GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: R40106

Similar documents
GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: TL0101

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: O50106

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS - GC PROFILING

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: CLO105

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: L50109

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: F80104

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: R10104

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: CL0106

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: LM0100

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: CC0104

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: BH0102

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: EG0101

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: P40106

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: TL0103

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: B50105

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: L40103

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: H20103

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: S30103

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: CF0108

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: CA0101

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: E10106

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: P40105

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: S40102

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: CF0106

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: CE0104

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: H90101

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: H20105

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: PJ0100

Alexis St-Gelais, M. Sc., chimiste

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: CD0103

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: LU0100

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: Y50101

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: SB5100

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION ANALYSIS. Date : December 1, 2016

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: G40105

Alexis St-Gelais, M. Sc., chimiste

Customer: Hemp Traders Type: Oil Instrument: UPLC-PDA-MS Submitted: 06/20/17

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: TK0105

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS - GC PROFILING

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS - GC PROFILING

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: W10104

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS - GC PROFILING

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS - GC PROFILING

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: PJ0103

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS - GC PROFILING

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS GC PROFILING

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: F30105

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS - GC PROFILING

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: PJ0102

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS - GC PROFILING

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS - GC PROFILING

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS - GC PROFILING

Essential Validation Services

Essential Validation Services

Essential Validation Services

Essential Validation Services

No adulterants, diluents, or contaminants were detected via this method. Conforms to 10/12 Iso Norms

Essential Validation Services

No adulterants, diluents, or contaminants were detected via this method. Total Italidione level 4-5%.

No adulterants, diluents, or contaminants were detected via this method.

No adulterants, diluents, or contaminants were detected via this method.

No adulterants, diluents, or contaminants were detected via this method. Conforms to ranges found in the literature. Extra caution should be taken

Essential Validation Services

Juniperus communis var. kelleyi, a new variety from North America

Comparison of volatile oils of Juniperus coahuilensis in fresh seed cones vs. cones in fresh gray fox scat

Extraction of Essential Oil from Citrus junos Peel using Supercritical Carbon Dioxide

Re-examination of the volatile leaf oils of Juniperus flaccida, J. martinezii, and J. poblana

CHEMOSYTEMATICS OF JUNIPERUS: EFFECTS OF LEAF DRYING ON ESSENTIAL OIL COMPOSITION III

Chemical and Aroma Profiles of Yuzu (Citrus junos) Peel Oils of Different Cultivars

CHEMOSYTEMATICS OF JUNIPERUS: EFFECTS OF LEAF DRYING ON ESSENTIAL OIL COMPOSITION II ABSTRACT

Composition of the essential oils of Pinus nigra Arnold from Turkey

Character Impact Odorants of Citrus Hallabong ([C. unshiu Marcov C. sinensis Osbeck] C. reticulata Blanco) Cold-pressed Peel Oil

GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN THE LEAF ESSENTIAL OILS OF JUNIPERUS GRANDIS (CUPRESSACEAE) II. ABSTRACT

THE BREWING VALUE OF HOPS HOP & BREW SCHOOL A UG 29 S EPT 1, 2017, Y AKIMA

Geographic variation in volatile leaf oils (terpenes) in natural populations of Helianthus annuus (Asteraceae, Sunflowers)

Research Article Chemical Composition of Essential Oil from the Peel of Chinese Torreya grandis Fort

Comparison of Peel Components of Sweet lime (Citrus limetta Risso) Obtained using Cold-press and Hydrodistillation Method

The volatile leaf oils of three Juniperus communis varieties from Bulgaria

Volatile constituents of cultivated Origanum vulgare L. inflorescences and leaves

Essential Oil Extraction OilExTech 2013

The effects of rootstock on the flower components of Clementine Mandarin (Citrus clementina)

Comparison of leaf components of sweet orange and sour orange (Citrus sp.)

GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN THE LEAF ESSENTIAL OILS OF JUNIPERUS OSTEOSPERMA (CUPRESSACEAE) II.

