Tree Inventory and Preservation Plan Report Innis Lake Road and Old Church Road Caledon, Ontario

Transcription

1 Tree Inventory and Preservation Plan Report Innis Lake Road and Old Church Road Caledon, Ontario prepared for Caledon Villas Corporation 55 Blue Willow Drive Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 9E8 prepared by 23 July 2013, revised 10 April 2014, and 26 February 2015 KUNTZ FORESTRY CONSULTING INC Project P704

2 Introduction Kuntz Forestry Consulting was retained by Caledon Villas Corporation to complete a Tree Inventory and Preservation Plan in support of a development application for the property located on the northeast corner of Innis Lake Road and Old Church Road, in Caledon, Ontario. The work plan for this tree preservation study included the following: Prepare inventory of the tree resources on the subject property including trees within 6m of development. Complete forest assessment of northwestern and north-central woodlots. Evaluate potential tree saving opportunities based on proposed development plans; and Document the findings in a Tree Inventory and Preservation Plan Report. Tree resources were assessed utilizing the following parameters: Tree # - number assigned to tree that corresponds to Figures 1-3. Species - common and botanical names provided in the inventory table. DBH - diameter (centimetres) at breast height, measured at 1.4 m above the ground. Condition - condition of tree considering trunk integrity, crown structure and crown vigour. Condition ratings include poor (P), fair (F) and good (G). Comments - additional relevant detail. The results of the evaluation are provided below. Methodology The topographic survey provided and aerial imagery of the subject property were used to locate tree resources. Trees inventoried were numbered Certain trees had been previously tagged by other parties these tags have been noted for trees in Table 1 if applicable. Groupings of trees (tree polygons) were identified with the prefix P. The grouping of Black Walnut trees in the northeast corner identified for retention, P370, was inventoried by 100% tally. Standard woodlot assessment protocol was used for P370, tallying trees by species, size category, and condition [Acceptable growing stock (AGS) and unacceptable growing stock (UGS)]. A stand analysis was completed for the northcentral woodlot using prism sweeps to determine basal area. Tree locations are shown on Figures 1, 2, and 3. See Tables 1 and 2 for the results of the inventory. A hazard tree assessment was completed for trees located within the northcentral woodlot within striking distance of the proposed development. Existing Site Conditions The subject property is currently occupied by agricultural land and a farmstead with a dwelling and associated outbuildings in the southern portion of the property. Woodlots exist in the north-central and northwestern portions of the property. Tree resources exist in the form of landscape, naturally occurring, woodlot, and hedgerow feature trees. Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P704 1

