CAFFEINE AND CALORIE CONSUMPTION AT A COLLEGE CAMPUS COFFEE CAFÉ

Similar documents
Caffeine and Theobromine Intakes of Children: Results From CSFII , 1998

Menu Labeling Evaluation

Chicken Usage Summary

FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH SOFT DRINK CONSUMPTION IN PRESCHOOL-AGED CHILDREN IN SRI LANKA.

STUDY REGARDING THE RATIONALE OF COFFEE CONSUMPTION ACCORDING TO GENDER AND AGE GROUPS

How caffeine affect college students mentality?: I-Search Research Process

FML Tackling Obesity: Determining the role of the food and drink industry in communicating facts about sugar: orange juice as a case study

Dietary intake of caffeine. EFSA STAKEHOLDERS MEETING ON THE SAFETY OF CAFFEINE Brussels, 5 March 2015

US Chicken Consumption. Presentation to Chicken Marketing Summit July 18, 2017 Asheville, NC

RESULTS OF THE MARKETING SURVEY ON DRINKING BEER

Awareness, Attitude & Usage Study Executive Summary

ICC September 2018 Original: English. Emerging coffee markets: South and East Asia

Problem. Background & Significance 6/29/ _3_88B 1 CHD KNOWLEDGE & RISK FACTORS AMONG FILIPINO-AMERICANS CONNECTED TO PRIMARY CARE SERVICES

Drink Journal PREPARATION 4-7. Sugary Drinks Extension Activity. Sugary Drinks USED BY:

An Examination of operating costs within a state s restaurant industry

1) What proportion of the districts has written policies regarding vending or a la carte foods?

RESEARCH UPDATE from Texas Wine Marketing Research Institute by Natalia Kolyesnikova, PhD Tim Dodd, PhD THANK YOU SPONSORS

How Much Sugar Is in Your Favorite Drinks?

Caffeine and its Effect on College Students Caffeine has become a staple part of many people s daily diet. Caffeine is found in many

ASSESSING THE HEALTHFULNESS OF FOOD PURCHASES AMONG LOW-INCOME AREA SHOPPERS IN THE NORTHEAST

Leverage the Rising Sustainability Wave

Can You Tell the Difference? A Study on the Preference of Bottled Water. [Anonymous Name 1], [Anonymous Name 2]

Step 1: Prepare To Use the System

The Economic Impact of the Craft Brewing Industry in Maine. School of Economics Staff Paper SOE 630- February Andrew Crawley*^ and Sarah Welsh

New study says coffee is good for you

Characteristics of Wine Consumers in the Mid-Atlantic States: A Statistical Analysis

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BEER TOURISM IN KENT COUNTY, MICHIGAN

Veganuary Month Survey Results

A Study on Consumer Attitude Towards Café Coffee Day. Gonsalves Samuel and Dias Franklyn. Abstract

The University of Georgia

PUBLIC HEALTH BRIEF 2011 UPDATE HEALTHIER CHOICES IN SCHOOL VENDING MACHINES: SURVEY RESULTS FROM MAHONING COUNTY SCHOOLS

AIC Issues Brief. The Availability and Cost of Healthier Food Items Karen M. Jetter and Diana L. Cassady 1. Agricultural Issues Center

Using Standardized Recipes in Child Care

DATA AND ASSUMPTIONS (TAX CALCULATOR REVISION, MARCH 2017)

Questions and Answers about Smart Snacks in School

Hamburger Pork Chop Deli Ham Chicken Wing $6.46 $4.95 $4.03 $3.50 $1.83 $1.93 $1.71 $2.78

Directions for Menu Worksheet. General Information:

Directions for Menu Worksheet ***Updated 9/2/2014 for SY *** General Information:

The College has attained Fairtrade status and is committed to ensuring its continuity through the standards set out by the Fairtrade Foundation.

Red Wine and Cardiovascular Disease. Does consuming red wine prevent cardiovascular disease?

