Adjusting Product Timing during the Powdery Mildew Critical Window to Improve Disease Management
|
|
- Wendy Lawrence
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ASEV CATALYST REPORT Adjusting Product Timing during the Powdery Mildew Critical Window to Improve Disease Management Michelle M. Moyer, 1 * Jensena M. Newhouse, 2 and Gary G. Grove 3 1 Associate Professor, Dept. of Horticulture; 2 Former research technician, Dept. of Horticulture; and 3 Professor, Dept. of Plant Pathology; Washington State University Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, N. Bunn Rd., Prosser, WA. *Corresponding author (michelle.moyer@wsu.edu) Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank Mauricio Garcia, Brittany Komm, Katherine East, Steve Hoff, and Eric Gale for their technical assistance. This work was partially supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch Project #226789, and a grant from the Washington State Grape and Wine Research Program. Manuscript submitted Jan 2, 2018; revised May 2, 2018, May 8, 2018; accepted May 11, 2018 Copyright 2018 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture. All rights reserved. Summary Goals: This project was designed to answer questions relating to the timing of different cultural (leaf removal) and chemical (fungicide rotation) disease management practices and how they influence the overall efficacy of a powdery mildew management program. Key Findings: The timing of specific chemical modes of action play an important role in overall powdery mildew fungicide program efficacy. In this study, programs with the evaluated products applied once during the critical window performed equally well to programs with the same evaluated products applied twice (critical window and bunch closure), emphasizing 1 Copyright 2018 by.
2 the idea that disease control on fruit is controlled by critical window sprays rather than laterseason sprays. As expected, leaf removal significantly improved spray coverage in the fruit zone; however, this improved coverage did not last the entire season. Canopy refill, due to the development of summer laterals, reduce fruit-zone coverage later in the season. Leaf removal also did not result in any positive additive effects for overall disease control. Impact and Significance: Overall, these findings can be used to aid growers in selection and rotation of products in their powdery mildew management programs to maximize both disease control efficacy and minimize fungicide resistance development risk. While early fruit zone leaf removal did not improve overall disease control in this high-pressure scenario, the resulting improved spray coverage in the fruit zone may enhance disease control when low-volume spray applications or contact-active chemistries are emphasized in a commercial program. 38 Key words: fungicide resistance, ontogenic resistance, spray programs Overview Management of grapevine powdery mildew was significantly altered with the discovery of ontogenic, or age-related resistance 1. This discovery demonstrated that grape berries were at their peak susceptibility to the grape powdery mildew pathogen during a limited window of development, from approximately prebloom to three to four weeks post-fruit set. This critical window concept for aligning spray programs to vine phenology has resulted in improved timing and reduction in overall number of pesticide applications; in Washington alone, educational efforts in the last five years that have focused on phenology-based mildew management has 2
3 reduced the average number of annual sprays by one to two applications and has saved the industry approximately $2,000,000 USD annually 2. However, even in a climate that is normally classified as an arid steppe 3 there can be years where mildew management is challenging. Such years were experienced in 2010 and 2011, which were characterized by cooler and wetter-than-average conditions 4. In these years, the standard six to eight sprays a season 5 was insufficient at managing mildew in many commercial settings. However, some growers were still able to achieve control with three sprays 6. In 2015 and 2016, years that were considered ideal for maximum mildew control (hot, dry, sunny), there were some growers who achieved acceptable control with only two sprays total 7. How is it that some programs, that are not limited to specific product selection, achieve equivalent control using only 25-50% of the industry standard number of sprays? There are clearly several factors that can influence disease control, not limited to proper sprayer calibration, ground speed at the time of application, and canopy management. However, one common factor for several of these low-frequency applicators was the choice of products used and the specifically-chosen timing of spray applications. The trial presented here aimed to evaluate and answer the question of Is timing really everything? particularly in context to key grapevine phenological stages for mildew management, and different chemical modes of action that are commonly used in conventional vineyard production systems. The concept of timing was approached using fungicide rotation programs that focused on the application of one of three different fungicide modes-of-action during different points between immediate prebloom and post-fruit set. Different fungicide modes-of-action are often annotated on their respective use labels as a specific FRAC group (multiple groups if the 3
4 product is a pre-mix of different fungicides). The term FRAC is an acronym for the Fungicide Resistance Action Committee 8, an international group composed of different industry specialists (private companies, university researchers) dedicated to developing information on how to effectively deploy fungicides to prolong their effective use and slow the process of fungicide resistance development. Fungicides that have similar properties are grouped into the same FRAC category. The active ingredients chosen were quinoxyfen (FRAC 13), cyflufenamid (FRAC U6) and metrafenone (FRAC U8), which were applied in a background spray program of myclobutanil (FRAC 3; Table 1). In Washington, there is a heavy reliance on FRAC 3 and strobilurin (FRAC 11) fungicides; there is also documented fungicide resistance to FRAC 11 9 fungicides and concerns that FRAC 3 fungicide resistance may be developing. Thus, while the use of these potentially compromised products can still be viable options within a spray program (provided they are tank mixed with another, non-compromised FRAC group), there is a growing demand to know how other FRAC group products perform, and perform optimally, during the critical window for mildew management Major Observations and Interpretations Disease ratings: In 2013, fungicide program 10 (Table 1) significantly influenced disease outcome (p < ; Fig 1A). All programs outperformed the untreated control. Program M2, which had a metrafenone application at full bloom, performed the best, whereas Q1 (quinoxyfen at prebloom), and C2 (cyflufenamid at bloom) were intermediate to M2 and the remaining programs. Leaf removal did not statistically influence cluster disease severity (p = 0.311). In 2013, disease was consistent throughout the vineyard block, likely due to consistent rains that 4
