red Rider HR HR Messina Mean C.V PR>F LSD(.05) N/A N/A N/A Table 4: Marsh Spot Analysis of Cranberry Bean Varieties from Elora, Ontario Marsh Spot Analysis Treatments Average Severity Incidence x Severity % Incidence (0 5) (0 5) 1 Hooter 0.0 b 0.0 b 0.00 b 2 Etna 0.0 b 0.0 b 0.00 b 3 Red Rider 1.3 b 0.9 ab 0.03 b 4 HR b 0.3 b 0.00 b 5 HR a 1.6 a 0.10 a 6 Messina 5.0 a 1.6 a 0.08 a Mean C.V PR>F LSD(.05)

51 Table 5: Marsh Spot Analysis of Cranberry Bean Varieties from St. Thomas, Ontario Marsh Spot Analysis Treatments Average Severity Incidence x Severity % Incidence (0 5) (0 5) 1 Hooter 22.0 abc ab 2 Etna 20.5 bc ab 3 Red Rider 9.8 cd bc 4 HR d c 5 HR ab a 6 Messina 35.0 a a Mean C.V PR>F LSD(.05) 13.5 N/A

52 TITLE: EVALUATION OF MARSH SPOT IN DRY EDIBLE BEANS PRELIMINARY YIELD TRIALS 2009 (THORNDALE AND KIPPEN) CROP: PEST: Edible beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), cv. as per treatment Marsh Spot NAME AND AGENCY: GILLARD C L, WILLIS, S. and DEPUYDT, D Ridgetown College, University of Guelph, Ridgetown, Ontario, N0P 2C0 Tel: (519) Fax: (519) cgillard@ridgetownc.uoguelph.ca MATERIALS: CRUISER MAXX BEANS 288 FS (thiamethoxam+ metalaxyl-m + fludioxonil, 22.61% + 1.7% %) METHODS: Cranberry beans are prone to a disorder known as marsh spot, which discolours the interior of the cotyledon and can create marketing issues. Seed samples were collected from the Preliminary Yield Trials to determine if any of the varieties are susceptible to marsh spot. The varieties were compared to Messina, a highly susceptible variety of cranberry beans, which was also seeded at each location. Seed was treated with CRUISER MAXX BEANS at registered rates, for protection against early season seedling diseases and insects. The two Preliminary Yield Trial locations were Thorndale and Kippen. The experiments were arranged as a RCBD design with 4 replications. Samples of seed harvested from these experiments were sent to the Huron Research Station, and scored for marsh spot incidence and severity. Fifty seeds were split and each half was rated for marsh spot incidence. The percentage incidence was then calculated for each variety. If marsh spot was present, its severity was visually rated on a scale of one to five, using the standards found in Figure 1. RESULTS: See Tables 1-2 CONCLUSIONS: Marsh spot scores for the two locations are presented in Tables 1-2. Messina and to a lesser extent BD 1004 are considered susceptible checks for marsh spot. Marsh spot incidence was not considered high at these locations in At the Thorndale site (Table 1), Crimson had the highest (I x S) score followed by SEM0928, Messina and the remaining varieties. At the Kippen location, Crimson had the highest I x S score, followed by ADMC and Messina (Table 2). The remaining varieties had very low scores. 52

53 Figure 1: Marsh Spot Severity Ratings 53

EDIBLE BEAN AGRONOMY AND PEST MANAGEMENT RESEARCH RESULTS C.L. GILLARD S. WILLIS D. DEPUYDT

EDIBLE BEAN AGRONOMY AND PEST MANAGEMENT RESEARCH RESULTS C.L. GILLARD S. WILLIS D. DEPUYDT EDIBLE BEAN AGRONOMY AND PEST MANAGEMENT RESEARCH RESULTS 2006 C.L. GILLARD S. WILLIS D. DEPUYDT Table of Contents Acknowledgements. 3 Executive Summary 4 2006 Weather.. 8 Control of Anthracnose in Dry

More information

EDIBLE BEAN AGRONOMY AND PEST MANAGEMENT RESEARCH RESULTS C.L. GILLARD S. WILLIS D. DEPUYDT

EDIBLE BEAN AGRONOMY AND PEST MANAGEMENT RESEARCH RESULTS C.L. GILLARD S. WILLIS D. DEPUYDT EDIBLE BEAN AGRONOMY AND PEST MANAGEMENT RESEARCH RESULTS 2007 C.L. GILLARD S. WILLIS D. DEPUYDT Table of Contents Acknowledgements. 3 Executive Summary 4 2007 Weather.. 8 Control of Anthracnose in Dry

More information

At harvest the following data was collected using the methodology described:

At harvest the following data was collected using the methodology described: TITLE OF PROJECT: Processing standard sweet corn cultivar evaluations - Pillsbury 2006. NAME OF CONTRIBUTOR(S) AND THEIR AGENCY: J.W. Zandstra and R.C. Squire, University of Guelph, Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown,

More information

Influence of fungicides and cultivar on development of cavity spot of carrot.