Consumer study on fruit - In depth interviews -

Investigation 1: Ratios and Proportions and Investigation 2: Comparing and Scaling Rates

Fleurieu zone (other)

Wine Purchase Intentions: A Push-Pull Study of External Drivers, Internal Drivers, and Personal Involvement

Investigation 1: Ratios and Proportions and Investigation 2: Comparing and Scaling Rates

SA Winegrape Crush Survey Regional Summary Report 2017 South Australia - other

LEVEL: BEGINNING HIGH

The Grocer : Soft Drinks Research on behalf of The Grocer April 2018

Mischa Bassett F&N 453. Individual Project. Effect of Various Butters on the Physical Properties of Biscuits. November 20, 2006

The Grocer: Food-to-go Research on behalf of The Grocer October 2018

Sodium and Healthy Hearts

Adelaide Plains Wine Region

Wine Clusters Equal Export Success

MANGO PERFORMANCE BENCHMARK REPORT

CHAPTER I BACKGROUND

Food Allergy Community Needs Assessment INDIANAPOLIS, IN

Challenges in Fluid Milk Consumption. October 25, 2017

THE EXPECTANCY EFFECTS OF CAFFEINE ON COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE. John E. Lothes II

Slide 1. Slide 2. A Closer Look At Crediting Fruits. Why do we credit foods? Ensuring Meals Served To Students Are Reimbursable

CENTER TRT EVALUATION PLAN. Kaiser Permanente Worksite Cafeteria Menu Labeling. Evaluation Plan:

North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Division of Public Health. November 25, 2013

A Profile of the Generation X Wine Consumer in California

Is Caffeine Really A Problem? Principles of Public Relations. Dr. John Fisher. Summer By: Jessica Eagen

CARBONATED SOFT DRINKS

Labor Supply of Married Couples in the Formal and Informal Sectors in Thailand

Produce Education Program 2015 Evaluation Report Comparison of Key Findings

Audrey Page. Brooke Sacksteder. Kelsi Buckley. Title: The Effects of Black Beans as a Flour Replacer in Brownies. Abstract:

2018 CONVENTION & TRADE SHOW CALL FOR POSTERS & ORAL PRESENTATIONS

BNI of kinds of corn chips (descriptive statistics)

Bt Corn IRM Compliance in Canada

Observations of the Baka huntergatherers in two controlled foraging trips in the tropical rainforest of southeastern Cameroon

MyPlate The New Generation Food Icon

Drinking Smart: Your Health and Alcohol Consumption. Patient Workbook for Creating a Healthier Lifestyle

Size makes a difference. What do you get for the calories? Sports drinks and soft drinks

Is Fair Trade Fair? ARKANSAS C3 TEACHERS HUB. 9-12th Grade Economics Inquiry. Supporting Questions

Access to Affordable and Nutritious Food: Measuring and Understanding Food Deserts and Their Consequences

Year 8 Health Food Key Stage 3 Rationale September 2012 July 2013

Rosemead School District Nutrition Services Department MEAL COUNTING & COLLECTION PROCEDURES

FOR PERSONAL USE. Capacity BROWARD COUNTY ELEMENTARY SCIENCE BENCHMARK PLAN ACTIVITY ASSESSMENT OPPORTUNITIES. Grade 3 Quarter 1 Activity 2

To make wine, to sell the grapes or to deliver them to a cooperative: determinants of the allocation of the grapes

Power and Priorities: Gender, Caste, and Household Bargaining in India

Measuring household food waste The Spain experience

This is USDA s Non-Discrimination Statement and MUST be available in this format.

THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S.

DEVELOPMENT AND STANDARDISATION OF FORMULATED BAKED PRODUCTS USING MILLETS

Restaurant Management

Buying Filberts On a Sample Basis

A Comparison of X, Y, and Boomer Generation Wine Consumers in California

A FLOURISHING SUPPLY & BURGEONING CONSUMER INTEREST PRESENT AN OPPORTUNITY TO INNOVATE

MEMO CODE: SP , CACFP , SFSP Smoothies Offered in Child Nutrition Programs. State Directors Child Nutrition Programs All States

Debt and Debt Management among Older Adults

Primary Prevention of Food Allergies

ANALYSIS OF THE EVOLUTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF MAIZE CULTIVATED AREA AND PRODUCTION IN ROMANIA

Tofu is a high protein food made from soybeans that are usually sold as a block of

Consumer Perceptions: Dairy and Plant-based Milks Phase II. January 14, 2019

Perspective of the Labor Market for security guards in Israel in time of terror attacks

CCEI530B: Nutrition II: Nutrition and Food Service in the Childcare Setting Course Handout

