RESEARCH VESSEL SALMONID CPUE IN RELATION TO THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE SQUID DRIFTNET FISHERY

Similar documents
Report of the Norwegian 2008 survey for minke whales in the Small Management Area ES - Svalbard

Japan s s Position on Scientific Research Whaling

Use of Hatchery Fish to Recolonize Historically Productive Habitat in the Upper Cowlitz River Basin

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 1. When do Asian clams reproduce in Lake George? 2. How fast do Asian clams grow in Lake George?

COMPILATION AND SUMMARY OF COMMERCIAL CATCH REPORT FORMS USED IN THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS, 1974/75 TO 2004/05

Problem Set #3 Key. Forecasting

JAPAN

PEEL RIVER HEALTH ASSESSMENT

ALASKA SEAFOOD INSTITUTE JAPAN OFFICE

SOUTHERN BLUEFIN TUNA TRADE DATA: EXPLORATORY ANALYSES

Comparison of FY15 and FY16 Foodservice Program Budgets

QUARTELY MAIZE MARKET ANALYSIS & OUTLOOK BULLETIN 1 OF 2015

BRITISH COLUMBIA ANNUAL FISHERIES PRODUCTION SCHEDULE

Improving Capacity for Crime Repor3ng: Data Quality and Imputa3on Methods Using State Incident- Based Repor3ng System Data

Sebec Lake Association Meeting - 7/11/15

Silage Corn Variety Trial in Central Arizona

Institutional Structure and Profit Maximization in the Eastern Bering Sea Fishery for Alaska Pollock

Prey consumption and feeding habits of three baleen whale species in the western North Pacific (PICES / W3) Tsutomu TAMURA and Kenji KONISHI

A hypothesis on the migration pattern of J-stock common minke

Whale Meat Trade in East Asia: A Review of the Markets in 1997

Tsutomu TAMURA,Kenji KONISHI, Koji Matsuoka and Takashi Hakamada. The Institute of Cetacean Research

Fruit and Vegetables: Q1/2013

Optimization Model of Oil-Volume Marking with Tilted Oil Tank

SELECTION STUDIES ON FIG IN THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION OF TURKEY

Cetacean habitat distribution in the eastern Bering Sea

Economic Losses from Pollution Closure of Clam Harvesting Areas in Machias Bay

State of California THE RESOURCES AGENCY Department of Fish and Game,

Quality of western Canadian pea beans 2011

IDOT and Illinois Tollway Connecting Northern Illinois Over the Years. Clarita Lao, Illinois Tollway September 29, 2017

Cowlitz Fisheries and Watershed Science Annual Conference April 20, 2017

Problem Set #15 Key. Measuring the Effects of Promotion II

Figure 1: Quartely milk production and gross value

Title: Western New York Sweet Corn Pheromone Trap Network Survey

western Canadian flaxseed 2003

Cowlitz Fisheries and Watershed Science Annual Conference June 21, 2018

Labor Requirements and Costs for Harvesting Tomatoes. Zhengfei Guan, 1 Feng Wu, and Steven Sargent University of Florida

Monthly Economic Letter U.S. and Global Market Fundamentals

Marvin Butler, Rhonda Simmons, and Ralph Berry. Abstract. Introduction

Vintage 2008: Umpqua Valley Reference Vineyard Report

WORLDCHEFS APPROVED SCHOOL PROGRAMMES ELIGIBLE FOR FAST TRACK CERTIFICATION

PERFORMANCE OF HYBRID AND SYNTHETIC VARIETIES OF SUNFLOWER GROWN UNDER DIFFERENT LEVELS OF INPUT

SUBCHAPTER 4E - ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES TAX SECTION LICENSES

Health Effects due to the Reduction of Benzene Emission in Japan

Northern Europe DENMARK, FINLAND, IRELAND, SWEDEN, THE NETHERLANDS, UNITED KINDGDOM

Kentucky Grape and Wine Council Wholesaler Reimbursement Program Program Guidelines

COMMITTEE OF THE PROTOCOL REGARDING MILK FAT. Suspension of Minimum Prices for Butter and Anhydrous Milk Fat Monitoring of International Price Levels

International Journal Of Recent Scientific Research

Application of value chain to analyze harvesting method and milling efficiency in sugarcane processing

MONITORING WALNUT TWIG BEETLE ACTIVITY IN THE SOUTHERN SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY: OCTOBER 2011-OCTOBER 2012

November 9, Myde Boles, Ph.D. Program Design and Evaluation Services Multnomah County Health Department and Oregon Public Health Division

Illinois Asphalt Pavement Association. March 12, 2013

COLD STORAGE HOLDINGS OF FISH

Differences in cookie cutter shark-induced body scar marks between J and O stocks of common minke whales in the western North Pacific.

