The Effects of Presidential Politics on CEO Compensation
|
|
- Merryl Summers
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Effects of Presidential Politics on CEO Compensation Humnath Panta, Ph.D. Assistant Professor and Finance Program Director Brenau University, Gainesville, GA Salil K. Sarkar, Ph.D., CFA Coordinator, Doctoral Finance Program & Associate Professor The University of Texas at Arlington Arlington, TX ABSTRACT This paper provides evidence for the effects of presidential politics on chief executive officer (CEO) compensation. We hypothesize that CEO in publicly traded US companies earn more compensation during Republican regimes because of the expectation of affirmative government policies. Consistent with our prediction, we find that CEO compensation is significantly higher during Republican presidencies than during Democratic presidencies, even after controlling for income tax effect. Finally, incorporating the Senate and House of Representatives impact on CEO compensation in addition to presidencies validates our main proposition that CEO compensation is higher during Republican presidencies than during Democratic presidencies. We also examine the effects of presidential politics on non-ceo executive compensation and find that all components of non-ceo executive commendation are significantly higher during Republican presidencies than during Democratic presidencies. Keywords: CEO, Compensation, Democrats, Republicans. JEL Classification: G1, G14, G18. 1
2 Variables LSALARY LBONUS LCASH_COMP L EQUITY_COMP LTOTAL_COMP LPPS HOUSE_DUM SENATE_DUM PRES_DUM CYCLE1 CYCLE2 CYCLE3 CYCLE4 CYCLE5 VOLATILITY Appendix A Variable Definitions and Data Sources Data Definition and Source Logarithmic transformation of the dollar value of salary earned by the named executive officer during the fiscal year. Data source: Standard and Poor s ExecuComp database. Logarithmic transformation of the dollar value of bonus earned by the named executive officer during the fiscal year. Data source: Standard and Poor s ExecuComp database. Logarithmic transformation of the dollar value of the sum of salary and bonuses earned by the named executive officer during the fiscal year. Data source: Standard and Poor s ExecuComp database. Logarithmic transformation of sum of Black Scholes value option awards, fair value of option awards, restricted stock grant and fair value of stock awards. Data source: Standard and Poor s ExecuComp database. Logarithmic transformation of sum of salary, bonus, non-equity incentive plan compensation, grant-date fair value of option awards, grant-date fair value of stock awards, deferred compensation earnings reported as compensation, and other compensation. Data source: Standard and Poor s ExecuComp database. Logarithmic transformation of pay performance sensitivity. PPS is the change in the value of the CEO s stock and option portfolio due to a 1% increase in the value of the firm s common stock price. Data source: Standard and Poor s ExecuComp database. Data source: Standard and Poor s ExecuComp database. A dummy variable equal to 1 if Republican Party has majority in House of Representative and zero otherwise A dummy variable equal to 1 if Republican Party has majority in Senate and zero otherwise A dummy variable equal to 1 if Republican serves as US President and zero otherwise CYCLE1 indicates the first year after a Democratic or Republican incumbent becomes president. CYCLE2 indicates the second year after a Democratic or Republican incumbent becomes president. CYCLE3 indicates the third year after a Democratic or Republican incumbent becomes president. CYCLE4 indicates the fourth year after a Democratic or Republican incumbent becomes president. CYCLE5 indicates the 2nd term of an incumbent becomes president for repeated times. First obtain the standard deviation of daily log returns over the past five years, and then annualize the standard deviation by multiplying by the square root of 254. This is the percentage return volatility. Data source: CRSP monthly stock returns 2
3 ZSCORE_DUM LROA LSTOCK_RETURN LASSETS LSALE LGROWTH_OPPORT CASH_SHORT OPEARATING_LOSS LTAX_RATE LADV_EXP/AT ADV_MISSING LR&D_EXP/AT RD_MISSING LINVEST_EXP/AT Equals one if Altman s Z-score is greater than 1.81, and zero otherwise. Altman s Z-score is computed as sum of 3.3*OIADP/AT, 1.2*(ACT-LCT)/AT, Sale/AT, 0.6*PRCCF*CSHO/Sum (of DLTT DLC), and 1.4*RE/AT. Data source: COMPUSTAT Annual Industrial file. Logarithmic transformation of ROA. ROA is ratio of operating income before depreciation to total assets. Data source: COMPUSTAT Annual Industrial file. Logarithmic transformation of stock return. Stock return is the buy-and-hold return during the fiscal year. Data source: CRSP monthly file. Logarithmic transformation of total assets. Data source: COMPUSTAT Annual Industrial file. Logarithmic transformation of total sales. Data source: COMPUSTAT Annual Industrial file. Logarithmic transformation of growth opportunity. It is is book value of assets scaled by the market value of assets. Data source: COMPUSTAT Annual Industrial file. Cash flow shortfall is defined as sum of three year average of common and preferred dividends and cash flow from investing minus cash flow from operations scaled by total assets. Data source: COMPUSTAT Annual Industrial file. Net operating loss equals to 1 if the firm has net operating loss carry forwards in any of the three years prior to when the new equity grant is awarded. Data source: COMPUSTAT Annual Industrial file. Logarithmic transformation of taxes. Taxes are the tax rate faced by a firm after interest deduction. Data source: COMPUSTAT Annual Industrial file. Logarithmic transformation of ADV_EXP/AT. Advertising expenditure (xad or zero if missing) scaled by assets. Data source: COMPUSTAT Annual Industrial file. A dummy variable equal to one if the Advertising expenditure is missing. Data source: COMPUSTAT Annual Industrial file. Logarithmic transformation of R&D_EXP/AT. Research and development expenditures (xrd or zero if missing) scaled by assets. Data source: COMPUSTAT Annual Industrial file. A dummy variable equal to one if the research and development expenditure is missing. Data source: COMPUSTAT Annual Industrial file. Logarithmic transformation of INVEST_EXP/AT. Investment expenditure is the sum of capital expenditures plus acquisitions over the last three years divided by market value of assets. Data source: COMPUSTAT Annual Industrial file. 3
4 LLEVERAGE LDIV_YIELD LEXE_AGE DUALITY EXE_DIR FEMALE TURNOVER EINDEX RATE_DUM Logarithmic transformation of leverage. Leverage is calculated as the difference between book value of assets and book value of equity scaled by market value of equity. Data source: COMPUSTAT Annual Industrial file. Logarithmic transformation of DIV_YIELD. Dividend yield is dividend per share divided by close price of firm stock for the fiscal year. Data source: COMPUSTAT Annual Industrial file. Logarithmic transformation of EXE_AGE. Executive's age CEO s age during the fiscal year. Data source: Standard and Poor s ExecuComp database. Duality equals one if the firm s executive holds more than one position during the fiscal year and zero otherwise. Data source: Standard and Poor s ExecuComp database. Equals one if the firm s executive served as a director during the fiscal year and zero otherwise. Data source: Standard and Poor s ExecuComp database. Equals to one if an executive is female and zero otherwise. Data source: Standard and Poor s ExecuComp database. Executive turnover equals 1 if an executive during the fiscal year is different from the last fiscal year and zero otherwise. Data source: Standard and Poor s ExecuComp database. EINDEX constructed by Bebchuk, Fried, and Walker (2009) as a proxy for corporate governance. The highest value of EINCEX is 6. Data source: Professor Bebchuk s Website. Equals to one if a firm has a bond rating during the fiscal year and zero otherwise. Data source: Standard and Poor s Credit Rating database. Main Results TABLE I Summary Statistics This table reports summary statistics for dependent and explanatory variables. The sample period is from 1992 to All variables are defined in Appendix A. N Mean Std.De Minimu p25 p50 p75 Maximu Variables v m m SALARY BONUS ,155. 1,293.9 CASH_COMP 9 0 EQUITY_COMP ,040. 1, ,040. 2,
