A Structural Equation Modelling Approach to Explore Consumers' Attitude Towards Sustainable Wine

Similar documents
Background & Literature Review The Research Main Results Conclusions & Managerial Implications

Emerging Local Food Systems in the Caribbean and Southern USA July 6, 2014

DETERMINANTS OF DINER RESPONSE TO ORIENTAL CUISINE IN SPECIALITY RESTAURANTS AND SELECTED CLASSIFIED HOTELS IN NAIROBI COUNTY, KENYA

International Journal of Business and Commerce Vol. 3, No.8: Apr 2014[01-10] (ISSN: )

Wine Purchase Intentions: A Push-Pull Study of External Drivers, Internal Drivers, and Personal Involvement

RESEARCH UPDATE from Texas Wine Marketing Research Institute by Natalia Kolyesnikova, PhD Tim Dodd, PhD THANK YOU SPONSORS

Fairtrade Buying Behaviour: We Know What They Think, But Do We Know What They Do?

Is Fair Trade Fair? ARKANSAS C3 TEACHERS HUB. 9-12th Grade Economics Inquiry. Supporting Questions

Coffee Eco-labeling: Profit, Prosperity, & Healthy Nature? Brian Crespi Andre Goncalves Janani Kannan Alexey Kudryavtsev Jessica Stern

Work Sample (Minimum) for 10-K Integration Assignment MAN and for suppliers of raw materials and services that the Company relies on.

ACEF, June 2016

Comparative Analysis of Fresh and Dried Fish Consumption in Ondo State, Nigeria

The Roles of Social Media and Expert Reviews in the Market for High-End Goods: An Example Using Bordeaux and California Wines

Sustainable oenology and viticulture: new strategies and trends in wine production

Leverage the Rising Sustainability Wave

CGSS Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment Jan Aizen C916

The University of Georgia

STUDY REGARDING THE RATIONALE OF COFFEE CONSUMPTION ACCORDING TO GENDER AND AGE GROUPS

Fairtrade Designation Endorsement

CONSUMER PREFERENCES FOR CSR WINES:

Wine-Tasting by Numbers: Using Binary Logistic Regression to Reveal the Preferences of Experts

Structures of Life. Investigation 1: Origin of Seeds. Big Question: 3 rd Science Notebook. Name:

What do consumers think about farm animal welfare in modern agriculture? Attitudes and shopping behaviour

This is a repository copy of Poverty and Participation in Twenty-First Century Multicultural Britain.

CARBONATED SOFT DRINKS

Eco-Schools USA Sustainable Food Audit

Sustainability: Programs and communication in the leading wine producing countries

Influence of Service Quality, Corporate Image and Perceived Value on Customer Behavioral Responses: CFA and Measurement Model

A typology of Chinese wine consumers.

RESULTS OF THE MARKETING SURVEY ON DRINKING BEER

Chef de Partie Apprenticeship Standard

Survival of the Fittest: The Impact of Eco-certification on the Performance of German Wineries. Patrizia Fanasch University of Paderborn, Germany

Reaction to the coffee crisis at the beginning of last decade

From bean to cup and beyond: exploring ethical consumption and coffee shops

Missing value imputation in SAS: an intro to Proc MI and MIANALYZE

Characteristics of U.S. Veal Consumers

Previous analysis of Syrah

REMARKS BY PAUL BULCKE, GROUP CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NESTLÉ S.A. MEDIA CONFERENCE, NAIROBI, FRIDAY, JULY 2, 2010

Food, landscape and tourism: Sorprendente Basilicata experience

INTERNATIONAL UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM BINA NUSANTARA UNIVERSITY. Major Marketing Sarjana Ekonomi Thesis Odd semester year 2007

Consumer Responses to Food Products Produced Near the Fukushima Nuclear Plant

TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES FOR MEASURING THE OBESOGENIC ENVIRONMENT

FAIR TRADE WESTERN PURPLE PAPER

Consumer Perceptions: Dairy and Plant-based Milks Phase II. January 14, 2019

1. Continuing the development and validation of mobile sensors. 3. Identifying and establishing variable rate management field trials

Predictors of Repeat Winery Visitation in North Carolina

To make wine, to sell the grapes or to deliver them to a cooperative: determinants of the allocation of the grapes

Informing Wineries Tourism Decisions: Studies of Tasting Room Visitors and Wine Tourism Collaboration

EWWR good practices and case studies

Measuring economic value of whale conservation

22/05/2018 STUDY RATIONALE OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY THEORETICAL BACKGROUND

Religion and Innovation

Mobility tools and use: Accessibility s role in Switzerland

Tania Page Interim Sector Head. +44 (0)

A Comparison of X, Y, and Boomer Generation Wine Consumers in California

Wine On-Premise UK 2016

New from Packaged Facts!