2018 U.S. Dry Bean and Chickpea Planting and Production Estimates August Dry Beans and Chickpeas, Planted Area (in hectares)

canadian seafood 3 oceans 2,000,000 lakes 1 place Fisheries Council of Canada Conseil Canadien des Pêches

Feeding habits of minke whales in Korean waters

Candidate Agreement. The American Wine School (AWS) WSET Level 4 Diploma in Wines & Spirits Program PURPOSE

Quality of western Canadian pea beans 2010

2014 PACIFIC NORTHWEST WINTER CANOLA VAREITY TRIAL REPORT. Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Pendleton, OR

Quality of western Canadian peas 2017

KOSHER CERTIFICATE. BLUEFISH (BLUEFISH, PEPPERED BLUEFISH) - Parve, Fish Kof-K symbol required KF379ZMSL3Z

Global Perspectives Grant Program

O4W1703APP780 WSET Diploma Online

Louisiana Crawfish Action Plan

Survey and Information Collection on Surimi Industry and catch data in Vietnam, June 2006

Managing Insect Pests of Ripening Grapes

SUMMER AVOCADO VARIETIES

There is no school from December 24 - January 1. Students will return for school on Wednesday, January 2.

Food Additive Produced by IAR Team Focus Technology Co., Ltd

Special Collections Division University of Washington Libraries Box Seattle, Washington, USA (206)

Walter A. Dahlstrom - 2/ ABSTRACT

Quality of western Canadian flaxseed 2012

MALBEC SYRAH/BONARDA CABERNET SAUVIGNON RED BLEND

MALBEC SYRAH/BONARDA CABERNET SAUVIGNON LIMITED EDITION RED BLEND

Public Oyster Shoal Survey - Spring 1992

Tridacna gigas Linnaeus, 1758

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING HOT LUNCH:

Shown are the top volume varieties of fresh grapes. Over 85 varieties are grown in California Blanc Seedless C Princess July November

CIRCLE The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement

IMPORTATION OF NELUMBO NUCIFERA

For the purposes of this page, this distribution arrangement will be referred to as a wine boutique and wine includes wine coolers.

MALBEC SYRAH/BONARDA CABERNET SAUVIGNON RED BLEND LIMITED EDITION TANNAT

MALBEC SYRAH/BONARDA CABERNET SAUVIGNON RED BLEND LIMITED EDITION TANNAT

OVERSEEDING EASTERN GAMAGRASS WITH COOL-SEASON GRASSES OR GRASS- LEGUME MIXTURES. Abstract

OREGON WINE COUNTRY PLATES TOURISM PROMOTION DISTRIBUTION GUIDELINES

PROMOTION OF EXTRACTION OF GREEN TEA CATECHINS IN WATER EXTRACTION AT LOW TEMPERATURE USING ULTRASOUND. Hitoshi Koiwai, Nobuyoshi Masuzawa

Plums. Sources: consumer/plums.html and harvestofthemonth.com/download/summer/ Plums/Plums_Edu.

MBA 503 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric

Quality of Canadian oilseed-type soybeans 2016

Flowering and Fruiting Morphology of Hardy Kiwifruit, Actinidia arguta

Diseases Of Raspberries And Blackberries (Farmers' Bulletin / United States Department Of Agriculture) By B. O Dodge

2012 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox, Phil Atkins, and Mike Davis Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Slade Gorton Monthly Market Report January 2018

Purpose/Objective: Monitor and provide information on pre-spawning and spawning Delta Smelt distribution in the upper San Francisco Estuary.