3 Tree Resources The tree inventory was conducted on 8, 17, 18 July 2013, 9 April 2014, and 11 November The April and November 2014 site visits assessed additional trees considering changes to the site plan and assessed damage from the ice storm of December The original inventory documented 371 trees and tree polygons on and within 6 metres of the development. Trees 239, 240, and 339 were noted to have failed during the April 2014 site visit. An additional 97 trees were identified in subsequent site visits for a total of 468 trees and tree polygons. Refer to Tables 1 and 2 for the full tree inventory and Figures 1, 2, and 3 for the location of trees reported in the tree inventory. No threatened, rare, or endangered species were identified in the inventory. Tree resources were comprised of Sugar Maple ( ), Basswood ( ), Black Cherry ( ), Bitternut Hickory (Carya cordiformis), Eastern Hemlock (Tsuga canadensis), Ironwood (Ostrya virginiana), White Ash ( ), Green Ash ( ), ( ), Black Walnut (Juglans nigra), Apple species (Malus sp.), Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris), White Spruce (Picea glauca), White Pine (Pinus strobus), Norway Maple ( platanoides), Silver Maple ( saccharinum), Cherry species ( sp.), Manitoba Maple ( negundo), Blue Spruce (Picea pungens), Trembling Aspen (Populus tremuloides), Horsechestnut (Aesculus hippocastanum), White Elm (Ulmus ), and Hawthorne species (Crateagus sp.). Forest Resources The northwestern woodlot is a Dry-Fresh Sugar Maple Deciduous Forest Type (FODM5-1). The canopy is mature and almost entirely dominated by Sugar Maple. Associate tree species include Basswood, Bitternut Hickory, Green Ash, Ironwood, Black Cherry, and Eastern Hemlock. The sub-canopy is very sparse (10% cover) with a few Sugar Maple trees in this layer. The shrublayer is also fairly sparse (20% cover) but contains Sugar Maple with occasional occurrences of Red-berried Elderberry (Sambucus pubens) and Common Buckthorn (Rhamnus carthatica). The groundlayer has moderate cover (70%) and is dominated by False Virginia Creeper (Parthenocissus vitacea) and Enchanter s Nightshade (Circaea lutetiana) with occasional occurrences of Bloodroot (Sanguinaria canadensis), Motherwort (Leonurus cardiaca), Goldenrod (Solidago sp.), Herb Robert (Geranium robertianum), and Burdock (Arctium sp.). SAAR Environmental Ltd. also identified native Ginger (Asarum canadense), and Rose twisted-stalk (Streptopus lanceolatus) in their Natural Heritage Evaluation (NHE). The NHE recommends that the Ginger be transplanted. SAAR Environmental Ltd. identified this unit as having "no viable remaining forest interior habitat, reflected by the low diversity of forest breeding birds, and as well by the incursion of weedy roadside plant species." They indicated that the unit does not meeting the criteria for significant woodlands. A number of canopy gaps exist within the northwestern woodlot. Refer to Figure 1 for the location of trees within the woodlot and Appendix B for photographs of the woodlot. The April 2014 field investigations revealed that certain trees within the northwestern woodlot have sustained damage from the December 2013 ice storm. Table 1 has been updated to reflect the condition changes to trees inventoried individually. Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P704 2

4 The northcentral woodlot is a Sugar Maple community with open pockets throughout. The results of the stand analysis indicate an average basal area of 16 m 2 /ha. Refer to Appendix A for the results of this analysis. Proposed Development A multi-block residential development is proposed for the subject property with a stormwater management block in the southwest corner of the property and a park near the centre of the property. The retention of the northcentral woodlot is proposed. The development will also be offset from the northern property boundary to protect the hedgerow. Road access is proposed from both Old Church Road and Innis Lake Road. Refer to Figures 1, 2, and 3 for the existing conditions and proposed site plan. Discussion The following sections provide a discussion and analysis of development impacts, tree removal requirements, and tree preservation relative to the proposed development and existing conditions. Development Impacts The proposed development will have impacts on a number of trees included in the inventory. Trees at the rear of proposed lots have been retained where possible. Tree Removal The removal of 237 trees and tree polygons will be required to accommodate the proposed development and associated earth works. Removals are identified as trees 21, 25, 28, 30, 31, 36, 37, 39, 41, 42, 48-59, 81-85, 90, 96, 98, 111, 112, , 144, 145, 152, 153, , , , , , , , , , 330, 331, , 337, 338, 340, 343, 345, 348, 356, 357, 368, 369, 373, 375, , 418, , 441, , Refer to Figures 1, 2, and 3 for the locations of required tree removals. Trees 36, 42, 59, 144, 168, 236, 237, 245, 249, 251, 253, 255, 256, 307, 308, 333, 345, 348, and 373 are hazard trees and their removal would be required regardless of the site plan. Trees 245, 249, 251, 253, and are located in the road right-of-way. Trees 81-85, 90, 96, 98, 117, 182, 191, 200, 235, 243, , 250, 257, 262, 263, 265, 266, 309, 320, 330, 340, 343, 356, and 357 are in poor condition - their removal would also be recommended regardless of the site plan. Seven dead trees were also identified. Two of these trees are located on neighbouring properties and one within the road right-of-way but they should also be removed due to their hazard potential. In addition, Trees 25, 160, 172, and 342, also located on neighbouring properties, are currently identified for retention but are considered hazard trees. The neighbours should be made aware of these dead and hazardous trees and as it is recommended they be removed. Refer to Figures 1 and 2 for the locations of these dead trees. It is our understanding that the dripline of the northcentral woodlot was staked by the TRCA. A 10m buffer is proposed to protect this dripline. Tree protection fencing should be installed on the outside limit of the buffer. Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P704 3

