Tim Martinson. Sr. Extension Associate Dept. of Horticulture Cornell University

Transcription

1 The Northern Grapes Project: Integrating Viticulture, Enology, and Marketing of New Cold-hardy Wine Grape Cultivars in the Midwest and Northeast United States. Tim Martinson Sr. Extension Associate Dept. of Horticulture Cornell University Anna Katharine Mansfield, Cornell University Jim Luby and William Gartner, University of Minnesota Murli Dharmadhikari and Paul Domoto, Iowa State University The Northern Grapes Project is funded by the USDA s Specialty Crops Research Initiative Program of the National Institute for Food and Agriculture, Project #

2 Northern Grapes : Integrating viticulture, winemaking, and marketing of new cold hardy cultivars supporting new and growing rural wineries 5 Year Coordinated Ag Project 12 Institutions, 12 states 34 Research/Extension Scientists 23 Industry Associations $2.5M Funded (2 yr) USDA; $3M Renewal (2 yr) Matched > 25 Organizations and Individuals The Northern Grapes Project is funded by the USDA s Specialty Crops Research Initiative Program of the National Institute for Food and Agriculture, Project #

3 University of Minnesota Cultivars Katie Cook, Jim Luby & Peter Hemstad Cultivar Frontenac La Crescent Marquette Frontenac gris Original cross Year released Mid-winter cold tolerance -36 C/-33 F -38 C/-36 F -34 C/-29 F -36 C/-33 F Pedigree (V. riparia, V. vinifera, V. labrusca) V. riparia 89 x Landot 4511 St. Pepin x E. S MN 1094 x Ravat 262 Single cane bud mutation of Frontenac Ave. Soluble Solids ( Brix) Ave. Titratable Acid. (g/l)

4 Elmer Swenson Cultivars Elmer Swenson Cultivar Brianna Eidelweiss St Croix St Pepin Original cross ?? Year released Mid-winter cold tolerance? -34 C/-29 F -35 C/-32 F -32 C/-25 F Pedigree (V. labrusca, V. riparia, V. vinifera) Kay Gray x E.S St. Pepin x E. S E.S. 283 x E.S. 193 (MN #78 x Seibel 1000) x Seyval blanc *Pistillate vine Ave. Soluble Solids ( Brix) Ave. Titratable Acidity (g/l)

5 Unique Acid Composition Malic vs Tartaric Murli Dharmadhikari Iowa State University Chardonnay >=70%

6 New York Grape Production Lake Erie /Niagara 29,000 Ac. Finger Lakes 10,000 Ac. Hudson Valley 600 Ac. Long Island 2000 Ac.

7 Novice Growers and Winemakers Project clientele Vineyards 5,900 acres (2,460 Ha) 40% Non-bearing (2011) 80% planted since % < 2 HA Wineries cases 80% established since Tuck, B. and Gartner, W Vineyards and grapes of the north: a status report. Univ. Minnesota Extension Center for Community Vitality. Tuck, B. and Gartner, W Wineries of the north: a status report. Univ. Minnesota Extension Center for Community Vitality.

8 Economic Impact of Cold Climate Cultivars Brigid Tuck and Bill Gartner, University of Minnesota Source Economic Impact Jobs Generated (Millions) Winery $215 5,000 Vineyard $46 5,900 Winery-Associated $140 1,700 Tourism Overall $401 12,600 Tuck, B. and Gartner, W Economic Contribution: Vineyards and Wineries of the North.. Univ. Minnesota Ext. Ctr. for Comm. Vitality. North.pdf

9 Multi-Disciplinary Studies Address Varietal performance and resulting fruit and wine flavor attributes in different climates Applying appropriate viticultural practices to achieve consistent fruit characteristics for ripening Applying winemaking practices to their unique fruit composition to produce distinctive wines that consumers will like and purchase Understanding consumer preferences, individual/regional marketing strategies to increase sales and sustained profitability of wineries and vineyards. The Vine The Vineyard The Wines The Tasting Room

10 Northern Grapes Project Cultivar performance Coordinated variety trials (NE1020) Genomics and flavor attributes Monoterpenoid biosynthesis gene expression Front Skin Marq Skin VIT_12s0134g VIT_06s0004g VIT_17s0000g VIT_01s0010g VIT_13s0067g VIT_15s0046g VIT_13s0067g VIT_19s0135g VIT_00s0253g VIT_19s0135g VIT_05s0049g VIT_15s0046g VIT_08s0032g VIT_15s0021g VIT_11s0016g VIT_19s0015g VIT_17s0000g VIT_15s0048g VIT_02s0025g

11 Northern Grapes Project Viticulture Training, cropping, canopy management Nutrition Disease management

12 Northern Grapes Project Enology Acid reduction/partial malolactic Yeast selection Wine styles that fit the cultivar

13 Northern Grapes Project Consumers Baseline survey/economic impact Tasting room attributes Branding Collaboration

14 Coordinated Variety Trials NE-1020 Project Climate and standard maturity indices Amaya Atucha Amaya Atucha Vine performance and climate Evaluate: Yield and quality vs. climate indices Data from 3-9 sites/variety

15 Challenge #1: Climate winter lows, heat units, early budburst GDD F 3200

16 Training Systems Trials in NY Marquette and Frontenac Vertical Shoot Positioning (VSP): Midwire cordon with catch wires Shoot position, shoot tip, leaf removal Intensive canopy management. Top Wire Cordon (TWC): High cordon shoot combing Moderate canopy management. Umbrella Kniffen (UK): 3-4 long canes arched and tied to middle wire. No additional canopy management Minimal canopy management.

