Acoustic Assessment Report Suncor Adelaide Wind Power Project Municipality of Adelaide Metcalfe, Ontario

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Acoustic Assessment Report Suncor Adelaide Wind Power Project Municipality of Adelaide Metcalfe, Ontario"

Transcription

1 Acoustic Assessment Report Adelaide Wind Power Project Municipality of Adelaide Metcalfe, Ontario Prepared for Energy Products Inc th Avenue SW Calgary, Alberta T2P 3E3 Prepared by Ian R. Bonsma, PEng and Feb. 28/12 Brian Howe, MEng, MBA, PEng February 28, 2013

2 VERSION CONTROL Adelaide Wind Power Project, Municipality of Adelaide Metcalfe, Ontario Ver. Date Version Description 1 June 26, 2012 Original DRAFT Acoustic Assessment Report supporting a Renewable Energy Application. Prepared By I. Bonsma 2 November 23, 2012 Updated Acoustic Assessment Report supporting an application for a Renewable Energy Approval (reduced number of turbines I. Bonsma 3 February 28, 2013 Updated Acoustic Assessment Report supporting an application for a Renewable Energy Approval (addressing minor comments from the MOE. I. Bonsma ii

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT REPORT CHECK-LIST... v 1 INTRODUCTION GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WIND TURBINE INSTALLATION SITE AND SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENT DESCRIPTION OF SOUND SOURCES WIND TURBINE NOISE EMISSION RATINGS TRANSFORMER SOUND POWER ESTIMATION POINT OF RECEPTION SUMMARY ASSESSMENT CRITERIA IMPACT ASSESSMENT CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REFERENCES Figure 1: Adelaide Wind Power Project Site Location Figure 2: Proposed Wind Turbine Generator and Receptor Locations Figure 3: Adelaide Transformer Acoustic Barrier Figure 4: Predicted Sound Levels, Leq [dba] Calculated at 4.5 m Above Ground Level Appendix A: Assessment Summary Tables Appendix B: Municipality of Adelaide Metcalfe Zoning Maps Appendix C: General Siemens Wind Turbine Generator Information Appendix D: Sound Power Data for Siemens Wind Turbine Generators Appendix E: Calculation Details Appendix F: Wind Shear Coefficient Summary iii

4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Howe Gastmeier Chapnik Limited ( HGC Engineering was retained by Energy Products Inc. ( to assess the acoustic impact of the proposed Adelaide Wind Power Project. The proposed wind project site is located in the Municipality of Adelaide Metcalfe, in the County of Middlesex, Ontario. This assessment considers twenty-two Siemens wind turbine generators, each rated at MW, however only eighteen will be constructed. HGC Engineering has assessed the acoustic impact against the acoustic criteria of the Ontario Ministry of the Environment ( MOE and in accordance with the requirements of Ontario Regulation 359/09. This report comprises a summary of our assessment and is intended as supporting documentation for an application for a Renewable Energy Approval. There are a number of residences located in the vicinity of the project. From an acoustic perspective, the area is a rural environment, with relatively low ambient sound levels. The criteria of MOE publication NPC-232 Sound Level Limits for Stationary Sources in Class 3 Areas (Rural are thus relevant. Supplementary guidance is also provided by MOE publication Interpretation for Applying MOE NPC Publications to Wind Power Generation Facilities. The sound power data for the Siemens wind turbine generators has been obtained through. This data has been used in a computer model to predict the sound level impact at the closest residential receptors. The results of the modelling demonstrate compliance with the MOE guidelines when all twenty-two turbines are operating over their entire speed range, at all but two receptor locations. These receptor locations have entered into lease agreements with the proponent. Details of our assessment are provided in the main body of this report. The report is structured around the report format suggested by the MOE for Renewable Energy Approval applications for wind farms, with the required summary tables included as Appendix A. iv

5 Company Name: Company Address: ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT REPORT CHECK-LIST Energy Products Inc th Avenue SW Calgary, Alberta, T2P 3E3 Location of Facility: Municipality of Adelaide Metcalfe, County of Middlesex, Ontario The attached Acoustic Assessment Report was prepared in accordance with the guidance in the ministry document Information to be Submitted for Approval of Stationary Source of Sound (NPC 233 dated October 1995 and the minimum required information identified in the check-list on the reverse of this sheet has been submitted. Company Contact: Name: Title: Christopher Scott Project Developer Phone Number: Signature: Date: February 28, 2013 Technical Contact: Name: Representing: Ian Bonsma HGC Engineering Phone Number: Signature: Date: February 28, 2013 v PIBS 5356e

6 ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT REPORT CHECK-LIST Required Information Submitted Explanation/Reference 1.0 Introduction (Project Background and Overview Yes Section Facility Description 2.1 Operating hours of facility and significant Noise Sources 2.2 Site Plan identifying all significant Noise Sources Yes Yes Figure Noise Source Summary 3.1 Noise Source Summary Table Yes Appendix A 3.2 Source noise emissions specifications Yes Appendix D 3.3 Source power/capacity ratings Yes Appendix D 3.4 Noise control equipment description and No N/A acoustical specifications 4.0 Point of Reception Noise Impact Calculations 4.1 Point of Reception Noise Impact Table Yes Appendix A 4.2 Point(s of Reception (POR list and Yes Tables A3 & A4 description 4.3 Land-use Zoning Plan Yes Appendix B 4.4 Scaled Area Location Plan Yes Figure Procedure used to assess noise impacts at Yes Section 8, Appendix E each POR 4.6 List of parameters/assumptions used in Yes Section 8, Appendix E calculations 5.0 Acoustic Assessment Summary 5.1 Acoustic Assessment Summary Table Yes Appendix A 5.2 Rationale for selecting applicable noise Yes Section 7 guideline limits 5.3 Predictable Worst Case Impacts Operating Yes Figure 5, Scenario Table A5 A Conclusions 6.1 Statement of compliance with selected noise performance limits Yes 7.0 Appendices (provide details such as Yes Listing of Insignificant Noise Sources Yes Manufacturer s Noise Specifications Yes Appendix D Calculations Yes Appendix E Instrumentation Yes Meteorology during Sound Level Yes Measurements Raw Data from Measurements No N/A Drawings (Facility / Equipment Yes Appendix C vi PIBS 5356e

7 Energy Products Inc. Page 1 Adelaide Wind Power Project, Acoustic Assessment February 28, INTRODUCTION Howe Gastmeier Chapnik Limited ( HGC Engineering was retained by Energy Products Inc. ( to assess the acoustic impact of the proposed Adelaide Wind Power Project. The purpose of the report is to determine the acceptability of the predicted sound levels at the nearby residential receptors resulting from the operation of twenty-two 99.5 meter hub height, Siemens wind turbine generators rated at MW, in relation to the guidelines of the Ontario Ministry of the Environment ( MOE including Ontario Regulation 359/09. Ultimately, the project will include eighteen wind turbine generators; this report considers four alternative turbine locations. Final selection of the turbine sites will be determined prior to project construction and will be based on consultation activities, potential effects assessments and detailed design/engineering work. Based on Ontario Regulation 359/09, the Project is considered a Class 4 wind facility. This report is intended as supporting documentation for a Renewable Energy Approval application for the facility. UPDATES ADDRESSED IN THIS ASSESSMENT REPORT This report replaces the Acoustic Assessment Report Adelaide Wind Power Project, Version 2, dated November 23, 2012 [1]. This update has been prepared to address twenty-nine additional points of reception from the NextEra Jericho project. 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WIND TURBINE INSTALLATION SITE AND SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENT The wind farm project consists of twenty-two wind turbine generators to be located in the Municipality of Adelaide Metcalfe, in the County of Middlesex, Ontario as shown in Figure 1. Eighteen wind turbine generators will be constructed, however this assessment considers twentytwo to maintain flexibility during construction. The wind project is bound by Townsend Line and Centre Road to the north, Hansford Road to the east, Highway 402 to the south, and Sexton Road to the west.

8 Energy Products Inc. Page 2 Adelaide Wind Power Project, Acoustic Assessment February 28, 2013 The area is generally rural in nature, both acoustically and in general character, with agricultural land uses widely in evidence, including scattered dwellings near the major roadways. Road traffic on Highway 402 provides some elevated background sound for dwellings in the near vicinity. Zoning maps obtained from the Municipality of Adelaide Metcalfe are included as Appendix B, which illustrate that the project site areas are zoned for General Agricultural use, and that small residential parcels, generally with Rural Residential zoning, exist around the lands. The NextEra Adelaide Wind Energy Park is located in the central portion and to the south of the Adelaide Wind Power Project. The NextEra Adelaide Wind Energy Centre consists of one transformer and thirty-eight GE wind turbines with 100 meter rotor diameters and 80 meter hub heights. The NextEra Bornish Wind Energy Park is located approximately 5 km north of the Adelaide Wind Power Project. The Bornish project consists of one transformer and forty-eight GE wind turbines with 100 meter rotor diameters and 80 meter hub heights. The wpd Canada Napier Wind Project is located approximately 5 km south of the Adelaide Wind Power Project. The Napier project consists of two REpower MM92 wind turbines with 92.5 meter rotor diameters and 100 meter hub heights. Due to the proximity of these three wind farms, cumulative sound levels are considered in this assessment. In addition to the above wind projects, NextEra is developing the Parkhill Interconnect Project. This project is located approximately 11 km from the Adelaide project and has not been considered further herein. 3 DESCRIPTION OF SOUND SOURCES Twenty-two Siemens wind turbine generators are proposed for the site, of which only eighteen will be constructed. All of the wind turbines will be operated at MW. They are three bladed, upwind, horizontal axis wind turbines with a rotor diameter of 113 meters. The turbine rotor and nacelle are mounted on top of a 99.5 meter high tubular tower. The turbines are anticipated to operate continuously whenever wind conditions allow. Additional details are contained in Appendix C, with acoustic information contained in Appendix D. Electronic

9 Energy Products Inc. Page 3 Adelaide Wind Power Project, Acoustic Assessment February 28, 2013 topography mapping for the area suggests that the turbines will generally be based at an elevation of between 220 and 260 meters. Table 1 provides the UTM coordinates (Zone 17 of the twenty-two wind turbine generators and the one proposed transformer. Table 1: Locations of Wind Turbine Generators (WTG Source Northing Northing Easting [m] Source ID Easting [m] ID [m] [m] WTG WTG WTG WTG WTG WTG WTG WTG WTG WTG WTG WTG WTG WTG WTG WTG WTG WTG WTG WTG WTG Substation WTG Smaller transformers will be installed at each of the wind turbine generator locations however these are acoustically insignificant in comparison to the wind turbine generator sound power levels. One large step-up transformer will be installed as part of the project. Additional details regarding the larger step-up transformers are provided below. 4 WIND TURBINE NOISE EMISSION RATINGS Overall sound power data for the Siemens wind turbines as determined in accordance with IEC :2002+A1:2006 [2], are provided by Siemens in the documents Contract Acoustic Emission, SWT (2221 kw, Hub Height 99.5 m [3], included in Appendix D. CAN/CSA- C standard, referenced by the MOE, is an adoption without modification of the identically titled IEC Standard IEC (edition 2:2002 consolidated with amendment

10 Energy Products Inc. Page 4 Adelaide Wind Power Project, Acoustic Assessment February 28, :2006. The overall A-weighted sound power levels as a function of 10 meter height wind speed are shown in Table 2. Table 2: 10 Meter Height Wind Speed vs Turbine Sound Power Level, Based on IEC Sound Power Determination Methodology and Wind Shear of Meter Height Wind Speed [m/s] Wind Turbine Sound Power Level [dba] Sound power level data determined under IEC :2002 is normalized to a standard roughness length value of 0.05 m. The roughness length concept is used to take into account the effect of friction at the ground, which results in lower wind speeds near the ground than at higher elevations. The wind shear exponent quantifies the same concept by describing the rate of change of wind speed with elevation. A roughness length of 0.05 meters is generally held to be equivalent to a wind shear value of about 0.2. Meteorological data near the proposed wind project provided by GENIVAR indicates that the wind shear coefficient during a summer night may reach 0.55 (Appendix F. This means that a 10 meter height wind speed of 1.7 m/s can occur simultaneously with a 6 m/s wind speed at the hub height of 99.5 meters, indicating that maximum sound power output may occur during relatively low 10 meter level wind speeds. Consequently the maximum sound power level for the wind turbine (corresponding to a hub height wind speed of 6 m/s has been used in this analysis. Table 3 presents the typical octave band spectrum at 10 meter height received from Siemens, also included in Appendix D. The spectral shape shown for the 10 meter height 6 m/s wind speed has been used in the analysis since it has the higher low frequency sound power, resulting in higher overall predicted dba levels at the receptor locations.