5 A portion of the trees within the northwestern woodlot are identified for removal, including Trees 28, 30, 31, 36, 37, 39, 41, 42, 48-58, 373, , 393, , , Given the extremely common and secure forest type (Dry-Fresh Sugar Maple Deciduous Forest) and the anthropogenic nature of the woodlot (it appears intervention has controlled the understory of the woodlot), this feature poses a limited constraint to development. Trees range in size from 17.5cm to 67.5cm DBH. The majority of these trees are Sugar Maple with associates of Basswood, both of which are a secure species. As such, they do not pose a large constraint to development. Trees are mature Sugar Maple trees. Tree 301 is 71cm DBH and is in fair condition. Tree 302 is 53.5cm, also in fair condition, and Tree 303 is 62cm, also in fair condition. All three trees contain a number of defects affecting their crown structure and trunk integrity. Given the common nature of this species, their size (mature), and their condition, these trees pose a limited constraint to development. Trees 238, 240, 241, , , and 328 are located in the road right-of-way. Their removal is required to accommodate the widening of Old Church Road. Permission from the Region of Peel is required prior to their removal. Trees , located on the school property adjacent to the southwest corner of the subject property, will require removal to accommodate the proposed grading and retaining wall to be constructed through this area. Permission from the school will be require prior to the removal of these trees. However, these trees are all Green Ash and their decline and eventual death is anticipated given the presence of the Emerald Ash Borer. It is our understanding that these trees will be replaced with more desirable species. In addition to these trees, all Ash trees located on the subject property have been identified for removal, including Trees 39, 111, 112, 118, 119, 264, 267, 270, 323, 326, 330, 334, 369, and one tree within P271. Tree Preservation Preservation of all remaining tree resources is possible with the use of appropriate tree protection measures as indicated on Figures 1-3. Trees identified for retention include Trees 1-20, 22-27, 29, 32-36, 38, 40, 43-47, 60-80, 86-89, 91-95, 97, , , , , , 166, 167, , 181, , , , , 329, 332, 336, 339, 341, P344, 346, 347, , , P , 374, , , , , and Refer to Figures 1, 2, and 3 for the locations of required tree protection fencing and the protection fence detail. Tree 18 contains a hazardous limb overhanging the subject property. This limb should be removed. The 64cm Black Cherry within P344 contains a dead stem in the crown. This stem should also be removed. The minimum tree protection zones (mtpz s) of all trees identified for retention have been respected, particularly Tree 106, a large specimen Sugar Maple along the northern property boundary and the other trees along this hedgerow. Tree protection fencing should be installed at the limits of these mtpz s to protect the root zones during construction as shown on Figures 1, 2, and 3. Protecting the minimum tree protection zones is expected to be sufficient for the preservation of these trees, particularly due to the long-term presence of agricultural activity through the area. All grading and servicing requirements are proposed outside of these mtpz s. The mtpz s used are based on Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P704 4

6 the accepted standards within municipalities across the GTA and have been shown to sufficiently protect trees during construction if they are respected. As such, a dripline plus 10m buffer should not be required for trees identified for retention outside of the central woodlot. A walkway is proposed within the mtpz s of certain trees identified for retention in the northwest woodlot. Through these areas, the walkway should be installed by hand, at the existing grade, using crushed gravel of permeable pavers. No equipment is permitted within the mtpz s of these trees. The removal of any hazardous limbs or stems on trees identified for retention shall be carried out in accordance with good arboricultural practices and overseen by a certified Arborist. The remedial work shall be completed prior to the Registration of the Plan to ensure that any hazardous limbs have been addressed prior to residents taking occupancy in the subdivision. Hazard Trees Five hazard trees were identified within the northcentral woodlot. Refer to Figure 2 for the locations of these trees. Hazard trees have been marked with orange flagging tape. H1 Sugar Maple, ~63cm DBH. Previously tagged #132. H2 Sugar Maple, ~48cm DBH. H3 Sugar Maple, ~48cm DBH. H4 Sugar Maple ~50cm DBH. marked stem. H5 Sugar Maple, ~60cm DBH. Summary and Recommendations Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. was retained by Caledon Villas Corporation to complete a Tree Inventory and Preservation Plan in support of a development application for the property located at the northwest corner of Innis Lake Road and Old Church Road. A tree inventory was conducted and reviewed in the context of the proposed development plan. The findings of the study indicate a total of 468 trees and tree polygons on and within 6 metres of the subject property. The removal of 237 trees and tree polygons is required to accommodate the proposed development. All other trees can be saved provided appropriate tree protection measures are implemented prior to earthworks and construction. The following recommendations are suggested to minimize impacts to trees identified for preservation. Refer to Figures 1-3 for additional tree preservation notes and the preservation fence detail. Tree protection barriers and fencing should be erected at locations prescribed on Figures 1-3. Tree protection measures will have to be implemented prior to construction to ensure the trees identified for preservation are not impacted by the development. Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P704 5