5 occurred at the end of June that increased canopy growth (i.e., new tissue for disease infection), and humidity in and surrounding the canopy (Fig. 2). In 2014 we saw similar results, where fungicide programs significantly influenced disease outcome (Fig. 1B), and leaf removal nested within fungicide programs did not (p = 0.07). As in 2013, all programs outperformed the untreated control. In 2014, program Q4, which consisted of a post-fruit set application of quinoxyfen and was the best-performing program was significantly better than program C3, which had a fruit set application of cyflufenamid. All remaining programs were intermediate in performance to these two. Of interest is the comparison of the Q2 treatment to other Q treatments. Program Q2 had both early (full bloom) and late-season (bunch closure) applications of quinoxyfen and was the only quinoxyfen program with this dual application. A typical assumption would be that the added end-of-program application would improve disease control, but in both 2013 and 2014, its performance was not significantly different than the other, single-timed applications of quinoxyfen that occurred either just before or during the critical window for fruit infection. This highlights how the duration of ontogenic susceptibility could influence the perception of product performance 1 fruit was already resistant at bunch closure, and thus, additional fungicides directed to control cluster disease severity at this time did not have any impact on season-long disease control; but if a field manager only had a program with this dual application, it might be assumed that the late-application is necessary to achieve that level of disease control on the fruit. However, the full-bloom application was likely carrying most of the control for that program. We see this repeated in 2014, when both the cyflufenamid and metrafenone had similar comparable treatments a program timing that had a dual application of an early (full bloom) 5
6 and late-season (bunch closure) treatment (C2, M2), and then a single application at fruit set (C3, M3). In both cases, the dual applications were not statistically better than the single applications (Fig. 1), reinforcing the idea that management of grape powdery mildew on clusters should be emphasized earlier in the growing season, rather than later. Of consideration for placing disease management into seasonal context is the consideration of vine development differences between the two years. As noted in Table 1, 2014 was a much faster vine development year than All phenological stages started on earlier calendar dates in 2014 when compared to Typically, in eastern Washington, earlier growing seasons are related to warmer winters. In most cases, when the region has warmer winters and earlier starts to the growing season, phenological stages can become protracted (extended) due to less-than-optimal winter chilling. As such, while a bloom spray is a single date at a specified time (Table 1), the duration of bloom following a warmer winter can be longer and in a longer period of practical vineyard susceptibility than the duration of bloom following a colder winter, holding in-season weather conditions constant. A major consideration for any trial that is rating the efficacy of a product or a program on disease management is that of the consistency of disease outbreaks that are typically seen on fruit. While coverage, as determined by spray penetration, was measured, there is always potentially associated error in product delivery related to machine operation. While the sprayer used in this study was calibrated at the start of the season, calibration was not re-assessed throughout the year to ensure that nozzle wear or misalignment had not occurred. This could be a reason for the variation seen in cluster disease severity, as evenness of product delivery would ultimately influence evenness of cluster disease severity. 6
7 Spray coverage. In 2013, spray coverage was only evaluated on one day (Fig. 3); coverage evaluation occurred four times in 2014 to more effectively see how leaf removal influenced spray penetration over time (Fig. 3). In 2013, coverage was assessed on 2 July, which was 46 days after prebloom leaf removal, 25 days after the bloom leaf removal, and three days prior to post-bloom leaf removal. As seen in Fig. 3, even at several weeks post-leaf removal, its effects on increasing spray penetration were still observed. In 2014, spray coverage assessment occurred four times; (i) 11 days after prebloom leaf removal (Fig. 4A), (ii) three days after bloom leaf removal (Fig. 4B), (iii) six days after post-bloom leaf removal (Fig. 4C), and (iv) a followup, near end of season assessment on 31 July (Fig. 4D). As noted, when leaf removal had occurred, spray coverage was significantly improved; however, by the end of the season, the prebloom leaf removal treatment was no longer effective at improving spray coverage in the fruit zone due to canopy refill from lateral shoot development. Fruit quality assessments. In both years, the timing of leaf removal did not influence fruit quality (Brix, titratable acidity, or juice ph); however, fungicide program did influence fruit quality (Table 2). Even then, there were not many differences between the untreated control and regular fungicide programs and final fruit quality as measured by Brix, titratable acidity, or juice ph. In 2013, Program Q3, which had an application of quinoxyfen at fruit set, had the highest Brix and the higher juice ph (in this case, higher ph was desirable due to overall low ph of the fruit). This program also performed well in 2014 and was not statistically different from the highest performing programs (based on juice Brix), which were programs Q2 and M2. These programs had either quinoxyfen (Q2) or metrafenone (M2) at full bloom. Both programs performed equally well in 2013 as well. Past reports have also indicated that powdery mildew 7
8 diseased fruit can result in off-flavors in the final fermented product 11 ; that aspect was not evaluated in this study, and the lack of disease control in some of the fungicide programs, while no major differences in initial fruit quality, could lead to differences in wine quality Broader Impact The understanding of grape powdery mildew management has progressed past when to spray and what to spray; we know the general efficacies of many standard products, and we know when key periods for infection and disease development are in vineyards. At the same time, however, we juggle maximizing disease management programs with managing fungicide resistance development and labor availability. Our field trial here is a part of the exploration on how to be the most efficient with different chemical modes of action within a season s spray program, while still incorporating cultural practices. The intention is to define windows in management where specific modes of action may have their top performance, thus providing guidelines to help with the planning of fungicide rotations. Just as with other studies which use ontogenic resistance as a basis for developing spray programs 12, we saw that the best program performance was achieved when management was focused early (fruit set and earlier) in the growing season, regardless of product mode of action. By improving the timing of specific chemical modes of action within a spray program and using different modes of action during the critical window for infection, disease can be effectively managed while being mindful of the risks of fungicide resistance development that can arise from repeated use of the same chemical mode of action. The authors would like to emphasize, however, that while product selection and timing are key components to disease 8