Final Report. TITLE: Developing Methods for Use of Own-rooted Vitis vinifera Vines in Michigan Vineyards

New England Middle Atlantic Region

MARKET NEWSLETTER No 111 December 2016

2011 NEW YORK STATE SOYBEAN VARIETY YIELD TESTS. William J. Cox and Phil Atkins Dep. of Crop and Soil Sciences

Early Mid Late. ANY REMAINING CATCH CROPS: Lettuce, Arugula, Tatsoi, Bok Choy, Broccoli Rabe, Kale, Chard, Peacock Broccoli

SINGAPORE. Summary Table: Import of Fresh fruits and Vegetables in Fresh fruit and Vegetables Market Value $000 Qty in Tons

Transcription:

NOT TO BE CITED BY FRI-UW-9 118 INPFC DOCUMENT NUMBER September 1991 RESEARCH VESSEL SALMONID CPUE IN RELATION TO THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE SQUID DRIFTNET FISHERY by Robert V. Walker FISHERIES RESEARCH INSTITUTE School of Fisheries College of Ocean and Fishery Sciences University of Washington Seattle, Washington 98195 Submitted to International North Pacific Fisheries Commission by the United States National Section September 1991 THIS PAPER MAY BE CITED IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER: Walker, R.V. 1991. Research vessel salmonid CPUE in relation to the northern boundary of the squid driftnet fishery. (INPFC Doc.) FRI-UW-9l 18. Fish. Res. Inst., Univ. Washington, Seattle. 7 pp.

RESEARCH VESSEL SALMONID CPUE IN RELATION TO THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE SQUID DRIFTNET FISHERY ABSTRACT Research vessel gilinet catch per unit effort (CPUE) from 1972-1989 is presented in tabular form for six salmonid species by latitude and month for easy comparison with the northern boundary of the Japanese high seas squid driftnet fishery. Because of bycatch of salmonids by high seas squid driftnet fisheries, the relative abundance of salmonids in and near the squid fishery area is of interest. This document presents salmonid catch per unit effort (CPUE) calculated from Japanese salmon and squid research vessels. The values are arranged by latitude and month so that CPUE can be compared with the northern boundary of the Japanese high seas squid driftnet fishery. Because the tables were prepared for general use by the Commission and the Sub-Committee on Salmon, no interpretation of the results is made. Gillnet catch data from 1972-1989 from Japanese salmon research vessels and from 1984-1989 from Japanese squid research vessels were used. Because of problems in the reporting of steelhead catches, only data from 1981-1989 were used for steelhead. Records for total giinet catch (Z999 records) were used for both effort and salmon catch tallies. Data were stratified by species, month, 1 latitude from 39 N to 54 N, and two longitudinal regions (170 E-170 W and 170 W-145 W) corresponding to the western and eastern fishery regions which have different northern boundaries in July and August. Data are presented for six (June-November) of the seven months in which the fishery operates. No research vessel operations were conducted in the fishery area in December, but very little fishing takes place in that month. CPUE was calculated as total catch for each species divided by total number of tans fished in each stratum and is expressed in the tables as catch per tan for each species. The calculations are presented by species in Tables 1-6. AC KNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the Fisheries Agency of Japan for providing research vessel catch data over the years and for permitting its use for this report. Dr. Robert Burgner and Kate Myers provided the inspiration and impetus for analyzing the data and presenting it in this form. I thank Rebecca Bernard for creating the finished tables for this document. Funding for the analysis was provided through contract No. 5OABNF100027 of the Alaska Fisheries Science Center of the National Marine Fisheries Service.