5 ,077. 1, ,636. 3,627. 4,278.3 TOTAL_COMP STD. RETURN ZSCORE_DUM STOCK RETURN ROA FIRM AGE ,169. 5, ,437. 5, ,318.4 TOTAL ASSETS GROWTH_OPPO RT CASH_SHORT OPERAT_LOSS ADV_EXP/AT ADV_MISSING R&D_EXP/AT R&D_MISSING INVEST_EXP/AT LEVERATE 9 DIVIDEND_YIEL D EXE_AGE DUALITY EXE_DIR FEMALE TURNOVER 9 RATE_DUM
6 9 Table II Average excess CEO compensation during Republican and Democratic presidencies This table reports comparative annual average excess CEO compensation during Democratic and Republican presidencies for full sample period and in different election cycles. Here, 1st year indicates the first year after a Democratic or Republican incumbent becomes president, so as the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th year; 2nd term indicates the tenure of an incumbent becomes president for repeated times. The sample period is from 1992 to Panel A, B, C, D, E and F report excess CEO compensation for our full sample and election cycle respectively. All variables are defined in Appendix A. Test statistics are reported in parentheses. ***, **, and * denote significance at less than the 1%, 5% and 10% levels respectively. Panel A: Average excess compensation during Republican and Democratic presidencies full sample Republican Democratic Compensation Difference t-stat Observation Mean Observation Mean SALARY *** (23.09) BONUS *** (4.81) CASH_COMP *** (16.07) EQUITY_COMP *** (17.45) TOTAL COMP *** (19.21) Panel B: Average excess compensation during Republican and Democratic presidencies 1 st Year Republican Democratic Compensation Difference t-stat Observation Mean Observation Mean SALARY *** (-4.41) BONUS *** (14.74) CASH_COMP *** (3.74) EQUITY_COMP , *** (8.20) TOTAL_COMP , , *** (9.72) Panel C: Average excess compensation during Republican and Democratic presidencies 2 nd Year Republican Democratic Compensation Difference t-stat Observation Mean Observation Mean SALARY (-1.81) 6
7 BONUS *** (15.10) CASH_COMP *** (5.51) EQUITY_COMP , *** (3.97) TOTAL_COMP , , *** (6.52) Panel D: Average excess compensation during Republican and Democratic presidencies 3 nd Year Compensation Republican Democratic Observation Mean Observation Mean Difference t-stat SALARY (1.91) BONUS *** (18.15) CASH_COMP *** (9.67) EQUITY_COMP , ** (2.92) TOTAL_COMP , , *** (7.21) Panel E: Average excess compensation during Republican and Democratic presidencies 4 th Year Republican Democratic Compensation Difference t-stat Observation Mean Observation Mean SALARY *** (15.35) BONUS *** (13.63) CASH_COMP *** (16.35) EQUITY_COMP , *** (13.60) TOTAL_COMP , , *** (17.02) Panel F: Average excess compensation during Republican and Democratic presidencies 2 nd Term Republican Democratic Compensation Difference t-stat Observation Mean Observation Mean SALARY *** (29.66) BONUS *** (-25.81) CASH_COMP *** (4.50) EQUITY_COMP , *** (10.40) TOTAL_COMP , , *** (6.59) 7
8 Table III Correlations between Variables Variables SALARY BONUS CASH_COMP EQUITY_COMP TOTAL_COMP ZSCORE_DUM STD.DEV STOCK RETURN ROA FIRM_AGE TOTAL ASSETS GROWTH_OPPO RT CASH_SHORT OPERT_LOSS XAD/AT R&D/AT INVEST_EXP/AT EXE_DIR
9 TURNOVER
10 Table IV Presidential Politics and CEO Salary Compensation This table shows regression results for CEO salary compensation on presidencies and other control variables. The sample contains 32,139 firm-year observations. The sample period is from 1992 to Standard errors are reported in parentheses. The goodness-of-fit measures reported are the Adjusted R-squared. ***, **, and * denote significance at less than the 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. All variables are defined in Appendix A. INTERCEPT *** (0.073) *** (0.073) *** (0.072) *** (0.072) *** (0.082) HOUSE_DUM *** *** *** SENATE_DUM *** PRES_DUM *** *** *** LVOLATILITY *** *** (0.284) (0.283) ZSCORE_DUM *** *** LSTOCK_RTURN ** *** LROA *** *** (0.056) (0.056) FIRM AGE *** *** LTOTAL ASSETS *** *** (0.002) (0.002) LGROWTH_OPPORT (0.022) (0.022) CASH_SHORT *** *** OPERT_LOSS *** *** LADV_EXP/AT *** *** (0.279) (0.279) ADV_MISSING *** *** LRD_EXP/AT *** *** (0.083) (0.083) RD_MISSING *** *** LINVEST_EXP/AT *** *** (0.071) (0.071) LLEVERAGE ** ** *** (0.282) *** *** *** (0.055) *** *** (0.002) * *** *** *** (0.276) *** *** (0.083) *** *** (0.071) *** *** (0.283) *** *** *** (0.055) *** *** (0.002) (0.022) *** *** *** (0.276) ** *** (0.083) *** *** (0.071) *** *** (0.291) *** *** *** (0.055) *** *** (0.002) *** (0.022) *** *** ** (0.293) *** * (0.101) *** (0.075) ***
11 LDIV_YIELD *** *** *** *** *** EXE AGE *** *** *** *** *** DUALITY *** ** *** *** *** EXE_DIR *** *** *** *** *** FEMALE *** *** *** *** TURNOVER *** *** *** *** *** RATE_DUM Industry Effects No No No No Yes Observations Adjusted R Table V Presidential Politics and CEO Bonus Compensation This table shows regression results for CEO bonus compensation on presidencies and other control variables. The sample contains 32,139 firm-year observations. The sample period is from 1992 to Standard errors are reported in parentheses. The goodness-of-fit measures reported are the Adjusted R-squared. ***, **, and * denote significance at less than the 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. All variables are defined in Appendix A. INTERCEPT ** (0.521) * (0.526) *** (0.539) ** (0.520) *** (0.597) HOUSE_DUM *** (0.032) *** (0.032) *** (0.032) SENATE_DUM *** PRES_DUM *** *** (0.029) *** (0.029) LVOLATILITY *** (2.024) (2.035) (2.099) *** (2.036) *** (2.121) ZSCORE_DUM (0.034) (0.034) (0.034) (0.036) LSTOCK_RTURN *** (0.044) *** (0.045) *** (0.046) *** (0.044) *** (0.044) LROA *** (0.396) *** (0.399) *** (0.410) *** (0.395) *** (0.402) FIRM AGE *** *** *** (0.027) *** ** (0.028) LTOTAL ASSETS *** *** *** *** *** LGROWTH_OPPORT (0.155) (0.157) ** (0.160) (0.155) (0.160) CASH_SHORT * (0.124) (0.125) * (0.129) * (0.124) * (0.127) OPERT_LOSS *** *** *** *** *** 11
12 (0.051) (0.051) (0.053) (0.051) (0.052) LADV_EXP/AT *** (1.986) *** (2.007) *** (2.056) *** (1.986) *** (2.140) ADV_MISSING *** (0.052) *** (0.052) *** (0.053) *** (0.052) *** (0.052) LRD_EXP/AT ** (0.593) (0.598) (0.614) * (0.593) *** (0.738) RD_MISSING ** * * (0.036) * *** (0.043) LINVEST_EXP/AT (0.507) (0.512) * (0.526) (0.508) ** (0.549) LLEVERAGE *** (0.149) *** (0.151) *** (0.155) *** (0.150) ** (0.154) LDIV_YIELD *** *** *** (0.032) *** *** (0.032) EXE AGE *** (0.126) *** (0.127) *** (0.130) *** (0.126) *** (0.126) DUALITY *** *** *** (0.034) *** *** EXE_DIR *** (0.039) FEMALE *** (0.096) *** (0.097) *** (0.099) *** (0.095) *** (0.096) TURNOVER *** (0.045) *** (0.046) *** (0.047) *** (0.046) *** (0.046) RATE_DUM * (0.039) ** (0.039) *** (0.040) (0.039) (0.039) Industry Effects No No No No Yes Observations Adjusted R Table VI Presidential Politics and CEO Cash Compensation This table shows regression results for CEO cash compensation on presidencies and other control variables. The sample contains 32,139 firm-year observations. The sample period is from 1992 to Standard errors are reported in parentheses. The goodness-of-fit measures reported are the Adjusted R-squared. ***, **, and * denote significance at less than the 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. All variables are defined in Appendix A. INTERCEPT *** (0.088) *** (0.089) *** (0.089) *** (0.088) *** (0.100) HOUSE_DUM *** *** *** SENATE_DUM *** PRES_DUM *** *** *** LVOLATILITY *** (0.344) ZSCORE_DUM *** *** (0.343) *** *** (0.345) *** *** (0.345) *** *** (0.355) ***