9 management, they are irrelevant if the product does not make it to the plant sprayer functionality and appropriate selection of water carrier volume to match canopy size are also critical components to a good management program. Under the disease pressure 13 that occurred in this trial, leaf removal should not be considered as a stand-alone management option. In some cases, it may enhance disease on clusters by exposing them to high levels of powdery mildew inoculum when they are not protected by a fungicide. In other words, if cultural practices such as fruit zone removal are a part of a management program, their timing should be considered as a part of the management regime. In the case of mildew management, leaf removal should not occur immediately after a fungicide spray, as it would be removing product from the vineyard. It should also not occur substantially before a fungicide spray, leaving clusters exposed for potential infection. Ideally, leaf removal would occur within a day or two preceding a fungicide application Experimental Design Vineyard description. Experiments were conducted at the Washington State University Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center s Roza Research Farm (lat ' 24'' N; long ' 48'' W) during the 2013 and 2014 growing seasons. The approximately 1 ha vineyard was a mixed planting of own-rooted Vitis vinifera Chardonnay and Riesling planted in 2001; only Riesling was used for the experiment to eliminate potential cultivar influence. Vines are planted on a 1.8 m x 2.7 m (6 ft vine x 8 ft row) spacing, with north-south row orientation. Vines were spur pruned, trained to a modified vertical shoot position system with a single set of mobile catch wires above the cordon, drip-irrigated, with a weed-free strip 9
10 chemically maintained directly under vines, and natural vegetation maintained between the rows managed with periodic mowing. This block is reserved for pathology experiments, and as such, the eastern and western most rows have remained unsprayed since planting to provide a sufficient reservoir of E. necator inoculum. Weather data was collected using the Washington State University s AgWeatherNet system 14. The Roza weather station was used and is located within 4 m (13 ft) of the experimental vineyard. Daily maximum and minimum air temperatures, and daily total precipitation for 2013 and 2014 are presented in Figure 2. Fungicide treatments. Specific fungicide treatments and application timing are listed in Table 1. This rotation was chosen to see effects of specific fungicide timing in a complete program rotation on final cluster disease severity. Fungicide treatment replicate plots consisted of six vine panels; data was collected from the center four vines (Fig. 5). Individual fungicide treatments were replicated four times. Treatments were applied using a modified Rears sprayer with a custom-built boom equipped with seven flat spray brass nozzles (TeeJet 8006; TeeJet Nozzles) at 100 psi (nozzle output at 1 gal/min). The sprayer consisted of three tanks, two 95 L tanks and one 189 L tank. Tractor speed was 3.2 to 4.8 km/hr (2 to 3 mph). Total water volume applied changed with the developing canopy; the first spray was applied using three nozzles resulting in L/ha (45 gal/acre). The second spray was applied using five nozzles resulting in L/ha (75 gal/acre); the remaining sprays were applied using seven nozzles at L/ha (105 gal/acre). Regardless of total water volume applied, the product rate consisted of the following per-hectare equivalents: myclobutanil (Rally) at g (5 oz/acre); quinoxyfen (Quintec) at ml (4 fl.oz/acre); cyflufenamid (Torino) 10
11 at ml (3.4 fl. oz/acre); and metrafenone (Vivando) at ml (15.4 fl. oz/acre). All treatments were applied with a surfactant (Break-Thru) at 62.5 ml/l (8 fl. oz/gal). The control treatment was unsprayed and used to develop a baseline idea of disease pressure in the block. As a general good practice when evaluating fungicide performance, untreated controls are recommended to determine if control was due to the actual product, and not due to nonconducive environmental conditions or low inoculum levels. Leaf removal treatments. Fruit zone leaf removal consisted of removing leaves on a shoot from the base of the shoot up and adjacent to the secondary cluster. Leaves were removed on the east side of the canopy, as per common practice in eastern Washington. The different timing of fruit zone leaf removal treatments evaluated were: a control (no leaf removal), prebloom (when 50% of the clusters were at rachis elongation), bloom (when 50% of the clusters were at 50% capfall), and 4 weeks postbloom. In 2013, leaf removal treatments were implemented on 17 May (prebloom), 7 June (bloom), and 5 July (4 weeks postbloom). In 2014, leaf removal treatments were implemented on 30 May (prebloom), 16 June (bloom) and 11 July (4 weeks postbloom). Fruit zone leaf removal treatments were nested within each fungicide treatment. Of the four center data vines in each fungicide treatment replicate plot, one vine was dedicated to each leaf removal treatment. As with fungicide treatments, leaf removal within each fungicide treatment, was replicated four times. Spray coverage. Spray coverage was evaluated in the leaf removal treatments using water-sensitive cards (Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Basel, Switzerland). Cards were affixed to the node between the basal and secondary clusters using a clothespin, water-sensitive side facing east. The cards were placed in the vineyard just prior to spraying and were removed 11
12 promptly after they had dried in the field (approximately 2 to 3 hrs). Four cards placed in each leaf-removal subplot for one fungicide treatment in both 2013 and Coverage was visually estimated as percent area covered in three, 1 cm 2 areas per card. Spray coverage was assessed on 2 July in 2013, and was expanded to 10 June, 19 June, 17 July and 31 July in Disease ratings. Powdery mildew ratings were collected by visually estimating percent surface area of the cluster affected. Five clusters from each fungicide program plus leaf removal treatment replicate (a total of 20 clusters per fungicide treatment replicate) were nondestructively rated at the end of each growing season, on 18 Sept and 30 Sept Fruit quality assessments. To evaluate soluble solids (Brix), ph, and titratable acidity (TA) in the fruit, 3 whole clusters per fungicide + leaf removal treatment replicate were pressed in a 4 L plastic zip-top bag until all the berries were macerated. Juice from each bag was decanted into a dedicated 50 ml conical plastic centrifuge tube, and was used to determine soluble solids, ph and TA. Juice soluble solids were measured using a digital refractometer (Quick-Brix 60, Mettler-Toledo, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland). Juice ph was measured using a ph meter (InLab Versatile 413, Mettler-Toledo, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland). The same juice was then used for TA measurements 15. Statistical analyses. All statistical analyses were completed in JMP 9 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC), the linear mixed model platform, with fungicide treatment as a fixed effect, leaf removal treatment nested within fungicide treatment, and replicate as a random factor. Means separation was done using Tukey s HSD at α =