Availability of Healthy Snacks in Stores Near Low-Income Urban, High-Income Urban, and Rural Elementary/Middle Schools

Wine Trends & the U.S. Consumer Laura Maniec, MS. CVRVV Conference January 10 th & 11 th 2013

Effects of Acai Berry on Oatmeal Cookies

Transcription:

Brief Report CAFFEINE AND CALORIE CONSUMPTION AT A COLLEGE CAMPUS COFFEE CAFÉ Jessica Sloan Kruger 1, Thomas Castor 1, Daniel J. Kruger 2 1 Health and Recreation Professions, University of Toledo, Toledo, USA. 2 School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. Jessica.Sloan2@rockets.utoledo.edu ABSTRACT Coffee and tea consumption has substantially increased among young adults in the United States across the past few decades, particularly on college campuses. In this study, we observed beverage purchases at a campus coffee shop across an academic term at a university in the Midwestern USA. Although results do not indicate a gender difference in average drink size, women consumed more calories and a greater proportion of daily-recommended calories on average than men did. Men consumed more caffeine on average than women did. Our project demonstrates how observational research methods can provide a better understanding of health issues in a college population. Keywords: Diet, coffee, caffeine, calories, college students. INTRODUCTION Coffee beverage providers are now nearly ubiquitous on North American academic campuses. These establishments serve beverages ranging from basic black coffee to specialty drinks that vary by franchise and location. Grigg (2002) found that within the past decade, coffee and other caffeinated beverages have become one of the most consumed beverage https://doi.org/10.22330/heb/311/074-083

types in the world, coffee only following that of soft drinks (and plain water) in the United States. About 89% of the adult US population is a caffeine consumer on any given day. An equal percentage of men and women ingests caffeine (Fulgoni, Keast, & Lieberman, 2015). The purpose of this study was to examine the consumption of caffeinated drinks at a university campus coffee beverage provider. The specialty coffee drinks frequently consumed today are considerably higher in calories than the basic coffee drinks most widely available in earlier times (The Nutrition Source, 2015). Starbucks has expanded rapidly; the chain opened nearly two stores per day between 1987 and 2007, with 11,563 stores total in the USA alone at the end of 2014 (Starbucks, 2015). According to the National Coffee Association Study (2015), people aged 18-39 were more likely then older consumers to purchase coffee out-of-home. Coffee drinks range from 5 to over 500 calories per beverage (Starbucks, 2015). A previous study found that college age women consumed an additional 186 kcal on days when they drank gourmet coffee beverages (GCB) (mean=2,017 ± 588; GCBs contributed 14% of energy and 12% of energy from fat to daily intake) than on non-gcb days (mean=1,831±530; p=.318) (Shields, Corrales, & Metallinos-Katsaras, 2004). The excess calories consumed in coffee beverages can increase the likelihood of obesity and other health issues (Lustig, Schmidt, & Brindis, 2012). Thus, coffee consumption is now an important aspect of students dietary behaviors. Many coffee beverages are also high in caffeine. For example, the average 16 ounce Starbucks coffee contains 320 milligrams of caffeine, which is roughly 10 times that of a 12 ounce can of Coca-Cola (34 mg of caffeine) (Coca-Cola Ingredients and Nutritional Information, 2014; Starbucks, 2015a). The average cup of coffee (8 fluid ounces or 237 milliliters) contains 95-200mg of caffeine (Mayo Clinic Staff, 2014a). Consuming more than 500 milligrams of caffeine a day can increase the likelihood of insomnia, nervousness, restlessness, irritability, stomach upset, tachycardia, and muscle tremors (Mayo Clinic Staff, 2014b). Overconsumption of calories and caffeine can increase the likelihood of serious health consequences. A recent study (2014) focusing on caffeine beverage intakes in the U.S. shows that caffeine intakes are slightly higher than what they were a decade ago. This study utilized a survey and diary of the beverages that people consumed and found that coffee is the largest contributor of beverage caffeine intake (Mitchell, Knight, Hockenberry, Teplansky, & Hartman, 2014). The study found that the mean daily caffeine intake from all beverages was 165 ± 1 mg for all ages combined. Caffeine intake was highest for people ages 50-64 years old (226 ± 2 mg/day)(mitchell et al., 2014). This study uses an observational approach to document and analyze the caffeine and calorie consumption of consumers at a campus coffee shop at a university in the Midwestern USA. Our purpose is to provide useful information using observational methods that will complement data from typical methods of research on health behaviors, such as self-report surveys. Survey results about food consumption are prone to recall bias, especially regarding complicated items such as specialty coffee drinks. Store records on sales of coffee beverages 75