13 LSTOCK_RTURN *** *** *** *** *** LROA *** (0.067) *** (0.067) *** (0.067) *** (0.067) *** (0.067) FIRM AGE *** *** *** *** *** LTOTAL ASSETS *** *** *** *** *** LGROWTH_OPPORT ** (0.027) CASH_SHORT *** *** *** *** *** OPERT_LOSS ** LADV_EXP/AT *** (0.338) *** (0.338) *** (0.338) *** (0.337) *** (0.358) ADV_MISSING LRD_EXP/AT *** (0.101) *** (0.101) *** (0.101) *** (0.101) (0.124) RD_MISSING *** *** *** *** LINVEST_EXP/AT *** (0.086) *** (0.086) *** (0.086) *** (0.086) (0.092) LLEVERAGE *** *** *** *** *** LDIV_YIELD *** *** *** *** *** EXE AGE *** *** *** *** *** DUALITY *** *** *** *** *** EXE_DIR *** *** *** *** *** FEMALE TURNOVER *** *** *** *** *** RATE_DUM Industry Effects No No No No Yes Observations Adjusted R Table VII Presidential Politics and CEO Equity Compensation This table shows regression results for CEO equity compensation on presidencies and other control variables. The sample contains 32,139 firm-year observations. The sample period is from 1992 to Standard errors are reported in parentheses. The goodness-of-fit measures reported are the Adjusted R-squared. ***, **, and * denote significance at less than the 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. All variables are defined in Appendix A. 13
14 INTERCEPT *** (0.592) *** (0.593) *** (0.592) *** (0.592) *** (0.681) HOUSE_DUM (0.036) (0.036) (0.036) SENATE_DUM *** (0.034) PRES_DUM *** *** *** LVOLATILITY *** (2.303) *** (2.292) ZSCORE_DUM *** *** LSTOCK_RTURN (0.050) (0.051) LROA (0.450) (0.450) FIRM AGE LTOTAL ASSETS *** *** LGROWTH_OPPORT *** *** (0.176) (0.177) CASH_SHORT (0.141) (0.141) OPERT_LOSS (0.058) (0.058) LADV_EXP/AT ** ** (2.260) (2.260) ADV_MISSING (0.059) (0.059) LRD_EXP/AT *** *** (0.674) (0.674) RD_MISSING *** *** (0.040) (0.040) LINVEST_EXP/AT * ** (0.577) (0.577) LLEVERAGE * * (0.170) (0.170) LDIV_YIELD * * EXE AGE *** *** (0.143) (0.143) DUALITY (0.037) EXE_DIR *** *** (0.043) (0.043) FEMALE ** ** (0.109) (0.109) TURNOVER *** *** (0.052) (0.051) *** (2.306) *** (0.050) (0.450) *** *** (0.175) (0.141) (0.058) * (2.259) (0.059) *** (0.675) *** (0.040) ** (0.578) (0.170) ** *** (0.143) (0.037) *** (0.043) * (0.109) *** (0.052) *** (2.318) *** (0.050) (0.450) *** *** (0.176) (0.141) (0.058) * (2.261) (0.059) *** (0.675) *** (0.040) ** (0.578) (0.170) ** *** (0.143) *** (0.043) * (0.109) *** (0.052) (0.034) *** (2.417) *** (0.041) (0.050) (0.458) *** *** (0.182) (0.145) (0.060) (2.438) (0.060) *** (0.841) *** (0.049) *** (0.626) (0.175) *** (0.036) *** (0.144) *** (0.043) ** (0.109) *** (0.052)
15 RATE_DUM *** (0.044) *** (0.044) *** (0.044) *** (0.044) *** (0.045) Industry Effects No No No No Yes Observations Adjusted R Table VIII Presidential Politics and CEO Total Compensation This table shows regression results for CEO total compensation on presidencies and other control variables. The sample contains 32,139 firm-year observations. The sample period is from 1992 to Standard errors are reported in parentheses. The goodness-of-fit measures reported are the Adjusted R-squared. ***, **, and * denote significance at less than the 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. All variables are defined in Appendix A. INTERCEPT *** (0.138) *** (0.138) *** (0.138) *** (0.137) *** (0.156) HOUSE_DUM *** *** *** SENATE_DUM *** PRES_DUM *** *** *** LVOLATILITY *** (0.535) *** (0.534) *** (0.537) *** (0.538) *** (0.558) ZSCORE_DUM *** *** *** *** *** LSTOCK_RTURN * * *** ** *** LROA *** (0.104) *** (0.105) *** (0.105) *** (0.104) *** (0.105) FIRM AGE * ** LTOTAL ASSETS *** *** *** *** *** LGROWTH_OPPORT *** (0.050) *** (0.050) *** (0.050) *** (0.050) *** (0.051) CASH_SHORT *** *** *** *** ** OPERT_LOSS * * * * *** LADV_EXP/AT * (0.525) * (0.527) *** (0.526) ** (0.525) (0.560) ADV_MISSING *** ** * LRD_EXP/AT *** (0.156) ** (0.157) *** (0.157) *** (0.156) *** (0.193) RD_MISSING *** *** *** *** *** (0.011) LINVEST_EXP/AT *** (0.134) *** (0.135) ** (0.135) *** (0.134) (0.144) LLEVERAGE *** *** *** *** * 15
16 LDIV_YIELD *** *** *** *** *** EXE AGE *** *** *** *** *** DUALITY *** *** *** *** *** EXE_DIR *** *** *** *** *** FEMALE TURNOVER *** *** *** *** *** RATE_DUM *** *** *** *** *** Industry Effects No No No No Yes Observations Adjusted R Table IX Presidential Politics and CEO Compensation: Robust Regression This table shows robust regression results for CEO compensation on presidencies and other control variables. In model 1 through 5 dependent variables are log salary, bonus, cash compensation, equity compensation, total compensation respectively. The sample contains 32,139 firm-year observations. The sample period is from 1992 to Standard errors are reported in parentheses. The goodness-of-fit measures reported are the Adjusted R-squared. ***, **, and * denote significance at less than the 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. All variables are defined in Appendix A. INTERCEPT *** (0.074) (0.698) *** (0.098) *** (0.275) *** (0.160) PRES_DUM *** *** (0.034) *** *** *** LVOLATILITY ** (0.275) *** (2.575) *** (0.361) *** (1.017) *** (0.591) ZSCORE_DUM *** (0.042) *** *** LSTOCK_RTURN ** *** (0.051) *** *** *** LROA *** (0.050) *** (0.469) *** (0.066) * (0.185) *** (0.108) FIRM AGE *** * (0.032) *** *** LTOTAL ASSETS *** (0.002) *** *** *** *** LGROWTH_OPPORT ** *** (0.224) * *** (0.088) *** (0.051) CASH_SHORT *** *** *** OPERT_LOSS *** (0.148) *** (0.065) (0.059) ** (0.034) **
17 LTAX_RATE *** (0.040) *** (0.378) *** (0.053) * (0.149) (0.087) LADV_EXP/AT * (0.263) *** (2.464) *** (0.345) (0.973) (0.565) ADV_MISSING *** *** (0.060) *** LRD_EXP/AT *** (0.091) (0.856) (0.120) *** (0.338) *** (0.196) RD_MISSING *** (0.051) *** *** LINVEST_EXP/AT (0.068) *** (0.632) (0.089) * (0.250) (0.145) LLEVERAGE *** (0.087) *** *** ** LDIV_YIELD *** *** *** *** *** EXE AGE *** *** (0.146) *** (0.058) *** DUALITY *** *** (0.039) *** *** *** EXE_DIR *** (0.044) *** *** *** FEMALE *** (0.112) * (0.044) TURNOVER *** *** (0.052) *** *** *** RATE_DUM *** (0.045) *** ** *** Industry Effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Observations Adjusted R Table X Presidential Politics and CEO Compensation: Median Regression This table shows median regression results for CEO compensation on presidencies and other control variables. In model 1 through 5 dependent variables are log salary, bonus, cash compensation, equity compensation, total compensation respectively. The sample contains 32,139 firm-year observations. The sample period is from 1992 to Standard errors are reported in parentheses. The goodness-of-fit measures reported are the Adjusted R-squared. ***, **, and * denote significance at less than the 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. All variables are defined in Appendix A. INTERCEPT *** (0.086) *** (0.497) *** (0.109) *** (0.375) *** (0.160) PRES_DUM *** * *** *** *** LVOLATILITY *** *** *** *** (0.319) ZSCORE_DUM *** (1.840) (0.405) *** (1.387) ** (0.590) ***
18 LSTOCK_RTURN ** *** (0.036) *** *** (0.028) *** LROA *** (0.058) *** (0.335) *** (0.074) ** (0.253) *** (0.108) FIRM AGE *** * *** * LTOTAL ASSETS *** (0.002) *** *** *** (0.011) *** LGROWTH_OPPORT (0.028) *** (0.160) ** *** (0.121) *** (0.051) CASH_SHORT *** *** (0.106) *** (0.080) (0.034) OPERT_LOSS *** *** (0.046) *** LTAX_RATE *** (0.047) *** (0.270) * (0.059) *** (0.204) (0.087) LADV_EXP/AT * (0.305) *** (1.759) *** (0.387) (1.327) (0.564) ADV_MISSING *** *** (0.043) *** LRD_EXP/AT *** (0.106) (0.611) ** (0.135) *** (0.461) *** (0.196) RD_MISSING *** (0.036) * *** (0.027) *** LINVEST_EXP/AT (0.078) *** (0.452) (0.099) *** (0.341) (0.145) LLEVERAGE (0.011) *** (0.063) *** *** (0.047) LDIV_YIELD *** *** (0.027) *** *** *** EXE AGE *** * (0.104) *** *** (0.079) *** DUALITY *** *** (0.028) *** *** ** EXE_DIR *** *** *** *** *** FEMALE *** (0.080) * (0.060) TURNOVER *** ** (0.037) *** *** (0.028) *** RATE_DUM ** *** (0.032) *** *** *** Industry Effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Observations Pseudo R Table XI Presidential Politics and CEO Compensation: Linear Probability Model This table shows linear probability regression results for CEO compensation on presidencies and other control variables. Here president is a dummy variable indicating 1 if Republican president 18