13 References and Footnotes 1. Gadoury DM, Seem RC, Ficke A and Wilcox W Ontogenic Resistance to Powdery Mildew in Grape Berries. Phytopathology 93: Hansen M. Research Leads to Better Control for Grape Disease. 25 May Good Fruit Grower. Washington State Fruit Commission, Yakima, WA. Online: Accessed 7 June The area receives approximately 200 mm of annual precipitation which predominately falls during the winter months. 4. Moyer MM and O Neal S Pest Management Strategic Plan for Washington State Wine Grape Production. Western Region IPM Center, USDA-NIFA. Online: 5. Moyer MM, Gadoury DM, Wilcox WF and Seem R Weather During Critical Epidemiological Periods and Subsequent Severity of Powdery Mildew on Grape Berries. Plant Dis 100: Grove G. Viticulturist (personal vineyard) Personal communication. 7. Hoff R, Director of Viticulture, Mercer Canyons Inc Personal communication; Schultz A, General Manager, Elephant Mountain Vineyards Personal communication. 8. Fungicide Resistance Action Committee: Specific information on FRAC fungicide categories are updated annually, and are found at: 9. Prengaman, K and Mullinax TJ. Resistance Rising for Powdery Mildew. 26 Feb Good Fruit Grower. Washington State Fruit Commission, Yakima, WA. Online: Accessed 2 May Fungicide program (Table 1) name abbreviations are designed to reflect the active ingredient (Q = quinoxyfen; C = cyflufenamid; M = Metrafenone), and the timing of that application relative to the timing of the spray during the Critical Window. For example, Q2 indicates that quinoxyfen was applied in the second spray during the period, whereas M3 indicates that metrafenone was applied in the third spray. 11. Gadoury DM, Seem RC, Wilcox WF, Henick-Kling T, Conterno L, Day A and Ficke A Effects of diffuse colonization of grape berries by Uncinula necator on bunch rots, 13
14 berry microflora, and juice and wine quality. Phytopathology 97: ; Ough CS and Berg HW Powdery mildew sensory effect on wine. Am J Enol Vitic 30:321; Stummer BE, Francis IL, Zanker T, Lattey KA and Scott ES Effects of powdery mildew on the sensory properties and composition of Chardonnay juice and wine when grape sugar ripeness is standardised. Aust J Grape Wine Res 11: Caffi T, Legler SE and Rossi V Evaluation of a warning system for early-season conrol of grapevine powdery mildew. Plant Dis 96: ; Gadoury DM, Seem RC, Ficke A and Wilcox WF Ontogenic resistance to powdery mildew in grape berries. Phytopathology 93: ; Gadoury DM, Pearson RC, Seem RC and Park EW Integrating the control programs for fungal diseases of grapevine in the northeastern United States. Vit Enol Sci 52: ; Moyer, MM, Gadoury DM, Wilcox WF and Seem RC Release of Erysiphe necator ascospores and impact of early-season disease pressure on Vitis vinifera fruit infection. Am J Enol Vitic 65: ; Moyer MM, Gadoury DM, Wilcox WF and Seem RC Weather During Critical Epidemiological Periods and Subsequent Severity of Powdery Mildew on Grape Berries. Plant Dis 100: Disease pressure is defined here as macro- and micro-climate conditions that are conducive for rapid disease development when the pathogen and host plant are present. For grape powdery mildew, the primary drivers for rapid disease development are moderate temperatures (Delp CJ Effect of temperature and humidity on the grape powdery mildew fungus. Phytopathology 44: ; Moyer MM, Gadoury DM, Cadle- Davidson L, Dry IB, Magarey PA, and Seem RC Effects of acute low temperature events on the development of Erysiphe necator and susceptibility of Vitis vinifera. Phytopathology 100: ; Choudhury RA, McRoberts N, Gubler WD Effects of punctuated heat stress on the grapevine powdery mildew pathogen, Erysiphe necator. Phyt Medi 53: ) and moderate to high relative humidity (Carroll JE and Wilcox WF Effects of humidity on the development of grapevine powdery mildew. Phytopathology 93: ). 14. AgWeatherNet can be accessed at: The samples were titrated to a ph of 8.20 using 0.1M sodium hydroxide (NaOH)
15 Table 1 Fungicide programs, their product rotation, and application dates for 2013 and Application Date May b (30cm shoot) 4 June (Prebloom) 18 June (Full bloom) 2 July (Fruit set) 16 July 30 July (Bunch closure) Program a Critical Window for Fruit Infection c Control Untreated Untreated Untreated Untreated Untreated Untreated Q1 myclobutanil quinoxyfen myclobutanil myclobutanil myclobutanil myclobutanil Q2 myclobutanil myclobutanil quinoxyfen myclobutanil myclobutanil quinoxyfen Q3 myclobutanil myclobutanil myclobutanil quinoxyfen myclobutanil myclobutanil Q4 myclobutanil myclobutanil myclobutanil myclobutanil quinoxyfen myclobutanil C2 myclobutanil myclobutanil cyflufenamid myclobutanil myclobutanil myclobutanil M2 myclobutanil myclobutanil metrafenone myclobutanil myclobutanil myclobutanil May b 22 July 28 May 10 June 24 June 8 July (Bunch (30cm shoot) (Prebloom) (Full bloom) (Fruit set) closure) Program a Critical Window for Fruit Infection c Control Untreated Untreated Untreated Untreated Untreated Untreated Q1 myclobutanil quinoxyfen myclobutanil myclobutanil myclobutanil myclobutanil Q2 myclobutanil myclobutanil quinoxyfen myclobutanil myclobutanil quinoxyfen Q3 myclobutanil myclobutanil myclobutanil quinoxyfen myclobutanil myclobutanil Q4 myclobutanil myclobutanil myclobutanil myclobutanil quinoxyfen myclobutanil C2 myclobutanil myclobutanil cyflufenamid myclobutanil myclobutanil cyflufenamid C3 myclobutanil myclobutanil myclobutanil cyflufenamid myclobutanil myclobutanil M2 myclobutanil myclobutanil metrafenone myclobutanil myclobutanil metrafenone M3 myclobutanil myclobutanil myclobutanil metrafenone myclobutanil myclobutanil a These programs were designed for experimental evaluation. The authors do not recommend, nor is it recommended on product labels, to repeatedly apply FRAC group 3 fungicides (demethylation inhibitors; DMI; e.g., myclobutanil) back to back in a fungicide program, or more than two times in a single growing season. Improper application of these and other fungicides can result in fungicide resistance development. Always rotate products, or tank mix high-risk products with contact fungicides when appropriate and compatible. b Budbreak: 27 Apr 2013 and 17 Apr c Defined from: Gadoury DM, Seem RC, Ficke A and Wilcox W Ontogenic Resistance to Powdery Mildew in Grape Berries. Phytopathology. 93:
16 Table 2 Fruit quality data for 2013 and Letters indicate means separation (within a year) using Tukey s HSD at α = Fungicide Program Brix Titratable Acidity (g/l) ph Control (ab) (cd) Q (ab) (d) Q (ab) (ab) Q (a) (a) Q (b) (ab) C (ab) (abc) M (ab) (bcd) 2014 Fungicide Program Brix Titratable Acidity (g/l) ph Control (ab) (a) 2.80 Q (ab) (ab) 2.78 Q (a) (ab) 2.80 Q (ab) (ab) 2.82 Q (ab) (b) 2.81 C (ab) (ab) 2.78 C (ab) (ab) 2.79 M (a) (ab) 2.78 M (b) (ab)
17 Figure 1 Cluster disease severity as a result of different fungicide programs in: (A) 2013 and (B) In both years, the timing of leaf removal did not influence powdery mildew disease severity on clusters overall, only fungicide treatment did. Letters denote significance between transformed fungicide treatment means using Tukey s HSD at α =
18 Figure 2 Daily maximum and minimum temperature, and daily precipitation for 1 April to 30 September in both 2013 (A) and 2014 (B). The 2013 growing season was marked by average temperatures and above average June precipitation, whereas 2014 was marked by above average temperatures, and below average spring precipitation. 18
19 Figure 3 Influence of leaf removal on mid-season spray coverage in the fruiting zone in Letters denote significance using Tukey s HSD at α =
20 Figure 4 Influence of leaf removal on early through mid-season spray coverage in the fruiting zone in Asterisks indicate treatments that had leaves removed prior to the spray date indicated. Letters denote significance using Tukey s HSD at α =
21 Figure 5 Field experimental design. Fungicide treatments were applied to a panel of six vines. To reduce potential carry-over from adjacent treatments, data was only recorded from the center four vines. Stakes in the ground marked start and stop points for fungicide application to aid the sprayer operator. Fungicide treatments were replicated four times. Leaf removal treatments occurred on a single vine within the panel and were replicated four times. 21
Adjusting Product Timing during the Powdery Mildew Critical Window to Improve Disease Management
REPORT Adjusting Product Timing during the Powdery Mildew Critical Window to Improve Disease Management Michelle M. Moyer, 1 * Jensena M. Newhouse 2 and Gary G. Grove 3 Cite this article: Moyer MM, Newhouse