Table 1. Driftnet effort in tans and mean catch of sockeye salmon per tan in combined sampling of Japanese salmon (1972-89) and squid (1984-1989) 54 4241 1.2846 2879 0.4908 257 0.0506 53 6452 1.6386 1069 0.4051 255 0.0196 52 4317 2.3831 1694 2.0697 60 0.9833 51 5681 2.1516 14823 2.4936 1007 2.9583 410 0.9780 50 15281 1.2362 24326 2.5002 1450 1.5386 150 0.7333 49 12573 0.8486 15444 0.8987 732 0.5232 370 0.2054 48 9649 0.7474 11717 0.2756 2680 0.0507 180 0.0278 47 11341 0.6702 13173 0.0420 1546 0.0039 46 11603 0.4789 12901 0.0127 1005 0.0070 180 0.0000 45 13132 0.2414 16910 0.0039 824 0.0000 184 0.0163 44 12015 0.0777 6974 0.0000 522 0.0000 120 0.0000 200 0.0000 43 12399 0.0135 6200 0.0000 751 0.0000 120 0.0000 84 0.0000 42 9062 0.0000 3250 0.0000 913 0.0000 220 0.0000 41 1721 0.0000 3283 0.0000 717 0.0000 40 1052 0.0000 2442 0.0000 717 0.0000 39 1454 0.0000 1429 0.0000 291 0.0000 54 1231 2.9058 775 3.1961 53 406 1.2143 687 1.8617 52 292 0.2945 637 2.3093 51 90 0.8889 1002 2.2395 50 90 0.7444 742 1.0148 49 90 0.2667 476 0.5483 48 935 0.4235 473 0.3340 47 650 0.2323 219 0.0091 392 0.0204 46 654 0.1927 300 0.2333 897 0.0000 180 0.0000 45 752 0.0372 319 0.0721 797 0.0000 159 0.0000 59 0.0000 44 545 0.0000 675 0.0000 699 0.0000 159 0.0000 43 692 0.0014 769 0.0000 496 0.0000 42 90 0.0000 1075 0.0000 598 0.0000 338 0.0000 41 774 0.0000 298 0.0000 40 399 0.0000 200 0.0000 39 94 0.0000 673 0.0000

Table 2. Driftnet effort in tans and mean catch of chum salmon per tan in combined sampling of Japanese salmon (1972-89) and squid (1984-1989) 54 4241 0.5659 2879 2.2237 257 4.3619 53 6452 0.6787 1069 1.3134 255 0.8039 52 4317 1.4807 1694 0.7143 60 1.1500 51 5681 1.3603 14823 1.3894 1007 0.7309 410 1.2976 50 15281 0.9872 24326 1.1017 1450 0.7524 150 0.4600 49 12573 1.2337 15444 1.0772 732 1.5082 370 0.7378 48 9649 1.4503 11717 1.0857 2680 0.8407 180 0.5667 47 11341 1.2345 13173 0.9547 1546 1.0705 46 11603 0.9079 12901 0.9573 1005 0.4766 180 0.7611 45 13132 0.7984 16910 0.4895 824 0.3495 184 0.7880 44 12015 0.5337 6974 0.3797 522 0.0000 120 0.0000 200 0.0000 43 12399 0.3991 6200 0.4082 751 0.0093 120 0.0000 84 0.0000 42 9062 0.2373 3250 0.1178 913 0.0000 220 0.0000 184 0.000Q 41 1721 0.0889 3283 0.0064 717 0.0000 40 1052 0.0390 2442 0.0000 717 0.0000 39 1454 0.0000 1429 0.0000 291 0.0000 54 1231 1.3688 775 2.3665 53 406 0.8399 687 0.6638 52 292 0.7603 637 1.0157 51 90 1.5111 1002 0.9521 50 90 1.3889 742 0.6860 49 90 0.3667 476 0.6345 48 935 1.9455 473 0.6025 47 650 0.9462 219 0.4475 392 0.1122 46 654 0.8471 300 0.5633 897 0.1171 180 0.0056 45 752 0.6662 319 0.0345 797 0.0000 159 0.0000 59 0.0000 44 545 0.5284 675 0.1407 699 0.0200 159 0.0000 43 692 0.2731 769 0.1352 496 0.0000 42 90 0.1222 1075 0.0000 598 0.0000 338 0.0000 41 774 0.0000 298 0.0000 40 399 0.0000 200 0.0000 39 94 0.0000 673 0.0000