19 and 0 otherwise. In model 1 through 5, we regress log of salary, bonus, cash, equity and total compensation on presidencies. The sample contains 32,139 firm-year observations. The sample period is from 1992 to Standard errors are reported in parentheses. The goodness-of-fit measures reported are the Adjusted R-squared. ***, **, and * denote significance at less than the 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. All variables are defined in Appendix A. INTERCEPT *** (0.072) ** (0.063) *** (0.071) * (0.063) LSALARY *** LBONUS *** (0.001) LCASH_COMP *** LEQUITY_COMP *** *** (0.067) (0.001) LTOTAL_COMP *** LVOLATILITY *** (0.403) *** (0.410) *** (0.406) *** (0.410) *** (0.406) ZSCORE_DUM * LSTOCK_RTURN *** *** *** *** *** LROA *** (0.077) *** (0.079) *** (0.078) *** (0.079) *** (0.078) LGROWTH_OPPORT *** (0.037) *** (0.037) *** (0.037) *** (0.037) *** (0.037) CASH_SHORT OPERT_LOSS *** (0.011) *** (0.011) *** (0.011) *** (0.011) *** (0.011) LTAX_RATE *** (0.062) * (0.064) (0.063) (0.063) (0.063) LADV_EXP/AT *** (0.275) *** (0.280) *** (0.277) *** (0.280) *** (0.278) LRD_EXP/AT *** (0.129) *** (0.132) *** (0.130) *** (0.132) *** (0.131) LINVEST_EXP/AT *** (0.104) *** (0.106) *** (0.105) *** (0.106) *** (0.105) LLEVERAGE *** *** *** *** *** LDIV_YIELD *** *** DUALITY *** *** *** *** *** TURNOVER *** *** *** *** *** Industry Effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Observations Pseudo R
20 Table XII Presidential Politics and CEO Compensation: logistic regression This table shows logistic regression results for CEO compensation on presidencies and other control variables. Here president is a dummy variable indicating 1 if Republican president and 0 otherwise. In model 1 through 5, we regress log of salary, bonus, cash, equity and total compensation on presidencies. The sample contains 32,139 firm-year observations. The sample period is from 1992 to Standard errors are reported in parentheses. The goodness-of-fit measures reported are the Adjusted R-squared. ***, **, and * denote significance at less than the 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. All variables are defined in Appendix A. PRES_DUM INTERCEPT *** *** (0.278) (0.341) LSALARY *** LBONUS *** *** (0.321) LCASH_COMP *** *** (0.280) LEQUITY_COMP *** *** (0.303) LTOTAL_COMP *** LVOLATILITY *** (1.863) ZSCORE_DUM * (0.032) LSTOCK_RTURN *** LROA *** (0.352) LGROWTH_OPPORT *** (0.166) CASH_SHORT (0.112) OPERT_LOSS *** (0.049) LTAX_RATE *** (0.282) LADV_EXP/AT *** (1.258) LRD_EXP/AT *** (0.592) LINVEST_EXP/AT *** (0.481) LLEVERAGE *** (0.062) LDIV_YIELD *** (1.804) *** *** (0.346) *** (0.163) (0.109) *** (0.048) * (0.279) *** (1.228) *** (0.579) *** (0.471) *** (0.060) *** *** (1.836) *** *** (0.352) *** (0.165) (0.110) *** (0.048) (0.280) *** (1.246) *** (0.587) *** (0.476) *** (0.062) *** (1.808) *** *** (0.346) *** (0.164) (0.109) *** (0.048) (0.278) *** (1.231) *** (0.582) *** (0.472) *** (0.061) *** *** (1.824) *** *** (0.349) *** (0.166) (0.111) *** (0.048) (0.279) *** (1.242) *** (0.588) *** (0.476) *** (0.062)
21 DUALITY *** *** (0.029) *** (0.029) *** (0.029) *** (0.029) TURNOVER *** (0.042) *** (0.037) *** (0.040) *** *** (0.039) Industry Effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Observations Pseudo R Table XIII Presidential Politics and CEO Compensation: probit regression This table shows probit regression results for CEO compensation on presidencies and other control variables. Here president is a dummy variable indicating 1 if Republican president and 0 otherwise. In model 1 through 5, we regress log of salary, bonus, cash, equity and total compensation on presidencies. The sample contains 32,139 firm-year observations. The sample period is from 1992 to Standard errors are reported in parentheses. The goodness-of-fit measures reported are the Adjusted R-squared. ***, **, and * denote significance at less than the 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. All variables are defined in Appendix A. PRES_DUM INTERCEPT *** *** (0.171) (0.204) LSALARY *** LBONUS *** *** (0.195) LCASH_COMP *** *** (0.172) LEQUITY_COMP *** *** (0.184) (0.002) LTOTAL_COMP *** LVOLATILITY *** (1.128) ZSCORE_DUM * LSTOCK_RTURN *** LROA *** (0.214) LGROWTH_OPPORT *** (0.101) CASH_SHORT (0.067) OPERT_LOSS *** LTAX_RATE *** (0.172) LADV_EXP/AT *** (0.765) LRD_EXP/AT *** (0.359) *** (1.106) *** *** (0.212) *** (0.100) (0.067) *** (0.029) * (0.172) *** (0.752) *** (0.354) *** (1.118) *** *** (0.214) *** (0.101) (0.067) *** (0.172) *** (0.760) *** (0.357) *** (1.107) *** *** (0.211) *** (0.100) (0.067) *** (0.029) * (0.171) *** (0.754) *** (0.355) *** (1.113) *** *** (0.212) *** (0.101) (0.067) *** (0.029) (0.171) *** (0.758) *** (0.357)
22 LINVEST_EXP/AT *** (0.291) *** (0.287) *** (0.290) *** (0.288) *** (0.289) LLEVERAGE *** *** (0.037) *** *** (0.037) *** LDIV_YIELD *** *** DUALITY *** *** *** *** *** TURNOVER *** *** *** *** *** Industry Effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Observations Pseudo R Robustness test Table XIV Presidential Politics and CEO Pay performance sensitivity This table shows robust regression results for pay performance sensitivity on presidencies and other control variables. The sample contains 24,047 firm-year observations. The sample period is from 1992 to Standard errors are reported in parentheses. The goodness-of-fit measures reported are the Adjusted R-squared. ***, **, and * denote significance at less than the 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. All variables are defined in Appendix A. INTERCEPT *** (0.315) *** (0.316) *** (0.316) *** (0.316) *** (0.357) HOUSE_DUM *** *** *** SENATE_DUM PRES_DUM ** ** ** LVOLATILITY *** (1.207) *** (1.198) *** (1.206) *** (1.215) *** (1.266) ZSCORE_DUM (0.022) LROA *** (0.232) *** (0.232) *** (0.232) *** (0.232) ** (0.235) FIRM AGE *** *** *** *** *** LTOTAL ASSETS *** *** *** *** *** LGROWTH_OPPORT *** (0.110) *** (0.110) *** (0.109) *** (0.110) *** (0.111) CASH_SHORT *** (0.072) *** (0.072) *** (0.072) *** (0.072) *** (0.074) OPERT_LOSS * LADV_EXP/AT *** *** *** *** *** 22
23 (1.187) (1.188) (1.188) (1.190) (1.277) ADV_MISSING *** *** *** *** *** LRD_EXP/AT *** (0.348) *** (0.348) *** (0.349) *** (0.349) (0.431) RD_MISSING (0.022) (0.022) (0.022) (0.022) (0.027) LINVEST_EXP/AT *** (0.307) *** (0.308) ** (0.308) ** (0.308) (0.331) LLEVERAGE *** (0.043) *** (0.043) *** (0.043) *** (0.043) *** (0.044) LDIV_YIELD *** *** *** *** *** EXE AGE *** (0.076) *** (0.076) *** (0.076) *** (0.076) *** (0.076) DUALITY *** *** *** *** *** EXE_DIR *** *** *** *** *** FEMALE (0.059) (0.059) (0.059) (0.059) (0.060) TURNOVER *** *** *** *** *** RATE_DUM * * * Industry Effects No No No No Yes Observations Adjusted R Table XV Presidential Politics, marginal tax rates and CEO compensation This table shows regression results for CEO compensation on presidencies and other control variables. In model 1 through 5 dependent variables are log salary, bonus, cash compensation, equity compensation, total compensation respectively. The sample contains 31,635 firm-year observations. The sample period is from 1992 to Standard errors are reported in parentheses. The goodness-of-fit measures reported are the Adjusted R-squared. ***, **, and * denote significance at less than the 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. All variables are defined in Appendix A. INTERCEPT *** (0.083) * (0.624) *** (0.102) *** (0.692) *** (0.160) PRES_DUM *** *** *** *** (0.034) *** LTAX_RATE *** (0.045) *** (0.338) *** (0.055) *** (0.375) (0.086) LVOLATILITY ** (0.307) *** (2.303) *** (0.376) *** (2.554) *** (0.589) ZSCORE_DUM *** *** *** (0.042) *** LSTOCK_RTURN *** *** *** *** 23