AJAE Appendix: Testing Household-Specific Explanations for the Inverse Productivity Relationship

Appendix A. Table A.1: Logit Estimates for Elasticities

Shaping the Future: Production and Market Challenges

Fair Trade C E R T I F I E D

Coffee, Health & Consumption: Reaching Coffee Drinkers

ECONOMICS OF COCONUT PRODUCTS AN ANALYTICAL STUDY. Coconut is an important tree crop with diverse end-uses, grown in many states of India.

Bottling Wine and Spirits in a Changing Climate. 17 May 2011

Re: LCBO Lightweight Glass Wine Standard Implementation Date

Survival of the Fittest: The Impact of Eco-certification on the Performance of German Wineries Patrizia FANASCH

GI Protection in Europe

Summary Report Survey on Community Perceptions of Wine Businesses

LIVE Wines Backgrounder Certified Sustainable Northwest Wines

UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH FAIRTRADE PLAN

2. The proposal has been sent to the Virtual Screening Committee (VSC) for evaluation and will be examined by the Executive Board in September 2008.

"Primary agricultural commodity trade and labour market outcome

Ex-Ante Analysis of the Demand for new value added pulse products: A

Awareness, Attitude & Usage Study Executive Summary

Starbucks / Dunkin Donuts research. Presented by Alex Hockley and Molly Fox. Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Senior Chef Production Cooking Apprenticeship Standard

MBA 503 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric

GREAT WINE CAPITALS GLOBAL NETWORK MARKET SURVEY FINANCIAL STABILITY AND VIABILITY OF WINE TOURISM BUSINESS IN THE GWC

Dietary Diversity in Urban and Rural China: An Endogenous Variety Approach

Problem. Background & Significance 6/29/ _3_88B 1 CHD KNOWLEDGE & RISK FACTORS AMONG FILIPINO-AMERICANS CONNECTED TO PRIMARY CARE SERVICES

From Selling to Supporting-Leveraging Mobile Services in the Field of Food Retailing

A Web Survey Analysis of the Subjective Well-being of Spanish Workers

Gasoline Empirical Analysis: Competition Bureau March 2005

Foodservice EUROPE. 10 countries analyzed: AUSTRIA BELGIUM FRANCE GERMANY ITALY NETHERLANDS PORTUGAL SPAIN SWITZERLAND UK

Implement Summer Food Standards of Excellence in Your Community

ICC July 2010 Original: French. Study. International Coffee Council 105 th Session September 2010 London, England

Pitfalls for the Construction of a Welfare Indicator: An Experimental Analysis of the Better Life Index

WACS culinary certification scheme

US Chicken Consumption. Presentation to Chicken Marketing Summit July 18, 2017 Asheville, NC

Flexible Working Arrangements, Collaboration, ICT and Innovation

Study of Selection Behavior of Wine for Different Markets

Structural Reforms and Agricultural Export Performance An Empirical Analysis

The Grocer : Soft Drinks Research on behalf of The Grocer April 2018

Global Flavor and Fragrance Market Report

Serving the New Senior Managing Menus and Dining. Senior Living Culinary and Nutrition Summit April 6, 2016

An update from the Competitiveness and Market Analysis Section, Alberta Agriculture and Forestry.