11 Energy Products Inc. Page 5 Adelaide Wind Power Project, Acoustic Assessment February 28, 2013 Table 3: Wind Turbine Acoustic Emissions Summary Make and Model: Siemens SWT Electrical Rating: 2.2 MW Hub Height (m: 99.5m Wind Shear Coefficient: Maximum sound power level utilized Octave Band Sound Power Level [db] Manufacturer s Emission Levels Adjusted Emission Level Wind Speed [m/s] Frequency [Hz] Overall A-Weighted In the Contract Acoustic Emission document, Siemens indicates that the sound level test reports for the SWT at 99.5m hub height produce no tonal audibility above 2 db. A tonal penalty has not been applied in this assessment. Siemens has also indicated that the sound power levels provided have an uncertainty of +/- 1.5 dba. The sound level predictions herein are thus subject to the degree of uncertainty related to the sound power of the turbine, in addition to the uncertainty related to the fluctuations of atmospheric conditions and the accuracy and limitations inherent in the modelling methodology. 5 TRANSFORMER SOUND POWER ESTIMATION The project proposes to utilize one 62 MVA transformer. The transformer (TS1 will be located approximately 730 meters southeast of WTG21. The transformer is proposed to include a 15 meter long, 6 meter high, L-shaped acoustic barrier. The proposed barrier, shown in Figure 3, is proposed to be constructed at the following UTM coordinates (also included in Table A2, and will have a surface density of at least 20 kg/m 2.

12 Energy Products Inc. Page 6 Adelaide Wind Power Project, Acoustic Assessment February 28, 2013 Table 4: Proposed Transformer Acoustic Barrier Coordinates [m] Point Easting Northing North Southwest East The transformer is proposed to be a Waukesha 35/47/62 MVA transformer which will have a maximum National Electrical Manufacturers Association ( NEMA sound level of 71.4 db measured in accordance with IEEE Standard C , IEEE Standard Test Code for Liquid- Immersed Distribution, Power and Regulating Transformers [4]. Using the drawings provided in Appendix E, we have arrived at an enclosing surface area estimate of approximately 255 m 2. The NEMA sound rating and the measurement surface area were used to compute the overall sound power level of 96 dba [5]. Under MOE guidelines tonal noises, such as the hum typically produced by electrical transformers, are penalized 5 db to account for the increased potential for annoyance that such sounds tend to have [6]. Thus, the 96 dba sound power level becomes 101 dba. 6 POINT OF RECEPTION SUMMARY As shown in Figure 2, there are a number of residences in the vicinity of the project, generally sited along the major roadways. A table of UTM coordinates for 710 receptors, including vacant lots, located near the proposed wind turbine generators was received from. Additionally, this assessment considers 29 receptors related to the NextEra Adelaide project where the UTM coordinates were obtained from the NextEra Noise Impact Assessment Adelaide Wind Energy Centre, dated October 12, 2012 [7]. The existing receptors and vacant lots, together with their coordinates are listed in Tables A3 and A4. A concordance table identifying the common receptors between the Adelaide Wind Energy Project and the NextEra Adelaide Wind Project is attached as Table 5. There are no common receptors between the wpd Napier, NextEra Bornish and Adelaide projects. Under NPC-232, receptor locations in a rural area are taken to be anywhere within 30 meters of the exterior walls of a dwelling. For the purposes of this report, each of the 739 receptors was

13 Energy Products Inc. Page 7 Adelaide Wind Power Project, Acoustic Assessment February 28, 2013 represented by a discrete sound prediction location at the dwelling coordinate, with an assumed height of 4.5 meters above the local grade, to represent existing or potential future second-story windows. Where vacant lots were identified, the assumed future location of the dwelling was selected to be consistent with the typical building pattern in the area. Where three storey dwellings were identified, the prediction location utilized an assumed height of 7.5 meters above the local grade. A number of the receptors identified have agreements with the wind farm developer. These receptors are identified as participating receptors by the MOE. According to the MOE publication Noise Guidelines for Wind Farms Interpretation for Applying MOE NPC Publications to Wind Power Generation Facilities ( Interpretation [8], a participating receptor means a property that is associated with the Wind Farm by means of a legal agreement with the property owner for the installation and operation of wind turbines or related equipment located on that property. Table A3 includes non-participating receptors while Table A4 includes the details of the participating receptors. 7 ASSESSMENT CRITERIA The MOE publication NPC-232 Sound Level Limits for Stationary Sources in Class 3 Areas (Rural [9] indicates that the applicable sound level limit for a stationary source of sound is the background sound level. However, where background sound levels are low, exclusionary minimum criteria apply, with an exclusionary limit of 40 dba specified for quiet night time periods, and 45 dba specified for quiet daytime periods. To determine if the minimum criteria should apply, the site was visited on October 28, 2011 and short-duration sound levels were recorded at a number of locations throughout the study area. With exception to receptor locations close to Highway 402 average sound levels (L EQ were typically less than 40 dba, indicating that the area is acoustically rural. For receptors near Highway 402 elevated background sound levels were measured however, for this assessment the exclusionary minimum limits of 40 dba have been assumed for all receptors.

14 Energy Products Inc. Page 8 Adelaide Wind Power Project, Acoustic Assessment February 28, 2013 Because wind turbines generate more sound as the wind speeds increase, and because increasing wind speeds tend to cause greater background sound levels, wind turbine generators have been identified by the MOE as a unique case, and the MOE has provided supplementary guidance for the assessment of wind turbine noise in Interpretation [8]. This publication provides criteria for the combined impact of all turbines in an area as a function of 10 meter height wind speed. The criteria are presented in A-weighted decibels, as follows. Table 6: Wind Turbine Noise Criteria [dba] 10 Meter Height Wind Speed [m/s] Wind Turbine Noise Criteria, NPC-232 [dba] It should be noted that the MOE guidelines, including NPC-232 and Interpretation do not require or imply that a noise source should be inaudible at a point of reception, and inaudibility should not be expected. In fact, even when the sound levels from a source are less than the numeric guideline limits, spectral and temporal characteristics of a sound regularly result in audibility at points of reception. To be clear, wind turbines will be audible at many residences even when sound levels are below MOE noise criteria guidelines. In the case of this assessment, the sound power output is assumed to be constant at the maximum value of dba over the full range of 10 meter height wind speeds due to the summer nighttime wind shear exponent, which means that strong hub height winds and the maximum sound power level can occur at the same time as low 10 meter height winds and low background sound. Thus, this assessment is based on the minimum criteria of 40 dba and the maximum wind turbine sound power level. 8 IMPACT ASSESSMENT An acoustic model of the site was created on a computer using Cadna/A (version , a commercial acoustic modeling system. Cadna/A uses the computational procedures of ISO , Acoustics Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors Part 2: General method of calculation [10], which accounts for reduction in sound level with distance due to geometrical

15 Energy Products Inc. Page 9 Adelaide Wind Power Project, Acoustic Assessment February 28, 2013 spreading, air absorption, ground attenuation and acoustical shielding by intervening structures (or by topography and foliage where applicable. This is the standard that is specified by Interpretation to be used in the assessment of wind farm noise. Topographical data for the site and surrounding area was provided by. Ground attenuation was assumed to be spectral for all sources, with the ground factor (G assumed to be 0.7 globally. The temperature and relative humidity were assumed to be 10 C and 70%, respectively. Stands of foliage were not modelled. For each receptor the predictions include the sound emissions of known wind turbines within a 5 km radius as stipulated in the 2008 MOE Interpretation. Details for the NextEra Adelaide Wind Energy Centre were obtained from the Noise Impact Assessment Adelaide Wind Energy Centre, dated October 12, 2012 [7] and an of February 15, 2013 from GL Garrad Hassan confirming the coordinates for the NextEra Adelaide Transformer Station acoustic barrier [11]. Details for the NextEra Bornish Wind Energy Centre were obtained from the Renewable Energy Approval Application Noise Impact Assessment Bornish Wind Energy Centre, dated September 21, 2012 [12]. Details for the wpd Canada Napier Wind Project were obtained from the Acoustic Assessment Report Napier Wind Project, Township of Adelaide Metcalfe, dated September 28, 2012 [13]. The wind turbine and transformer locations, as well as their sound power levels were obtained from the above reports. All the Adelaide wind turbine generators were modeled as point sources at a height of 99.5 meters above grade, the NextEra Adelaide wind turbine generators as point sources at a height of 80 meters above grade and the wpd Canada Napier wind turbine generators as point sources at a height of 100 meters above grade. Figure 2 presents the acoustic model, with the source and receptor locations shown. Figure 4 shows the noise contours of the area surrounding the facility, as produced by Cadna/A, based on the octave band sound power levels of each wind turbine. The required summary tables are contained in Appendix A of this report. Tables A5 through A10 list the sound pressure levels calculated at each of the identified receptor locations. In general, sound levels are predicted to be at or below the 40.0 dba minimum criterion at all but two participating receptor locations. At these participating receptors sound

16 Energy Products Inc. Page 10 Adelaide Wind Power Project, Acoustic Assessment February 28, 2013 levels of up to 43.5 dba are predicted. The owners of these properties have entered into lease agreements with the proponent and include a wind turbine or related infrastructure on the properties. These receptors are considered herein to be part of the project (ie. participating receptors and not sensitive receptors for the purposes of sound level impact. Details of the calculations are provided in Appendix E. The Cadna/A computer model can be provided upon request. In accordance with the 2008 MOE Interpretation, sound level predictions for receptors within 1500 meters of the sound sources are presented in Tables A5 though A10. Tables A5 and A6 show the sound level predictions for the cumulative assessment scenario (all existing wind projects and all proposed wind turbine projects within 5km. Tables A7 and A8 show the sound level predictions solely for the Adelaide Wind Power Project and tables A9 and A10 show the sound level predictions solely for the transformer related to the Adelaide Project. When conducting an acoustic audit of a conventional stationary industrial sound source, the MOE guidelines direct that periods of high wind be excluded. Typically, the noise output of industrial sound sources is independent of wind speed. However, this is not the case for wind plants and there is an intrinsic relationship between wind speed (and therefore ambient noise and increased sound power levels associated with the wind turbine generators. Complicating matters, there is a large degree of variability related to environmental factors within the wind plant area including, among others, local ground level wind speeds, wind speeds affecting the wind turbine generator blades, the associated wind shear, and the sound power of the wind turbine generators, all of which affect the measured sound levels. Thus, it is not realistic to expect that in practice a single repeatable sound level can or will be measured for a given wind speed at a given setback distance; a simple comparison of single numbers is not sufficient or possible. 9 CONCLUSIONS The analysis, performed in accordance with the methods prescribed by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment in publication Interpretation for Applying MOE NPC Technical Publications to Wind Power Generation Facilities, October 2008, indicates that the operation of the proposed

17 Energy Products Inc. Page 11 Adelaide Wind Power Project, Acoustic Assessment February 28, 2013 wind farm will comply with the requirements of the MOE publication NPC-232 Sound Level Limits for Stationary Sources in Class 3 Areas (Rural for all identified non-participating receptor locations.