Influence of fungicides and cultivar on development of cavity spot of carrot. Influence of fungicides and cultivar on development of cavity spot of carrot. Mary Ruth McDonald, Kevin Vander Kooi, Michael Tesfaendrias and Catarina Saude Muck Crops Research Station, Ontario, Canada

More information

WEED CONTROL IN SWEET CORN RESEARCH RESULTS 2006 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO PROCESSING VEGETABLE GROWERS

WEED CONTROL IN SWEET CORN RESEARCH RESULTS 2006 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO PROCESSING VEGETABLE GROWERS WEED CONTROL IN SWEET CORN RESEARCH RESULTS 2006 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO PROCESSING VEGETABLE GROWERS NOVEMBER 8, 2006 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Purpose Of This Booklet This

More information

NAME OF CONTRIBUTOR(S) AND THEIR AGENCY:

NAME OF CONTRIBUTOR(S) AND THEIR AGENCY: TITLE OF PROJECT: Evaluation of Topaz (propiconazole) for transplant size control and earlier maturity of processing tomato. NAME OF CONTRIBUTOR(S) AND THEIR AGENCY: J.W. Zandstra, Ridgetown College, University

More information

Alan Schreiber Agriculture Development Group, Inc. Tom Walters Walters Ag Research

Alan Schreiber Agriculture Development Group, Inc. Tom Walters Walters Ag Research New Products and Resistance Management Strategies for Mummy Berry and Botrytis in Conventional Blueberries Alan Schreiber Agriculture Development Group, Inc. Tom Walters Walters Ag Research Objectives

More information

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Highland Rim Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins, Barry Sims, Bill Pitt, and Steve C.

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Highland Rim Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins, Barry Sims, Bill Pitt, and Steve C. Performance of Pumpkin s, Highland Rim Experiment Station, 2000 Charles A. Mullins, Barry Sims, Bill Pitt, and Steve C. Bost Interpretative Summary All pumpkin cultivars were fairly productive. Gold Rush,

More information

CONTROL OF EARLY AND LATE BLIGHT I N TOMATOES, N. B. Shamiyeh, A. B. Smith and C. A. Mullins. Interpretive Summary

CONTROL OF EARLY AND LATE BLIGHT I N TOMATOES, N. B. Shamiyeh, A. B. Smith and C. A. Mullins. Interpretive Summary CONTROL OF EARLY AND LATE BLIGHT I N TOMATOES, 2001 N. B. Shamiyeh, A. B. Smith and C. A. Mullins Interpretive Summary Plots treated with BAS-500, BAS-510, and with alternated with Quadris had significantly

More information

Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary Performance of Fresh Market Snap Bean Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, 2000 Charles A. Mullins Interpretative Summary Most cultivars performed reasonably well in the trial, and had widely varying

More information

Assessment of Specialty Potatoes for Powdery Scab Resistance

Assessment of Specialty Potatoes for Powdery Scab Resistance Assessment of Specialty Potatoes for Powdery Scab Resistance Steven R. James and M. Isabel Vales Abstract Experiments were conducted to assess potential genetic resistance to powdery scab in specialty

More information

Angel Rebollar-Alvitar and Michael A. Ellis The Ohio State University/OARDC Department of Plant Pathology 1680 Madison Avenue Wooster, OH 44691

Angel Rebollar-Alvitar and Michael A. Ellis The Ohio State University/OARDC Department of Plant Pathology 1680 Madison Avenue Wooster, OH 44691 Evaluation of strobilurin fungicides (Abound and Cabrio), potassium phosphite ( ProPhyt ) and Ridomil Gold for control of leather rot of strawberry, caused by Phytophthora cactorum. Angel Rebollar-Alvitar

More information

Result Demonstration/Applied Research Report

Result Demonstration/Applied Research Report Result Demonstration/ Research Report Summary 2001 Tom Green County Cotton Harvest Aid Demonstration Cooperator: Chris Bubenik Rick Minzenmayer, Marvin Ensor, Marc Tucker, and Billy Warrick * Eleven harvest

More information

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS Emmalea Ernest & Gordon Johnson University of Delaware Research and Education Center 16483 County Seat Highway Georgetown, DE 19947 2017 2017 UNIVERSITY OF

More information

Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board January 11, Delaware Soybean Board

Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board January 11, Delaware Soybean Board Final Report to Delaware Soybean Board January 11, 2017 Delaware Soybean Board (susanne@hammondmedia.com) Effect of Fertigation on Irrigated Full Season and Double Cropped Soybeans Cory Whaley, James Adkins,

More information

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS Emmalea Ernest & Gordon Johnson University of Delaware Research and Education Center 16483 County Seat Highway Georgetown, DE 19947 2018 2018 UNIVERSITY OF