24 (0.046) (0.051) LROA *** (0.056) *** (0.420) *** (0.068) (0.465) *** (0.107) FIRM AGE *** * (0.029) *** (0.032) ** LTOTAL ASSETS *** (0.002) *** *** *** *** LGROWTH_OPPORT *** (0.027) *** (0.200) *** (0.222) *** (0.051) CASH_SHORT *** *** (0.133) *** (0.022) (0.147) ** (0.034) OPERT_LOSS *** *** (0.058) *** (0.064) *** LADV_EXP/AT ** (0.294) *** (2.204) *** (0.360) (2.444) (0.563) ADV_MISSING *** *** (0.054) ** (0.060) LRD_EXP/AT (0.102) (0.765) (0.125) *** (0.849) *** (0.196) RD_MISSING ** (0.045) *** (0.050) *** LINVEST_EXP/AT (0.075) *** (0.566) (0.092) *** (0.627) (0.145) LLEVERAGE *** (0.078) *** *** (0.087) * LDIV_YIELD *** *** (0.034) *** *** (0.037) *** EXE AGE *** *** (0.131) *** *** (0.145) *** DUALITY *** *** *** (0.039) *** EXE_DIR *** * (0.039) *** *** (0.044) *** FEMALE *** (0.100) ** (0.111) TURNOVER *** *** (0.047) *** *** (0.052) *** RATE_DUM *** (0.041) * *** (0.045) *** Industry Effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Observations Adjusted R Table XVI Presidential Politics, firm size and CEO compensation This table shows regression results for CEO compensation on presidencies and other control variables. In model 1 through 5 dependent variables are log salary, bonus, cash compensation, equity compensation, total compensation respectively. The sample contains 28,830 firm-year observations. The sample period is from 1992 to Standard errors are reported in parentheses. The goodness-of-fit measures reported are the Adjusted R-squared. ***, **, and * denote 24
25 significance at less than the 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. All variables are defined in Appendix A. INTERCEPT *** (0.086) *** (0.646) *** (0.106) *** (0.720) *** (0.169) PRES_DUM *** *** (0.032) *** *** (0.036) *** LTAX_RATE *** (0.048) *** (0.355) *** (0.058) *** (0.396) (0.093) LVOLATILITY (0.324) *** (2.420) *** (0.396) *** (2.698) *** (0.633) ZSCORE_DUM * (0.040) *** (0.044) LSTOCK_RTURN *** *** (0.048) *** (0.054) *** LROA (0.059) *** (0.439) *** (0.072) ** (0.489) (0.115) FIRM AGE *** *** (0.034) LSALE *** *** *** *** *** LGROWTH_OPPORT ** (0.028) *** (0.209) (0.034) *** (0.233) *** (0.055) CASH_SHORT *** (0.139) * * (0.155) (0.036) OPERT_LOSS *** *** (0.062) *** (0.069) *** LADV_EXP/AT (0.306) *** (2.285) (0.374) ** (2.547) ** (0.597) ADV_MISSING *** *** (0.056) * (0.063) ** LRD_EXP/AT (0.107) (0.801) (0.131) *** (0.893) *** (0.209) RD_MISSING * (0.047) *** (0.053) *** LINVEST_EXP/AT (0.079) *** (0.588) (0.096) *** (0.656) (0.154) LLEVERAGE (0.011) *** (0.082) *** *** (0.091) LDIV_YIELD * *** *** *** (0.039) EXE AGE *** *** (0.137) *** (0.022) *** (0.152) *** (0.036) DUALITY *** *** (0.036) *** (0.040) ** EXE_DIR *** ** (0.040) *** *** (0.045) *** FEMALE *** ** TURNOVER *** (0.101) *** (0.047) *** (0.113) *** (0.053) ***
26 RATE_DUM *** *** (0.041) *** *** (0.046) *** (0.011) Industry Effects Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Observations Adjusted R Table XVII Presidential Politics, corporate governance and CEO compensation This table shows regression results for CEO compensation on presidencies and other control variables. In model 1 through 5 dependent variables are log salary, bonus, cash compensation, equity compensation, total compensation respectively. The sample contains 28,830 firm-year observations. The sample period is from 1992 to Standard errors are reported in parentheses. The goodness-of-fit measures reported are the Adjusted R-squared. ***, **, and * denote significance at less than the 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively. All variables are defined in Appendix A. INTERCEPT *** (0.106) *** (0.806) *** (0.131) *** (0.883) *** (0.205) PRES_DUM *** *** *** *** (0.042) *** EINDEX *** (0.002) *** ** (0.002) *** *** LVOLATILITY (0.393) *** (2.995) *** (0.485) *** (3.283) *** (0.764) ZSCORE_DUM (0.049) ** (0.054) LSTOCK_RTURN *** *** (0.058) *** (0.064) *** LROA ** (0.071) *** (0.541) *** (0.088) ** (0.593) (0.138) FIRM AGE *** *** (0.041) LSALE *** *** *** *** *** LGROWTH_OPPORT *** (0.034) (0.263) *** (0.043) *** (0.288) *** (0.067) CASH_SHORT ** (0.195) *** (0.032) (0.214) (0.050) OPERT_LOSS *** (0.079) ** (0.087) ** LADV_EXP/AT (0.370) * (2.819) (0.457) * (3.089) ** (0.718) ADV_MISSING ** *** (0.071) (0.011) * (0.077) * LRD_EXP/AT (0.130) (0.993) (0.161) ** (1.088) *** (0.253) RD_MISSING * (0.056) *** (0.061) *** LINVEST_EXP/AT (0.095) *** (0.721) (0.117) *** (0.790) * (0.184) LLEVERAGE ** *
Panel A: Treated firm matched to one control firm. t + 1 t + 2 t + 3 Total CFO Compensation 5.03% 0.84% 10.27% [0.384] [0.892] [0.
Online Appendix 1 Table O1: Determinants of CMO Compensation: Selection based on both number of other firms in industry that have CMOs and number of other firms in industry with MBA educated executives
More informationInternet Appendix. For. Birds of a feather: Value implications of political alignment between top management and directors
Internet Appendix For Birds of a feather: Value implications of political alignment between top management and directors Jongsub Lee *, Kwang J. Lee, and Nandu J. Nagarajan This Internet Appendix reports
More informationOnline Appendix to The Effect of Liquidity on Governance
Online Appendix to The Effect of Liquidity on Governance Table OA1: Conditional correlations of liquidity for the subsample of firms targeted by hedge funds This table reports Pearson and Spearman correlations
More informationInternet Appendix for CEO Personal Risk-taking and Corporate Policies TABLE IA.1 Pilot CEOs and Firm Risk (Controlling for High Performance Pay)
TABLE IA.1 Pilot CEOs and Firm Risk (Controlling for High Performance Pay) OLS regressions with annualized standard deviation of firm-level monthly stock returns as the dependent variable. A constant is
More informationAppendix Table A1 Number of years since deregulation
Appendix Table A1 Number of years since deregulation This table presents the results of -in-s models incorporating the number of years since deregulation and using data for s with trade flows are above
More informationThis appendix tabulates results summarized in Section IV of our paper, and also reports the results of additional tests.
Internet Appendix for Mutual Fund Trading Pressure: Firm-level Stock Price Impact and Timing of SEOs, by Mozaffar Khan, Leonid Kogan and George Serafeim. * This appendix tabulates results summarized in
More informationInternet Appendix for Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation? *
Internet Appendix for Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation? * This Internet Appendix provides supplemental analyses and robustness tests to the main results presented in Does Stock Liquidity
More informationInternet Appendix to. The Price of Street Friends: Social Networks, Informed Trading, and Shareholder Costs. Jie Cai Ralph A.
Internet Appendix to The Price of Street Friends: Social Networks, Informed Trading, and Shareholder Costs Jie Cai Ralph A. Walkling Ke Yang October 2014 1 A11. Controlling for s Logically Associated with
More informationNovember K. J. Martijn Cremers Lubomir P. Litov Simone M. Sepe
ONLINE APPENDIX TABLES OF STAGGERED BOARDS AND LONG-TERM FIRM VALUE, REVISITED November 016 K. J. Martijn Cremers Lubomir P. Litov Simone M. Sepe The paper itself is available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract-id=364165.