18 Energy Products Inc. Page 12 Adelaide Wind Power Project, Acoustic Assessment February 28, 2013 REFERENCES 1. Howe Gastmeier Chapnik Limited, Acoustic Assessment Report Adelaide Wind Power Project, Version 2, November 23, CAN/CSA-C , Wind Turbine Generator Systems Part 11: Acoustic noise measurement techniques, Edition 2.1, Siemens Wind Power A/S, Contract Acoustic Emission, SWT (2221 kw, Hub Height 99.5 m, Document ID: E W EN OEN DES TLS , June 21, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE, Standard C , IEEE Standard Test Code for Liquid-Immersed Distribution, Power, and Regulation Transformers. 5. Crocker, Malcolm, J., Sound Power Level Predictions for Industrial Machinery, In Encyclopedia of Acoustics (Vol. 2, pp , John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Ontario Ministry of the Environment Publication NPC-104, Sound Level Adjustments, August, GL Garrad Hassan, Renewable Energy Approval Application Noise Impact Assessment Adelaide Wind Energy Centre, Issue D, October 12, Ontario Ministry of the Environment Publication, Noise Guidelines for Wind Farms, Interpretation for Applying MOE NPC Publications to Wind Power Generation Facilities, October Ontario Ministry of the Environment Publication NPC-232, Sound Level Limits for Stationary Sources in Class 3 Areas (Rural, October, International Organization for Standardization, Acoustics Attenuation of Sound during Propagation Outdoors Part 2: General Method of Calculation, ISO , Switzerland, C. Scott, personal communication from GL Garrad Hassan, February 15, GL Garrad Hassan, Renewable Energy Approval Application Noise Impact Assessment Bornish Wind Energy Centre, Issue G, September 21, Howe Gastmeier Chapnik Ltd., Acoustic Assessment Report Napier Wind Project, Version 2, September 28, Google Maps Aerial Imagery, Internet Application: maps.google.com

19 Receptor Concordance Table Adelaide, Page 1 of 4 POR UTM coordinates Easting Northing Adelaide NextEra Adelaide Distance between Receptor Points Adelaide Table 5: Receptor Concordance Table Adelaide Wind Power Project POR ID Distance to nearest source (m Nearest source ID Level of farm (dba Next Era Adelaide UTM Coordinates NextEra Adelaide NextEra Bornish R_ R_ R_ R_ PR_ R_ R_ R_ R_ R_ R_ R_ PR_ R_ PR_ R_ V_ PV_ R_ R_ R_ R_ R_ R_ R_ PR_ Napier Adelaide WTG23 WTG23 WTG21 WTG20 WTG21 WTG20 WTG20 WTG20 WTG21 WTG20 WTG20 substation WTG19 WTG19 WTG19 WTG19 WTG19 WTG19 WTG19 WTG19 WTG17 WTG17 WTG17 WTG17 WTG17 WTG15 NextEra Adelaide TG02 TG02 TG02 TG01 TG01 TG01 TG01 TG01 TG01 TG01 TG01 TG02 TG01 TG01 TG01 TG01 TG01 TG01 TG01 TG04 TG06 TG06 TG06 TG06 TG06 TG06 NextEra Bornish Napier Bornish WTG34 Napier_WT G01 WTG34 G01 WTG39 G01 WTG39 G01 WTG39 G01 WTG39 G01 WTG39 G01 WTG39 G01 WTG39 G01 WTG39 G01 WTG39 G02 WTG39 G02 WTG47 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 Adelaide NextEra Adelaide Level (dba Total Comments Receptor Added Below Receptor Added Below

20 Receptor Concordance Table Adelaide, Page 2 of 4 POR UTM coordinates Easting Northing Adelaide NextEra Adelaide POR ID Distance to nearest source (m Nearest source ID Level of farm (dba Next Era Adelaide UTM Coordinates Distance between Receptor Points Adelaide NextEra Adelaide NextEra Bornish R_ R_ R_ R_ R_ R_ R_ V_ V_ V_ V_ V_ V_ V_ PV_ PV_ PV_ PR_ V_ V_ V_ V_ V_ V_ V_ V_ R_ Napier Adelaide WTG15 WTG15 WTG15 WTG13 WTG13 WTG13 WTG13 WTG20 WTG20 WTG20 WTG20 substation WTG20 WTG19 WTG19 WTG19 WTG19 WTG19 WTG19 WTG19 WTG17 WTG15 WTG15 WTG15 WTG15 WTG15 WTG14 NextEra Adelaide TG06 TG06 TG06 TG12 TG12 TG12 TG12 TG01 TG01 TG01 TG01 TG02 TG01 TG01 TG01 TG01 TG01 TG01 TG04 TG04 TG05 TG06 TG06 TG06 TG06 TG06 TG06 NextEra Bornish Napier Bornish WTG44 Napier_WT G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG39 G01 WTG39 G01 WTG39 G01 WTG39 G01 WTG39 G02 WTG39 G02 WTG47 G02 WTG47 G02 WTG47 G02 WTG47 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 Adelaide NextEra Adelaide Level (dba Total Comments Receptor Added Below Receptor Added Below Receptor Added Below Receptor Added Below Receptor Added Below Receptor Added Below Receptor Added Below Receptor Added Below Receptor Added Below Receptor Added Below Receptor Added Below Receptor Added Below Receptor Added Below Receptor Added Below Receptor Added Below Receptor Added Below Receptor Added Below Receptor Added Below Receptor Added Below

21 Receptor Concordance Table Adelaide, Page 3 of 4 POR UTM coordinates Easting Northing Adelaide NextEra Adelaide POR ID Distance to nearest source (m Nearest source ID Level of farm (dba Next Era Adelaide UTM Coordinates Distance between Receptor Points Adelaide NextEra Adelaide NextEra Bornish V_ R_ R_ R_ V_ R_ V_ V_ V_ V_ V_ Napier PR_ PV_ PV_ PV_ PV_ R_ V_ V_ V_ V_ V_ V_ V_ V_ V_ V_ Adelaide WTG13 WTG20 WTG20 WTG17 WTG17 WTG15 WTG21 WTG21 WTG21 WTG17 WTG19 WTG19 WTG19 WTG19 WTG19 WTG19 WTG13 WTG13 WTG13 substation WTG19 WTG15 WTG17 WTG18 WTG20 WTG19 WTG20 NextEra Adelaide TG12 TG01 TG01 TG06 TG06 TG06 TG02 TG01 TG01 TG06 TG04 TG01 TG01 TG01 TG01 TG01 TG11 TG12 TG12 TG02 TG04 TG06 TG05 TG05 TG01 TG01 TG01 NextEra Bornish Napier Bornish WTG44 Napier_WT G02 WTG39 G01 WTG39 G01 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG39 G01 WTG39 G01 WTG39 G01 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG47 G02 WTG47 G02 WTG47 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG39 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG39 G02 WTG47 G02 WTG39 G01 Adelaide NextEra Adelaide Level (dba Total Comments Receptor Added Below Receptor Added Below Receptor Added Below Receptor Added Below Receptor Added Below

22 Receptor Concordance Table Adelaide, Page 4 of 4 POR UTM coordinates Easting Northing Adelaide NextEra Adelaide POR ID Distance to nearest source (m Nearest source ID Level of farm (dba Next Era Adelaide UTM Coordinates Distance between Receptor Points Adelaide NextEra Adelaide NextEra Bornish Napier V_ V_ V_ V_ V_ V_ V_ V_ V_ V_ V_ V_ V_ Adelaide WTG21 WTG20 WTG21 WTG14 WTG15 WTG15 WTG15 WTG17 WTG17 WTG20 WTG20 WTG20 WTG19 NextEra Adelaide TG01 TG01 TG01 TG06 TG06 TG06 TG06 TG06 TG06 TG01 TG01 TG01 TG01 NextEra Bornish Napier Bornish WTG39 Napier_WT G01 WTG39 G01 WTG39 G01 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG44 G02 WTG39 G02 WTG39 G01 WTG39 G01 WTG44 G02 Adelaide NextEra Adelaide Level (dba Total Comments

23 Adelaide NextEra Adelaide NextEra Bornish wpd Napier Figure 1: Adelaide Wind Power Project Location

24 os e R oad d tt Ro a ad Ha sk e s Ro Rodd ic Hodg in Fort R k Ro ad ad n Ro S y lv a ad od R Wat so ad Ke rw o on R o Ausa b nd Li n $ T V_ e _ ^ Fe D $ ll e hi rn ri v 329 School Road d oa Town se R ill rh a pl 107 Langan Drive d oa Po R n tre et bi ub Birnam Line ow S cc Gla s g M Property Boundary D 427 e ri v 121 et Participating Property re St e 110 Road A rg yl 742 o ad Ped d en R t Stree 747 Receptor and Wind Turbine Generator Locations Petty Title Wyat t Roa d 83 2 d 59 Expressway / Highway 103 Figure No. ± NextEra- Adelaide Roa d Adelaide Wind Project 1:18,000 NextEra- Substation Existing Features 1 km Noise Wall- NextEra Adelaide oa 0 Noise Receptors NextEra Receptor ID gban k T $ V355 rr 53 Client/Project Other Noise Receptors he ad le R o February 2013 Receptor ID tc Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N 2. Base features produced under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Queen's Printer for Ontario, Imagery Source- Energy Includes Material 2011 of the Queens printer for Ontario. All rights reserved. Imagery Date: 2010 e Fl Non-Participating Vacant _ ^ Other Infrastructure Access Roads S p ri n 37 Non-Participating Occupied ad m Setback Distance Is la n d Ro - Adelaide Transformer Collector Line 14 Participating Vacant _ ^ Ca m er o ad n Ro Bingo Road MET Tower d oa + $ Participating Occupied 32 Noise Wall 12 Proposed Turbine Location o ad Notes Noise Receptors- Adelaide R 6 il R m Fos s ea Proposed Project Components tr Legend ds ri v e r iv e ol C Riv er D E lm T re e D T $ $ V_359 T T $ V_357 V_360 V_400 T $ T $ PV_444 T $ 592 T $ 596 PV_442 T $ PR_366 T $ V_356 $ T T $ 612 V_ V_390 T $ V_ _ ^ $ V_331 T Egremont Drive ce V_ T $ T $ Seed Road Highway ic H Mullifarry Drive Nd Street W:\active\ \drawing\MXD\HGC_NoiseReport\ _Fig2_NoiseReceptors_ mxd Revised: By: dharvey 658 D e ry ko ri v Zion Line 400 Adair Boulevard Wright Street 590 School Road Highway V_ Egremont Road Brown Road T $ Sexton Road R_ Cuddy Drive 274 T $ V_ $ T V_382 T $ d 23 T $ 628 V_385 T $ V_387 T $ V_388 T $ T $ oa 123 V_460 $ TT $ V_389 V_ PV_ R 24 T $ PV_443 V_ d oo W Wilson Road V_ T $ M V_ Hansford Road 686 Newell Road Centre Road Brick Yard Line Robotham Road Seed Road Morse Road w en 430 Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, and the GIS User Community 539

25 TS Proposed Acoustic Barrier Length = 7.5m x 7.5m Height = 6m FRAME COORDINATES ARE UTM IN METRES Figure 3: Proposed Acoustic Barrier for Substation Transformer Energy Products - Adeladie Wind Energy Project

26 7 : < 7 ; 7, ;3 -< < 7, 7, / 16 ; 7, 7, 7, - :? 7 6/6 :1>-!7?6 ;- 6, 16 - $ T ( 28 4;/ 7? < :- - < _ ^ ( T $ T ( T $ $ ( T $ ( ( T $ ( ( ( T $ T $ $ T T $ ( T $ ( 23 ( ( $ TT $ _ ^ 15 T $ T $ ( T $ ( ( T $ ( ( T $ /:- 5 76< 7, =,, A :1>- T $ /:- 5 76< :1> ( T $ ( T $ , 7, 1/0?A 1/0?A % , < :- - < : 1> :A =441.::A :1>- W:\active\ \drawing\MXD\HGC_NoiseReport\ _Fig4_SoundContours_ mxd Revised: By: dharvey, 1: 7=4- >:, :1/0< < :- - < , ( :7?6 7, 76 7, T $ ( T $ ( ( ( T $ T $ 14 ( T $ $ T ( T $ ( T $, 7, 24 ( 77-6< :- 7, --, 7, 7:;- 7, :1+3 $:, 16-6 : 1> ;76 7, 16 : - + $ , 27, : 4 Property Boundary 8 7 Participating Property, 7 :-, 1+< -, 7=6, - >- 4; - 9 &, ' =6+7: 6- :/A :7, =+< ; B, - 41, - 16, 7?- : :72- +< ;! 16,!=:16- ;, 7=6, - >- 4 :1, - 1/0< 4+=4< -, < 5 Title 6 1 = ++ 1: Road 45 dba Expressway / Highway Figure No. ± 40 16/ - < =:- ; 35 Receptor ID 7=6, 76< 7=:; NextEra- Adelaide Adelaide Wind Project +? -6 Noise Receptors NextEra NextEra- Substation 6;.7:, 7, T $ Noise Wall- NextEra Adelaide < 0- : 71; < 7:;, 7 :, Client/Project Receptor ID -< Collector Line February 2013 :/ A4 - <: - Non-Participating Vacant -?- 44 7, =; 4-7 -,, - 6 7, Access Roads _ ^ Non-Participating Occupied < 0- : 6.:;< :=+< =:- Noise Wall - Adelaide Transformer - < < A< :- - < Participating Vacant 77< 05 7, MET Tower 8 : 16 / 6 3 7, + $ +0 -< 4 Participating Occupied _ ^ ;46, 7, Proposed Turbine Location 1. Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N 2. Base features produced under license with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Queen's Printer for Ontario, Imagery Source- Energy Includes Material 2011 of the Queens printer for Ontario. All rights reserved. Imagery Date: 2010 A< < 7, 71; < 7:; =6+7:, - 41, - :787;-, :72- +< < ; 5 - : 76 7, 7, 16/7 7 ; ;14 7, 7< -;, 7 < ;7 6 7, - /- 6, : 1> - 7,, 1+3 7,, A4>6 7 1>- 5 - <:,; 74 1>- : : 45!:- - : 1>- Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, and the GIS User Community