are considered to be proprietary information, and thus are nearly impossible for researchers to obtain. The observational approach to record consumer-purchasing behavior has the added benefit of documenting consumer characteristics and additional relevant behaviors (e.g., using additives such as cream and sugar). We also explored if there were sex differences in consumption patterns. METHODS The University of Toledo s Institutional Review Board approved the study prior to the start of observations. Observations (N = 912 orders) were conducted at a Starbucks shop located within a student union at a university in the Midwestern USA. We conducted fifteen observation sessions, one-hour in duration, from 27 January 2015 to 5 May 2015. Observation sessions varied by time of the day and day of the week. During these observation sessions, the observers sat at a table that was approximately three meters from the counter where drink orders were announced by coffee shop employees and retrieved by the customer (See Figure 1). The observers had a clear view of the table where customers used additives such as cream and sugar. Orders were recorded when the observer heard the full order and observed the quantity of additives (e.g., three packets of sugar) added by the customer. If the order was unclear or not fully heard it was omitted from the data to ensure accuracy of the orders. Customer gender was recorded when the customer picked up the beverage. If a customer picked up more than one beverage the beverage order was not recorded, because the gender of the consumer could not be determined. This situation occurred only 5 times during the observation period. Two observers were present in 65% of sessions to verify accuracy of orders. The reviewers verified accuracy of orders by recording orders separately on a tracking sheet and then confirming with the other observer immediately following each observed purchase. A second check of the consistency between observers was completed at the time the information was entered into the statistical software. Observation logs were compared to ensure consistency and accuracy of the information. If the observers did not agree on the beverage the entry was not recorded. Observers believed they were able to determine and reached agreement on the gender of every subject. In accordance with Starbucks protocol, each order is verbally announced upon completion including whether there are any staff-provided additives (such as flavoring and whipped cream) or modifications to the standard recipe (extra syrup, double shots, and/or milk preference). Observers also documented whether customers added any additional cream or sugar, as well as customer gender. Nutritional information for each order was calculated based on information provided on the Starbucks website (Starbucks, 2015b). The Starbucks website has a comprehensive calorie calculator to accommodate their various ingredients, such as types of milk, syrup, whipped cream and other additives. Total calories were computed from the beverage's listed information and listed calories in beverage additives. The caffeine content of beverages is approximate. 76

Table 1. Examples of beverage calorie and caffeine amounts. Beverage Caffeine Calories S mores Frappuccino 75 500 Java Chip Frappuccino 110 470 Hot Chocolate 25 400 Carmel Macchiato 150 240 Caffé Americano 225 15 Coffee 330 5 Note: Values above are based on Grande sizes (16 fluid oz/473 ml), and specialty beverages being made with 2% milk and including whipped cream. We compared women and men's average drink size (in fluid ounces), calorie intake (in Calories), and caffeine intake (in mg) with independent-samples t-tests for continuous measures. We computed 95% confidence intervals for aggregate scores and effect sizes for gender differences. We converted observation dates into a continuous variable indicating the number of days since the beginning of the study and examined trends in calorie and caffeine consumption over time, separately for men and women with Pearson correlations. Figure 1. Field site for observations (Note: Observers were stationed three meters from the pick up location of the coffee, at the table circled on the right side in this photograph.) 77