2017 Food Attitudes & Behaviors

Regression Models for Saffron Yields in Iran

Fairtrade a sustainable choice

Hamburger Pork Chop Deli Ham Chicken Wing $6.46 $4.95 $4.03 $3.50 $1.83 $1.93 $1.71 $2.78

Transcription:

A Structural Equation Modelling Approach to Explore Consumers' Attitude Towards Sustainable Wine G. Sogari 1, D. Menozzi 2 ; C. Corbo 1, M. Macconi 1 ; C. Mora 2 1 Doctoral School on the Agro-Food System Agrisystem, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Piacenza, Email: giovanni.sogari@unicatt.it, chiara.corbo@unicatt.it, martina.macconi@unicatt.it 2 Department of Food Science, University of Parma, Via Kennedy 6, 43125 - Parma (Italy). Tel.: +39 0521 902469; Fax: +39 0521 902498. Email: davide.menozzi@unipr.it, cristina.mora@unipr.it. Poster paper prepared for presentation at the EAAE 2014 Congress Agri-Food and Rural Innovations for Healthier Societies August 26 to 29, 2014 Ljubljana, Slovenia Copyright 2014 by G. Sogari, D. Menozzi, C. Corbo, M. Macconi, C. Mora. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for non-commercial purposes by any means, provided that this copyright notice appears on all such copies.

Abstract This paper investigates how environmental and socio-economic beliefs affect consumers attitude towards sustainable wine, and the main drivers during wine purchase. Data were collected with online questionnaire in 2013 from 513 Italian wine drinkers. The results of a structural equation model show that attitude towards sustainable wine is driven by both environmental and quality beliefs of sustainable wine, while is not affected by the economic dimension. Attitudes and quality beliefs affect consumer s importance of sustainable aspects during wine purchase. This paper suggests that communication strategies should focus on sustainable issues to meet the need of environmentally-conscious consumers. Keywords: Structural Equation Model (SEM), Sustainability, Wine, Attitude. 1. Introduction Over recent years, much research has found evidence that consumers are interested in buying more green and sustainable products. Sustainable practices are becoming increasingly recognized and adopted over the whole agro-food sector, and sustainability has become a key issue also in the global wine business (Klohr et al., 2013). There is a large body of literature addressing consumers perceptions of organic wine and eco-friendly labelling (see, e.g., Barber et al., 2010; Olsen et al., 2012). However, to our knowledge, no studies have investigated how environmental and socio-economic beliefs drive the attitude towards sustainable labelled wine so far. The objective of this study was to explore variables which influence consumer attitude towards sustainable labelled wine and, at the same time, to examine to what extent sustainable aspects are important during wine purchase. An on-line questionnaire was submitted to 513 Italian wine consumers and the data were analyzed by means of structural equation modelling (SEM). 2. Method A model was developed that includes environmental values, socio-economic beliefs about the sustainable wine certification and attitude. The age of respondents was also included in the model. Based on background research and literature review, ten hypotheses are put forward to be tested: H1. People with a stronger value of environmental protection will pay more attention in sustainable aspects during the wine purchase. H2. People with a stronger belief that self-sacrifice is needed to protect the environment, will show a higher belief that sustainable products provide benefits for the environment. H3. People with a stronger belief that self-sacrifice is needed to protect the environment, will show a more positive attitude towards sustainable labelled wine. H4. People who belief that sustainable products provide benefits for the environment will show a more positive attitude towards sustainable labelled wine. H5. People who belief that sustainable products provide benefits for the environment will give more importance in sustainable aspects during the wine purchase. H6. People who belief that sustainable wine labelling certification gives economic support to the producers will show a more positive attitude towards sustainable labelled wine. H7. People who belief that sustainable labelling certification gives high quality standards at the product will show a more positive attitude towards sustainable labelled wine. 1