27 APPENDIX A: ASSESSMENT SUMMARY TABLES

28 ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT SUMMARY TABLES VERSION CONTROL Adelaide Wind Power Project, Municipality of Adelaide Metcalfe, Ontario Tables Ver. 1 Date June 26, 2012 Issued as Part of AAR? Y Version Description Original DRAFT Acoustic Assessment Report supporting a Renewable Energy Application Prepared By I. Bonsma 2 November 23, 2012 Y Revised Version of tables as part of Ver. 2 of the Acoustic Assessment Report I. Bonsma 3 February 28, 2013 Y Revised Version of tables as part of Ver. 3 of the Acoustic Assessment Report I. Bonsma

29 Make and Model: Electrical Rating: Hub Height (m: Wind Shear Coefficient: Table A1a: Siemens Wind Turbine Acoustic Emmissions Summary Adelaide Wind Power Project Siemens SWT MW 99.5m Maximum sound power level utilized Octave Band Sound Power Level [db] Manufacturer s Emission Levels Adjusted Emission Level Wind Speed [m/s] Frequency [Hz] Overall A-Weighted Make and Model: Electrical Rating: Hub Height (m: Wind Shear Coefficient: Table A1b: GE Wind Turbine Acoustic Emmissions Summary NextEra Adelaide/Bornish Wind Farm GE kw 80 m Maximum sound power utilized Octave Band Sound Power Level (db Manufacturer s Emission Levels Adjusted Emission Level Wind Speed [m/s] Frequency [Hz] Overall A-Weighted

30 Table A1c: REpower MM92 Wind Turbine Acoustic Emmissions Summary Napier Wind Project Make and Model: Electrical Rating: Hub Height (m: REpower, MM kw 100 m Wind Shear Coefficient: Maximum sound power level utilized Octave Band Sound Power Level (db Manufacturer s Emission Levels Adjusted Emission Level Wind Speed [m/s] Frequency [Hz] Overall A-Weighted

31 Table A2: Wind Turbine Generator Locations Adelaide Wind Power Project Appendix A2: Page 1 of 3 Source Locations Source ID Wind Turbine Generator Make and Model UTM Coordinates Easting Northing WTG05 Siemens SWT , 99.5m hub height, MW WTG06 Siemens SWT , 99.5m hub height, MW WTG07 Siemens SWT , 99.5m hub height, MW WTG08 Siemens SWT , 99.5m hub height, MW WTG09 Siemens SWT , 99.5m hub height, MW WTG11 Siemens SWT , 99.5m hub height, MW WTG12 Siemens SWT , 99.5m hub height, MW WTG13 Siemens SWT , 99.5m hub height, MW WTG14 Siemens SWT , 99.5m hub height, MW WTG15 Siemens SWT , 99.5m hub height, MW WTG16 Siemens SWT , 99.5m hub height, MW WTG17 Siemens SWT , 99.5m hub height, MW WTG18 Siemens SWT , 99.5m hub height, MW WTG19 Siemens SWT , 99.5m hub height, MW WTG20 Siemens SWT , 99.5m hub height, MW WTG21 Siemens SWT , 99.5m hub height, MW WTG22 Siemens SWT , 99.5m hub height, MW WTG23 Siemens SWT , 99.5m hub height, MW WTG24 Siemens SWT , 99.5m hub height, MW WTG26 Siemens SWT , 99.5m hub height, MW WTG27 Siemens SWT , 99.5m hub height, MW WTG28 Siemens SWT , 99.5m hub height, MW TS1 Waukesha Transformer, 62 MVA Adelaide Transformer Barrier, North Adelaide Transformer Barrier, Southwest Adelaide Transformer Barrier, East

32 Appendix A2: Page 2 of 3 Source Locations NextEra Adelaide Wind Energy Centre Source ID Wind Turbine Generator Make and Model UTM Coordinates Easting Northing TG01 General Electric , 80m hub height TG02 General Electric , 80m hub height TG03 General Electric , 80m hub height TG04 General Electric , 80m hub height TG05 General Electric , 80m hub height TG06 General Electric , 80m hub height TG07 General Electric , 80m hub height TG08 General Electric , 80m hub height TG09 General Electric , 80m hub height TG10 General Electric , 80m hub height TG11 General Electric , 80m hub height TG12 General Electric , 80m hub height TG13 General Electric , 80m hub height TG14 General Electric , 80m hub height TG15 General Electric , 80m hub height TG16 General Electric , 80m hub height TG17 General Electric , 80m hub height TG18 General Electric , 80m hub height TG19 General Electric , 80m hub height TG20 General Electric , 80m hub height TG21 General Electric , 80m hub height TG22 General Electric , 80m hub height TG23 General Electric , 80m hub height TG24 General Electric , 80m hub height TG25 General Electric , 80m hub height TG26 General Electric , 80m hub height TG27 General Electric , 80m hub height TG28 General Electric , 80m hub height TG29 General Electric , 80m hub height TG30 General Electric , 80m hub height TG31 General Electric , 80m hub height TG32 General Electric , 80m hub height TG33 General Electric , 80m hub height TG34 General Electric , 80m hub height TG35 General Electric , 80m hub height TG36 General Electric , 80m hub height TG37 General Electric , 80m hub height TG38 General Electric , 80m hub height NextEra_TS NextEra Adelaide Transformer NextEra Adelaide Transformer Barrier, West NextEra Adelaide Transformer Barrier, East wpd Canada Napier Wind Project Napier_WTG01 REpower MM92, 100m hub height Napier_WTG02 REpower MM92, 100m hub height

33 Appendix A2: Page 3 of 3 Source Locations NextEra Bornish Wind Energy Centre Source ID Wind Turbine Generator Make and Model UTM Coordinates Easting Northing Bornish WTG01 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG02 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG03 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG04 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG05 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG06 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG07 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG08 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG09 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG10 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG11 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG12 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG13 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG14 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG15 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG16 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG17 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG18 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG19 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG20 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG21 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG22 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG23 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG24 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG25 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG26 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG27 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG28 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG29 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG30 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG31 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG32 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG33 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG34 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG35 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG36 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG37 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG38 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG39 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG40 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG41 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG42 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG43 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG44 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG45 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG46 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG47 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish WTG48 General Electric , 80m hub height Bornish Transformer NextEra Bornish Transformer

34 Appendix A3: Page 1 of 14 Adelaide Receptor Locations Table A3: Non-Participating Receptor Locations Adelaide Wind Power Project Point of Reception UTM Coordinates Description ID Easting Northing 1 Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant

35 Appendix A3: Page 2 of 14 Adelaide Receptor Locations Point of Reception UTM Coordinates Description ID Easting Northing 53 Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling

36 Appendix A3: Page 3 of 14 Adelaide Receptor Locations Point of Reception UTM Coordinates Description ID Easting Northing 111 Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling

37 Appendix A3: Page 4 of 14 Adelaide Receptor Locations Point of Reception UTM Coordinates Description ID Easting Northing 165 Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling

38 Appendix A3: Page 5 of 14 Adelaide Receptor Locations Point of Reception UTM Coordinates Description ID Easting Northing 221 Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling

39 Appendix A3: Page 6 of 14 Adelaide Receptor Locations Point of Reception UTM Coordinates Description ID Easting Northing 275 Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling

40 Appendix A3: Page 7 of 14 Adelaide Receptor Locations Point of Reception UTM Coordinates Description ID Easting Northing 331 Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling

41 Appendix A3: Page 8 of 14 Adelaide Receptor Locations Point of Reception UTM Coordinates Description ID Easting Northing 414 Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling

42 Appendix A3: Page 9 of 14 Adelaide Receptor Locations Point of Reception UTM Coordinates Description ID Easting Northing 472 Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling

43 Appendix A3: Page 10 of 14 Adelaide Receptor Locations Point of Reception UTM Coordinates Description ID Easting Northing 527 Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant

44 Appendix A3: Page 11 of 14 Adelaide Receptor Locations Point of Reception UTM Coordinates Description ID Easting Northing 581 Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant

45 Appendix A3: Page 12 of 14 Adelaide Receptor Locations Point of Reception UTM Coordinates Description ID Easting Northing 637 Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant

46 Appendix A3: Page 13 of 14 Adelaide Receptor Locations Point of Reception UTM Coordinates Description ID Easting Northing 721 Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant PR_366 Non-Participating Dwelling PV_442 Non-Participating Vacant PV_443 Non-Participating Vacant PV_444 Non-Participating Vacant PV_461 Non-Participating Vacant R_338 Non-Participating Dwelling V_272 Non-Participating Vacant V_276 Non-Participating Vacant V_331 Non-Participating Vacant V_341 Non-Participating Vacant V_349 Non-Participating Vacant V_350 Non-Participating Vacant V_351 Non-Participating Vacant V_355 Non-Participating Vacant V_356 Non-Participating Vacant V_357 Non-Participating Vacant V_359 Non-Participating Vacant V_360 Non-Participating Vacant V_361 Non-Participating Vacant V_382 Non-Participating Vacant

47 Appendix A3: Page 14 of 14 Adelaide Receptor Locations Point of Reception UTM Coordinates Description ID Easting Northing V_385 Non-Participating Vacant V_387 Non-Participating Vacant V_388 Non-Participating Vacant V_389 Non-Participating Vacant V_390 Non-Participating Vacant V_400 Non-Participating Vacant V_403 Non-Participating Vacant V_420 Non-Participating Vacant

48 Table A4: Participating Receptor Locations Adelaide Wind Power Project Point of Reception ID Description UTM Coordinates Easting Northing 402 Participating Dwelling Participating Dwelling Participating Dwelling Participating Dwelling Participating Dwelling Participating Dwelling Participating Dwelling Participating Dwelling Participating Dwelling Participating Dwelling Participating Dwelling Participating Dwelling Participating Dwelling Participating Dwelling Participating Dwelling Participating Dwelling Participating Dwelling Participating Vacant Participating Vacant Participating Vacant Participating Vacant Participating Vacant Participating Vacant Participating Vacant Participating Vacant Participating Vacant Participating Vacant Participating Vacant Participating Vacant Participating Vacant

49 Appendix A5: Page 1 of 4 Cumulative Noise Impact Summary Non Partiicpating Receptors Point of Reception ID Table A5: Wind Turbine Noise Impact Summary - Non-Participating Receptor Locations Adelaide Wind Power Project, Cumulative Impact Height [m] Distance to Nearest Source [m] Nearest Turbine ID Calculated Sound Level [dba] at Selected Wind Speeds (m/s Sound Level Limit [dba] Description Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling substation Non-Participating Dwelling substation Non-Participating Dwelling substation Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling substation Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG

50 Appendix A5: Page 2 of 4 Cumulative Noise Impact Summary Non Partiicpating Receptors Distance to Calculated Sound Level [dba] at Point of Height Nearest Sound Level Limit [dba] Description Nearest Selected Wind Speeds (m/s Reception ID [m] Turbine ID Source [m] Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG

51 Appendix A5: Page 3 of 4 Cumulative Noise Impact Summary Non Partiicpating Receptors Distance to Calculated Sound Level [dba] at Point of Height Nearest Sound Level Limit [dba] Description Nearest Selected Wind Speeds (m/s Reception ID [m] Turbine ID Source [m] Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant substation Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant substation Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG

52 Appendix A5: Page 4 of 4 Cumulative Noise Impact Summary Non Partiicpating Receptors Distance to Calculated Sound Level [dba] at Point of Height Nearest Sound Level Limit [dba] Description Nearest Selected Wind Speeds (m/s Reception ID [m] Turbine ID Source [m] Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant substation Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG PR_366 Jericho Receptor WTG PV_442 Jericho Receptor WTG PV_443 Jericho Receptor WTG PV_444 Jericho Receptor WTG PV_461 Jericho Receptor WTG R_338 Jericho Receptor WTG V_272 Jericho Receptor WTG V_276 Jericho Receptor WTG V_331 Jericho Receptor substation V_341 Jericho Receptor WTG V_349 Jericho Receptor WTG V_350 Jericho Receptor WTG V_351 Jericho Receptor WTG V_355 Jericho Receptor WTG V_356 Jericho Receptor WTG V_357 Jericho Receptor WTG V_359 Jericho Receptor WTG V_360 Jericho Receptor WTG V_361 Jericho Receptor WTG V_382 Jericho Receptor WTG V_385 Jericho Receptor WTG V_387 Jericho Receptor WTG V_388 Jericho Receptor WTG V_389 Jericho Receptor WTG V_390 Jericho Receptor WTG V_400 Jericho Receptor WTG V_403 Jericho Receptor WTG V_420 Jericho Receptor WTG V_460 Jericho Receptor WTG All other non-particapting receptors greater than 1500m from Wind Turbines.