RESULTS Women were the majority (69%) of customers at the Starbucks. Women and men did not differ in average drink size (16 fluid ounces), t(910) = 1.10, p =.271, d =.08 (See Figure 2 and 3). Men were more likely than women to add extra sugar (15% vs 4%, t(910) = 5.92, p <.001, d =.40), and cream (14% vs. 4%, t(910) = 6.06, p <.001, d =.40) to their drinks. Women consumed more calories on average than men did, accounting for added sugar or creamer, 253 vs. 224, t(910) = 2.56, p =.011, d =.18 (See Figure 4). Men consumed more caffeine on average than women did, 169 mg vs. 117 mg, t(910) = 6.02, p <.001, d =.41 (See Figure 4). Across observations, from mid-winter to late Spring 2015, average caffeine consumption declined for both men, r(279) = -.166, p =.005, and women, r(633) = -.140, p <.001 (See Figure 5). The average calorie intake increased for men, r(279) =.164, p =.006, but not for women, r(633) =.018, p =.654 (See Figure 6). Propor%on of beverages ordered 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Short 8oz Tall 12oz Grande 16oz Ven8 20oz Trenta 31oz Women Men Beverage Size Figure 2. Proportion of Beverage Orders by Size and Customer Gender 78

Figure 3. 95% Confidence interval of beverage size in fluid ounces by customer gender (Note: d =.08; ds of.20,.50, and.80 respectively represent small, medium, and large effects (Cohen, 1988)). Figure 4. 95% Confidence intervals of caffeine and calorie consumption by customer gender (Note: d =.41 for caffeine intake, d =.18 for calorie intake; ds of.20,.50, and.80 respectively represent small, medium, and large effects (Cohen, 1988)). 79

Figure 5. Mean caffeine intake by month Figure 6. Mean calorie intake by month 80

DISCUSSION Several studies have investigated caffeine consumption from energy drinks among college students (Attila & Çakir, 2011; Dillon et al.; Norton, Lazev, & Sullivan, 2011), but to our knowledge no previous study has focused on caffeine and calories from the consumption of coffee beverages. We found that women consumed a greater proportion of their recommended daily energy intake from coffee beverages than did men, 11.5% vs. 7.8%, based on the US Department of Health and Human Services estimated calorie needs for moderately active women and men ages 19-25 (the age range for most undergraduates at the university). In contrast, men consumed 33.8% of the recommended daily caffeine intake, compared to 23.4% for women. Previous studies have found consistent results that men consume greater quantities of caffeine than do women (Fulgoni, Keast, & Lieberman, 2015). Our results are also consistent with another study which found that male doctors bought significantly more coffees per person per year (128 (SD 140) v 86 (SD 86), t= 4.66, P<0.01) and twice as many espressos as female doctors (mean 27 (SD 46) v 10 (SD 19), t= 6.54, P<0.01) (Giesinger, Hamilton, Erschbamer, Jost & Giesinger, 2015). The proportions in our study are based on a single purchase, so individuals may have ingested additional calories and caffeine at other times of the day. Mitchell et al. (2014) examined overall caffeine consumption across age groups and calculated the average amount of caffeine consumed per day, including caffeine specifically consumed in coffee beverages. For 18-24 year olds (the average age of most college students) consumption averaged 60.1 ± 3.6 mg/day of caffeine (Mitchell et al., 2014). Our study found that people on a university campus were consuming twice this average daily amount of caffeine from one beverage, on average men consumed 169mg of caffeine per drink and women 117mg of caffeine per drink. This could represent a difference between the college students we observed and the Beverage Consumption Panel, utilize by Mitchell et al. (2014), which is a sample tailored to match U.S. Census demographic characteristics, or a difference based on methodologies, i.e. self-report vs. observational. Although selfreport surveys can assess multiple beverage purchases in one day, in contrast to our observation of one purchase, the lower self-reported caffeine consumption suggests that selfreported caffeine intake might not be accurate. The self-reported data relied on caffeine values in a list of general beverages; "coffee (e.g., specialty coffee drinks, iced coffee, brewed, instant, and decaffeinated coffee), tea (e.g., green tea, white tea and other varieties, iced tea)," and "most food and nutrient databases have limited brand specificity, particularly for coffee and tea," (Mitchell et al., 2014, p. 137). Over the course of the semester, women consumed less caffeine on average. Men's caffeine consumption dropped from January to March and then increased from March to May. These trends may in part be an artifact of seasonal differences in beverage availability and gender differences in preferences. Subjects are also experiencing more intense and longer periods of sunlight as the semester progresses, and thus may require less caffeine to stay alert. Additional evidence for the causal effect of the amount of sunlight would be generated if the reverse pattern were found during the Fall semester. 81