2014 Maxwell Scientific Publication Corp. Submitted: December 18, 2013 Accepted: December 28, 2013 Published: June 10, 2014

FOOD QUALITY CONTROL USING PEPTIDE BASED GAS SENSOR ARRAYS

Little Things That Make A Big Difference: Yeast Selection. Yeast selection tasting

Influence of Rootstock on Essential Oil Composition of Mandarins

Brittany M. Xu, George L. Baker, Paul J. Sarnoski, and Renée M. Goodrich-Schneider

High concrete and ester containing Jasmine species (Jasminum malabaricum Wight)

T. Praet, F. van Opstaele, B. de Causmaecker, G. Bellaio, G. de Rouck, G. Aerts and L. de Cooman

Alphonso is the most popular and most exported mango [Mangifera indica L.

Comparison of intensely sweet volatile leaf oils of Lippia dulcis (Verbenaceae) with low and high camphor from Brazil and Mexico

Safety Assessment of Citrus Flower- and Leaf-Derived Ingredients as Used in Cosmetics

FLAVOR CHARACTERIZATION OF THREE MANDARIN CULTIVARS (SATSUMA, BODRUM, CLEMANTINE) BY USING GC/MS AND FLAVOR PROFILE ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES ABSTRACT

Essential Oils of Phoebe angustifolia Meisn., Machilus velutina Champ. ex Benth. and Neolitsea polycarpa Liou (Lauraceae) from Vietnam #

Correspondence should be addressed to Khalijah Awang;

Tyler Trent, SVOC Application Specialist; Teledyne Tekmar P a g e 1

Quantitative Measurement of Sesquiterpenes in Various Ginger Samples by GC-MS/MS

Hops. Philippe Lefèvre Yakima Chief

Essential oil composition variability among natural populations of Pinus mugo Turra in Kosovo

Transcription:

GC/MS BATCH NUMBER: R40106 ESSENTIAL OIL: ROSEMARY BOTANICAL NAME: ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS ORIGIN: TUNISIA KEY CONSTITUENTS PRESENT IN THIS BATCH OF ROSEMARY OIL % 1,8-CINEOLE + LIMONENE 45.5 α-pinene 13.2 CAMPHOR 12.3 β-pinene 5.0 CAMPHENE 4.8 BORNEOL 4.1 β-caryophyllene 3.3 α-terpineol 2.0 MYRCENE 1.4 Comments from Robert Tisserand: Beautiful fresh, green-woody quality. Twelve of thirteen key ISO constituents are within range, with limonene uncertain from the lab report. 510 2nd St S. Twin Falls, ID 83301 * 800-917-6577 * planttherapy.com facebook.com/planttherapy * planttherapy.com/blog

Date : November 1, 2017 SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION Internal code : 17J31-PTH1-1-CC Customer identification : Rosemary - Tunisia - R4010673R Type : Essential oil Source : Rosmarinus officinalis Customer : Plant Therapy ANALYSIS Method : PC-PA-001-15E06, "Analysis of the composition of a liquid essential oil by GC-FID" (in French). Identifications double-checked by GC-MS Analyst : Sylvain Mercier, M. Sc., chimiste Analysis date : 2017-11-01 Checked and approved by : Alexis St-Gelais, M. Sc., chimiste 2013-174 Note: This report may not be published, including online, without the written consent from Laboratoire PhytoChemia. This report is digitally signed, it is only considered valid if the digital signature is intact. Page 1 of 5

IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS Identification Column: BP5 Column: WAX R.T. R.I. % % R.I. R.T. Molecular Class cis-hex-3-en-1-ol 2.52 866 0.01 0.02 1337 5.72 Aliphatic alcohol Tricyclene 3.23 915 0.20 0.15 926 1.06 Monoterpene α-thujene 3.32 921 0.14 12.98 956 1.18* Monoterpene α-pinene 3.45 928 13.21 [12.98] 956 1.18* Monoterpene Camphene 3.72* 945 4.94 4.79 1003 1.46 Monoterpene α-fenchene 3.72* 945 [4.94] 0.08 996 1.40 Monoterpene Thuja-2,4(10)-diene 3.81 949 0.02 4.86 1041 1.83* Monoterpene Sabinene 4.15 970 0.06 [4.86] 1041 1.83* Monoterpene β-pinene 4.22 974 5.04 [4.86] 1041 1.83* Monoterpene Myrcene 4.49 990 1.40 1.40 1118 2.59 Monoterpene Octan-3-one 4.54 993 0.06 1.75 1211 3.82* Aliphatic ketone Octen-3-ol 4.59 996 0.17 0.15 1399 6.70 Aliphatic alcohol α-phellandrene 4.77* 1005 0.35 0.12 1112 2.51 Monoterpene Δ3-Carene 4.77* 1005 [0.35] 0.17 1096 2.31 Monoterpene α-terpinene 4.96 1016 0.42 0.41 1125 2.67 Monoterpene 1,8-Cineole 5.31* 1035 46.48 45.52 1154 3.05* Monoterp. ether Limonene 5.31* 1035 [46.48] [45.52] 1154 3.05* Monoterpene para-cymene 5.31* 1035 [46.48] [1.75] 1211 3.82* Monoterpene cis-β-ocimene 5.37 1038 0.05 0.69 1191 3.55* Monoterpene trans-β-ocimene 5.55 1048 0.05 [1.75] 1211 3.82* Monoterpene γ-terpinene 5.74 1058 0.59 [0.69] 1191 3.55* Monoterpene cis-sabinene hydrate 6.08 1077 0.05 0.04 1406 6.84 Monoterp. alcohol Terpinolene 6.21 1084 0.28 0.29 1226 4.04 Monoterpene para-cymenene 6.44 1096 0.04 0.04 1367 6.20 Monoterpene Linalool 6.75* 1108 0.75 0.75 1495 8.94* Monoterp. alcohol trans-sabinene hydrate 6.75* 1108 [0.75] 0.07 1476 8.51* Monoterp. alcohol endo-fenchol 7.23 1125 0.06 0.06 1517 9.65 Monoterp. alcohol cis-para-menth-2-en-1-ol 7.29 1128 0.06 [0.75] 1495 8.94* Monoterp. alcohol trans-pinocarveol 7.71 1143 0.07 0.08 1566 11.44 Monoterp. alcohol Camphor 7.86 1148 12.31 12.89 1424 7.28* Monoterp. ketone Camphene hydrate 8.08 1156 0.05 4.06 1522 9.83* Monoterp. alcohol Pinocarvone 8.25 1163 0.03 [0.07] 1476 8.51* Monoterp. ketone Borneol 8.74 1180 4.12 3.80 1617 13.51* Monoterp. alcohol Terpinen-4-ol 8.86 1185 0.71 [4.06] 1522 9.83* Monoterp. alcohol para-cymen-8-ol 9.45 1203 0.04 0.03 1763 21.90 Monoterp. alcohol α-terpineol 9.56 1205 2.00 2.33 1621 13.72 Monoterp. alcohol Verbenone 9.85 1212 0.01 0.39 1597 12.58 Monoterp. ketone Bornyl acetate 12.96 1280 0.47 0.51 1507 9.27 Monoterp. ester α-cubebene 16.02 1332 0.02 [12.89] 1424 7.28* Sesquiterpene α-ylangene 17.29 1351 0.07 [12.89] 1424 7.28* Sesquiterpene α-copaene 17.76 1358 0.29 [12.89] 1424 7.28* Sesquiterpene Page 2 of 5

β-caryophyllene 20.74 1402 3.26 [4.06] 1522 9.83* Sesquiterpene Methyleugenol 21.72 1414 0.03 0.03 1932 33.38 Phenylpropanoid Aromadendrene 22.06 1418 0.05 [4.06] 1522 9.83* Sesquiterpene α-humulene 23.49 1435 0.43 0.46 1585 12.11 Sesquiterpene γ-muurolene 25.56 1459 0.24 [3.80] 1617 13.51* Sesquiterpene α-muurolene 27.74 1485 0.05 0.06 1646 15.02 Sesquiterpene γ-cadinene 28.80 1498 0.17 0.12 1669 16.23 Sesquiterpene β-bisabolene 28.95 1500 0.07 0.07 1660 15.72 Sesquiterpene δ-cadinene 29.45 1507 0.35 0.37 1676 16.55 Sesquiterpene Caryophyllene oxide 33.90 1570 0.14 0.15 1846 27.64 Sesquiterp. ether Total identified 99.41% 99.69% *: Two or more compounds are coeluting on this column [xx]: Duplicate percentage due to coelutions, not taken account in the identified total Note: no correction factor was applied OTHER DATA Physical aspect : Faintly yellow liquid Refractive index : 1.4680 ± 0.0003 (20 C) CONCLUSION No adulterant, contaminant or diluent were detected using this method. Page 3 of 5

Page 4 of 5

Page 5 of 5