53 Point of Reception ID Table A6: Wind Turbine Noise Impact Summary - Participating Receptor Locations Adelaide Wind Power Project, Cumulative Impact Height [m] Distance to Nearest Adelaide Turbine [m] Nearest Turbine ID Calculated Sound Level [dba] at Selected Wind Speeds (m/s Description Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Vacant WTG Participating Vacant WTG Participating Vacant WTG Participating Vacant WTG Participating Vacant WTG Participating Vacant WTG Participating Vacant WTG Participating Vacant WTG Participating Vacant WTG Participating Vacant WTG Participating Vacant WTG Participating Vacant WTG Participating Vacant WTG

54 Appendix A7: Page 1 of 4 Noise Impact Summary Non Participating Receptors, Adelaide ONLY Point of Reception ID Table A7: Wind Turbine Noise Impact Summary - Non-Participating Receptor Locations Adelaide Wind Power Project, No Cumulative Impact Height [m] Distance to Nearest Source [m] Nearest Turbine ID Calculated Sound Level [dba] at Selected Wind Speeds (m/s Sound Level Limit [dba] Description Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling substation Non-Participating Dwelling substation Non-Participating Dwelling substation Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling substation Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG

55 Appendix A7: Page 2 of 4 Noise Impact Summary Non Participating Receptors, Adelaide ONLY Distance to Calculated Sound Level [dba] at Point of Height Nearest Sound Level Limit [dba] Description Nearest Selected Wind Speeds (m/s Reception ID [m] Turbine ID Source [m] Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG

56 Appendix A7: Page 3 of 4 Noise Impact Summary Non Participating Receptors, Adelaide ONLY Distance to Calculated Sound Level [dba] at Point of Height Nearest Sound Level Limit [dba] Description Nearest Selected Wind Speeds (m/s Reception ID [m] Turbine ID Source [m] Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant substation Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant substation Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG

57 Appendix A7: Page 4 of 4 Noise Impact Summary Non Participating Receptors, Adelaide ONLY Distance to Calculated Sound Level [dba] at Point of Height Nearest Sound Level Limit [dba] Description Nearest Selected Wind Speeds (m/s Reception ID [m] Turbine ID Source [m] Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Dwelling WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant substation Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG Non-Participating Vacant WTG PR_366 Jericho Receptor WTG PV_442 Jericho Receptor WTG PV_443 Jericho Receptor WTG PV_444 Jericho Receptor WTG PV_461 Jericho Receptor WTG R_338 Jericho Receptor WTG V_272 Jericho Receptor WTG V_276 Jericho Receptor WTG V_331 Jericho Receptor substation V_341 Jericho Receptor WTG V_349 Jericho Receptor WTG V_350 Jericho Receptor WTG V_351 Jericho Receptor WTG V_355 Jericho Receptor WTG V_356 Jericho Receptor WTG V_357 Jericho Receptor WTG V_359 Jericho Receptor WTG V_360 Jericho Receptor WTG V_361 Jericho Receptor WTG V_382 Jericho Receptor WTG V_385 Jericho Receptor WTG V_387 Jericho Receptor WTG V_388 Jericho Receptor WTG V_389 Jericho Receptor WTG V_390 Jericho Receptor WTG V_400 Jericho Receptor WTG V_403 Jericho Receptor WTG V_420 Jericho Receptor WTG V_460 Jericho Receptor WTG All other non-particapting receptors greater than 1500m from Wind Turbines.

58 Point of Reception ID Table A8: Wind Turbine Noise Impact Summary - Participating Receptor Locations Adelaide Wind Power Project, No Cumulative Effects Description Height [m] Distance to Nearest Adelaide Turbine [m] Nearest Turbine ID Calculated Sound Level [dba] at Selected Wind Speeds (m/s Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Dwelling WTG Participating Vacant WTG Participating Vacant WTG Participating Vacant WTG Participating Vacant WTG Participating Vacant WTG Participating Vacant WTG Participating Vacant WTG Participating Vacant WTG Participating Vacant WTG Participating Vacant WTG Participating Vacant WTG Participating Vacant WTG Participating Vacant WTG

59 Point of Reception ID Table A9: Transformer Noise Impact Summary - Non-Participating Receptor Locations Adelaide Wind Power Project Description Height [m] 176 Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Dwelling Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant Non-Participating Vacant V_331 Jericho Receptor V_357 Jericho Receptor V_359 Jericho Receptor V_360 Jericho Receptor V_361 Jericho Receptor V_403 Jericho Receptor All other participating receptors greater than 1500m from the Transformer Distance to Transformer [m] Calculated Sound Level [dba] Sound Level Limit [dba]

60 Point of Reception ID Table A10: Transformer Noise Impact Summary - Participating Receptor Locations Adelaide Wind Power Project Description Height [m] 674 Participating Dwelling Participating Dwelling Participating Vacant Participating Vacant Participating Vacant All other participating receptors greater than 1500m from the Transformer Distance to Transformer [m] Calculated Sound Level [dba]

61 APPENDIX B: Zoning Maps

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79 TOWNSHIP OF ADELAIDE METCALFE 402 HIGHWAY 402 TOWNSHIP OF ADELAIDE METCALFE!( 1 CON II SER!( 2 TOWNSHIP OF ADELAIDE METCALFE SECOND ST 19!( 6 9 DRURY LANE ALBERT ST!( 11 PANNELL LANE VICTORIA ST METCALFE ST W 44!( 13 9!( 8!( 7!( 12!( Canadian National Railway 10 HEAD ST N CARADOC ST N!( 14 CON X CON III SER OAK AVE!( !( 9 CON IV SER 39 CARADOC ST S 11!( CON IX CARROLL ST W METCALFE ST E MCNAB ST QUEEN ST!( 5 YORK S !( 17!( 10 CARROLL ST E ADELAIDE RD!( 16!( 18 SAXTON RD LVERT DR ERS DR MUNICIPALITY OF STRATHROY-CARADOC BY-LAW No :30,000 F Metres SCHEDULE 'B' INDEX MAP STRATHROY

80 TOWNSHIP OF ADELAIDE METCALFE HIGHWAY M2 FD M2 M3 TOWNSHIP OF ADELAIDE METCALFE CONCESSION II SOUTH OF EGREMONT DR LOT 23 FD Map 2 WRIGHT ST RICCO PL M2 U FD R1 SECOND ST Map 3 Map 4 MUNICIPALITY OF STRATHROY-CARADOC BY-LAW No LEGEND Natural Environment Overlay 1:6, Metres F SCHEDULE 'B' MAP 1

81 TOWNSHIP OF ADELAIDE METCALFE HIGHWAY FD FD CONCESSION II SOUTH OF EGREMONT RD Map 1 LOT 24 M1 LOT 25 OS TOWNSHIP OF ADELAIDE METCALFE FD ADAIR BLVD I R1 I R1 SECOND ST Map 5 MUNICIPALITY OF STRATHROY-CARADOC BY-LAW No LEGEND Natural Environment Overlay 1:6, Metres F SCHEDULE 'B' MAP 2

82 APPENDIX C: Siemens SWT Wind Turbine Generator Information

83 SWT Turning moderate wind into maximum results

84 At the leading edge of evolution The new Siemens SWT wind turbine is the ultimate choice for low to moderate wind conditions. The revolutionary direct drive generator and the new, optimized Quantum Blade are paired to extract as much energy as possible from the wind. Efficient. Quiet. Robust and reliable. The Siemens SWT is the new benchmark wind turbine for low to medium wind speeds. As a result of more than 30 years of research and development, it is designed to harvest more energy out of moderate wind conditions than anyone thought possible. Proven design The SWT is built around the same revolutionizing direct drive generator as the SWT The direct drive turbine offers exceptional reliability and efficiency with only 50% of the parts normally required for a conventional wind turbine. By using the same proven design and sharing the majority of components with its larger sibling, production costs and lead times can be kept down. Unique aerodynamics The Quantum Blade combines exceptional aerodynamic performance with patented manufacturing technology. Based on innovative aerodynamic solutions in the root and tip sections, the Quantum Blade offers maximum efficiency at low to medium wind speeds. Maximum availability Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication. With the simple and robust direct drive concept with 50% fewer parts, the SWT wind turbine is designed for maximum availability. Furthermore, the spacious nacelle and the ergonomic working conditions facilitate serviceability and contribute to minimizing downtime for scheduled maintenance.

85 You cannot change the wind. It may be strong, it may be light. This leaves it up to us to extract as much energy as we can from it. Anne Schannong Vinther, Quality Engineer

86 Innovation for efficiency Siemens direct drive technology and the new Quantum Blade represent groundbreaking wind turbine design and technology. The result of these two key innovations is a turbine with maximum efficiency and reliability, which helps to enable a solid return on investment. Maximized performance with 50% fewer parts The Siemens direct drive design incorporates a permanent magnet generator with fewer moving parts than ever before. The simple permanent magnet design offers increased efficiency directly by minimizing energy losses and indirectly by reducing maintenance needs. The outer rotor arrangement leads to a more compact and lightweight generator, making transportation and installation easier and faster. The B55 Quantum Blade The new generation of Siemens wind turbine blades is lighter than previous designs but retains the superior strength known from earlier generations of blades. Thanks to unique airfoils and redesigned tip and root sections, the blade offers superior performance at low to medium wind speeds. The root section uses Siemens flatback profiles to minimize root leakage and provide higher lift. The tip has also undergone a fine-tuning process to give enhanced lift and acoustic performance. One-piece moulding Like other Siemens blades, the new Quantum Blades are manufactured in Siemens proprietary IntegralBlade process. Each blade is moulded in one single production step from fiberglass-reinforced epoxy resin, resulting in a stronger, lighter blade without any joints.

87 Lower noise With a low 105 db noise level, the SWT is one of the quietest wind turbines on the market. As a result, this turbine type has an extremely high ratio of energy output per noise affected area, resulting in fewer disturbances to people and wildlife. Superior grid compliance The Siemens NetConverter is designed for maximum flexibility in the turbine s response to voltage and frequency variations, fault ride-through capability and output adjustment. The advanced wind farm control system provides state-of-the-art fleet management.

