Set Sail For Continued And Steady Growth By Emily Refermat, Editor The office coffee service industry reached a record-breaking $4.75 billion in annual sales due to a burgeoning economy, a sophisticated consumer palate and more options than ever. In 214/215 it also experienced the greatest percentage of growth in more than a decade. 14 Automatic Merchandiser VendingMarketWatch.com September 215
It has been a tremendous growth year for office coffee service (OCS). In the second half of 214 and the start of 215, OCS revenues showed a jump of 5.5 percent over the previous year a greater percentage of growth than in past years, including those preceding the Great Recession. The gain illustrates the opportunities in OCS, steered by economic factors motivating companies to provide quality coffee service to an expanding workforce. The record-breaking $4.75 billion OCS industry is also being fed by coffee drinkers discerning tastes, an array of single-cup brewer options and expanding into new services. Green in beans and banks Green coffee prices have been dropping since the end of 214. The most recent International Coffee Organization (ICO) data, as of press time, cited a price of 199.77 cents per pound for the month of July. Recordbreaking exports from coffee-producing countries is resulting in this price drop. However, the ICO also warns that overall stock levels are waning, which could leave the industry vulnerable to a rapid surge in price in the coming months. Regardless of the uncertain future of green coffee prices, the drop in base price of this commodity has given operators a chance at better profit margins, which helps them cover costs in other areas of their businesses as well as expand into new services. A very large percentage, 82.5 percent of operators, reported increasing prices this year quite a bit more than in the past two years. However, few of those s were in coffee. Instead, operators felt the most pressure to raise prices in allied product areas. From paper goods to snacks and soda, the supplier cost s in those categories drove the higher prices OCS providers needed to charge to protect profits. The rise in costs for non-coffee products is especially relevant for today s OCS provider as that segment of the industry has steadily d for the past few years. In 215, we expanded the range of possible answers for operators to choose when talking about strategies for dealing with increasing costs and 9.2 percent indicated they most often added additional services to bolster Chart 2: Operator sales change, 4-year review Sales Rose sales Declined No change 22% 17% 14.5% 12% 66% 21/11 6% 77% 211/12 9% 76.5% 212/13 The gain in revenues illustrates the opportunities in OCS. 12% 16.8% 71.2% Chart 1: OCS revenues 1-year history BILLIONS OF DOLLARS 5 4 3 2 1 4.11 3.74 3.92 3.93 3.73 3.93 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 9-1 1-11 4.12 11-12 4.33 4.5 12-13 13-14 4.75 14-15 213/14 13.9% 7.7% 78.4% 214/15 15 Automatic Merchandiser VendingMarketWatch.com September 215
Chart 3A: Composite green coffee prices, 212 to July 215 2 CENTS PER POUND 15 1 5 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 212 213 214 215 Source: International Coffee Organization, London, U.K. their bottom line (chart 3B). Among the new services added by OCS providers were micro markets, added by 16.7 percent of respondents. More than half, 63.4 percent, of operators that provide OCS are operating one or more micro markets. In fact, micro markets were the most frequently added service, with water service and pantry service being close second and third options with 14. percent and 1.5 percent respectively. New services divide market share The addition of non-coffee products and services makes up a substantial percentage of the OCS industry revenues. Pantry service commonly Chart 3B: How rising costs are being handled Raising prices Absorbing Combination Adjusting product mix Selling additional services Changing workforce Divesting business Other 4.2% *Other includes changing product mix, divesting business, workforce changes, etc. defined as delivering snacks, soda and other products to a location that employees enjoy freely while the workplace is invoiced for the items has grown substantially. For.8%.8% 9.2% 53.3% 3.3% 214/215 21.7% 6.7% example, revenues associated with providing snacks and soda to locations have quadrupled (chart 5). Tea and water services have also added considerably to OCS revenues. Operator pricing activity Chart 4A: Operator pricing activity, 5-year review Raised prices Lowered prices No change 1% 1.8% 88.2% 1.5% 24.5% 74% 43.3% 5% 49.2% 5% 15.8% 1.7% 82.5% 6.7%.8% 21/211 211/212 212/213 213/214 214/215 16 Automatic Merchandiser VendingMarketWatch.com September 215