Table 3. Driftnet effort in tans and mean catch of pink salmon per tan in combined sampling of Japanese salmon (1972-89) and squid (1984-1989) 54 4241 0.7461 53 6452 1.7480 52 4317 1.51 19 51 5681 2.3167 50 15281 2.1315 49 12573 2.0394 48 9649 1.7061 47 11341 1.3397 46 11603 1.1300 45 13132 0.7690 44 12015 0.4565 43 12399 0.2421 42 9062 0.1321 41 1721 0.0070 40 1052 0.0000 39 1454 0.0000 2879 1.7690 1069 0.1085 1694 0.0945 14823 2.0907 24326 0.9795 15444 0.79 19 11717 0.6004 13173 0.3329 12901 0.2097 16910 0.0984 6974 0.0612 6200 0.0066 3250 0.0412 3283 0.0052 2442 0.0000 1429 0.0000 257 0.0156 255 0.0000 60 0.0167 1007 0.1092 1450 0.0379 732 0.0027 2680 0.0343 1546 0.0142 1005 0.0010 824 0.0000 522 0.0000 751 0.0013 913 0.0000 717 0.0000 717 0.0000 291 0.0000 410 0.0634 150 0.0000 370 0.0027 180 0.0000 180 0.0000 120 0.0000 120 0.0000 220 0.0000 184 0.0109 200 0.0000 84 0.0000 54 1231 0.0739 53 406 0.2143 52 292 0.5925 51 90 4.9778 50 90 1.9667 49 90 3.0333 48 935 0.8406 47 650 0.3846 46 654 0.1560 45 752 0.7074 44 545 0.0569 43 692 0.2500 42 90 0.0222 41 100 0.0200 40 100 0,0000 39 94 0.0000 775 1.0026 687 1.0277 637 0.9513 1002 1.8912 742 0.7938 476 0.3319 473 0.0550 219 0.0046 300 0.0100 319 0.0000 675 0.0015 769 0.0000 1075 0.0009 774 0.0000 399 0.0000 673 0. 0000 392 0.0000 897 0.0000 797 0.0000 699 0.0000 496 0.0000 598 0.0000 298 0.0000 200 0.0000 159 0.0000 159 0.0000 338 0.0000 180 0.0000 59 0.0000

Table 4. Driftnet effort in tans and mean catch of coho salmon per tan in combined sampling of Japanese salmon (1972-89) and squid (1984-1989) 54 4241 0.0000 53 6452 0.0017 52 4317 0.0002 51 5681 0.0014 50 15281 0.0016 49 12573 0.0041 48 9649 0.0037 47 11341 0.0151 46 11603 0.6049 45 13132 1.0135 44 12015 1.2481 43 12399 1.3986 42 9062 1.1634 41 1721 0.3114 40 1052 0.0675 39 1454 0.0103 2879 0.0132 1069 0.0075 1694 0.0579 14823 0.3935 24326 0.5487 15444 1.2066 11717 1.3289 13173 1.1841 12901 0.9147 16910 0.8859 6974 0.5149 6200 0.2303 3250 0.0831 3283 0.0244 2442 0.0000 1429 0.0000 257 0.0000 255 0.0000 60 0.0500 1007 0.9643 1450 0.4234 732 0.2432 2680 1.1836 1546 1.2678 1005 0.0756 824 0.2330 522 0.0000 751 0.0000 913 0.0011 717 0.0000 717 0.0000 291 0.0000 410 0.0610 150 0.0133 370 0.0081 180 0.0000 180 0.0056 120 0.0000 120 0.0000 220 0.0000 184 0.0272 200 0.0000 84 0.0000 54 1231 0.0008 53 406 0.0000 52 292 0.0000 51 90 0.0000 50 90 0.0000 49 90 0.0000 48 935 0.0160 47 650 0.0354 46 654 0.1621 45 752 0.5612 44 545 0.2202 43 692 0.5780 42 90 0.4556 41 40 39 94 0.0000 775 687 637 1002 742 0.3 226 0.4294 0.5165 0.6737 0.8167 476 0.2920 473 0.1755 219 0.7260 300 0.2000 319 0.0094 675 0.0133 769 0.4603 1075 0.0000 774 0.0000 399 0.0000 673 0.0000 392 0.0179 897 0.0022 797 0.0000 699 0.0014 496 0.0000 598 0.0000 298 0.0000 200 0.0000 159 0.0000 159 0.0000 338 0.0000 180 0.0056 59 0.0000 Ui