More information

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, 2000 Charles A. Mullins Interpretative Summary The pumpkin cultivars were highly productive, and fruit size was very large for most of the

More information

Spring Red and Savoy Cabbage Variety Evaluation 2013

Spring Red and Savoy Cabbage Variety Evaluation 2013 Spring Red and Savoy Cabbage Evaluation 2013 Chris Smigell, John Strang, Lucas Hanks, and John Snyder, Department of Horticulture; Pam Sigler, Program and Staff Development; and Elizabeth Buckner, Family

More information

Plant Population Effects on the Performance of Natto Soybean Varieties 2008 Hans Kandel, Greg Endres, Blaine Schatz, Burton Johnson, and DK Lee

Plant Population Effects on the Performance of Natto Soybean Varieties 2008 Hans Kandel, Greg Endres, Blaine Schatz, Burton Johnson, and DK Lee Plant Population Effects on the Performance of Natto Soybean Varieties 2008 Hans Kandel, Greg Endres, Blaine Schatz, Burton Johnson, and DK Lee Natto Natto soybeans are small (maximum of 5.5 mm diameter),

More information

Evaluation of desiccants to facilitate straight combining canola. Brian Jenks North Dakota State University

Evaluation of desiccants to facilitate straight combining canola. Brian Jenks North Dakota State University Evaluation of desiccants to facilitate straight combining canola Brian Jenks North Dakota State University The concept of straight combining canola is gaining favor among growers in North Dakota. The majority

More information

Aug (Dry Bean 2012 PRE) ARM Site Description Page 1 of 9 USDA - ARS. Broad Axe Trial on Pinto Bean General Trial Information

Aug (Dry Bean 2012 PRE) ARM Site Description Page 1 of 9 USDA - ARS. Broad Axe Trial on Pinto Bean General Trial Information Aug-12-14 (Dry Bean 2012 PRE) ARM 2014.2 Site Description Page 1 of 9 Investigator: Rick Boydston General Trial Information Trial Status: E established City: Prosser Country: USA United States State/Prov.:

More information

Performance of SE Sweet Corn Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary

Performance of SE Sweet Corn Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary Performance of SE Sweet Corn Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, 2002 A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins Interpretative Summary Most of the SE sweet corn cultivars performed well in the trial. Excellent

More information

varieties had marginally higher sucrose levels than Golden Jubilee (3.7 % vs 3.1 %) while the supersweet varieties had much

varieties had marginally higher sucrose levels than Golden Jubilee (3.7 % vs 3.1 %) while the supersweet varieties had much EVALUATION OF SUPERSWEET AND SUGARY-ENHANCED SWEET CORN AT ONTARIO C.C. Shock, D. Burnett, C. Burnett, and J. Zalewski Malheur Experiment Station, 0.S.U., Ontario, Oregon Summary Supersweet and sugary-enhanced

More information

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE BICOLOR FRESH MARKET VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE BICOLOR FRESH MARKET VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE BICOLOR FRESH MARKET VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS Emmalea Ernest and Gordon Johnson University of Delaware Carvel Research and Education Center 16483 County Seat Highway Georgetown, DE

More information

2013 Safflower Irrigation Research Results

2013 Safflower Irrigation Research Results 2013 Safflower Irrigation Research Results Presentation by L. Niel Allen Extension Irrigation Specialist Earl Creech, Clark Israelsen, Mike Pace Students Holly Kent and Phillip Castro Logan, Utah February

More information

Powdery Mildew Resistant Acorn-type Winter Squash Variety Evaluation, New York 2008

Powdery Mildew Resistant Acorn-type Winter Squash Variety Evaluation, New York 2008 Powdery Mildew Resistant Acorn-type Winter Squash Variety Evaluation, New York 2008 Margaret T. McGrath, Cornell University, Riverhead, NY 11901 George M. Fox, Cornell University, Riverhead, NY 11901 Sandra

More information

Results and Discussion Eastern-type cantaloupe

Results and Discussion Eastern-type cantaloupe Muskmelon Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2016 Wenjing Guan, Daniel S. Egel and Dennis Nowaskie Southwest Purdue Agricultural Center, Vincennes, IN, 47591 Introduction Indiana ranks fifth in 2015 in

More information

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary.