College students are also under pressure to be successful in their course work. Many feel that coffee is the magic elixir to yield high levels of productivity. Yet, few know the dangers of consuming too much caffeine per day. Interventions are needed to raise awareness regarding the high number of calories that coffee beverages may contain and/or the dangers of consuming too much caffeine. College students are especially vulnerable to obesity due to over consumption of calories, especially liquid calories. A media campaign could focus on increasing awareness about the number of calories in a coffee beverage and emphasize the need to observe the existing calorie counts. Along with increasing knowledge about simple ways to reduce calories, such as not adding whipped cream, selecting non-fat milk, and not adding additional syrups to beverages. LIMITATIONS As with any study, there are limitations. We only used one Starbucks location, on one campus in the Midwestern USA. It is unknown if people had more than one Starbucks beverage per day or other drinks with caffeine or calories. Our current research utilizes a combination of methodologies to address these limitations. The observations were also completed during the time that holiday beverages are available which could have possibly skewed the data. Furthermore, people are more likely to drink hot beverages when it is cold out, since the observations were completed during the winter months this could have inflated the number of beverages ordered. We used officially listed values for calorie content in coffee additives and were not able to control for individual variation in portion size. CONCLUSION Overall, we provided information on patterns of coffee beverage calorie and caffeine consumption in a university campus population. Our observational methods complement results from self-report survey studies. A combination of observational and survey methods may extend understanding of these issues even further. REFERENCES Attila, S., & Çakir, B. (2011). Energy-drink consumption in college students and associated factors. Nutrition, 27(3), 316-322. DOI Coca-Cola Ingredients and Nutritional Information. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.cocacolaproductfacts.com/en/coca-cola-products/coca-cola/ Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press. DOI Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture: Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Washington DC: HHS and USDA; 2005. 82

Dillon, P., Svikis, D., Pomm, D., Thacker, L., Kendler, K., & Dick, D. Understanding the buzz about energy drink use in college students. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 146, e267. DOI Fulgoni, V. L., Keast, D. R., & Lieberman, H. R. (2015). Trends in intake and sources of caffeine in the diets of US adults: 2001 2010. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 101(5), 1081-1087. DOI Giesinger, K., Hamilton, D. F., Erschbamer, M., Jost, B., & Giesinger, J. M. (2015). Black medicine: an observational study of doctors' coffee purchasing patterns at work. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 351, h6446. DOI Grigg, D. (2002). The worlds of tea and coffee: Patterns of consumption. GeoJournal, 57, 283-294. DOI Lustig, R. H., Schmidt, L. A., & Brindis, C. D. (2012). Public health: The toxic truth about sugar. Nature, 27-29. DOI Mayo Clinic Staff. (2014a, May 13). Caffeine content for coffee, tea, soda and more. Retrieved from http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/indepth/caffeine/art-20049372 Mayo Clinic Staff. (2014b, April 14). Caffeine: How much is too much? Retrieved from http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/indepth/caffeine/art-20045678 McIlvain, G. E., Noland, M. P., & Bickel, R. (2011). Caffeine consumption patterns and beliefs of college freshman. American Journal of Health Education, 42, 235-244. DOI Mitchell, D. C., Knight, C. A., Hockenberry, J., Teplansky, R., & Hartman, T. J. (2014). Beverage caffeine intakes in the U.S. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 63, 136-142. DOI National Coffee Association. (2015). http://www.ncausa.org/ National coffee drinking trends 2005. New York. Norton, T. R., Lazev, A. B., & Sullivan, M. J. (2011). The buzz on caffeine: Patterns of caffeine use in a convenience sample of college students. Journal of Caffeine Research, 1(1), 35-40. DOI Shields, D. H., Corrales, K. M., & Metallinos-Katsaras, E. (2004). Gourmet coffee beverage consumption among college women. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 104(4), 650-653. DOI Starbucks. (2015a). Nutrition. Retrieved from http://www.starbucks.co.uk/blog/archive/nutrition Starbucks. (2015b). Explore our Menu. Retrieved from http://www.starbucks.com/menu/catalog/product?drink=brewedcoffee#view_control=nutrition The Nutrition Source. (2015, August 26). Healthy Beverage Guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/nutrition-news/ Wardana, G. A., Irwadi, I., & Soetjipto, H. (2014). Effect of coffee drinks to the reaction time of 18-22 years old male university students. Folia Medica Indonesiana, 50, 48-51. 83