Adding new services was motivated by operators wanting to be proactive, a majority of respondents explained, rather than due to customer requests/market pressure. Most operators cited that they wanted to maximize their revenue-generating opportunities and/or wanted to stay at the leading edge of the industry. Due to the growth in non-coffee, the levels of revenue generated by coffee in chart 5 appear to be slipping. Because total sales is out of 1 percent, the extreme decline in private label and national brands should be viewed more as evidence of product and service diversification, rather than a true decrease in interest for these segments of coffee. Indeed, demand remains very strong for both private label and national brands. Private label was rated the top-selling OCS product for the past 12 months by 27.3 percent of OCS operators (chart 5B). Clearly, locations are still asking for a value blend coffee from service providers. National coffee brands were top sellers for 24.7 percent of OCS providers showing a continued demand for consistent quality coffee with a nationally known name. Drip is out, single-cup is in Single-cup continues to grow. While the placement of single-cup brewers, which includes all models of countertop brew-by-the-cup equipment, has seen only a modest 23.2 percent, up from 22.3 percent the number of requests for singlecup service options has skyrocketed. Operators talked about dramatically different requests from locations seeking OCS than in previous years because everyone wants their customized coffee. In fact, most new customers ask about the single-cup and bean-to-cup options first, even if it is not the brewer ultimately placed. In its latest National Coffee Drinking Trends Report, the National Cof- Chart 4B: Revenue per cup in cents per cup, Fraction pack plumbed in/pourover coffee, 5-year review 21/211 211/212 212/213 213/214 214/215 Revenue 1.8 11.7 11.8 12 12.4 *Previous numbers have been adjusted based on additional data Chart 4C: Revenue per cup, single-cup coffee, 5-year review 21/211 211/212 212/213 213/214 214/215 Revenue 42.5 41.8 43.1 44.9 45.5 *Previous numbers have been adjusted based on additional data Chart 5A: % OCS sales by product category, 5-year review 1/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 Private label coffee 28.1% 28.2% 18.2% 21.8% 12.7% Local coffee brands 12.5 8.5% National brand coffee 26.9 28.1 24.4 21.9 12.1% Value frac packs 3.5 5.4% Whole bean coffee 4.7% Espresso/cappuccino 3.6 3.7 5.4 1.9 4.3% K-cups 7.9 7.4% Other single-cup 6. 5.2% Other coffee* 12.1 9.9 17.4 4.8 6.% Total Coffee 7.7 69.9 65.4 8.2 66.4% Other hot beverages 4.9 5.5 6.4 4 3.3% Soft drinks/juices 5.4 5.7 6.6 1.8 4.5% Bottled/filtered water 5.7 4.8 7.3 3.9 5.3% Creamers/sweeteners 5.6 6.6 6.5 5.2 4.5% Cups/paper products 5.4 6.2 6.5 4.5 3.8% Tea 3.6% Water Service 4.9% Other 2.3 1.3 1.9.4 3.6% *Includes flavored and varietal. CHART 5B: top-selling OCS product for past 12 Months 214/215 Local coffee brands 13.% Private label 27.3% Value frac packs 2.6% Specialty drinks 1.3% Whole bean 5.2% National brand coffees 24.7% K-Cups 16.9% Single-cup 5.2% Tea.% Water.% Other 3.9% Private label coffee was rated the top-selling product by over 25% of OCS providers. 17 Automatic Merchandiser VendingMarketWatch.com September 215
Chart 6: Plumbed-in, automatic and thermal as % of total, 5-year review Pourover glass pot Automatic glass pot Plumbed-in glass pot Plumbed-in thermal Pourover thermal Automatic thermal Single-cup 2.2% 15.8% 17.1% 19.8% 12.9% 12.3% 2.1% 12% 11.3% 22.3% 8.3% 12.1% 24.4% 13.8% 11.6% 21% 2% 2% 2.1% 13.1% 7.4% 1.4% 9.6% 5.5% 16.5% 18.3% 3.1% 21/211 211/212 212/213 213/214 1% 23.2% 1.3% 8% 22.7% 4% 21.9% 214/215 Chart 7: Estimated market share of single-cup brewer placements in the U.S., 5-year review 21/11 211/12 212/13 213/14 214/15 % Change Marketer Product(s) Bodecker Brewed Bodecker.2%.3%.4% % 2.5% 2.5% BUNN Single serve pod brewers 1.6 2.4 Cafection Avalon 4.1 3.9 2 3.3 6.4 3.2 Cafejo Cafejo 2.2 2.4 2.4..1.1 Technologies Coffea Coffea.3 Crane Café System, Genesis 1.1 1 1.3.3 5.2 4.9 De Jung Duke Virtu.8 1.2.4 Filterfresh Filterfresh 1.7 1.4 4.7 2.9 1.2-1.7 Grindmaster Grindmaster 1.2 1.4 6..1 1.9 JM Smucker s Douwe Egberts 2.9 Keurig Keurig 43. 