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins. Interpretative Summary. Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Plateau Experiment Station, 2002 A. Brent Smith and Charles A. Mullins Interpretative Summary The pumpkin cultivars were highly productive, but fruit size was less than

More information

2012 Organic Broccoli Variety Trial Results

2012 Organic Broccoli Variety Trial Results 2012 Organic Broccoli Variety Trial Results The following tables present the results of organic broccoli variety trials that took place on research stations and cooperating farms in Washington, Oregon,

More information

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Ames Plantation, Charles A. Mullins, Marshall Smith, and A. Brent Smith. Interpretative Summary

Performance of Pumpkin Cultivars, Ames Plantation, Charles A. Mullins, Marshall Smith, and A. Brent Smith. Interpretative Summary Performance of Pumpkin s, Ames Plantation, 2001 Charles A. Mullins, Marshall Smith, and A. Brent Smith Interpretative Summary The pumpkin cultivars were highly productive and fruit size was very large

More information

Trial Report: Cantaloupe Variety Evaluation 2015

Trial Report: Cantaloupe Variety Evaluation 2015 Trial Report: Cantaloupe Variety Evaluation 2015 Conducted by: Timothy Coolong PhD Department of Horticulture University of Georgia 2360 Rainwater Road Tifton, GA 31793 tcoolong@uga.edu Contents Table

More information

AMINOFIT.Xtra, SOME TEST RESULTS

AMINOFIT.Xtra, SOME TEST RESULTS FRUITS WALNUT CHERRY PLUM PEAR APPLE STRAWBERRY VEGETABLES ORNAMENTALS, SOME TEST RESULTS POTATO ONION TOMATO MELON LETTUCE BERMUDA GRASS ORCHID PELARGONIUM CHRYSANTHEMUM on WALNUT (Australia 23) DO YOU

More information

Midwest Cantaloupe Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2015

Midwest Cantaloupe Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2015 Midwest Cantaloupe Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2015 Wenjing Guan, Daniel S. Egel, and Dennis Nowaskie Southwest Purdue Agriculture Center, Vincennes, IN, 47591 Introduction Cantaloupe is one of

More information

Treatments protocol # Color Materials Timing FP/A Tol 1 W Untreated Y 2 OD Rovral 50WP

Treatments protocol # Color Materials Timing FP/A Tol 1 W Untreated Y 2 OD Rovral 50WP Cooperative Research Project, Doug Gubler, U.C. Davis Dept. of Plant Pathology Final report Trial name... Grape bunch rot fungicide trial, 00 Location... Valley Foothills Vineyard, Philo, Mendocino County,

More information

Tolerance of Arbequina Olives (Olea europaea Arbequina) to Mission Herbicide.

Tolerance of Arbequina Olives (Olea europaea Arbequina) to Mission Herbicide. Tolerance of Arbequina Olives (Olea europaea Arbequina) to Mission Herbicide. INTRODUCTION: The safety of flazasulfuron (Mission Herbicide) was evaluated on field grown olives (Olea europaea Arbequina).

More information

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS

UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS Emmalea Ernest & Gordon Johnson University of Delaware Research and Education Center 16483 County Seat Highway Georgetown, DE 19947 2015 2015 UNIVERSITY OF

More information

Annual Report for the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board

Annual Report for the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board Annual Report for the Pennsylvania Vegetable Research and Marketing Board Keeping PA Vegetable Growers Profitable: Statewide Cultivar Trials Elsa Sánchez, Associate Professor of Horticultural Systems Management

More information

Fungicide Control of Phomopsis Cane and Leaf Spot on Grapevine: 2015 Field Trial

Fungicide Control of Phomopsis Cane and Leaf Spot on Grapevine: 2015 Field Trial Fungicide Control of Phomopsis Cane and Leaf Spot on Grapevine: 2015 Field Trial W. Douglas Gubler, Trang T. Nguyen and Nicholas S. Morris Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis,

More information

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL

PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL PERFORMANCE OF SUPERSWEET CORN AND SWEET CORN VARIETIES FOLLOWING SEVERE HAIL Erik B. G. Feibert, Clinton C. Shock, and Monty Saunders Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, OR, 1998

More information

Fall Pepper Variety Evaluation

Fall Pepper Variety Evaluation Fall Pepper Evaluation Submitted by Monica Ozores-Hampton, Gene McAvoy, Chris Miller and Richard Raid University of Florida/SWFREC Palm Beach, FL February 6, 2015 Table 1. Summary of cultural practices

More information

Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Variety Evaluation, New York, 2009

Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Variety Evaluation, New York, 2009 Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Variety Evaluation, New York, 2009 Margaret T. McGrath, Cornell University, Riverhead, NY 11901 George M. Fox, Cornell University, Riverhead, NY 11901 Sandra Menasha,

More information

1

1 Niche Market Shell Bean Variety Trial Carol Miles, Liz Nelson, Lydia Garth, and Erin Klingler Washington State University, Vancouver Research & Extension Unit, 1919 NE 78 th Street, Vancouver, WA 98665

More information

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona Shawna Loper 1 and Jay Subramani 2 1 University of Arizona of Arizona Cooperative Extension, Pinal County 2 Maricopa Ag Center, University of Arizona Abstract

More information

2016 Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluations

2016 Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluations 2016 Ohio Sweet Corn Evaluations Michael L. Gastier, Ohio State University Extension, Huron County, Ohio Matthew Hofelich, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Fremont, Ohio Allen M. Gahler,