17 Tons/Acre Marquette 2012 & 2013 Yield Marquette Yield b a a c TWC VSP Umbrella 1.0 b b Yield Yield Clusters Cluster Berries/ Treatment t/acre (lb/vine) per vine wt. (g) cluster Berry wt. (g) TWC 1.1 ab b 63.5 a 48.8 a 1.3 VSP 1.0 b ab 49.2 b 37.8 b 1.3 Umbrella 1.6 a a 64.8 a 54.0 a Treatment Yield (T/A) Yield (lb/vine) Clusters Per Vine Cluster wt. (g) Berries per cluster Berry wt. (g) Adj. # of shoots Yield (g) per shoot (adj) Clusters Per shoot (adj) TWC 4.3 b b 76.6 a 63.2 a 1.21 ab 36.9 b a 2.3 a VSP 2.3 c c 49.2 b 43.4 b 1.13 b 36.3 b 94.2 b 1.9 b Umbrella 5.0 a a 72.5 a 59.2 a 1.23 a 41.0 a a 2.5 $1500/ton = $3000 higher revenue/acre

18 TWC vs VSP Marquette 2013 TWC VSP TWC VSP Pennsylvania VSP New York

19 Marquette 2014 Impact of Winter Injury Trtmt Shoot Counts Nodes per vine Shoots per vine Shoots per node Clusters per shoot TWC VSP UK Vine Collapse Adjusted Yield

20 TWC vs VSP Marquette 2014 TWC 2013 TWC VSP 2014 VSP VSP

21 Marquette Fruit Composition 2013 ph ph Titratable acidity (g/l) ab a b Marquette ph ab a b TWC VSP Umbrella Marquette TA b b a TWC VSP Umbrella 30.0 Brix 3.10 Marquette ph o Brix a b b a b b 8/19 9/3 9/10 9/16 9/ < p = p = p = p = p a b b a b b TWC VSP Umbrella /19 9/3 9/10 9/16 9/26 p = p = p = p = p = a b b a a b TWC VSP Umbrella

22 Marquette Fruit Composition 2014

23 Impact of Winter Injury and Frost Damage on Frontenac and Marquette Grapes in Clayton, NY Chrislyn A. Particka & Timothy E. Martinson The Northern Grapes Project is funded by the USDA s Specialty Crops Research Initiative Program of the National Institute for Food and Agriculture, Project #

24

25

26 2013 Frontenac Results in a Nutshell Frontenac Yield Yield Clusters/ Avg.berry Cluster Berries/ Adj. # shoots/ Treatment t/acre lb/vine vine wt. (g) wt. (g) cluster vine TWC VSP UK Yie sh No differences in yield or yield components No differences in Brix, ph, or TA at harvest

27 Frontenac Frontenac Essentially no trunk damage. Low yield due to bud damage, but TWC still yielded more than VSP. No difference in Brix at harvest among treatments. TA was higher in UK (18.0) compared to VSP (16.3). Adj. # shoots/ vine Yield ad shoo Yield Yield Clusters/ Avg.berry Cluster Berries/ Treatment t/acre lb/vine vine wt. (g) wt. (g) cluster TWC 0.5 a 1.8 a 13.2 a ab 41.4 ab 55.0 a 16.1 VSP 0.1 b 0.5 b 4.5 b b 36.0 b 41.4 b 5.0 UK 0.4 ab 1.1 ab 8.0 ab a 48.1 a 51.9 ab 9.8

28 2015 Late Spring Freeze Winter was not as harsh as 2014, and vines looked great in early spring Major freeze event on May 22/23, temps dropped to 27 o F.

29 Spring Freeze in Clayton NY 2015 May 22 Mid April May 14 May 14 May 25

30 2015 Late Spring Freeze

31 June 29 Frontenac June 29 Marquette August 14 Frontenac August 14 Marquette

32 Frontenac Yield t/acre Yield lb/vine Clusters/ vine Avg.berry wt. (g) Cluster wt. (g) Shoot # 1st crop TWC ab 1.24 a VSP b 1.15 ab UK a 1.10 b nd crop TWC 2.4 a 7.86 a 43 a a 19.0 (38%) a VSP 0.9 b 3.46 b 20.3 b b 11.0 (30%) b UK 1.1 b 2.90 b 18.5 b b 9.1 (30%) b 1 st crop shoots were tagged and 1 st and 2 nd crop were kept separate. 1 st crop yield was very small; no differences among treatments. 2 nd crop yield was larger in TWC, mainly due to more second crop shoots, which lead to more clusters per vine. Also, a higher percentage of second crop shoots had clusters. Cluster weight in 2nd crop was not smaller. Berries/ cluster # of shoots w/ clusters

33

34

35 2015 Frontenac Fruit Chemistry 1st crop TWC Brix 23.7 ph 3.17 TA 18.2 YAN VSP UK Avg nd crop TWC a VSP b UK a Avg p-value 1st vs. 2nd < < No differences in fruit chemistry in 1 st crop, only slight difference in TA in second crop among treatments. When averaged across treatments, there were significant differences between first and second crop, BUT.