H8. People who belief that sustainable labelling certification gives high quality standards at the product will pay more attention in sustainable aspects during the wine purchase. H9. People with a positive attitude towards sustainable wine will give more importance in sustainable aspects during the wine purchase. H10. Younger people will have a more positive attitude towards sustainable wine than older consumers. Following similar studies (Olsen et al., 2012; Pomarici and Vecchio, 2013), data were collected from an online survey passing during September to November 2013 to a random sample of Italian population. The questionnaire aimed to explore: I) wine consumption and purchase habits; II) variables such as values and beliefs about the environment and attitude towards sustainable labelled wine; III) respondents demographic and socio-economic characteristics commonly used for market segmentation. Respondents were asked to state their level of agreement with each statement presented in the questionnaire. All replies were measured on a 5-point scale from 1 to 5 (from completely negative response to a positive agreement). First, an exploratory factor analysis was carried out with principal component analysis and varimax rotation. Using Cronbach s alpha, which gives the internal consistency of the constructs, reliability was estimated. Then, the SEM technique was employed to test the causal link specified in the model. The model was tested to verify the goodness-of-fit of the hypothesized (restricted) model and the observed data. The fit indices used to assess the model fit were χ 2 /degrees of freedom (χ 2 /df), comparative fix index (CFI) and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA). The analysis was performed using Amos 20.0 (Byrne, 2010). 3. Results 3.1 The sample Respondents who stated they were non-wine drinkers, and those who stated they drink wine only a few times per year, were excluded. The final sample was composed of 513 respondents (62% male), the mean age was 39 and almost 80% of the sample were under 50 years old. The educational background of the respondents was high (62.6%: first or second cycle university degree; 13.3%: Ph.D). The respondents were grouped into three geographic areas of Italy: Northern (62%), Central (15%) and Southern (23%). 3.2 The structural model The constructs resulted from the factorial analysis are reported in Table 1. The Cronbach s alpha values, over 0.70 except for construct C2 which is above 0.65, indicate a high reliability and an overall acceptability of the constructs. The hypothesized model shown in Figure 1 is well fitting, as indicated by the goodnessof-fit statistics (Byrne, 2010). The explained variance (R 2 ) in the endogenous (dependent) variables is 42% for the belief that sustainable products provide benefits for the environment, 63% for the attitude towards sustainable labelled wine and 56% for the importance attached to sustainable attributes during wine purchase. Results show that valuing environmental protection is strongly related to the importance that consumers give to sustainable aspects during wine purchase (γ 1 =0.54), which confirms 2

H1. In line with H2, the belief that self-sacrifice is needed to protect the environment is very strongly and significantly linked to the belief that sustainable products provide benefits for the environment (γ 2 =0.74). Table 1. Tests for construct validity. Constructs Measurement items Mean (sd) Alpha X1. I am willing to make personal sacrifice for C1 Belief in the need for 4.15 (0.7) the sake of the environment self-sacrifice to protect X2. I would be willing to change my behaviour the environment 4.28 (0.7) to help protect the environment 0.87 C2 Belief that X3. I feel that purchasing sustainable products sustainable products helps protect the environment 4.19 (0.8) provide benefits for the X4. Purchasing sustainable products does not environment really do much to help the environment 4.24 (1.0) 0.67 X5. I think that protecting the environment is a C3 Value environmental worthwhile goal 4.83 (0.3) protection X6. It is important to me to preserve the environment for future generations 4.85 (0.4) 0.81 C4 The belief that X7. It is a guarantee of high product quality 2.85 (1.2) sustainable wine X8. It is a guarantee of high hygiene standards 2.72 (1.1) labelling certification 0.81 X9. It is a guarantee of the origin of raw gives a product high 3.32 (1.1) materials quality standards C5 The belief that X8. It is a guarantee of economic support for sustainable wine local producers 2.81 (1.2) labelling certification X9. It encourages employment in the area 3.09 (1.1) 0.80 gives producers X10. It is a guarantee of the respect of working economic support to conditions 3.26 (1.1) X11. If it is a sustainable wine label, sustainability might be an important factor 3.73 (0.9) X12. Sustainable wine label could be a good tool C6 Attitude towards to grow the Italian wine market 3.86 (0.9) sustainable labelled X13. Sustainable wine label could help me to 0.78 3.81 (1.0) wine understand sustainable winegrowing issues X14. I could be interested in buying a bottle of wine with a sustainable label (showing 3.84 (0.9) environmental, economic and social aspects) C7 Importance to X15. Environmental aspects (e.g., low energy consumer of sustainable consumption) 3.82 (0.9) aspects during wine X16. Social-ethical aspects/certification (i.e. Fair purchase Trade) 3.17 (1.1) 0.79 H3 was not supported by preliminary testing of the model and was not considered further. The belief in the need for self-sacrifice to protect the environment does not appear to have a significant effect on attitude towards sustainable labelled wine, unless it is mediated by the belief that sustainable products benefit the environment. This finding suggests how important it is for consumers to believe that sustainable wines truly benefit to the environment in order for them to have a positive attitude about towards such products. As hypothesized by H4 and H5 respectively, the belief that sustainable products provide benefits for the environment influences both the attitude towards sustainable labelled wine (γ 4 =0.50) and the importance that consumer attaches to sustainable aspects when purchasing wine (γ 5 =0.30). 3