More informationThe Financing and Growth of Firms in China and India: Evidence from Capital Markets
The Financing and Growth of Firms in China and India: Evidence from Capital Markets Tatiana Didier Sergio Schmukler Dec. 12-13, 2012 NIPFP-DEA-JIMF Conference Macro and Financial Challenges of Emerging
More informationInside the Family Firm: The Role of Families in Succession Decisions and Performance *
Inside the Family Firm: The Role of Families in Succession Decisions and Performance * Morten Bennedsen Copenhagen Business School and CEBR Francisco Pérez-González Columbia University, GSB Kasper M. Nielsen
More informationOnline Appendix to Voluntary Disclosure and Information Asymmetry: Evidence from the 2005 Securities Offering Reform
Online Appendix to Voluntary Disclosure and Information Asymmetry: Evidence from the 2005 Securities Offering Reform This document contains several additional results that are untabulated but referenced
More informationCredit Supply and Monetary Policy: Identifying the Bank Balance-Sheet Channel with Loan Applications. Web Appendix
Credit Supply and Monetary Policy: Identifying the Bank Balance-Sheet Channel with Loan Applications By GABRIEL JIMÉNEZ, STEVEN ONGENA, JOSÉ-LUIS PEYDRÓ, AND JESÚS SAURINA Web Appendix APPENDIX A -- NUMBER
More informationDETERMINANTS OF GROWTH
POLICY OPTIONS AND CHALLENGES FOR DEVELOPING ASIA PERSPECTIVES FROM THE IMF AND ASIA APRIL 19-20, 2007 TOKYO DETERMINANTS OF GROWTH IN LOW-INCOME ASIA ARI AISEN INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND Paper presented
More informationEffects of Election Results on Stock Price Performance: Evidence from 1976 to 2008
Effects of Election Results on Stock Price Performance: Evidence from 1976 to 2008 Andreas Oehler, Bamberg University Thomas J. Walker, Concordia University Stefan Wendt, Bamberg University 2012 FMA Annual
More informationLabor Supply of Married Couples in the Formal and Informal Sectors in Thailand
Southeast Asian Journal of Economics 2(2), December 2014: 77-102 Labor Supply of Married Couples in the Formal and Informal Sectors in Thailand Chairat Aemkulwat 1 Faculty of Economics, Chulalongkorn University
More informationStructural Reforms and Agricultural Export Performance An Empirical Analysis
Structural Reforms and Agricultural Export Performance An Empirical Analysis D. Susanto, C. P. Rosson, and R. Costa Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University College Station, Texas INTRODUCTION
More informationValuation in the Life Settlements Market
Valuation in the Life Settlements Market New Empirical Evidence Jiahua (Java) Xu 1 1 Institute of Insurance Economics University of St.Gallen Western Risk and Insurance Association 2018 Annual Meeting
More informationCorporate Social Responsibility and CEO Compensation Structure
Corporate Social Responsibility and CEO Compensation Structure Khondkar Karim a Manning School of Business, University of Massachusetts Lowell Eunju Lee b Manning School of Business, University of Massachusetts
More informationOnline Appendix for. To Buy or Not to Buy: Consumer Constraints in the Housing Market
Online Appendix for To Buy or Not to Buy: Consumer Constraints in the Housing Market By Andreas Fuster and Basit Zafar, Federal Reserve Bank of New York 1. Main Survey Questions Highlighted parts correspond
More informationInvestment Wines. - Risk Analysis. Prepared by: Michael Shortell & Adiam Woldetensae Date: 06/09/2015
Investment Wines - Risk Analysis Prepared by: Michael Shortell & Adiam Woldetensae Date: 06/09/2015 Purpose Look at investment wines & examine factors that affect wine prices over time We will identify
More informationPeet's Coffee & Tea, Inc. Reports 62% Increase in Second Quarter 2008 Diluted Earnings Per Share
Peet's Coffee & Tea, Inc. Reports 62% Increase in Second Quarter 2008 Diluted Earnings Per Share EMERYVILLE, Calif., July 31, 2008 /PRNewswire-FirstCall via COMTEX News Network/ -- Peet's Coffee & Tea,
More informationOnline Appendix. for. Female Leadership and Gender Equity: Evidence from Plant Closure
Online Appendix for Female Leadership and Gender Equity: Evidence from Plant Closure Geoffrey Tate and Liu Yang In this appendix, we provide additional robustness checks to supplement the evidence in the
More informationFiscal Reaction Functions of Different Euro Area Countries
Fiscal Reaction Functions of Different Euro Area Countries Klaus Weyerstrass 56th SIE Annual Conference, Naples, 22-24 October 2015 Introduction sustainability of public finances Fiscal reaction functions
More informationThe Differential Effects of Classified Boards on Firm Value
The Differential Effects of Classified Boards on Firm Value SEOUNGPIL AHN, VIDHAN K. GOYAL and KESHAB SHRESTHA * March, 2009 ABSTRACT We find that classified boards actually increase the value of firms
More informationZeitschrift für Soziologie, Jg., Heft 5, 2015, Online- Anhang
I Are Joiners Trusters? A Panel Analysis of Participation and Generalized Trust Online Appendix Katrin Botzen University of Bern, Institute of Sociology, Fabrikstrasse 8, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; katrin.botzen@soz.unibe.ch
More informationGender and Firm-size: Evidence from Africa
World Bank From the SelectedWorks of Mohammad Amin March, 2010 Gender and Firm-size: Evidence from Africa Mohammad Amin Available at: https://works.bepress.com/mohammad_amin/20/ Gender and Firm size: Evidence
More informationVolume 30, Issue 1. Gender and firm-size: Evidence from Africa
Volume 30, Issue 1 Gender and firm-size: Evidence from Africa Mohammad Amin World Bank Abstract A number of studies show that relative to male owned businesses, female owned businesses are smaller in size.
More informationUpdate to A Comprehensive Look at the Empirical Performance of Equity Premium Prediction
Update to A Comprehensive Look at the Empirical Performance of Equity Premium Prediction Amit Goyal UNIL Ivo Welch UCLA September 17, 2014 Abstract This file contains updates, one correction, and links
More informationFinancing Decisions of REITs and the Switching Effect
Financing Decisions of REITs and the Switching Effect By Lucia Gibilaro University of Bergamo Department of Management, Economics and Quantitative Methods and Gianluca Mattarocci University of Rome Tor
More informationTable A.1: Use of funds by frequency of ROSCA meetings in 9 research sites (Note multiple answers are allowed per respondent)
Appendix Table A.1: Use of funds by frequency of ROSCA meetings in 9 research sites (Note multiple answers are allowed per respondent) Daily Weekly Every 2 weeks Monthly Every 3 months Every 6 months Total
More informationAppendix A. Table A1: Marginal effects and elasticities on the export probability
Appendix A Table A1: Marginal effects and elasticities on the export probability Variable PROP [1] PROP [2] PROP [3] PROP [4] Export Probability 0.207 0.148 0.206 0.141 Marg. Eff. Elasticity Marg. Eff.
More informationMBA 503 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric
MBA 503 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric Overview There are two summative assessments for this course. For your first assessment, you will be objectively assessed by your completion of a series of MyAccountingLab
More information$ BUY STARBUCKS CORPORATION (SBUX) Rena Kaufman. Valuation Methodology. Market Data. Financial Summary (7/1/2018) Profile. Financial Analysis
STARBUCKS CORPORATION (SBUX) Market Data Market Cap (intraday): $69,991M Enterprise Value (Aug 9, 2018): $74,898M Enterprise Value/EBITDA (ttm): 14.97x Rena Kaufman $51.88 - BUY Valuation Methodology Method
More informationHow Rest Area Commercialization Will Devastate the Economic Contributions of Interstate Businesses. Acknowledgements
How Rest Area Commercialization Will Devastate the Economic Contributions of Interstate Businesses Acknowledgements The NATSO Foundation, a charitable 501(c)(3) organization, is the research and educational
More informationInvestment of private firms and the stock price of public industry peers
Investment of private firms and the stock price of public industry peers Hee Jung Choi a, Dong Wook Lee a,* November 2, 2014 Abstract This paper examines how the stock price of publicly traded firms is
More informationRelationships Among Wine Prices, Ratings, Advertising, and Production: Examining a Giffen Good
Relationships Among Wine Prices, Ratings, Advertising, and Production: Examining a Giffen Good Carol Miu Massachusetts Institute of Technology Abstract It has become increasingly popular for statistics
More informationAnalyst coverage, information, and bubbles
ONLINE APPENDIX Analyst coverage, information, and bubbles Sandro C. Andrade Jiangze Bian y Timothy R. Burch Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, forthcoming 1) A simple model of bubbles and
More informationMultiple Imputation for Missing Data in KLoSA
Multiple Imputation for Missing Data in KLoSA Juwon Song Korea University and UCLA Contents 1. Missing Data and Missing Data Mechanisms 2. Imputation 3. Missing Data and Multiple Imputation in Baseline
More informationOnline Appendix to. Are Two heads Better Than One: Team versus Individual Play in Signaling Games. David C. Cooper and John H.