More informationEfficacy of Biopesticides and Leaf Removal in Grapevine Powdery Mildew Management
Plant Health Research Efficacy of Biopesticides and Leaf Removal in Grapevine Powdery Mildew Management Michelle M. Moyer, Assistant Professor, Department of Horticulture; Jensena M. Newhouse, Research
More informationGRAPE POWDERY MILDEW: MANAGEMENT AND RESISTANCE
World Class. Face to Face. 2017 WSGS Grandview, WA 17 November 2017 GRAPE POWDERY MILDEW: MANAGEMENT AND RESISTANCE Michelle M. Moyer, Ph.D. Associate Professor Statewide Viticulture Extension Specialist
More informationVineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 12 July 2010 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI
1 Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 12 July 2010 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI Mid-season Disease Update Steve Jordan A warm, wet June has
More informationVineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 18 August 2014 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station
NO. 9 1 Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 18 August 2014 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Mid to Late Season Downy Mildew Management Ideal temperatures coupled
More informationOrganic viticulture research in Pennsylvania. Jim Travis, Bryan Hed, and Noemi Halbrendt Department of Plant Pathology Penn State University
Organic viticulture research in Pennsylvania Jim Travis, Bryan Hed, and Noemi Halbrendt Department of Plant Pathology Penn State University Organic production in the US; 1 st national certified organic
More informationAngel Rebollar-Alvitar and Michael A. Ellis The Ohio State University/OARDC Department of Plant Pathology 1680 Madison Avenue Wooster, OH 44691
Evaluation of strobilurin fungicides (Abound and Cabrio), potassium phosphite ( ProPhyt ) and Ridomil Gold for control of leather rot of strawberry, caused by Phytophthora cactorum. Angel Rebollar-Alvitar
More informationCANOPY MANAGEMENT AND VINE BALANCE
World Class. Face to Face. BCWGC Annual Meeting Penticton, BC 20 July 2015 CANOPY MANAGEMENT AND VINE BALANCE Michelle M. Moyer, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Statewide Viticulture Extension Specialist WSU-IAREC
More informationEffects of Plastic Covers on Canopy Microenvironment and Fruit Quality. Matthew Fidelibus Viticulture & Enology UC Davis
Effects of Plastic Covers on Canopy Microenvironment and Fruit Quality Matthew Fidelibus Viticulture & Enology UC Davis Justification and importance Table grapes are costly to produce Late-harvested fruit
More informationResearch News from Cornell s Viticulture and Enology Program Research Focus Research Focus
Research News from Cornell s Viticulture and Enology Program Research Focus 2011-2 Research Focus Variable Eastern Weather Influences Powdery Mildew Severity Michelle Moyer*, David Gadoury, and Robert
More informationControl of Powdery Mildew in Wine Grape. N.L. Rothwell and K.L. Powers, NWMHRS A. Schilder, Dept. of Plant Pathology, MSU
Control of Powdery Mildew in Wine Grape N.L. Rothwell and K.L. Powers, NWMHRS A. Schilder, Dept. of Plant Pathology, MSU Powdery mildew Uncinula necator Infection appears as a white or gray powdery coating
More informationMichigan Grape & Wine Industry Council 2008 Research Report
Michigan Grape & Wine Industry Council 2008 Research Report Determination of action thresholds for potato leafhopper in winegrapes, and comparison of foliar insecticides for its control Rufus Isaacs 1,
More informationManaging Pests & Disease in the Vineyard. Michael Cook
Managing Pests & Disease in the Vineyard Michael Cook Who is this guy? Challenges Facing Growers 1) Pierce s Disease 2) Pest & Disease Pressure fungal 3) Late Freeze 4) Rain excess and timing 5) Vigor
More informationColorado State University Viticulture and Enology. Grapevine Cold Hardiness
Colorado State University Viticulture and Enology Grapevine Cold Hardiness Grapevine cold hardiness is dependent on multiple independent variables such as variety and clone, shoot vigor, previous season
More informationFungicide control of Phomopsis cane and leaf spot on grape: 2014 field trial
Fungicide control of Phomopsis cane and leaf spot on grape: 2014 field trial W. Douglas Gubler, Trang T. Nguyen and Nicholas S. Morris Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA
More informationVineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 11 June 2012 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI
NO. 9 1 Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 11 June 2012 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI Scouting and Monitoring in the Vineyard Dean Volenberg
More informationMechanical Canopy and Crop Load Management of Pinot Gris. Joseph P. Geller and S. Kaan Kurtural
Mechanical Canopy and Crop Load Management of Pinot Gris Joseph P. Geller and S. Kaan Kurtural 3.6 million tons of wine grapes grown in CA More than 50% comes from the San Joaquin Valley More than 60%
More informationTechnical Product Guide
CUSTODIA TECHNICAL PRODUCT GUIDE Custodia Technical Product Guide 2 1 CUSTODIA TECHNICAL PRODUCT GUIDE Introducing Custodia Custodia is a co-formulation of a strobilurin fungicide and a DMI fungicide.
More informationFungicide Control of Phomopsis Cane and Leaf Spot on Grapevine: 2015 Field Trial
Fungicide Control of Phomopsis Cane and Leaf Spot on Grapevine: 2015 Field Trial W. Douglas Gubler, Trang T. Nguyen and Nicholas S. Morris Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis,
More informationInfluence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless
University of California Tulare County Cooperative Extension Influence of GA 3 Sizing Sprays on Ruby Seedless Pub. TB8-97 Introduction: The majority of Ruby Seedless table grapes grown and marketed over
More informationFungicide Timing and Selection Conundrum 2015 Annual Report
Final Annual Report Proposal Title: Grape Powdery Mildew Management A Fungicide Timing and Selection Conundrum Principal Investigators: Walt Mahaffee, USDA-ARS-HCRL, 3420 NW Orchard Ave Corvallis, OR 97330,
More informationVinews Viticulture Information News, Week of 4 May 2015 Columbia, MO
NO. 2 1 Vinews Viticulture Information News, Week of 4 May 2015 Columbia, MO Phomopsis cane and leaf spot Weather forecast outlook for wet conditions and cool night temperatures are ideal for Phomopsis
More informationLeaf removal: a tool to improve crop control and fruit quality in vinifera grapes
Michigan Grape & Wine Industry Council 2015 Report of Research Activities Leaf removal: a tool to improve crop control and fruit quality in vinifera grapes PI Paolo Sabbatini Dept. of Horticulture, Michigan
More informationVineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 3 May 2010 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI
Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 3 May 2010 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Sturgeon Bay, WI What is the potential yield of grapes after a destructive spring
More informationTreating vines after hail: Trial results. Bob Emmett, Research Plant Pathologist
Treating vines after hail: Trial results Bob Emmett, Research Plant Pathologist Treating vines after hail: Trial results Overview Hail damage recovery pruning trial Background and trial objectives Post-hail
More informationMichigan Grape & Wine Industry Council 2012 Research Report. Understanding foliar pest interactions for sustainable vine management
Michigan Grape & Wine Industry Council 2012 Research Report Understanding foliar pest interactions for sustainable vine management Rufus Isaacs 1, Steven Van Timmeren 1, and Paolo Sabbatini 2 1. Dept.
More informationDo lower yields on the vine always make for better wine?