46.2 46.2 39.6 3. -9.6 Kraft Gevalia, Tassimo Professional.7.8 2.9 3.9 9.8 5.9 Lavazza Espresso Point, Lavazza Blue 2. 1.7 2.1.4 5.3 4.9 Mars Drinks Mars Drinks (Flavia) 31.8 3.1 23.4 37.5 16.8-2.7 Newco Smartcup, Freshcup, CX-3.3.4 2.2 1.7 4.3 2.6 Rheavendors Rhea, Cino.4.3.1 Saeco USA Saeco, Estro 2.2 2..6..5.5 Starbucks Starbucks.8.8 1.6 2.6 2.7.1 Technologies Coffea Coffea.2.2...3.3 VE Global Solutions Brio, Colibri, Cypris, Juno, 1.9 1.6.1 1.9 4.9 3 Koro, Korinto, Kinvivo, Prosy, Venus VKI Technologies Eccellenza Express, Eccellenza 1.2 1.2 Touch, Eccellenza Cafe Wolfgang Puck Wolfgang Puck.2.3.3.1.3.2 Other.3.2.8.8 1.1.3 *Represents OCS provider placements only fee Association (NCA) indicated that 34 percent of consumers consider a single-cup brewer to be the preferred coffee preparation method at work, followed by ground coffee with 29 percent. The variety of coffee options available with single-cup as well as it being a fast and convenient option are driving this perception, according to NCA data. The report also suggests the consumer understands that single-cup isn t a low cost option. This would suggest that the location would be more open to paying the higher single-cup prices when asking for this type of coffee service. This spike in single-cup requests from locations reflects the evolving coffee preference of today s consumer. Words like fresh, greater variety, premium and specialty were listed by operators as key reasons for the current trends in coffee service locations. Much of today s new single-cup equipment meets these needs. Cartridgestyle solutions ensure quality control and offer a location a broad variety. 18 Automatic Merchandiser VendingMarketWatch.com September 215
Access to local or premium noncartridge roasts, however, is better met with a bean-to-cup machine. Successful operators in the single-cup segments report holding sampling events, offering local roasts not available in cartridgestyle single-cup, providing greater hot beverage variety in one machine, being a one-stop for all service (not just coffee) and placing high-end, sophisticated equipment. Single-cup was rated as the fastest-growing category of OCS while traditional coffee and water service were ranked second and third fastest-growing, respectively. Although single-cup is a fast growing segment, operators rank it second in overall contributions to revenues to traditional coffee which is the clear leader. The challenge with single-cup is making a good margin. Widely available cartridge-style cups can be expensive for operators, making the prices they charge look high compared to online and office supply retailers. The bean-to-cup systems are sophisticated brewers that require Chart 8: Account populations by size 212/13 213/14 214/15 3 25 2 15 1 5 2.7 4 1.4 Less than 1 7.3 2 6.8 11.8 6 9.5 16.4 2 1.8 21.8 2 18.9 17.3 22 25.7 11.8 13 9.5 1.9 13 11 to 14 15 to 19 2 to 29 3 to 49 5 to 74 75 to 99 1 or more Chart 9: Accounts by type, 5-year review 21/11 211/12 212/13 213/14 214/15 Offices 55.4% 55.8% 48.8% 45.% 47.4% Industrial plants 18.5 18.7 15.1 17.3 17.1 Restaurants, delis, 6.2 4.5 6.3 7.3 8.5 bakeries Convenience stores 3.5 5.2 7.2 8.3 4.7 Government/military 1.5 3.3 5.4 3.5 3.3 Schools/colleges 4.8 3.8 5.2 5.4 6.7 Retail outlets 1.4 1.9 2.11 2.7 5.8 Other (Health care/hotels) 7.6 6.9 1.1 1.5 6.5 17.6 Fuel Charge Activity Chart 1a: Company billed customers for fuel, 5-year review YES No 3.5% 68.3% 38.3% 61.7% 38.7% 61.3% 32.6% 67.4% 37.1% 62.9% 21/211 211/212 212/213 213/214 213/214 Chart 1B: Average amount charged for fuel per delivery, 5-year review 5 4 3 2 $3.8 $4.15 $3.94 $3.91 $4.3 1 21/11 211/12 212/13 213/14 214/15 19 Automatic Merchandiser VendingMarketWatch.com September 215
Chart 11a: Have added or reduced staff in the last 12 months Added Reduced No change 59.1% 35.1% 6% 52.9% 36.8% 1.3% Chart 11b: If added staff, in which areas? 1 6 5 4 8 6 4 2 52% 24% 11.7% 212/213 213/214 214/215 83% 55.6% 33% 4% 58.3% 5% 44% 14.2% 6.7% 46% 18.1% 15% 32% 55.6% 15% 6.7% Sales Delivery Repair Warehouse Office Other Chart 11c: If reduced staff, which areas? 