88 Technical specification Rotor Type: 3-bladed, horizontal axis Position: Upwind Diameter: 113 m Swept area: 10,000 m 2 Speed range: 6 13 rpm Power regulation: Pitch regulation with variable speed Rotor tilt: 6 degrees Blade Type: Self-supporting Blade length: 55 m Tip chord: 0.63 m Root chord: 4.2 m Aerodynamic profile: NB 1-7, SWPNA1_XX12, FFAxxx Material: GRE Surface gloss: Semi-mat, <30 / ISO2813 Surface colour: Light grey, RAL 7035 Aerodynamic brake Type: Full span pitching Activation: Active, hydraulic Load-supporting parts Hub: Nodular cast iron Main shaft: Cast Nacelle bed plate: Cast Sales power curve Mechanical brake Type: Hydraulic disc brake Position: Generator rear end Number of callipers: 3 Canopy Type: Totally enclosed Surface gloss: Silk mat, / ISO2813 Colour: Light grey, RAL 7035 Generator Type: Synchronous, PMG Nominal power: 2,300 kw Grid terminals (LV Nominal power: 2,300 kw Voltage: 690 V Frequency: 50 Hz or 60 Hz Yaw system Type: Active Yaw bearing: Externally geared Yaw drive: 8 (optional 10 electric gear motors Yaw brake: Passive friction brake Controller Type: Microprocessor SCADA system: WPS Controller designation: SWTC, STC-1, SCS-1 Tower Type: Cylindrical and/or tapered tubular Hub height: 99.5 m or site-specific Corrosion protection: Painted Surface gloss: Silk mat, / ISO2813 Colour: Light grey, RAL 7035 Operational data Cut-in wind speed: 3 m/s Nominal power at: m/s Cut-out wind speed: 25 m/s Maximum 3 s gust: 59.5 m/s (IEC version Weights (approximately Rotor: 66,700 kg Nacelle: 73,000 kg Tower: Site-specific

89 1 Quantum Blade Unique design and manufacturing process IntegralBlade one-piece moulding for maximum strength Optimized aerodynamics for low to medium wind conditions Increased length for higher energy yield Blade root designed for minimized root leakage and increased lift 3 4 Nacelle Solid, compact and lightweight structure Spacious, ergonomic design maximum serviceability 50% fewer parts compared to geared turbines Cooling Simple and robust LiquidLink water cooling system Top-mounted passive cooling radiators High-efficient two-stage cooling as function of power 2 Direct drive generator Permanent magnet design Totally enclosed, easy to handle and lightweight design Optimum reliability and efficiency

ORLEANS GARDENS SHOPPING CENTRE 1615 ORLEANS BOULEVARD CITY OF OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRAFFIC UPDATE. Prepared for:

ORLEANS GARDENS SHOPPING CENTRE 1615 ORLEANS BOULEVARD CITY OF OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRAFFIC UPDATE. Prepared for: ORLEANS GARDENS SHOPPING CENTRE 1615 ORLEANS BOULEVARD CITY OF OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRAFFIC UPDATE Prepared for: Orleans Gardens Shopping Centre Inc. 2851 John Street, Suite 1 Markham, ON K3R 5R7 June 12, 2015

More information

Architectural Review Board Report

Architectural Review Board Report Architectural Review Board Report To: From: Subject: Architectural Review Board Architectural Review Board Meeting: August 16, 2010 Steve Traeger, Principal Urban Designer Laura Beck, ARB Liaison Agenda

More information

Food Primary Liquor License Amendment

Food Primary Liquor License Amendment City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT Food Primary Liquor License Amendment Proposal: Permit a food primary liquor license with hours of liquor service past midnight for a newly-approved eating

More information

Food Primary Liquor License Amendment

Food Primary Liquor License Amendment City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File: Food Primary Liquor License Amendment Proposal: Amend Food Primary Liquor License to extend hours of operation for an existing restaurant. Recommendation:

More information

Liquor License Amendment - Change of Hours

Liquor License Amendment - Change of Hours City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT Liquor License Amendment - Change of Hours Proposal: Liquor primary license amendment to extend hours of liquor service. Recommendation: Denial Location: 10458-137

More information

Uniform Rules Update Final EIR APPENDIX 6 ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS USED FOR ESTIMATING TRAFFIC VOLUMES

Uniform Rules Update Final EIR APPENDIX 6 ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS USED FOR ESTIMATING TRAFFIC VOLUMES APPENDIX 6 ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS USED FOR ESTIMATING TRAFFIC VOLUMES ASSUMPTIONS AND CALCULATIONS USED FOR ESTIMATING TRAFFIC VOLUMES This appendix contains the assumptions that have been applied

More information

Goodban Ecological Consulting Inc.

Goodban Ecological Consulting Inc. Goodban Ecological Consulting Inc. 879 Cabot Trail, Milton, Ontario L9T 3W4 Phone: (905) 693-9064 e-mail: anthony.goodban@sympatico.ca January 30, 2013 Ms. Melinda Thompson-Black: Species at Risk Biologist

More information

BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT Date: June 4, 2018

BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT Date: June 4, 2018 # 5 BOA-000511-2018 BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT Date: June 4, 2018 CASE NUMBER 6182 APPLICANT NAME LOCATION VARIANCE REQUEST ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT ZONING AREA OF PROPERTY ENGINEERING

More information

ISO 9852 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

ISO 9852 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 9852 Second edition 2007-05-01 Unplasticized poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC-U) pipes Dichloromethane resistance at specified temperature (DCMT) Test method Tubes en poly(chlorure

More information

Standing Committee on Planning, Transportation and Environment

Standing Committee on Planning, Transportation and Environment ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Report Date: September 20, 2013 Contact: Tom Hammel Contact No.: 604.873.7545 RTS No.: 10229 VanRIMS No.: 08-2000-20 Meeting Date: October 9, 2013 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Standing Committee

More information

DRAFT SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION FAIRVIEW CEMETERY

DRAFT SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION FAIRVIEW CEMETERY DRAFT SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION I. DESCRIPTION OF SECTION 4(F) RESOURCE The Section 4(f) resource that could be affected by the proposed action is Fairview Cemetery. The proposed action would require the

More information

MBA 503 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric

MBA 503 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric MBA 503 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric Overview There are two summative assessments for this course. For your first assessment, you will be objectively assessed by your completion of a series of MyAccountingLab

More information

Ergon Energy Corporation Limited 21 July 2010

Ergon Energy Corporation Limited 21 July 2010 Ergon Energy Corporation Limited 21 July 2010 Disclaimer While care was taken in preparation of the information in this discussion paper, and it is provided in good faith, Ergon Energy Corporation Limited

More information

School Breakfast and Lunch Program Request for Proposal

School Breakfast and Lunch Program Request for Proposal School Breakfast and Lunch Program Provident Charter School 1400 Troy Hill Road Pittsburgh, PA 15212 412-709-5160 Date Proposal Opens: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 @ 12pm Bid Due Date: Wednesday, July 26,

More information

TYPE II LAND USE APPLICATION Winery Events Special Use Permit

TYPE II LAND USE APPLICATION Winery Events Special Use Permit LAND MANAGEMENT DIVISION Date Received: TYPE II LAND USE APPLICATION Winery Events Special Use Permit PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 3050 N. DELTA HWY, EUGENE OR 97408 Planning: 541-682-3577 For Office Use Only

More information

A. CALL TO ORDER B. STATEMENT OF THE CHAIR C. BYLAWS D. ADJOURNMENT

A. CALL TO ORDER B. STATEMENT OF THE CHAIR C. BYLAWS D. ADJOURNMENT TOWN OF OLIVER Public Hearing Meeting Agenda October 10, 2017, at 7:00 PM Council Chambers Page A. CALL TO ORDER B. STATEMENT OF THE CHAIR C. BYLAWS 1. Zoning Amendment Bylaw 365 Zinfandel Avenue - Contract

More information

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter Agenda Date: 7/1/2015 Agenda Placement: 10A Continued From: May 20, 2015 Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter TO: FROM: Napa County Planning Commission John McDowell for David Morrison -

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page. Page

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page. Page TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION... 1-1 Background... 1-1 Planning Benefits... 1-1 Comprehensive Planning Law... 1-4 County Partnership... 1-5 Advisory Committee and Staff Structure... 1-5 Plan

More information

Supports Item No. 2 CS&B Committee Agenda November 18, 2010

Supports Item No. 2 CS&B Committee Agenda November 18, 2010 Supports Item No. 2 CS&B Committee Agenda November 18, 2010 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Report Date: October 29, 2010 Contact: Lucia Cumerlato Contact No.: 604.871.6461 RTS No.: 08884 VanRIMS No.: 08-2000-20

More information

PLAN COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

PLAN COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PLAN COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project Title/Address: City Staff: General Amendment: BL District Drive-Through Facility Lot Area Ellen Johnson, Planner APPLICATION: PUBLIC HEARING 8/16/16

More information

Local Development Framework Background Paper Assessment of Retail Hierarchy. August 2009

Local Development Framework Background Paper Assessment of Retail Hierarchy. August 2009 Development Framework Background Paper Assessment of Retail Hierarchy August 2009 1 Background 1.1 National planning policy guidance (Planning Policy Statement 6, PPS6) sets out the Government s principles

More information

Our Project file: TPI-2017P Highway 27, Vaughan, Proposed Restaurant, Parking Justification Study Letter Response to Study Peer Review

Our Project file: TPI-2017P Highway 27, Vaughan, Proposed Restaurant, Parking Justification Study Letter Response to Study Peer Review 13 February 22, 2018 c/o Ms. Nicole Sampogna Associate Planner Evans Planning Inc. 8481 Keele Street, Unit 12 Vaughan, Ontario, L4K1Z7 Our Project file: TPI-2017P004 Re: 9732 Highway 27, Vaughan, Proposed

More information

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter Agenda Date: 10/19/2016 Agenda Placement: 9B Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter TO: FROM: Napa County Planning Commission John McDowell for David Morrison - Director Planning, Building

More information

The Weights and Measures (Specified Quantities) (Unwrapped Bread and Intoxicating Liquor) Order 2011

The Weights and Measures (Specified Quantities) (Unwrapped Bread and Intoxicating Liquor) Order 2011 The Weights and Measures (Specified Quantities) (Unwrapped Bread and Intoxicating Liquor) Order 2011 Guidance for Businesses July 2011 Version 1 Page 1 of 7 Guidance first issued/ Date of change July 2011

More information

ORDER OF AN EXECUTIVE OFFICER NOTICE OF CLOSURE

ORDER OF AN EXECUTIVE OFFICER NOTICE OF CLOSURE Environmental Public Health ORDER OF AN EXECUTIVE OFFICER NOTICE OF CLOSURE To: Donair Station Inc. Hijrat Shah the Owner RE: The food establishment located in Calgary, Alberta and municipally described

More information

AWRI Refrigeration Demand Calculator

AWRI Refrigeration Demand Calculator AWRI Refrigeration Demand Calculator Resources and expertise are readily available to wine producers to manage efficient refrigeration supply and plant capacity. However, efficient management of winery

More information

Migratory Soaring Birds Project. SEA & Wind Energy planning

Migratory Soaring Birds Project. SEA & Wind Energy planning Migratory Soaring Birds Project SEA & Wind Energy planning Strategic Environmental Assessment SEAs provide overall assessment and guidance to inform where specific developments could occur SEA is a key

More information

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File: City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT PROPOSAL: Planning Report Date: July 14, 2008 Winery Special Events Area Endorsement (Liquor License) in order to permit an existing winery to host special

More information

1407 San Pablo Avenue

1407 San Pablo Avenue Z O N I N G A D J U S T M E N T S B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION APRIL 26, 2012 1407 San Pablo Avenue UP #11-10000054 to establish a full service restaurant with incidental service of

More information

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. ) Idaho Power Company ) Docket No. ER06- )

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION. ) Idaho Power Company ) Docket No. ER06- ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Idaho Power Company Docket No. ER0- PREPARED DIRECT TESTIMONY OF RONALD D. SCHELLBERG ON BEHALF OF IDAHO POWER COMPANY EXHIBIT IPC-

More information

Inspector s Guidebook for Certification PUBLISHED BY THE SPECIALTY COFFEE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA (SCAA) February 2014 Pages: Cover + 7

Inspector s Guidebook for Certification PUBLISHED BY THE SPECIALTY COFFEE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA (SCAA) February 2014 Pages: Cover + 7 Inspector s Guidebook for Certification PUBLISHED BY THE SPECIALTY COFFEE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA (SCAA) February 2014 Pages: Cover + 7 Purpose SCAA Teaching Lab Inspector s Guidebook for Certification

More information

Letter of Determination

Letter of Determination SAN FRANCISCO (Clerically Amended - December 30, 2014) 1650 Mission St. Sue 400 San Francisco, CA 94103-2479 December 2, 2014 San Francisco, CA 94107 Site Address: Assessor s Block/Lot: Zoning District:

More information

Inspector s Guidebook for Certification PUBLISHED BY THE SPECIALTY COFFEE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA (SCAA) June 2015 Pages: Cover + 8

Inspector s Guidebook for Certification PUBLISHED BY THE SPECIALTY COFFEE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA (SCAA) June 2015 Pages: Cover + 8 Inspector s Guidebook for Certification PUBLISHED BY THE SPECIALTY COFFEE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA (SCAA) June 2015 Pages: Cover + 8 Purpose To be completed by an SCAA Lab Inspector to determine whether

More information

Resource Consent Applications for Te Ara o Hei (Coromandel Walks) Project

Resource Consent Applications for Te Ara o Hei (Coromandel Walks) Project Memo Information 1 Resource Consent Applications for Te Ara o Hei (Coromandel Walks) Project TO FROM DATE 24 August 2017 SUBJECT Thames-Coromandel District Council Sam Napia, Director Strategic Relationships

More information

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION

PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION September 30, 2010 Project No. 10797 11A Ms. Ginger Hitzke Hitzke Development Corporation 251 Autumn Drive, Suite 100 San Marcos, CA 92069 Subject: Interpretive Report for Infiltration System Design, Proposed

More information

Memorandum for Tree Survey at the Marywood Residential Development Site in Orange, CA.