Grape and wine quality Increasing quality Do lower yields on the vine always make for better wine? Nick Dokoozlian Viticulture, & Enology E&J Gallo ry Do lower yields on the vine always make for better
More informationCanopy Management for Disease Control in Wine Grapes Grape IPM Workshop March, 2011
Canopy Management for Disease Control in Wine Grapes Grape IPM Workshop March, 2011 Mark L. Chien State-wide Viticulture Educator Penn State Cooperative Extension mlc12@psu.edu Environmental and viticultural
More informationSustainable grape production for the reestablishment of Iowa s grape industry
Competitive Grant Report 02-46 Sustainable grape production for the reestablishment of Iowa s grape industry Abstract: Reviving the grape industry in Iowa requires development of improved sustainable production
More informationFungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape
October 2014 Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape Summary of HGCA fungicide project 2010 2014 (RD-2007-3457) While the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board, operating through its
More informationMarvin Butler, Rhonda Simmons, and Ralph Berry. Abstract. Introduction
Evaluation of Coragen and Avaunt Insecticides for Control of Mint Root Borer in Central Oregon Marvin Butler, Rhonda Simmons, and Ralph Berry Abstract Pheromone traps that attract male mint root borer
More informationTraining system considerations
Comparative results of three training systems in Winchester VVA Meeting: 13-15 Feb 2003 Tony K. Wolf Professor of Viticulture Training system considerations Why research training systems in Virginia? increase
More informationEFFECTIVE PROTECTION AGAINST BOTRYTIS ON GRAPES. THE ALTERNATIVE IN GRAPE PROTECTION
EFFECTIVE PROTECTION AGAINST BOTRYTIS ON GRAPES. THE ALTERNATIVE IN GRAPE PROTECTION PROTECT YOUR GRAPES FROM BOTRYTIS WITH BOTECTOR. Botrytis can cause costly damage to the quality of wine and table grapes.
More informationResearch Report: Use of Geotextiles to Reduce Freeze Injury in Ontario Vineyards
Research Report: Use of Geotextiles to Reduce Freeze Injury in Ontario Vineyards Prepared by Dr. Jim Willwerth CCOVI, Brock University February 26, 20 1 Cool Climate Oenology & Viticulture Institute Brock
More informationTemperature effect on pollen germination/tube growth in apple pistils
FINAL PROJECT REPORT Project Title: Temperature effect on pollen germination/tube growth in apple pistils PI: Dr. Keith Yoder Co-PI(): Dr. Rongcai Yuan Organization: Va. Tech Organization: Va. Tech Telephone/email:
More informationThe NEW Benchmark Fungicide for Grape Growers. Grapes A GUIDE FOR GRAPE GROWERS. Superior Multi-Crop Control
The NEW Benchmark Fungicide for Grape Growers Grapes A GUIDE FOR GRAPE GROWERS What is Pristine? Pristine is a NEW fungicide that combines two exclusive BASF active ingredients for superior, DUAL-ACTION
More informationFungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape
October 2016 Fungicides for phoma control in winter oilseed rape Summary of AHDB Cereals & Oilseeds fungicide project 2010-2014 (RD-2007-3457) and 2015-2016 (214-0006) While the Agriculture and Horticulture
More informationCold Climate Grape IPM
Cold Climate Grape IPM Diseases & Insects Lorraine P. Berkett University of Vermont August 6, 2008 Major Diseases The BIG 4 Phomopsis cane and leaf spot Black Rot Powdery Mildew Downy Mildew NYS IPM Fact
More informationPractical Aspects of Crop Load and Canopy Management
Practical Aspects of Crop Load and Canopy Management Jim Wolpert Extension Viticulturist Department of Viticulture and Enology University of California, Davis Penn State Grape Day August 10, 2011 Presentation
More information2012 Research Report Michigan Grape & Wine Industry Council
2012 Research Report Michigan Grape & Wine Industry Council Early leaf removal to improve crop control, cluster morphology and berry quality in vinifera grapes Paolo Sabbatini 1 and Annemiek Schilder 2
More informationWillsboro Grape Variety Trial Willsboro Research Farm Willsboro, NY
Willsboro Grape Variety Trial Willsboro Research Farm Willsboro, NY Anna Wallis & Tim Martinson Cornell Cooperative Extension Background and Rationale: Evaluating performance of cold-hardy grape varieties
More informationEvaluation of desiccants to facilitate straight combining canola. Brian Jenks North Dakota State University
Evaluation of desiccants to facilitate straight combining canola Brian Jenks North Dakota State University The concept of straight combining canola is gaining favor among growers in North Dakota. The majority
More informationRootstock Traits 2013
Rootstock Percent Tree size Cold hardy Bud 9 15 to 25 R Good Mark 25 Good M.9-Fl.56
More informationWALNUT HEDGEROW PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2010
WALNUT HEDGEROW PRUNING AND TRAINING TRIAL 2010 Carolyn DeBuse, John Edstrom, Janine Hasey, and Bruce Lampinen ABSTRACT Hedgerow walnut orchards have been studied since the 1970s as a high density system
More informationLate-season disease control options to manage diseases, but minimize fermentation problems and wine defects
Late-season disease control options to manage diseases, but minimize fermentation problems and wine defects Tony Wolf, Virginia Tech 1 Late-season disease control options to manage diseases..but minimize
More informationDemonstration Vineyard for Seedless Table Grapes for Cool Climates
Demonstration Vineyard for Seedless Table Grapes for Cool Climates Sonia G. Schloemann Department of Plant, Soil, & Insect Sciences, University of Massachusetts This project was designed to evaluate the
More informationPlant root activity is limited to the soil bulbs Does not require technical expertise to. wetted by the water bottle emitter implement
Case Study Bottle Drip Irrigation Case Study Background Data Tool Category: Adaptation on the farm Variety: Robusta Climatic Hazard: Prolonged dry spells and high temperatures Expected Outcome: Improved
More informationCold Climate Wine Grape Cultivars: A New Crop in the Northeast and Upper Midwest Regions of the USA
Cold Climate Wine Grape Cultivars: A New Crop in the Northeast and Upper Midwest Regions of the USA L.P. Berkett, T.L. Bradshaw, and S.L. Kingsley-Richards Department of Plant & Soil Science University
More informationTremain Hatch Vineyard training & design
Tremain Hatch Thatch@vt.edu Vineyard training & design Vineyards are complex: Break down into components Row spacing Vine spacing Cordon/spur vs head/cane Grapevine training systems Professional assistance
More informationCONTROL OF EARLY AND LATE BLIGHT I N TOMATOES, N. B. Shamiyeh, A. B. Smith and C. A. Mullins. Interpretive Summary
CONTROL OF EARLY AND LATE BLIGHT I N TOMATOES, 2001 N. B. Shamiyeh, A. B. Smith and C. A. Mullins Interpretive Summary Plots treated with BAS-500, BAS-510, and with alternated with Quadris had significantly
More informationBerry = Sugar Sink. Source: Sink Relationships in the Grapevine. Source: Sink Relations. Leaf = Photosynthesis = Source
Source: Sink Relationships in the Grapevine S. Kaan Kurtural Department of Viticulture and Enology Source: Sink Relations Leaf = Photosynthesis = Source Berry = Sugar Sink 2 3/4/2018 1 Sink growing apex
More informationTreatments protocol # Color Materials Timing FP/A Tol 1 W Untreated Y 2 OD Rovral 50WP
Cooperative Research Project, Doug Gubler, U.C. Davis Dept. of Plant Pathology Final report Trial name... Grape bunch rot fungicide trial, 00 Location... Valley Foothills Vineyard, Philo, Mendocino County,
More information2012 Organic Broccoli Variety Trial Results