More information

Stone Fruit Protection Solutions

Stone Fruit Protection Solutions STONE FRUIT GUIDE Protection Solutions Bud burst Bloom Petal fall & Fruit drop Fruit sizing Ripening BC only Cherry only Products Available Apogee Cabrio Cantus Kumulus DF Poast Ultra Prowl H 2 O Plant

More information

Strawberry Variety Trial

Strawberry Variety Trial Strawberry Variety Trial 2016-17 JAYESH SAMTANI ASSISTANT PROFESSOR AND SMALL FRUIT EXTENSION SPECIALIST HAMPTON ROADS AREC VIRGINIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Samtani, Copyright 2017 2013-14 growing season

More information

Fungicide control of Phomopsis cane and leaf spot on grape: 2014 field trial

Fungicide control of Phomopsis cane and leaf spot on grape: 2014 field trial Fungicide control of Phomopsis cane and leaf spot on grape: 2014 field trial W. Douglas Gubler, Trang T. Nguyen and Nicholas S. Morris Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA

More information

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality Brian Jenks, John Lukach, Fabian Menalled North Dakota State University and Montana State University The concept of straight

More information

Foliar diseases: Citrus Canker and Citrus Black Spot

Foliar diseases: Citrus Canker and Citrus Black Spot Foliar diseases: Citrus Canker and Citrus Black Spot Megan M. Dewdney Associate Professor of Plant Pathology and Extension Specialist University of Florida, IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center CITRUS

More information

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality

Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality Effect of paraquat and diquat applied preharvest on canola yield and seed quality Brian Jenks, John Lukach, Fabian Menalled North Dakota State University and Montana State University The concept of straight

More information

Report of Progress 961

Report of Progress 961 Southwest Research Extension Center Report of Progress 96 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service K STATE Southwest Research-Extension Center efficacy

More information

2008 Kraut Cabbage Variety Evaluation

2008 Kraut Cabbage Variety Evaluation FINAL REPORT 2008 Kraut Cabbage Variety Evaluation Christy Hoepting 1, Katie Klotzbach 1 and Jim Ballerstein 2 1 Cornell Cooperative Extension Vegetable Program 2 Dept. of Horticulture, NYSAES Objectives:

More information

Walnut Blight Control Investigations 2004 (Xanthomonas campestris pv juglandis)

Walnut Blight Control Investigations 2004 (Xanthomonas campestris pv juglandis) Walnut Blight Control Investigations 2004 (Xanthomonas campestris pv juglandis) 5 101 Sa c ra m e nto Rive r 80 San Francisco Oakland 580 Sacramento YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK Stockton 680 Sunnyvale San Jose

More information

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas High Plains in 2000

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas High Plains in 2000 Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas High Plains in 2000 Brent Bean (806) 359-5401, b-bean@tamu.edu Calvin Trostle 1 (806) 746-4044, c-trostle@tamu.edu Matt Rowland,

More information

Trial Report: Yellow Squash and Zucchini Spring and Fall Variety Evaluation 2015

Trial Report: Yellow Squash and Zucchini Spring and Fall Variety Evaluation 2015 Trial Report: Yellow Squash and Zucchini Spring and Fall Variety Evaluation 2015 Conducted by: Timothy Coolong, PhD Department of Horticulture University of Georgia 2360 Rainwater Road Tifton, GA 31793

More information

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Early Post Emergence Efficacy

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Early Post Emergence Efficacy http://www.ir4project.org/about-environmental-horticulture/environmental-horticulture-researchsummaries IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Early Post Emergence Efficacy Authors: Kathleen Hester, Cristi

More information

THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES

THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES THE EFFECT OF SIMULATED HAIL ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF PUMPKINS AND TWO SQUASH VARIETIES Myrtle P. Shock, Clinton C. Shock, and Cedric A. Shock Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State Station Ontario, Oregon

More information

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FINAL REPORT FUNDING CYCLE

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FINAL REPORT FUNDING CYCLE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FINAL REPORT FUNDING CYCLE 2015 2017 TITLE: Can Pumpkins be Grown Competitively for Snack Seed Purposes in Malheur County? RESEARCH LEADER: William H. Buhrig COOPERATORS:

More information

Materials and Methods

Materials and Methods Objective OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY SEED LABORATORY SUMMIT SEED COATINGS- Caldwell ID Final Report April 2010 Effect of various seed coating treatments on viability and vigor of two blends of Kentucky bluegrass

More information

Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Cultivar Evaluation, New York 2007

Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Cultivar Evaluation, New York 2007 Powdery Mildew Resistant Zucchini Squash Cultivar Evaluation, New York 2007 Margaret T. McGrath, Cornell University, Riverhead, NY 11901 George M. Fox, Cornell University, Riverhead, NY 11901 Sandra Menasha,