Online Appendix to Are Two heads Better Than One: Team versus Individual Play in Signaling Games David C. Cooper and John H. Kagel This appendix contains a discussion of the robustness of the regression
More informationBORDEAUX WINE VINTAGE QUALITY AND THE WEATHER ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS
BORDEAUX WINE VINTAGE QUALITY AND THE WEATHER ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS WINE PRICES OVER VINTAGES DATA The data sheet contains market prices for a collection of 13 high quality Bordeaux wines (not including
More informationRAVE Restaurant Group. ICR Finance Conference January 12, 2016
RAVE Restaurant Group ICR Finance Conference January 2, 206 is a multi-brand restaurant operating company Founded 958 Primarily buffet pizza concept 237 restaurants open U.S., Middle East, Honduras 99%
More informationWhether to Manufacture
Whether to Manufacture Butter and Powder or Cheese A Western Regional Research Publication Glen T. Nelson Station Bulletin 546 November 1954 S S De&dim9 S Whether to Manufacture Butterand Powder... or
More informationAJAE Appendix: Testing Household-Specific Explanations for the Inverse Productivity Relationship
AJAE Appendix: Testing Household-Specific Explanations for the Inverse Productivity Relationship Juliano Assunção Department of Economics PUC-Rio Luis H. B. Braido Graduate School of Economics Getulio
More informationHow does asymmetric information relate to investment efficiency? Evidence from analysts' earnings forecasts and daily stock trading
Lingnan University Digital Commons @ Lingnan University Theses & Dissertations Department of Finance and Insurance 8-21-2013 How does asymmetric information relate to investment efficiency? Evidence from
More informationPizza Pizza Royalty Corp. ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING May 29, 2013
Pizza Pizza Royalty Corp. ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING May 29, 2013 1 Elizabeth Wright, Board Chair 2 Forward-Looking Statement This presentation will contain forward-looking statements. Investors should be
More informationCurtis Miller MATH 3080 Final Project pg. 1. The first question asks for an analysis on car data. The data was collected from the Kelly
Curtis Miller MATH 3080 Final Project pg. 1 Curtis Miller 4/10/14 MATH 3080 Final Project Problem 1: Car Data The first question asks for an analysis on car data. The data was collected from the Kelly
More informationStrong Holiday Performance Drives 5% Global Comp Growth, Global Traffic Increases 2%
Starbucks Delivers Record Q1 Revenue and EPS Strong Holiday Performance Drives 5% Global Comp Growth, Global Traffic Increases 2% Revenues rise 13% to a record $4.8 billion; EPS of $1.30 includes a gain
More informationOntario Wine and Grape Industry Performance Study
Ontario Wine and Grape Industry Performance Study 2016 Performed by VQA Ontario and Deloitte on behalf of the Ontario wine and grape industry March 2017 FINANCIAL INFORMATION I II 2016 ONTARIO WINE AND
More informationPEEL RIVER HEALTH ASSESSMENT
PEEL RIVER HEALTH ASSESSMENT CONTENTS SUMMARY... 2 Overall River Health Scoring... 2 Overall Data Sufficiency Scoring... 2 HYDROLOGY... 3 Overall Hydrology River Health Scoring... 3 Hydrology Data Sufficiency...
More informationPreliminary unaudited financial results for the full year ended 30 June Amount for this reporting period
Marlborough Wine Estates Group Limited Results for Announcement to the Market Preliminary unaudited financial results for the full year ended 30 June 2017 Reporting Period 1st July to 30th June 2017 Previous
More informationSECTION IV. Summary of Administrative Compensation
SECTION IV Summary of Administrative Compensation Summary of Administrative Compensation: All Group Types Group Incumbent 90th 80th 20th Standard Specialty Type Count Count Percentile Percentile Median
More informationBusiness Statistics /82 Spring 2011 Booth School of Business The University of Chicago Final Exam
Business Statistics 41000-81/82 Spring 2011 Booth School of Business The University of Chicago Final Exam Name You may use a calculator and two cheat sheets. You have 3 hours. I pledge my honor that I
More informationInternet Appendix for: "Sticks or Carrots? Optimal CEO Compensation when Managers are Loss Averse"
Internet Appendix for: "Sticks or Carrots? Optimal CEO Compensation when Managers are Loss Averse" INGOLF DITTMANN, ERNST MAUG and OLIVER SPALT This internet appendix provides proofs and additional tables
More informationEestimated coefficient. t-value
Table 1: Estimated wage curves for men, 1983 2009 Dependent variable: log (real wage rate) Dependent variable: log real wage rate Men 1983-2009 Men, 1983-2009 Rendom-effect Fixed-effect z-vae t-vae Men
More informationFlexible Working Arrangements, Collaboration, ICT and Innovation
Flexible Working Arrangements, Collaboration, ICT and Innovation A Panel Data Analysis Cristian Rotaru and Franklin Soriano Analytical Services Unit Economic Measurement Group (EMG) Workshop, Sydney 28-29
More informationAre Cover Stories Effective Contrarian Indicators?
University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Finance Faculty Publications Finance 2-2007 Are Cover Stories Effective Contrarian Indicators? Tom Arnold University of Richmond, tarnold@richmond.edu John
More informationFair Trade and Free Entry: Can a Disequilibrium Market Serve as a Development Tool? Online Appendix September 2014
Fair Trade and Free Entry: Can a Disequilibrium Market Serve as a Development Tool? 1. Data Construction Online Appendix September 2014 The data consist of the Association s records on all coffee acquisitions
More informationECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE FLORIDA CITRUS INDUSTRY IN
ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE FLORIDA CITRUS INDUSTRY IN 2007- Mohammad Rahmani and Alan W. Hodges Food and Resource Economics Department Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences FLORIDA CITRUS INDUSTRY HIGHLIGHTS
More informationPRIVATE AND PUBLIC MERGER WAVES
PRIVATE AND PUBLIC MERGER WAVES Vojislav Maksimovic, University of MD, Gordon Phillips, University of MD and NBER, Liu Yang, UCLA April 200 What do we do? We analyze public and private firm merger waves
More informationNot to be published - available as an online Appendix only! 1.1 Discussion of Effects of Control Variables
1 Appendix Not to be published - available as an online Appendix only! 1.1 Discussion of Effects of Control Variables Table 1 in the main text includes a number of additional control variables. We find
More informationDemographic, Seasonal, and Housing Characteristics Associated with Residential Energy Consumption in Texas, 2010
Demographic, Seasonal, and Housing Characteristics Associated with Residential Energy Consumption in Texas, 2010 Lila Valencia, Carlos Valenzuela, Jeff Jordan, Steve White, Lloyd Potter Institute for Demographic
More informationTHE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BEER TOURISM IN KENT COUNTY, MICHIGAN
THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BEER TOURISM IN KENT COUNTY, MICHIGAN Dan Giedeman, Ph.D., Paul Isely, Ph.D., and Gerry Simons, Ph.D. 10/8/2015 THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BEER TOURISM IN KENT COUNTY, MICHIGAN EXECUTIVE
More informationSTARBUCKS CORPORATION
STARBUCKS CORPORATION Background Starbucks started operations in 1971 by opening its first retail store in Seattle and by 2003 had grown to be the world s leading retailer, roaster and brand of specialty
More informationSurvival of the Fittest: The Impact of Eco-certification on the Performance of German Wineries. Patrizia Fanasch University of Paderborn, Germany
Survival of the Fittest: The Impact of Eco-certification on the Performance of German Wineries University of Paderborn, Germany Motivation Demand (Customer) Rising awareness and interest in organic products
More informationEconomic and Fiscal Impacts of LiftFund:
Economic and Fiscal Impacts of LiftFund: 2010-2015 Study Conducted By: Steven R. Nivin, Ph.D., LLC April 2016 1 I. Executive Summary LiftFund is a non-profit small business lender with the mission to provide
More informationOntario Wine and Grape Industry Performance Study
Ontario Wine and Grape Industry Performance Study 2015 Performed by VQA Ontario and Deloitte on behalf of the Ontario wine and grape industry March 2016 FINANCIAL INFORMATION I II 2015 ONTARIO WINE AND
More informationNZ Dairy Industry Report 2015
NZ Dairy Industry Report 2015 Executive Summary December 2015 www.tdb.co.nz 1 Principal contacts for this report: Geoff Taylor, Director Nigel Atherfold, Director Mob: 027 465 0024 Mob: 027 4650 057 Email:
More informationMcDONALD'S AS A MEMBER OF THE COMMUNITY
McDONALD'S ECONOMIC IMPACT WITH REBUILDING AND REIMAGING ITS RESTAURANTS IN SOUTH LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA A Report to McDonald's Corporation Study conducted by Dennis H. Tootelian, Ph.D. November 2010
More informationPublic good contributions among coffee farmers in Costa Rica: co-operativists and private dealers
Public good contributions among coffee farmers in Costa Rica: co-operativists and private dealers Astrid Hopfensitz & Josepa Miquel-Florensa (Toulouse School of Economics) Workshop on The Cognitive Foundations
More informationThe Impact of Government Interventions on CDS and Equity Markets
The Impact of Government Interventions on CDS and Equity Markets Frederic Schweikhard Zoe Tsesmelidakis Goethe University Frankfurt, House of Finance 8th Annual Credit Risk Conference Moody s and NYU Stern
More informationInvesting in a Brewpub: A Capital Budgeting Analysis
Investing in a Brewpub: A Capital Budgeting Analysis Elizabeth Webb Cooper, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Finance La Salle University 1900 W. Olney Ave. Philadelphia, PA 19041 cooper@lasalle.edu Page1 Abstract
More informationThe impact of difficulties in EU-Russia trade relations on the Finnish foodstuffs sector
The impact of difficulties in EU-Russia trade relations on the Finnish foodstuffs sector Jyrki Niemi Natural Resources Institute Finland www.luke.fi Perttu Pyykkönen Pellervo Economic Research www.ptt.fi
More informationThe connoisseurs choice for a portfolio with Fine French Wines
The connoisseurs choice for a portfolio with Fine French Wines Ensuring better returns on secure investments Discerning investors are looking for safer investments. With a volatile worldwide economy, certain
More information*p <.05. **p <.01. ***p <.001.