Figure 1. Complete model of consumer attitude towards sustainable labelled wine. Notes: The terms in ellipses represent latent constructs; the Age factor (in rectangle) is an observed variable. The solid arrows indicate the structural paths (i.e. regression coefficients), and the dashed arrows represent nonsignificant relationships. H6, which hypothesized that the belief that sustainable wine labelling gives producers economic support influences the attitude towards sustainable labelled wine, was not supported by evidence. Indeed, the overall goodness of fit deteriorates significantly when this link is included in the model. In addition, the explained variance (R 2 ) in the endogenous variables would show lower values: 59% (instead of 63%) for the attitude towards sustainable labelled wine and 46% (instead of 56%) for the importance to the consumer of sustainable aspects during the wine purchase. Finally, the regression coefficient between these two constructs was not significant (p=0.180). For these reasons, H6 was rejected and this link was not included in the final model. In line with H7 and H8, the belief that sustainable labelling certification gives a product high quality standards is positively and significantly related both to the attitude towards sustainable labelled wine (γ 6 =0.44) and importance to the consumer of sustainable aspects during wine purchase (γ 7 =0.33). This suggests that sustainable certification might be a good predictor in assessing whether a positive attitude towards sustainable labelled wine exists. Sustainable certification might become a powerful tool to promote sustainable wine as a high quality product, and help to give a positive perception of sustainable wine. As hypothesized by H9, attitude towards sustainable labelled wine affects the importance attributed by the consumer to sustainable aspects during wine purchase (γ 8 =0.35). This means that consumers who have a positive image of sustainable wine will actively search for it and give importance to sustainable aspects when making their choice. Finally, H10 was partially confirmed. In fact, age appears to have a slightly significant negative effect on attitude (γ 9 =- 0.05). 4

4. Discussions and conclusions The results show that consumers who give more importance to sustainable aspects during wine purchase are mainly those who have a higher interest in sustainable wine and in environmental protection. In addition, young wine drinkers who are interested in environmental conservation and who believe that sustainable products help to achieve this appear to look for a trustworthy system of sustainable certification labelling. The structural equation analysis yielded results useful for the interpretation of the following points. Sustainable claims on the label can be a tool to characterize wine, but consumers value sustainable certification only if the message can be trusted. The wine market in fact suffers from information asymmetry (Corduas et al., 2013), so there is an overall need to increase the general awareness of sustainable certification in order to reduce information asymmetry in this sector. Moreover, given that involvement and consumption of wine increase with age (Mueller et al., 2011), young consumers environmental values and beliefs need to be taken into account by both producers and marketers. Wine producers who wish to promote their wine as sustainable should pay detailed attention to consumer attitude, and whether the certification logo on the label might be effective. Age and environmental concerns of consumers need also to be taken into account. Since our sample mainly consisted of the younger generation and people having some knowledge and interest in wine, it might be more useful to analyze the effects of sustainable labelling of wine on other targets, such as middle aged consumers, and to extend this research abroad. Finally, the absence of a measure of actual behaviour is a limitation. One of the next steps will be to test whether the attitudes toward sustainable wine might help to forecast scenarios for actual decision-making processes, and investigate whether a sustainable certification on wine labels might have a positive impact on price. References Barber, N., Taylor, C., D., Deale, C., S. (2010). Wine Tourism, Environmental Concerns, and Purchase Intention. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing 27(2): 146-165. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications and programming. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, US: New York. Corduas M., Cinquanta L., Ievoli C., (2013). The importance of wine attributes for purchase decisions: A study of Italian consumers perception. Food Quality and Preference 28: 407 418. Klohr, B., Fleuchaus, R., Theuvsen, L. (2013). Sustainability: Implementation programs and communication in the leading wine producing countries. Academy of wine business, 7th International Conference of the AWBR, 12-15 June 2013, Ontario, Canada, p. 3. Mueller, S., Remaud, H., Chabin, Y. (2011). How strong and generalizable is the Generation Y phenomenon? A cross-cultural study for wine. International Journal of Wine Business Research 23 (2): 125-144. Olsen, J. Thach, L. Hemphill, L. (2012). The impact of environmental protection and hedonistic values on organic wine purchases in the US. International Journal of Wine Business Research 24(1): 47-67. Pomarici, E., Vecchio, R., (2013). Millennial generation attitude to sustainable wine: an exploratory study on Italian consumers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66: 537-545. 5