More information

Spring Canola Variety Performance in Iowa 2007 Final Report

Spring Canola Variety Performance in Iowa 2007 Final Report Spring Canola Variety Performance in Iowa 2007 Final Report Lance Gibson, Mumtaz Cheema, and George Patrick Iowa State University Department of Agronomy Financial support provided by Iowa State University

More information

2013 Sunflower Variety Trial

2013 Sunflower Variety Trial 2013 Sunflower Variety Trial Dr. Heather Darby, UVM Extension Agronomist Hannah Harwood, Conner Burke, Erica Cummings, and Susan Monahan UVM Extension Crops and Soils Technicians (802) 524-6501 Visit us

More information

Niche Market Dry Bean Variety Trial Materials and Methods

Niche Market Dry Bean Variety Trial Materials and Methods Niche Market Dry Bean Variety Trial Carol A. Miles, Jennifer Wagner, Jenn Reed, Tracy Smith, Lydia Garth, Kathryn Kolker, and Gail Becker, Washington State University, Vancouver Research & Extension Unit,

More information

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona Jay Subramani 1 and Shawna Loper 2 1 Maricopa Ag Center, University of Arizona 2 University of Arizona Cooperative Extension, Pinal County Abstract Information

More information

WALNUT HEDGEROW PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2010

WALNUT HEDGEROW PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2010 WALNUT HEDGEROW PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2010 Carolyn DeBuse, John Edstrom, Janine Hasey, and Bruce Lampinen ABSTRACT Hedgerow walnut orchards have been studied since the 1970s as a high density system

More information

Seasonal Programs for Control of Turfgrass Diseases

Seasonal Programs for Control of Turfgrass Diseases Seasonal Programs for Control of Turfgrass Diseases Paul Koch, Tom Huncosky, Sam Soper, Ben Van Ryzin, and Dr. Jim Kerns Department of Plant Pathology University of Wisconsin - Madison OBJECTIVE To determine

More information

ALAN SCHREIBER AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. TOM WALTERS WALTERS AG RESEARCH

ALAN SCHREIBER AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. TOM WALTERS WALTERS AG RESEARCH How to Control Fungicide Resistant Botrytis in Raspberry ALAN SCHREIBER AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. TOM WALTERS WALTERS AG RESEARCH There is an important talk on grey mold resistance in raspberry

More information

Sunflower and Canola Production Issues Hans Kandel, NDSU Extension Agronomist

Sunflower and Canola Production Issues Hans Kandel, NDSU Extension Agronomist Sunflower and Canola Production Issues Hans Kandel, NDSU Extension Agronomist E-mail hans.kandel@ndsu.edu Canola Growth Stages 1. Seedling 2. Rosette 3. Bud 4. Flowering (Bloom) 5. Ripening Canola Production

More information

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY

PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY PROCESSING TOMATO VARIETY TRIAL SUMMARY - 2005 Stephen A. Garrison, 2 Thomas J. Orton, 3 Fred Waibel 4 and June F. Sudal 5 Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey 2 Northville Road, Bridgeton, NJ

More information

Report to the OSU Agricultural Research Foundation for the Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission

Report to the OSU Agricultural Research Foundation for the Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission 88 Report to the OSU Agricultural Research Foundation for the Oregon Processed Vegetable Commission Control and Management of Common Smut on Corn in the Columbia Basin of Oregon and Washington George Clough,

More information

Southwest Indiana Muskmelon Variety Trial 2013

Southwest Indiana Muskmelon Variety Trial 2013 Southwest Indiana Muskmelon Trial 2013 Shubin K. Saha 1 and Larry Sutterer 2 1 Vegetable Extension Specialist, Department of Horticulture, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40546 2 Agriculture Technician,

More information

Evaluation of Jalapeno, Big Chili, Poblano, and Serrano Chili Pepper Cultivars in Central Missouri

Evaluation of Jalapeno, Big Chili, Poblano, and Serrano Chili Pepper Cultivars in Central Missouri Evaluation of Jalapeno, Big Chili, Poblano, and Serrano Chili Pepper Cultivars in Central Missouri Steven Kirk, Catherin Bohnert, and David Johnson Lincoln University Cooperative Extension-Commercial Vegetable

More information

Processing Peach Cultivar Evaluations 2004 Progress Report

Processing Peach Cultivar Evaluations 2004 Progress Report Processing Peach Cultivar Evaluations 2004 Progress Report Cedar Springs Research Station Ridgetown College University of Guelph J.W. Zandstra G.J. Watt TITLE: PROCESSING PEACH CULTIVAR EVALUATION EXPERIMENT

More information

Powdery Mildew-resistant Melon Variety Evaluation, New York 2012

Powdery Mildew-resistant Melon Variety Evaluation, New York 2012 Powdery Mildew-resistant Melon Variety Evaluation, New York 2012 Margaret T. McGrath, Cornell University, Riverhead, New York Karen LaMarsh, Cornell University, Riverhead, New York Sandra Menasha, Cornell