Table 5. Driftnet effort in tans and mean catch of chinook salmon per tan in combined sampling of Japanese salmon (1972-89) and squid (1984-1989) 54 4241 0.0384 2879 0.0865 257 0.0272 53 6452 0.0580 1069 0.0384 255 0.0000 52 4317 0.0917 1694 0.0325 60 0.0667 51 5681 0.0123 14823 0.0385 1007 0.0427 410 0.0024 50 15281 0.0083 24326 0.0358 1450 0.0814 150 0.0067 49 12573 0.0099 15444 0.0757 732 0.0273 370 0.0027 48 9649 0.0104 11717 0.1037 2680 0.0425 180 0.0000 47 11341 0.0346 13173 0.0791 1546 0.0259 46 11603 0.0472 12901 0.0391 1005 0.0040 180 0.0000 45 13132 0.0483 16910 0.0235 824 0.0000 44 12015 0.0282 6974 0.0050 522 0.0000 120 0.0000 200 0.0000 43 12399 0.0120 6200 0.0027 751 0.0000 120 0.0000 84 0.0000 42 9062 0.0029 3250 0.0006 913 0.0000 220 0.0000 184 0,0000 0 41 1721 0.0000 3283 0.0003 717 0.0000 40 1052.0.0000 2442 0.0000 717 0.0000 39 1454 0.0000 1429 0.0000 291 0.0000 54 1231 0.0171 775 0.0077 53 406 0.0025 687 0.0262 52 292 0.0000 637 0.0942 51 90 0.0111 1002 0.0509 50 90 0.0000 742 0.0189 49 90 0.0000 476 0.0126 48 935 0.0064 473 0.0085 47 650 0.0108 219 0.0091 392 0.0000 46 654 0.0138 300 0.0167 897 0.0000 180 0.0000 45 752 0.0186 319 0.0000 797 0.0000 159 0.0000 59 0.0000 44 545 0.0000 675 0.0000 699 0.0000 159 0.0000 43 692 0.0043 769 0.0000 496 0.0000 42 90 0.0000 1075 0.0000 598 0.0000 338 0.0000 41 774 0.0000 298 0.0000 40 399 0.0000 200 0.0000 39 94 0.0000 673 0.0000

Table 6. Driftnet effort in tans and mean catch of steelhead per tan in combined sampling of Japanese salmon (1981-89) and squid (1984-1989) research vessels between 39 N and 54 N, 170 E and 145 W. Horizontal bars denote monthly northern fishery boundary. 54 1064 0.0000 2083 0.0010 53 1216 0.0000 264 0.0000 52 920 0.0000 132 0.0000 51 1613 0.0000 4334 0.0039 50 3234 0.0000 8832 0.0125 49 2782 0.0004 2581 0.0174 48 2469 0.0061 3023 0.0761 1648 0.0540 47 2751 0.0273 3837 0.0792 652 0.0414 46 2502 0.0492 5176 0.0864 310 0.0290 180 0.0000 45 3801 0.0760 5147 0.0800 565 0.0195 44 3419 0.0904 3865 0.0401 397 0.0000 120 0.0000 200 0.0000 43 3600 0.0822 4764 0.0065 526 0.0000 120 0.0000 84 0.0000 42 2419 0.0570 2651 0.0019 690 0.0000 220 0.0000 41 1160 0.0043 2855 0.0000 591 0.0000 40 574 0.0000 2308 0.0000 591 0.0000 39 1016 0.0000 1001 0.0000 194 0.0000 54 220 0.0000 645 0.0992 53 110 0.0000 557 0.0969 52 637 0.1319 51 872 0.1950 50 742 0.3598 49 346 0.3208 48 345 0.0986 47 219 0.1918 392 0.0051 46 300 0.0733 897 0.0022 180 0.0000 45 100 0.0800 319 0.0282 797 0.0013 159 0.0000 59 0.0000 44 675 0.0119 699 0.0000 159 0.0000 43 200 0.0100 500 0.0000 496 0.0000 42 0.0000 1075 0.0000 598 0.0000 338 0.0000 41 774 0.0000 298 0.0000 40 399 0.0000 200 0.0000 39 94 0.0000 673 0.0000