212/213 213/214 214/215 9%.8% 2% 4.3% 5.4% 9.2% 3 2 1 11.1% % 16.7% 11.1% % 8.3% Sales Delivery Repair Warehouse Office Other % 16.7% % 25% 8.3% 11.1% % 16.7% regular cleaning and maintenance to ensure the high performance for which they re known. Operators must factor in this added service commitment when determining a price for clients. Both of these issues are causing single-cup service not to boom in OCS at least steadily across the country. Most operators, however, are recognizing it as a viable solution that fits the needs and requests of many locations. Coffee perception s opportunities The number of locations served by OCS providers d in 214 to 215. Much of this was due to consolidation in the industry, but based on operator comments, a majority was from marketing and sales efforts made by management. Many altered the way their company solicited new business. More resources were dedicated to marketing, including new company Websites that include better SEO (search engine optimization) making it easier for customers to find them/their service when searching online. Websites were also enhanced with online ordering features, which drove sales (chart 13). Locations identified by size also saw a change this year, said operators (chart 8). Smaller workplaces grew into larger ones, driving up the percentage of 11 to 9 person accounts Chart 12A: Have added products that address environmental concerns, 5-year review YES 2.4% NO Don t KNOW 48.2% 49.4% 49% 2.4% 5.5% 51% 49.5% 6.8% 39.2% 53.1% 46.9% 21/211 211/212 212/213 213/214 214/215 2 Automatic Merchandiser VendingMarketWatch.com September 215
served. The 1 plus locations also showed a substantial gain driving up same location sales revenues. Office locations still lead the OCS marketplace, comprising 47.4 percent of revenues for OCS providers (chart 9). That is higher than in previous years, likely due to the gains in the economy and expanding workforces in white collar America. Since July 215, 27, professional and technical service jobs have been added equaling more than 3, over the past 12 months, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor and Statistics. This pushes the coffee service industry upwards for that segment. For the remaining location types, most stayed relatively steady, such as industrial plants which made up 17.1 percent of business, compared to last year s 17.3 percent. Convenience store service saw the most severe drop Chart 13: Company currently offers online ordering on its Website YES NO Don t have a website 59.8% 4.2% 212/213 61.2% 38.8% chart 12B: Products added that address environmental concerns, 5-year review 21/211 211/212 212/213* 213/214 214/215 6 5 4 3 2 1 35.9% 4.8% 3.4%* 4.7% 47% Recycled products (cups, filters, pods, utensils) * Includes multiple mentions 31.5% 38.8% 9.8%* 3.2% 29.5% Water filtration devices to reduce bottled water of 3.6 percentage points with operators moving towards other retail outlets instead, which saw an of 3.1. According to NCA drinking trend data, consumers tend to rank quality low on the list when expressing why they buy coffee at a convenience store. This perception could be a contributing factor to the decline in OCS providers servicing convenience stores. Final thoughts While few of the charts in this report show technology use, it s important to point out that its prevalence is increasing in OCS as well as other industry segments like vending. Operators are investing in OCS software. In 215, 3.4% 2.4% Coffee with sustainability features 35.9 percent indicated that they use an industry-specific software system and 4.7 percent use the same system for both OCS and vending. Adding a software system usually produces a more efficient and cost-effective operation, driving up profitability. Competitive pressures from coffeehouses and office supply companies, for example are the greatest challenges for OCS. OCS providers are able to compete by dedicating sales resources and building sales models with value-added amenities. This focus, coupled with meeting the needs of consumers who pine for customized, quality coffee, will keep OCS on course. Average Total Sales Revenue Change Per Region 53.3%* 26.7% 14.7% 2.2% % 6.5%* 2.3% 8.8% Other * 212/213 includes multiple mentions 213/ 214 6.2% 46.2% 47.7% 214/ 215 Northwest 1 percent Southwest 7.9 percent Midwest 5.3 percent Southeast 7.4 percent Mid-Atlantic 4 percent Northeast 7.4 percent National Operators 7.8 percent Methodology The Automatic Merchandiser State of the Coffee Service Industry Report is compiled from a survey sent to OCS operators, as well as operator interviews. The 215 report is based on a 5.5 percent response rate to the survey and includes full-service vending operators who offer OCS as well as operators who only provide coffee service. 21 Automatic Merchandiser VendingMarketWatch.com September 215