Table 1 Weighted Descriptive Statistics and Zero-Order Correlations with Fatherhood Timing (N = 1114) Variables Mean SD Min Max Correlation Interaction time 280.70 225.47 0 1095 0.05 Interaction time with
More informationData Science and Service Research Discussion Paper
Discussion Paper No. 69 A Network Analysis of International Financial Flows Hongwei Chuang and Navruzbek Karamatov Graduate School of Economics and Management, Tohoku University August, 2017 Data Science
More informationCoffee Price Volatility and Intra-household Labour Supply: Evidence from Vietnam
Coffee Price Volatility and Intra-household Labour Supply: Evidence from Vietnam Ulrik Beck U. Copenhagen Saurabh Singhal UNU-WIDER Finn Tarp UNU-WIDER June, 2016 Introduction Volatility in commodity markets
More informationGOVERNMENT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR CIVIL SECRETARIAT FINANCE DEPARTMENT. NOTIFICATION SRINAGAR THE 7 th JULY, 2005
Page 1 of 6 GOVERNMENT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR CIVIL SECRETARIAT FINANCE DEPARTMENT. NOTIFICATION SRINAGAR THE 7 th JULY, 2005 SRO 186 - In exercise of the powers conferred by section 16 read with section
More informationWeekly tax table with no and half Medicare levy
Schedule 5 Pay as you go (PAYG) withholding NAT 1008 tax table with no and half levy Incorporating levy adjustment to half levy FOR PAYMENTS MADE ON OR AFTER 1 JULY 2012 From 1 July 2012, the temporary
More informationThe R&D-patent relationship: An industry perspective
Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB) Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management (SBS-EM) European Center for Advanced Research in Economics and Statistics (ECARES) The R&D-patent relationship: An
More informationA Web Survey Analysis of the Subjective Well-being of Spanish Workers
A Web Survey Analysis of the Subjective Well-being of Spanish Workers Martin Guzi Masaryk University Pablo de Pedraza Universidad de Salamanca APPLIED ECONOMICS MEETING 2014 Frey and Stutzer (2010) state
More informationReturn to wine: A comparison of the hedonic, repeat sales, and hybrid approaches
Return to wine: A comparison of the hedonic, repeat sales, and hybrid approaches James J. Fogarty a* and Callum Jones b a School of Agricultural and Resource Economics, The University of Western Australia,
More informationSoybean Yield Loss Due to Hail Damage*
1 of 6 6/11/2009 9:22 AM G85-762-A Soybean Yield Loss Due to Hail Damage* This NebGuide discusses the methods used by the hail insurance industry to assess yield loss due to hail damage in soybeans. C.
More informationOn-line Appendix for the paper: Sticky Wages. Evidence from Quarterly Microeconomic Data. Appendix A. Weights used to compute aggregate indicators
Hervé LE BIHAN, Jérémi MONTORNES, Thomas HECKEL On-line Appendix for the paper: Sticky Wages. Evidence from Quarterly Microeconomic Data Not intended for publication Appendix A. Weights ud to compute aggregate
More informationTop 10 financial planning mistakes
2017 Annual TWGAA Conference Top 10 financial planning mistakes Presented by: Amanda Sims, Associate, Silicon Valley Bank # 10 Improper sourcing strategies 2015 Annual Wine Conditions Survey 21 February
More information2016 China Dry Bean Historical production And Estimated planting intentions Analysis
2016 China Dry Bean Historical production And Estimated planting intentions Analysis Performed by Fairman International Business Consulting 1 of 10 P a g e I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. Overall Bean Planting
More informationSOUTH AFRICA: ESTIMATES OF SUPPORT TO AGRICULTURE DEFINITIONS AND SOURCES
SOUTH AFRICA: ESTIMATES OF SUPPORT TO AGRICULTURE Contact person: Vaclav VOJTECH Email: Vaclav.VOJTECH@oecd.org Tel: (33 1) 45 24 92 66 Fax: (33 1) 44 30 61 02 DEFINITIONS AND SOURCES General Notes The
More informationIRS Enforcement and State Corporate Income Tax Revenues. Margot Howard University of North Carolina June 20, 2013
IRS Enforcement and State Corporate Income Tax Revenues Margot Howard University of North Carolina June 20, 2013 Overview Relation between state corporate income tax (SCIT) revenues and IRS enforcement
More informationThe Sources of Risk Spillovers among REITs: Asset Similarities and Regional Proximity
The Sources of Risk Spillovers among REITs: Asset Similarities and Regional Proximity Zeno Adams EBS Business School Roland Füss EBS Business School ZEW Mannheim Felix Schinder ZEW Mannheim Steinbeis University
More informationChapter 5. On Consumption Insurance Effects of the Long-term Care Insurance in Japan: Evidence from Micro Household Data
Chapter 5 On Consumption Insurance Effects of the Long-term Care Insurance in Japan: Evidence from Micro Household Data Abstract Employing the micro household data of the Comprehensive Survey of the Living
More informationPaper Reference IT Principal Learning Information Technology. Level 3 Unit 2: Understanding Organisations
Centre No. Candidate No. Surname Signature Paper Reference(s) IT302/01 Edexcel Principal Learning Information Technology Level 3 Unit 2: Understanding Organisations Wednesday 3 June 2009 Morning Time:
More informationSRO-Excise March-2006.doc Page 1 of 7. GOVERNMENT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR CIVIL SECRETARIAT- FINANCE DEPARTMENT. (Taxation Section)
SRO-Excise March-2006.doc Page 1 GOVERNMENT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR CIVIL SECRETARIAT- FINANCE DEPARTMENT. (Taxation Section) NOTIFICATION JAMMU THE 24 th MARCH, 2006 SRO 101 - In exercise of the powers conferred
More informationOnline Appendix for. Inattention and Inertia in Household Finance: Evidence from the Danish Mortgage Market,
Online Appendix for Inattention and Inertia in Household Finance: Evidence from the Danish Mortgage Market, Steffen Andersen, John Y. Campbell, Kasper Meisner Nielsen, and Tarun Ramadorai. 1 A. Institutional
More informationABN Australian Vintage Limited Full Year Result to 30 June 2018 Profit up 79% and Record Cash Flow
ABN 78 052 179 932 Company Announcements Australian Securities Exchange 29 August 2018 Key Points Australian Vintage Limited Full Year Result to 30 June 2018 Profit up 79% and Record Cash Flow Net Profit
More informationFlexible Imputation of Missing Data
Chapman & Hall/CRC Interdisciplinary Statistics Series Flexible Imputation of Missing Data Stef van Buuren TNO Leiden, The Netherlands University of Utrecht The Netherlands crc pness Taylor &l Francis
More informationChapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model. Pearson Education Limited All rights reserved.
Chapter 3 Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model 1-1 Preview Opportunity costs and comparative advantage A one-factor Ricardian model Production possibilities Gains from trade
More informationPreview. Introduction (cont.) Introduction. Comparative Advantage and Opportunity Cost (cont.) Comparative Advantage and Opportunity Cost
Chapter 3 Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model Preview Opportunity costs and comparative advantage A one-factor Ricardian model Production possibilities Gains from trade Wages
More informationPreview. Introduction. Chapter 3. Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model
Chapter 3 Labor Productivity and Comparative Advantage: The Ricardian Model. Preview Opportunity costs and comparative advantage A one-factor Ricardian model Production possibilities Gains from trade Wages
More informationVineyard Cash Flows Tremain Hatch
Vineyard Cash Flows Tremain Hatch thatch@vt.edu New grape growers Contemplating retirement or other transitions and considering viticulture and winemaking Alternative crop to existing farm operation Questions
More informationEmerging Local Food Systems in the Caribbean and Southern USA July 6, 2014
Consumers attitudes toward consumption of two different types of juice beverages based on country of origin (local vs. imported) Presented at Emerging Local Food Systems in the Caribbean and Southern USA
More information