2012 Organic Broccoli Variety Trial Results The following tables present the results of organic broccoli variety trials that took place on research stations and cooperating farms in Washington, Oregon,
More informationRhonda Smith UC Cooperative Extension, Sonoma County
Berry Shrivel Research Update 2005 and 2006 investigations Rhonda Smith UC Cooperative Extension, Sonoma County Note: This update includes a summary of research conducted by Mark Krasow, Post Doctoral
More informationWashington Wine Commission: Wine industry grows its research commitment
PROGRESS EDITION MARCH 22, 2016 10:33 PM Washington Wine Commission: Wine industry grows its research commitment HIGHLIGHTS New WSU Wine Science Center a significant step up for industry Development of
More informationSeasonal Programs for Control of Turfgrass Diseases
Seasonal Programs for Control of Turfgrass Diseases Paul Koch, Tom Huncosky, Sam Soper, Ben Van Ryzin, and Dr. Jim Kerns Department of Plant Pathology University of Wisconsin - Madison OBJECTIVE To determine
More informationGrape Weed Control. Harlene Hatterman-Valenti North Dakota State University
Grape Weed Control Harlene Hatterman-Valenti North Dakota State University The Northern Grapes Project is funded by the USDA s Specialty Crops Research Initiative Program of the National Institute for
More information2015 BUD SURVIVAL SURVEY IN NIAGARA AREA VINEYARDS
BUD SURVIVAL SURVEY IN NIAGARA AREA VINEYARDS Prepared for: The Grape Growers of Ontario KCMS - Applied Research and Consulting 1215 Maple St. P.O Box 13 Fenwick, Ontario L0S 1C0 Telephone: (905) 892-7050
More informationVolunteer buckwheat control in irrigated spring wheat year two. Mark Thorne, Henry Wetzel, Drew Lyon, Tim Waters
Volunteer buckwheat control in irrigated spring wheat year two. Mark Thorne, Henry Wetzel, Drew Lyon, Tim Waters A study initiated in 06 was repeated in 07 to evaluate postemergence herbicide control of
More information2012 BUD SURVIVAL SURVEY IN NIAGARA & ESSEX AREA VINEYARDS
BUD SURVIVAL SURVEY IN NIAGARA & ESSEX AREA VINEYARDS Prepared for: The Grape Growers of Ontario KCMS - Applied Research and Consulting 1215 Maple St. Box#13 Fenwick, Ontario L0S 1C0 Telephone: (905) 892-7050
More informationVineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 15 September 2014 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station
NO. 12 1 Vineyard IPM Scouting Report for week of 15 September 2014 UW-Extension Door County and Peninsular Agricultural Research Station Cold Slows Grape Maturity Grape maturity is reliant on a number
More informationPsa and Italian Kiwifruit Orchards an observation by Callum Kay, 4 April 2011
Psa and Italian Kiwifruit Orchards, 2011 The Psa-research programme in New Zealand draws on knowledge and experience gained from around the world particularly in Italy, where ZESPRI, Plant & Food Research
More informationFlowering and Fruiting Morphology of Hardy Kiwifruit, Actinidia arguta
Flowering and Fruiting Morphology of Hardy Kiwifruit, Actinidia arguta Chantalak Tiyayon and Bernadine Strik Department of Horticulture, Oregon State University 4017 ALS, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA Email:
More informationGrape disease control Update for 2015
Grape disease control Update for 2015 Mike Ellis Department of Plant Pathology The Ohio State University, OARDC Resources for Grape Disease Control and Pest Management Ohio State University Extension Bulletins:
More informationVinews Viticulture Information News, Week of 17 August 2015 Columbia, MO
NO. 7 Vinews Viticulture Information News, Week of 7 August 205 Columbia, MO Fungicide Resistance Management In 2008, Virginia reported that downy mildew (Plasmopara viticola) had developed resistance
More informationNE-1020 Cold Hardy Wine Grape Cultivar Trial
Iowa State Research Farm Progress Reports 2014 NE-1020 Cold Hardy Wine Grape Cultivar Trial Paul A. Domoto Iowa State University, domoto@iastate.edu Gail R. Nonnecke Iowa State University, nonnecke@iastate.edu
More informationSpecialty Cantaloupe Variety Performance
Specialty Cantaloupe Variety Performance Petrus Langenhoven, Ph.D. Horticulture and Hydroponics Crops Specialist February 13, 2018 1 Outline of Presentation Background Materials and Methods Results Conclusion
More informationSouthwest Indiana Muskmelon Variety Trial 2013
Southwest Indiana Muskmelon Trial 2013 Shubin K. Saha 1 and Larry Sutterer 2 1 Vegetable Extension Specialist, Department of Horticulture, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40546 2 Agriculture Technician,
More informationARIMNet2 Young Researchers Seminar
ARIMNet2 Young Researchers Seminar How to better involve end-users throughout the research process to foster innovation-driven research for a sustainable Mediterranean agriculture at the farm and local
More informationVineyard Site Selection and Layout. Dean Volenberg UW-Extension Door County
Vineyard Site Selection and Layout Dean Volenberg UW-Extension Door County Vineyard Site Selection Climate & Geographic Location French American hybrid wine grape plants are a phenologically distinct crop
More informationCorn Earworm Management in Sweet Corn. Rick Foster Department of Entomology Purdue University
Corn Earworm Management in Sweet Corn Rick Foster Department of Entomology Purdue University Pest of sweet corn, seed corn and tomato Two generations per year where it overwinters 2 nd is usually most
More informationOverview. Cold Climate Grape Growing: Starting and Sustaining a Vineyard
Cold Climate Grape Growing: Starting and Sustaining a Vineyard John and Jenny Thull Vineyard Manager and Assistant Vineyard Manager University of Minnesota 1 Overview The Sustainable Vineyard Establishment
More informationOhio Grape-Wine Electronic Newsletter
Ohio Grape-Wine Electronic Newsletter Imed Dami, Associate Professor and Extension Viticulturist Department of Horticulture and Crop Science Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center 1680 Madison
More information2009 Barley and Oat Trials. Dr. Heather Darby Erica Cummings, Rosalie Madden, and Amanda Gervais
2009 Barley and Oat Trials Dr. Heather Darby Erica Cummings, Rosalie Madden, and Amanda Gervais 802-524-6501 2009 VERMONT BARLEY AND OAT VARIETY PERFORMANCE TRIALS Dr. Heather Darby, University of Vermont
More informationInfluence of Cultivar and Planting Date on Strawberry Growth and Development in the Low Desert
Influence of Cultivar and Planting Date on Strawberry Growth and Development in the Low Desert Michael A. Maurer and Kai Umeda Abstract A field study was designed to determine the effects of cultivar and
More information(36) PROHEXADIONE-CALCIUM AFFECTS SHOOT GROWTH AND YIELD OF LEMON, ORANGE AND AVOCADO DIFFERENTLY
(36) PROHEXADIONE-CALCIUM AFFECTS SHOOT GROWTH AND YIELD OF LEMON, ORANGE AND AVOCADO DIFFERENTLY Lauren C. Garner, Yusheng Zheng, Toan Khuong and Carol J. Lovatt 1 ABSTRACT Lemon (Citrus limon L.) and
More informationAcademic Year 2014/2015 Assessment Report. Bachelor of Science in Viticulture, Department of Viticulture and Enology
Academic Year 2014/2015 Assessment Report Bachelor of Science in Viticulture, Department of Viticulture and Enology Due to changes in faculty assignments, there was no SOAP coordinator for the Department
More informationManagement and research of fruit rot diseases in vineyards
Management and research of fruit rot diseases in vineyards Bryan Hed, Henry Ngugi, and Noemi Halbrendt Department of Plant Pathology Penn State University Botrytis Bunch rot Late season condition, ripening.