Memorandum for Tree Survey at the Marywood Residential Development Site in Orange, CA. Memorandum Date: January 22, 2015 To: From: Subject: The New Home Company Brianna Bernard, VCS Environmental Memorandum for Tree Survey at the Marywood Residential Development Site in Orange, CA. 1. Introduction

More information

Zoning Text Amendment DPA , Provide for the Production of Mead, Cider and Similar Beverages on A-1 Agriculture Properties (County Wide)

Zoning Text Amendment DPA , Provide for the Production of Mead, Cider and Similar Beverages on A-1 Agriculture Properties (County Wide) COUNTY OF PRINCE WILLIAM 5 County Complex Court, Prince William, Virginia 22192-9201 PLANNING MAIN (703) 792-7615 FAX (703) 792-4758 OFFICE www.pwcgov.org/planning Christopher M. Price, AICP Director of

More information

LEAN PRODUCTION FOR WINERIES PROGRAM

LEAN PRODUCTION FOR WINERIES PROGRAM LEAN PRODUCTION FOR WINERIES PROGRAM 2015-16 An Initiative of the Office of Green Industries SA Industry Program and the South Australian Wine Industry Association, in association with Wine Australia South

More information

ROADSIDE STALL APPLICATION FORM TEMPLATE

ROADSIDE STALL APPLICATION FORM TEMPLATE ROADSIDE STALL APPLICATION FORM TEMPLATE Please note: The intention of this document is to provide a basic template as a starting point for council staff to develop an application form for people wanting

More information

Ideas for group discussion / exercises - Section 3 Applying food hygiene principles to the coffee chain

Ideas for group discussion / exercises - Section 3 Applying food hygiene principles to the coffee chain Ideas for group discussion / exercises - Section 3 Applying food hygiene principles to the coffee chain Activity 4: National level planning Reviewing national codes of practice and the regulatory framework

More information

CHAPTER 17: PLANNING AND ZONING Wineries

CHAPTER 17: PLANNING AND ZONING Wineries CHAPTER 17: PLANNING AND ZONING Wineries 17.56.330 A. Purpose. The purpose of this section is to provide for the orderly development of wineries within agricultural zoning districts and certain commercial,

More information

Standing Committee on Policy and Strategic Priorities. General Manager of Development, Buildings and Licensing

Standing Committee on Policy and Strategic Priorities. General Manager of Development, Buildings and Licensing ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Report Date: December 6, 2018 Contact: Sarah Hicks Contact No.: 604.873.7546 RTS No.: 12753 VanRIMS No.: 08-2000-20 Meeting Date: January 30, 2019 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Standing Committee

More information

16 September 2013 Reference No L-Rev1 FONTERRA DARFIELD GROUNDWATER NITRATE LEVELS CONSENT CONDITIONS - RECOMMENDATION

16 September 2013 Reference No L-Rev1 FONTERRA DARFIELD GROUNDWATER NITRATE LEVELS CONSENT CONDITIONS - RECOMMENDATION 16 September 213 Reference No. Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited 3792 West Coast Road RD1 Darfield 71 FONTERRA DARFIELD GROUNDWATER NITRATE LEVELS CONSENT CONDITIONS - RECOMMENDATION Dear Fiona Introduction

More information

Product Consistency Comparison Study: Continuous Mixing & Batch Mixing

Product Consistency Comparison Study: Continuous Mixing & Batch Mixing July 2015 Product Consistency Comparison Study: Continuous Mixing & Batch Mixing By: Jim G. Warren Vice President, Exact Mixing Baked snack production lines require mixing systems that can match the throughput

More information

Suitability for Haul Roads (MI) Macomb County, Michigan, and Oakland County, Michigan (River Bends Park, West Side, Shelby Twp.)

Suitability for Haul Roads (MI) Macomb County, Michigan, and Oakland County, Michigan (River Bends Park, West Side, Shelby Twp.) Suitability for Haul Roads (MI) Macomb, and Oakland () MAP LEGEND Area of Interest () Soils Soil Ratings Area of Interest () Soil Map Units Poorly suited Moderately suited Well suited Political Features

More information

Page 2 of 17 Report No.: Type of test object... : LED. Trade mark... :

Page 2 of 17 Report No.: Type of test object... : LED. Trade mark... : age 2 of 17 Report : 68.184.12.070.02 Type of test object... : LED Trade mark... : Model and/or type reference... : 1W-3535W Rating(s)... : DC 350mA (Vf < DC 4V) Manufacturer... : Same as Client. Manufacturer

More information

APPENDIX F. Lee County, FL Gasparilla Island CSRM draft integrated section 934 report & draft environmental assessment

APPENDIX F. Lee County, FL Gasparilla Island CSRM draft integrated section 934 report & draft environmental assessment APPENDIX F Lee County, FL Gasparilla Island CSRM draft integrated section 934 report & draft environmental assessment I. Overview Public Access and Sharing Assessment The project is located in Lee County,

More information

SEMINOLE COUNTY AUDIT OF THE ALTERNATIVE FEE RATE STUDIES SEPTEMBER 2008

SEMINOLE COUNTY AUDIT OF THE ALTERNATIVE FEE RATE STUDIES SEPTEMBER 2008 SEMINOLE COUNTY AUDIT OF THE ALTERNATIVE FEE RATE STUDIES SEPTEMBER 2008 Prepared by: Internal Audit Division Clerk of the Circuit Court DISTRIBUTION LIST BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Ms. Brenda Carey

More information

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter Agenda Date: 4/21/2010 Agenda Placement: 9A Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter TO: FROM: Napa County Planning Commission John McDowell for Hillary Gitelman - Director Conservation, Development

More information

Findlay Market Brewery District Restaurant Facility, Utilities and Services

Findlay Market Brewery District Restaurant Facility, Utilities and Services Request for Proposal: Lease/Operation of Restaurant in Over the Rhine The Crown Building, 1739 Elm Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Contact: Kimberly Starbuck, 513-309-0191 kim@crownotr.com www.crownotr.com

More information

Activity 10. Coffee Break. Introduction. Equipment Required. Collecting the Data

Activity 10. Coffee Break. Introduction. Equipment Required. Collecting the Data . Activity 10 Coffee Break Economists often use math to analyze growth trends for a company. Based on past performance, a mathematical equation or formula can sometimes be developed to help make predictions

More information

TOWN OF GAWLER POLICY

TOWN OF GAWLER POLICY TOWN OF GAWLER POLICY Policy Section: Policy Name: Classification: 3. Development, Environment & Regulatory Services Mobile Food Vendors Public Council Policy Adopted: June 2018 Frequency of Review: Triennial

More information

Board of Supervisors April 24, 2018

Board of Supervisors April 24, 2018 Board of Supervisors April 24, 2018 UPE16-0046 Bella Winery, Vineyards, and Wine Cave Presented by: Traci Tesconi Supervising Planner Vicinity Map General Plan Map Zoning Map Aerial Map of Project Site

More information

COUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA (707) FAX (707)

COUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA (707) FAX (707) COUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA 95403-2829 (707) 565-1900 FAX (707) 565-8358 NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

More information

Figure S2. Measurement locations for meteorological stations. (data made available by KMI: https://www.meteo.be).

Figure S2. Measurement locations for meteorological stations. (data made available by KMI: https://www.meteo.be). A High Resolution Spatiotemporal Model for In-Vehicle Black Carbon Exposure: Quantifying the In-Vehicle Exposure Reduction Due to the Euro 5 Particulate Matter Standard Legislation Supplementary data Spatial

More information

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter Agenda Date: 3/4/2015 Agenda Placement: 10A Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter TO: FROM: Napa County Planning Commission David Morrison - Director Planning, Building and Environmental

More information

LM-80 Data. Results from Curve Desk Lamp Lumen Maintenance Testing And Use Of IES LM Data

LM-80 Data. Results from Curve Desk Lamp Lumen Maintenance Testing And Use Of IES LM Data Curveby LM-80 Data Results from Curve Desk Lamp Lumen Maintenance Testing And Use Of IES LM-80-08 Data This report is provided by Inc. and applies to lumen maintenance testing for the Curve desk lamp.

More information

Table of Contents. Introduction. Logo Interpretation

Table of Contents. Introduction. Logo Interpretation Table of Contents Introduction, Logo Interpretation... 2 Organizational Signature (Tagline & positioning statement)... 3 Color Breaks... 4 Acceptable Usage... 7 Unacceptable Usage... 8 Affiliate Logos...

More information

Table of Contents. Foundation and Preparation 2 Hearth Base Dimensions 2. Laying the Inner Hearth 3 Inner Hearth Dimensions 4

Table of Contents. Foundation and Preparation 2 Hearth Base Dimensions 2. Laying the Inner Hearth 3 Inner Hearth Dimensions 4 Table of Contents Foundation and Preparation 2 Hearth Base Dimensions 2 Laying the Inner Hearth 3 Inner Hearth Dimensions 4 Constructing the Firebox 5 Face Opening Dimensions 5 Setting the Rumford Throat

More information

IESNA LM MEASURING LUMEN MAINTENANCE OF LED LIGHT SOURCES. MEASUREMENT AND TEST REPORT For

IESNA LM MEASURING LUMEN MAINTENANCE OF LED LIGHT SOURCES. MEASUREMENT AND TEST REPORT For IESNA LM-80-2008 MEASURING LUMEN MAINTENANCE OF LED LIGHT SOURCES MEASUREMENT AND TEST REPORT For Guangzhou Hongli Opto-Electronic Co., Ltd. No.1, Xianke Yi Road, Huadong Town, Huadu District, Guangzhou,

More information

Unit of competency Content Activity. Element 1: Organise coffee workstation n/a n/a. Element 2: Select and grind coffee beans n/a n/a

Unit of competency Content Activity. Element 1: Organise coffee workstation n/a n/a. Element 2: Select and grind coffee beans n/a n/a SITHFAB005 Formative mapping Formative mapping SITHFAB005 Prepare and serve espresso coffee Unit of competency Content Activity Element 1: Organise coffee workstation n/a n/a 1.1 Complete mise en place

More information

PJ 53/ August 2013 English only. Report of the Virtual Screening Subcommittee (VSS) on three coffee project proposals

PJ 53/ August 2013 English only. Report of the Virtual Screening Subcommittee (VSS) on three coffee project proposals PJ 53/13 15 August 2013 English only E Projects Committee 6 th Meeting 9 12 September 2013 Belo Horizonte, Brazil Report of the Virtual Screening Subcommittee (VSS) on three coffee project proposals Background

More information

CUP17-14 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST HIGHWAY 94 SOUTH

CUP17-14 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST HIGHWAY 94 SOUTH CUP 17-14 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST - 2711 HIGHWAY 94 SOUTH Application: Owner: Applicant: Use Requested: Property Zoning: Area: Location: CUP17-14 Defiance Ridge Vineyards, LLC Chuck Gillentine,

More information

ISO 712 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Cereals and cereal products Determination of moisture content Reference method

ISO 712 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Cereals and cereal products Determination of moisture content Reference method INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 712 Fourth edition 2009-11-15 Cereals and cereal products Determination of moisture content Reference method Céréales et produits céréaliers Détermination de la teneur en eau

More information

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter Agenda Date: 10/15/2014 Agenda Placement: 9C Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter TO: FROM: Napa County Planning Commission Charlene Gallina for David Morrison - Director Planning, Building

More information

Shaping the Future: Production and Market Challenges

Shaping the Future: Production and Market Challenges Call for Papers Dear Sir/Madam At the invitation of the Ministry of Stockbreeding, Agriculture, and Fisheries of the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, the 41th World Congress of Vine and Wine and the 16 th

More information

Please sign and date here to indicate that you have read and agree to abide by the above mentioned stipulations. Student Name #4

Please sign and date here to indicate that you have read and agree to abide by the above mentioned stipulations. Student Name #4 The following group project is to be worked on by no more than four students. You may use any materials you think may be useful in solving the problems but you may not ask anyone for help other than the

More information

Ridge. 137 Lot Entitled Subdivision in the City of Plymouth, California Website & Video: Listed at $2,950,000