More information

Cantaloupe Variety Trial for Kentucky, 2016

Cantaloupe Variety Trial for Kentucky, 2016 Cantaloupe Variety Trial for Kentucky, 2016 John Walsh, Shubin K. Saha, and John Snyder University of Kentucky, 1100 S. Limestone, N 318, Lexington, KY 40546 0091 shubin.saha@uky.edu Cantaloupe is the

More information

Berry Group Protection Solutions

Berry Group Protection Solutions BERRY GUIDE Berry Potato Group Protection Solutions Early - Late Green Tip Bud Swell - Bud Break Early Pink Bud Full Bloom Petal Fall Green Fruit 75% Blue Poast Ultra Herbicide Kumulus Cantus Nematac C

More information

Botrytis Control In Berries Key project cooperators

Botrytis Control In Berries Key project cooperators Botrytis Control In Berries Key project cooperators Alan Schreiber, Agriculture Development Group, Inc Jim Adaskaveg, University of California, Riverside Tom Walters, Walters Ag Research Steve Midboe,

More information

2014 Sunflower Variety Trial

2014 Sunflower Variety Trial 2014 Sunflower Trial Dr. Heather Darby, UVM Extension Agronomist Sara Ziegler, Erica Cummings, Susan Monahan, and Julian Post UVM Extension Crops and Soils Technicians (802) 524-6501 Visit us on the web

More information

2014 Agrium AT Fertilizer Trial Glen R. Obear and Bill Kreuser, Ph.D University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Objectives

2014 Agrium AT Fertilizer Trial Glen R. Obear and Bill Kreuser, Ph.D University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Objectives 2014 Agrium AT Fertilizer Trial Glen R. Obear and Bill Kreuser, Ph.D University of Nebraska-Lincoln Objectives The objective of this research was to quantify turf response to slow- and controlled-release

More information

Management of Resistance to Fungicides used for Botrytis Control in Berries

Management of Resistance to Fungicides used for Botrytis Control in Berries Management of Resistance to Fungicides used for Botrytis Control in Berries Tobin Peever David Dutton Olga Kozhar Dalphy Harteveld Adrian Alcocer Amreen Toor Funding: WBC WRRC WSCPR WSCBG BC Blueberry

More information

Double Crop Soybean Production System The Syngenta Story SW Ontario REWARD VS REAL RISK

Double Crop Soybean Production System The Syngenta Story SW Ontario REWARD VS REAL RISK Double Crop Soybean Production System The Syngenta Story SW Ontario REWARD VS REAL RISK Syngenta Canada Eric Richter, C.C.A., ASR February 10th, 2016 - Illinois Soybean Association Double Crop Soys Mt

More information

Report of Progress 945

Report of Progress 945 Southwest Research Extension Center Report of Progress 945 Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service K STATE Southwest Research-Extension Center EFFICACY

More information

2016 High Tunnel Tomato Variety Trials

2016 High Tunnel Tomato Variety Trials 216 High Tunnel Tomato Variety Trials Kansas State University Horticulture Research and Extension Center Olathe, Kansas Kimberly Oxley, Research Associate Cary Rivard, Extension Specialist www.hightunnels.org

More information

Soybean Production State Extension Conference

Soybean Production State Extension Conference Soybean Production 2018 State Extension Conference Rachel Vann 2018 Agronomic Research Update 2019 Research Portfolio Introduction/Agent Engagement Agronomic Program Team Update Soybean Yield Contest Update

More information

Searching for Fresh Pack Alternatives Through Economic and Taste Evaluations of Tri-State Varieties. RR Spear, MJ Pavek, ZJ Holden

Searching for Fresh Pack Alternatives Through Economic and Taste Evaluations of Tri-State Varieties. RR Spear, MJ Pavek, ZJ Holden Searching for Fresh Pack Alternatives Through Economic and Taste Evaluatio of Tri-State Varieties RR Spear, MJ Pavek, ZJ Holden The Dominant Fresh Variety: Russet Norkotah Product of North Dakota State

More information

2010 Winter Canola Variety Trial

2010 Winter Canola Variety Trial Winter Canola Variety Trial Dr. Heather Darby, Rosalie Madden, Amanda Gervais, Erica Cummings, Philip Halteman University of Vermont Extension (802) 524-6501 Winter Canola Variety Trial Dr. Heather Darby,

More information

Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station

Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station ANNUAL REPORT TO NE-183 Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station November 2003 Duane W. Greene, Jon M. Clements, Daniel R. Cooley, Wesley R. Autio, and Arthur F. Tuttle PROGRESS AND PRINCIPLE ACCOMPLISHMENTS