More informationCanker Diseases in California Lodi Grape Day 2017 W. D. GUBLER DEPARTMENT OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS, CA 95616
Canker Diseases in California Lodi Grape Day 2017 W. D. GUBLER DEPARTMENT OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS, CA 95616 Trunk diseases Natural dieback of pruning wound Uniform color of
More informationMain features of the Grand Valley
Main features of the Grand Valley High mountain valley (~4,700 ) In the North, the Bookcliffs rise almost 2,000 above the valley floor In the East, Grand Mesa rises >6,000 above the valley floor In the
More informationAMINOFIT.Xtra, SOME TEST RESULTS
FRUITS WALNUT CHERRY PLUM PEAR APPLE STRAWBERRY VEGETABLES ORNAMENTALS, SOME TEST RESULTS POTATO ONION TOMATO MELON LETTUCE BERMUDA GRASS ORCHID PELARGONIUM CHRYSANTHEMUM on WALNUT (Australia 23) DO YOU
More informationGrape. Disease Control
Grape Disease Control TM Fungicide for Grape Disease Control fungicide is a mixture of two complementary active ingredients that provide excellent protection against Botrytis bunch rot and sour rot on
More informationNotes on acid adjustments:
Notes on acid adjustments: In general, acidity levels in 2018 were lower than normal. Grape acidity is critical for the winemaking process, as well as the quality of the wine. There are 2 common ways to
More informationResults and Discussion Eastern-type cantaloupe
Muskmelon Variety Trial in Southwest Indiana 2016 Wenjing Guan, Daniel S. Egel and Dennis Nowaskie Southwest Purdue Agricultural Center, Vincennes, IN, 47591 Introduction Indiana ranks fifth in 2015 in
More informationDevelopment of smoke taint risk management tools for vignerons and land managers
Development of smoke taint risk management tools for vignerons and land managers Glynn Ward, Kristen Brodison, Michael Airey, Art Diggle, Michael Saam-Renton, Andrew Taylor, Diana Fisher, Drew Haswell
More informationKelli Stokely Masters of Agriculture candidate Department of Horticulture Oregon Wine Research Institute
Masters of Agriculture Degree Project Presentation Kelli Stokely Masters of Agriculture candidate Department of Horticulture Oregon Wine Research Institute Cane pruned system Photo courtesy of Patty Skinkis
More informationPowdery Mildew-resistant Melon Variety Evaluation, New York 2012
Powdery Mildew-resistant Melon Variety Evaluation, New York 2012 Margaret T. McGrath, Cornell University, Riverhead, New York Karen LaMarsh, Cornell University, Riverhead, New York Sandra Menasha, Cornell
More informationFinal Report. TITLE: Developing Methods for Use of Own-rooted Vitis vinifera Vines in Michigan Vineyards
Final Report TITLE: Developing Methods for Use of Own-rooted Vitis vinifera Vines in Michigan Vineyards PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Thomas J. Zabadal OBJECTIVES: (1) To determine the ability to culture varieties
More informationTomato Variety Observations 2009
Tomato Variety Observations 2009 Henry G. Taber, professor Department of Horticulture Introduction We continued our yearly evaluation of tomato varieties for commercial growers. Each year the major fruit
More informationWine Grape Cultivar Trial Performance in 2008
Wine Grape Cultivar Trial Performance in 2008 Paul Domoto, professor Gail Nonnecke, professor Department of Horticulture Joe Hannan, Dennis Portz, Leah Riesselman, and Lisa Smiley, ag specialists Bernie
More informationGrowing Cabernet Sauvignon at Wynns Coonawarra Estate
Growing Cabernet Sauvignon at Wynns Coonawarra Estate The influence of vintage, clones and site Ben Harris Vineyard Manager Wynns Coonawarra Estate Coonawarra Red and White Winegrape Varieties Red (90%)
More informationCHEMICAL THINNING OF APPLE UNDER NORWEGIAN CONDITIONS. WHAT WORKS?
CHEMICAL THINNING OF APPLE UNDER NORWEGIAN CONDITIONS. WHAT WORKS? Frank Maas & Mekjell Meland Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research NIBIO Ullensvang CONTENT PRESENTATION Introduction Frank Maas Background
More informationPerformance of cool-climate grape varieties in Delta County. Horst Caspari Colorado State University Western Colorado Research Center
Performance of cool-climate grape varieties in Delta County Horst Caspari Colorado State University Western Colorado Research Center Introduction The vineyard area in Delta County increased substantially
More informationJCAST. Department of Viticulture and Enology, B.S. in Viticulture
JCAST Department of Viticulture and Enology, B.S. in Viticulture Student Outcomes Assessment Plan (SOAP) I. Mission Statement The mission of the Department of Viticulture and Enology at California State
More informationJoseph A. Fiola, Ph.D. Specialist in Viticulture and Small Fruit Western MD Research & Education Center Keedysville Road Keedysville, MD
Joseph A. Fiola, Ph.D. Specialist in Viticulture and Small Fruit Western MD Research & Education Center 18330 Keedysville Road Keedysville, MD 21756-1104 301-432-2767 ext. 344; Fax 301-432-4089 jfiola@umd.edu
More informationResistant Varieties: New Perspectives for a More Sustainable Viticulture
InnoVine Final symposium Toulouse, 16-17 of November 2016 Your logo here Elisa De Luca Vivai Cooperativi Rauscedo Resistant Varieties: New Perspectives for a More Sustainable Viticulture What are the New
More informationResearch - Strawberry Nutrition
Research - Strawberry Nutrition The Effect of Increased Nitrogen and Potassium Levels within the Sap of Strawberry Leaf Petioles on Overall Yield and Quality of Strawberry Fruit as Affected by Justification:
More information2004 Grape Variety Trial at Rogers Mesa. Horst Caspari
2004 Grape Variety Trial at Rogers Mesa Horst Caspari Grape variety trial (2004) at Rogers Mesa In 2004, we started a variety and clonal trial at the Western Colorado Research Center Roger Mesa. Evaluation
More informationThe art of powdery mildew control Technical Manual
The art of powdery mildew control Technical Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Introduction Powdery Mildew Vivando s Features and Benefits Mode of Action Powdery Mildew Control Trial Results Australian
More information2010 Winter Canola Variety Trial
Winter Canola Variety Trial Dr. Heather Darby, Rosalie Madden, Amanda Gervais, Erica Cummings, Philip Halteman University of Vermont Extension (802) 524-6501 Winter Canola Variety Trial Dr. Heather Darby,
More information