36 Marquette Sept. 28

37 Conclusions 2014 Marquette: Moderate crop, trunk injury, vine collapse Frontenac: Low crop, little to no trunk injury, no vine collapse Overall, VSP seemed to be worse 2015 Both Marquette and Frontenac pushed 2 nd crop shoots after the freeze, but lasting damage in Marquette resulted in continued vine collapse Very little yield from 1 st crop TWC had higher yield from 2 nd crop, mostly due to more shoots Impact on fruit chemistry Marquette seemed to catch up better than Frontenac, and TA lagged behind more than Brix.

38 Exposed vs Shaded Clusters Impact on Brix, ph, TA Measured fruit composition from individual sunlightexposed and shaded clusters from the same vines Frontenac 2013 Marquette 2014 Frontenac 2015

39 Shaded vs Exposed Clusters Frontenac 2013 Berry Weight ph Brix TA Train Exposed Shaded Exposed Shaded Exposed Shaded Exposed Shaded TWC UK VSP

40 ph Titratable Acidity (g/l) Brix Shaded vs Exposed Clusters Marquette 2014 Exposed Shaded 6 vines 5 exposed and 5 shaded Individual Brix, ph, TA Exposed Shaded Exposed Shaded

41 Exposed vs Shaded Clusters Marquette 2014

42 Shaded vs. Exposed Clusters Frontenac

43 Preliminary Conclusions (NY) High training systems = Higher yield Lower cost Minimal impact on fruit composition (Brix, ph, TA) Within vines: Individual exposed clusters had higher soluble solids and lower titratable acidity than shaded clusters

44 Outreach to Industry Integration of Research and Extension Systems-based approach Develop growers/ winemakers skills Marketing & Consumers Grape Production Winemaking

45 Northern Grapes Symposium Held annually, in conjunction with another meeting Presentations by team members which update the audience about project findings Michigan Grape & Wine Conference February 24-26, 2016 Radisson Plaza Hotel, Kalamazoo

46 Northern Grapes News 4 issues each year Project news Team member profiles Relevant information Activities

47 Northern Grapes Webinars 24 webinars thru Spring each broadcast Interactive Archived on NG website

48 Upcoming Northern Grapes Webinars March 8, 2016 Cold-Hardy Grape Breeding at the University of Minnesota and North Dakota State University Matt Clark, University of Minnesota and Harlene Hatterman-Valenti, North Dakota State University April 12, 2016 Northern Grapes Project Research Results: Fungicide Sensitivity and Vine Nutrition of Cold-Hardy Cultivars Patricia McManus, University of Wisconsin-Madison and Carl Rosen, University of Minnesota May 10, 2016 From Vine to Glass: Understanding the Flavors and Aromas of Cold-Hardy Grapes and Wine Anne Fennell, South Dakota State University; Adrian Hegeman University of Minnesota; and Somchai Rice, Iowa State University

49 The Wines Frontenac Port La Crescent does exhibit cherry and black currant flavors and aromas but can be much more complex with integrated notes of blackberries, pepper, plum, tobacco, leather, and spice.

50 Acknowledgements Jim Luby, U MN Chrislyn Particka, Cornell University Project Manager Mike White Northern Grape Project Colleagues (States): ND, SD, NE,MN, IA, WI, IL, MI, NY, VT, MA, CT Industry cooperators 23 State winery and vineyard associations 17 Vineyard, winery, marketing survey partners Funding: USDA and NYS Dept. Ag and Markets Partnering Industry Associations Connecticut Vineyard and Winery Association Connecticut Farm Wine Development Council Iowa Wine Growers Association Western Iowa Wine Growers Association Illinois Grape Growers and Vintners Association Northern Illinois Wine Growers Scenic Rivers Grape and Wine Association Massachusetts Farm Wineries and Growers Association Michigan Grape and Wine Industry Council Minnesota Farm Winery Association Minnesota Grape Growers Association Nebraska Winery and Grape Growers Association New Hampshire Winery and Grape Growers Association New York Wine and Grape Foundation Upper Hudson Valley Wine and Grape Association Lake Champlain Wines Northern New York Wine Grape Growers Association North Dakota Grape and Wine Association Pennsylvania Winery Association South Dakota Specialty Producers Association South Dakota Winegrowers Association Vermont Grape and Wine Industry Council Wisconsin Grape Growers Association Northern Grapes Project Team and Industry Advisory Council The Northern Grapes Project is funded by the USDA s Specialty Crops Research Initiative Program of the National Institute for Food and Agriculture, Phil Randazzo Project #