More information

Tomato Variety Observations 2009

Tomato Variety Observations 2009 Tomato Variety Observations 2009 Henry G. Taber, professor Department of Horticulture Introduction We continued our yearly evaluation of tomato varieties for commercial growers. Each year the major fruit

More information

Stella Maris on Wine Grapes. Spring, 2018

Stella Maris on Wine Grapes. Spring, 2018 Stella Maris on Wine Grapes Spring, 2018 Traditional Stella Maris wine programs have focused on improving cluster architecture, berry set, and yield. Wine Grape Benefits More recent, research has focused

More information

Sharpen up your pulses harvest result. Increase harvest efficiency and the value of the crop

Sharpen up your pulses harvest result. Increase harvest efficiency and the value of the crop Sharpen up your pulses harvest result Increase harvest efficiency and the value of the crop Extra efficiency and value at harvest Using Sharpen as a harvest aid in lentils and other pulse crops provides:

More information

K. S. Lawrence, J. Luangkhot, C.J Land, K. M. Glass, C.H. Burmester

K. S. Lawrence, J. Luangkhot, C.J Land, K. M. Glass, C.H. Burmester VII. Nematode Management Evaluation of Cotton Cultivars with and without Nematicides in the Presence and Absence of the Reniform Nematode K. S. Lawrence, J. Luangkhot, C.J Land, K. M. Glass, C.H. Burmester

More information

Recalibration for Sunflower

Recalibration for Sunflower Nitrogen and Phosphorus Recalibration for Sunflower Eric Schultz, MS Student, NDSU Dave Franzen, NDSU Extension Soil Specialist Current recommendations N rate = (0.05 x Yield potential) - N credits P recommendations

More information

Sweet corn insect management by insecticides in Ohio, 2015 Final report 12/31/2015

Sweet corn insect management by insecticides in Ohio, 2015 Final report 12/31/2015 Sweet corn insect management by insecticides in Ohio, 2015 Final report 12/31/2015 Celeste Welty, Associate Professor, Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University, Rothenbuhler Laboratory, 2501

More information

Merivon Xemium Brand Fungicide

Merivon Xemium Brand Fungicide BASF Product & Research Update Ag. Innovation Symposium, March 26, 2014 Merivon Xemium Brand Fungicide Sanjeev Bangarwa, Field Biologist Kate Walker, Tech Service Rep Sean Morelos, Business Rep Merivon

More information

Organic viticulture research in Pennsylvania. Jim Travis, Bryan Hed, and Noemi Halbrendt Department of Plant Pathology Penn State University

Organic viticulture research in Pennsylvania. Jim Travis, Bryan Hed, and Noemi Halbrendt Department of Plant Pathology Penn State University Organic viticulture research in Pennsylvania Jim Travis, Bryan Hed, and Noemi Halbrendt Department of Plant Pathology Penn State University Organic production in the US; 1 st national certified organic

More information

2009 SUNFLOWER INSECT PEST PROBLEMS AND INSECTICIDE UPDATE

2009 SUNFLOWER INSECT PEST PROBLEMS AND INSECTICIDE UPDATE 2009 SUNFLOWER INSECT PEST PROBLEMS AND INSECTICIDE UPDATE Janet Knodel 1, Larry Charlet 2, Patrick Beauzay 1 and Theresa Gross 2 1 NDSU, School of Natural Resource Sciences Entomology, Fargo, ND 2 USDA-ARS,

More information

Bell Pepper Cultivar Evaluation, 2017

Bell Pepper Cultivar Evaluation, 2017 Bell Pepper Cultivar Evaluation, 07 Chris Smigell, John Strang and John Snyder, University of Kentucky, Department of Horticulture, N-8 Ag Science Center North, Lexington, KY 06 jstrang@uky.edu Bell peppers

More information

THE THREAT: The disease leads to dieback in shoots and fruiting buds and an overall decline in walnut tree health.

THE THREAT: The disease leads to dieback in shoots and fruiting buds and an overall decline in walnut tree health. Taking Control of Botryosphaeria in California Walnut Orchards Summary THE ISSUES: Botryosphaeria, or Bot, is a fungal disease that spreads by spores that germinate and enter the tree through existing

More information

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas South Plains in 2001

Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas South Plains in 2001 Effect of Planting Date and Maturity Group on Soybean Yield in the Texas South Plains in 2001 Calvin Trostle, Extension Agronomy, Lubbock, (806) 746-6101, c-trostle@tamu.edu Brent Bean, Extension Agronomy,

More information

NASGA Strawberry Variety Evaluation Trials

NASGA Strawberry Variety Evaluation Trials NASGA 2018 Strawberry Variety Evaluation Trials JAYESH SAMTANI ASSISTANT PROFESSOR AND SMALL FRUIT EXTENSION SPECIALIST HAMPTON ROADS AREC VIRGINIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION Copyright, Samtani 2018 2013-14

More information