Ridge. 137 Lot Entitled Subdivision in the City of Plymouth, California Website & Video:   Listed at $2,950,000 Shenandoah Ridge 147 Acres in the Shenandoah Valley Wine Region 137 Lot Entitled Subdivision in the City of Plymouth, California 95669 Website & Video: www.shenandoahplymouth.com Listed at $2,950,000 Prepared

More information

Infusion DLM Module. GE Lighting. True ambient white lighting solution DATA SHEET. Product information. Applications. Features & benefits

Infusion DLM Module. GE Lighting. True ambient white lighting solution DATA SHEET. Product information. Applications. Features & benefits GE Lighting Infusion DLM Module DATA SHEET True ambient white lighting solution Product information The Infusion DLM (Downlight Module) range is a versatile solution suitable for general lighting in retail

More information

Waterways Suitability Assessment Process. LCDR Dan McQuate Office of Facility and Port Compliance, Facilities and Cargo Division (CG-FAC-2)

Waterways Suitability Assessment Process. LCDR Dan McQuate Office of Facility and Port Compliance, Facilities and Cargo Division (CG-FAC-2) Waterways Suitability Assessment Process LCDR Dan McQuate Office of Facility and Port Compliance, Facilities and Cargo Division (CG-FAC-2) References 33 CFR 127 NFPA 59A NVIC 01-2011 Sandia National Laboratory

More information

Buying Filberts On a Sample Basis

Buying Filberts On a Sample Basis E 55 m ^7q Buying Filberts On a Sample Basis Special Report 279 September 1969 Cooperative Extension Service c, 789/0 ite IP") 0, i mi 1910 S R e, `g,,ttsoliktill:torvti EARs srin ITQ, E,6

More information

Business Guidance leaflet

Business Guidance leaflet Business Guidance leaflet Guidance notes for honey packers Honey Regulations 2003 Food Labelling Regulations 1996 Weights and Measures Act 1985 Application: For sales of honey to the ultimate consumer

More information

Subject: Industry Standard for a HACCP Plan, HACCP Competency Requirements and HACCP Implementation

Subject: Industry Standard for a HACCP Plan, HACCP Competency Requirements and HACCP Implementation Amendment 0: January 2000 Page: 1 V I S C New Zealand Subject: Industry Standard for a HACCP Plan, HACCP Competency Requirements and HACCP Implementation Reference Nos: VISC 1 Date issued: 27 January 2000

More information

(ii) The operator must provide evidence of legal access and use of the premises for food vending; and

(ii) The operator must provide evidence of legal access and use of the premises for food vending; and (i) Listings for mobile food service unit and extended food service unit food vending locations shall be maintained by the permit holder and shall be provided to the Health Authority. Permit holders shall

More information

PROPERTY INFORMATION SUMMARY. 599 Testalinden Place, 4.5 miles South of Oliver BC. Legal Description Size Property Description

PROPERTY INFORMATION SUMMARY. 599 Testalinden Place, 4.5 miles South of Oliver BC. Legal Description Size Property Description PROPERTY INFORMATION SUMMARY 599 Testalinden Place, 4.5 miles South of Oliver BC Legal Description Size Property Description Lot A, District Lot 2450s, Similkameen Division Yale District, Plan EPP25799

More information

For the purposes of this page, this distribution arrangement will be referred to as a wine boutique and wine includes wine coolers.

For the purposes of this page, this distribution arrangement will be referred to as a wine boutique and wine includes wine coolers. Beer and Wine Tax Beer and wine taxes are included in the price you pay for: made by an Ontario manufacturer, microbrewer or brew pub that you buy from: Brewers Retail Inc. (i.e., The Beer Store) licensed

More information

DRAFT. B. Definitions (Amend TITLE I, Chapter 25, Article 1)

DRAFT. B. Definitions (Amend TITLE I, Chapter 25, Article 1) DRAFT Winery A. Purpose The purpose of this ordinance is to provide for the orderly development of wineries and associated activities within Agricultural and Industrial zones to promote economic development

More information

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT COMPLIANCE DEPARTMENT COM 2293

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT COMPLIANCE DEPARTMENT COM 2293 SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT COMPLIANCE DEPARTMENT COM 2293 APPROVED: DATE: April 3, 2012 Morgan Lambert Director of Compliance TITLE: SUBJECT: RULE 4694 WINERY FERMENTATION

More information

PERMIT APPLICATION FOR MOBILE/EXTENDED FOOD SERVICE UNITS PERMIT APPLICATION FOR

PERMIT APPLICATION FOR MOBILE/EXTENDED FOOD SERVICE UNITS PERMIT APPLICATION FOR PERMIT APPLICATION FOR Page 1 of 6 Revised 11/13/2015 New Application A new Mobile/Extended Base of Operation requires a separate Food Service Application Change of Ownership A new Mobile/Extended Base

More information

Text Amendment for Restaurants, Nightclubs, Bars and Lounges

Text Amendment for Restaurants, Nightclubs, Bars and Lounges Text Amendment for Restaurants, Nightclubs, Bars and Lounges The Planning Department and citizens, through collaborative efforts, have been able to define development characteristics that have made Charlotte

More information

TOWN OF EMMITSBURG 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

TOWN OF EMMITSBURG 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TOWN OF EMMITSBURG 2009 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Emmitsburg Town Council Public Comment Draft August 13, 2009 Town of Emmitsburg 300A South Seton Avenue Emmitsburg, MD 21727 www.emmitsburgmd.gov TOWN OF EMMITSBURG

More information

COMPARISON OF CORE AND PEEL SAMPLING METHODS FOR DRY MATTER MEASUREMENT IN HASS AVOCADO FRUIT

COMPARISON OF CORE AND PEEL SAMPLING METHODS FOR DRY MATTER MEASUREMENT IN HASS AVOCADO FRUIT New Zealand Avocado Growers' Association Annual Research Report 2004. 4:36 46. COMPARISON OF CORE AND PEEL SAMPLING METHODS FOR DRY MATTER MEASUREMENT IN HASS AVOCADO FRUIT J. MANDEMAKER H. A. PAK T. A.

More information

Design of Conical Strainer and Analysis Using FEA

Design of Conical Strainer and Analysis Using FEA International Journal of Engineering Science Invention (IJESI) ISSN (Online): 2319 6734, ISSN (Print): 2319 6726 Volume 7 Issue 2 Ver. V February 2018 PP. 61-65 Design of Conical Strainer and Analysis

More information

Effect of SPT Hammer Energy Efficiency in the Bearing Capacity Evaluation in Sands

Effect of SPT Hammer Energy Efficiency in the Bearing Capacity Evaluation in Sands Proceedings of the 2 nd World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering (CSEE 17) Barcelona, Spain April 2 4, 2017 Paper No. ICGRE 123 ISSN: 2371-5294 DOI: 10.11159/icgre17.123 Effect

More information

Termination of Mr. Vending Inc. License Agreement

Termination of Mr. Vending Inc. License Agreement STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Termination of Mr. Vending Inc. License Agreement Date: April 1, 2008 To: From: Wards: Government Management Committee Brenda Librecz, General Manager, Parks, Forestry and

More information

3. Permit hotels/resorts with a liquor primary to provide a free alcoholic drink to guests in the lobby/reception area at check-in

3. Permit hotels/resorts with a liquor primary to provide a free alcoholic drink to guests in the lobby/reception area at check-in Date: October 20, 2016 To: Re: All LCLB Staff All licensees All industry associations All local government, First Nations and police agencies Liquor primary licence policy changes Please note: These policy

More information

INFLUENCE OF ENVIRONMENT - Wine evaporation from barrels By Richard M. Blazer, Enologist Sterling Vineyards Calistoga, CA

INFLUENCE OF ENVIRONMENT - Wine evaporation from barrels By Richard M. Blazer, Enologist Sterling Vineyards Calistoga, CA INFLUENCE OF ENVIRONMENT - Wine evaporation from barrels By Richard M. Blazer, Enologist Sterling Vineyards Calistoga, CA Sterling Vineyards stores barrels of wine in both an air-conditioned, unheated,

More information

Garthmyl Hall, Garthmyl Montgomery, Powys, SY15 6RS. Guide price 1,000,000

Garthmyl Hall, Garthmyl Montgomery, Powys, SY15 6RS. Guide price 1,000,000 Garthmyl Hall, Garthmyl Montgomery, Powys, SY15 6RS Guide price 1,000,000 Garthmyl Hall, Garthmyl Montgomery AN EXCEPTIONAL GRADE II LISTED PROPERTY SET IN THE BEAUTIFUL MONTGOMERYSHIRE COUNTRYSIDE DESCRIPTION

More information

IMPACT OF RAINFALL AND TEMPERATURE ON TEA PRODUCTION IN UNDIVIDED SIVASAGAR DISTRICT

IMPACT OF RAINFALL AND TEMPERATURE ON TEA PRODUCTION IN UNDIVIDED SIVASAGAR DISTRICT International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research (IJASR) ISSN (P): 2250-0057; ISSN (E): 2321-0087 Vol. 8, Issue 1 Feb 2018, 51-56 TJPRC Pvt. Ltd. IMPACT OF RAINFALL AND TEMPERATURE ON TEA PRODUCTION

More information

PRODUCT REGISTRATION: AN E-GUIDE

PRODUCT REGISTRATION: AN E-GUIDE PRODUCT REGISTRATION: AN E-GUIDE Introduction In the EU, biocidal products are only allowed on the market if they ve been authorised by the competent authorities in the Member States in which they will

More information

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 7304-2 First edition 2008-08-15 Alimentary pasta produced from durum wheat semolina Estimation of cooking quality by sensory analysis Part 2: Routine method Pâtes alimentaires

More information

A New Approach for Smoothing Soil Grain Size Curve Determined by Hydrometer

A New Approach for Smoothing Soil Grain Size Curve Determined by Hydrometer International Journal of Geosciences, 2013, 4, 1285-1291 Published Online November 2013 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/ijg) http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2013.49123 A New Approach for Smoothing Soil Grain

More information

TITLE: AMENDMENT TO STANDISH TOWN CODE, CHAPTER 181, LAND USE PART I (ZONING)

TITLE: AMENDMENT TO STANDISH TOWN CODE, CHAPTER 181, LAND USE PART I (ZONING) DRAFT 11/13/12 TITLE: AMENDMENT TO STANDISH TOWN CODE, CHAPTER 181, LAND USE PART I (ZONING) ORDERED, that the Town of Standish hereby ordains the following amendments to the Land Use Ordinance, effective

More information

Erosion Hazard (Off-Road, Off-Trail) Angelina County, Texas (Upland Island Erosion Hazard (Off-Road, Off-Trail))

Erosion Hazard (Off-Road, Off-Trail) Angelina County, Texas (Upland Island Erosion Hazard (Off-Road, Off-Trail)) Cypress Creek Erosion Hazard (Off-Road, Off-Trail) Angelina County, Texas () 31 7' 50'' 31 4' 50'' 3439500 3440400 3441300 3442200 3443100 3444000 3444900 94 24' 48'' 94 24' 51'' 365700 Graham Creek 365700

More information

EAST AFRICAN STANDARD

EAST AFRICAN STANDARD DEAS 130: 2019 ICS 67.140.20 HS 0901.11.00 EAST AFRICAN STANDARD Green coffee beans Specification EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY EAC 2019 Second Edition 2019 DEAS 130:2019 Copyright notice This EAC document is

More information

PUBLIC NOTICE The Illinois State Toll Highway Authority Schedule of Committee Meetings April 15, 2016

PUBLIC NOTICE The Illinois State Toll Highway Authority Schedule of Committee Meetings April 15, 2016 PUBLIC NOTICE The Illinois State Toll Highway Authority Schedule of Committee Meetings April 15, 2016 Public Notice is hereby given of the schedule for the Board Committee Meetings to be held during the

More information

Erosion Hazard (Road, Trail) Angelina County, Texas (Upland Island Erosion Hazard (Road, Trail)) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Erosion Hazard (Road, Trail) Angelina County, Texas (Upland Island Erosion Hazard (Road, Trail)) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey Cypress Creek Erosion Hazard (Road, Trail) Angelina County, Texas () 31 7' 50'' 31 4' 50'' 3439500 3440400 3441300 3442200 3443100 3444000 3444900 94 24' 48'' 94 24' 51'' 365700 Graham Creek 365700 366600

More information

This document is a preview generated by EVS

This document is a preview generated by EVS INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 4150 Third edition 2011-11-15 Green coffee or raw coffee Size analysis Manual and machine sieving Café vert Analyse granulométrique Tamisage manuel et à la machine Reference

More information