7 Branches and roots that extend past prescribed tree protection zones that require pruning must be pruned by a qualified Arborist or other tree professional. All pruning of tree roots and branches must be in accordance with good arboricultural standards. Site visits, pre, during and post construction are recommended to ensure proper utilization of tree protection barriers. Trees should also be inspected for damage incurred during construction to ensure appropriate pruning or other mitigation measures are implemented. Respectfully Submitted, Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. Celine Batterink Celine Batterink, H.B.Sc. Ecology Associate Ecologist, ISA Certified Arborist #ON1546-A Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P704 6

8 Table 1. Tree Inventory Location: Innis Lake and Old Church Date: 8, 17, 18 July 2013, 9 April, & 11 November 2014 Surveyors: CB Tree # Common Name 1 Sugar Maple 2 Sugar Maple 3 Basswood 4 Sugar Maple 5 Sugar Maple 6 Black Cherry 7 Sugar Maple 8 Sugar Maple 9 Sugar Maple 10 Sugar Maple 11 Sugar Maple 12 Basswood 13 Sugar Maple 14 Sugar Maple Basswood Basswood 15 Sugar Maple 16 Sugar Maple 17 Sugar Maple 18 Basswood 19 Sugar Maple 20 Bitternut Hickory 21 Sugar Maple Scientific Name Carya cordiformis DBH TI CS CV CDB PT Comments Action 39.5 G G F-G F F F G F F F F G F G G F F F - 29 F F-G F-G Crook, butt flare, asymmetrical crown Poor form, Union at 1.6m with seam 1 dead stem, cavity, bowed Eutypella canker, 39.5 G G F-G G F-G F Crowded 36 G G F-G F F F Bowed 61, 25, 20.5 F F-G F-G G F F ~17, 28 F-G F F - 29 F F F Bowed 26 F F F Union at 0.1m, cavity, crook, poor form, lean Clump of 3 trees, crowded, epicormic branching, lean (VL) Union at 0.1m, 17 G F-G F Partial understory tree 32 G G F-G F F P-F , 44.5, 50 P-F F-G F Natural pruning wounds, suppressed, seam Union at base, cavity, canker, natural pruning wounds, stem wound on 1 stem at base => limb overhanging subject property 18.5 G F-G F Partial understory tree 54.5 G F-G F-G Broken branches 65 F F-G F-G Lean, union at 4m with included bark, Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P704 7

9 22 Sugar Maple 23 Sugar Maple 24 Sugar Maple 25 Basswood 26 Basswood 27 Black Cherry 28 Eastern Hemlock 29 Sugar Maple 30 Eastern Hemlock 31 Sugar Maple 32 Basswood 33 Basswood 34 Sugar Maple 35 Ironwood 36 Basswood 37 Basswood 38 Sugar Maple 39 White Ash 40 Sugar Maple 41 Sugar Maple 42 Sugar Maple 43 Sugar Maple 44 Sugar Maple Tsuga canadensis Tsuga canadensis Ostrya virginiana 25 G F F-G - 17 G G F-G - 21 F F F - 39, 41.5 P-F F F - 56 F-G F F F F-G F-G F-G F F Sweep, stem wound, Union at base, cavity, canker => REMOVE Natural pruning wounds, sparse crown, asymmetrical crown Crook, 43 F G F-G Lean 50 F F-G F-G F F-G F - 90, possible girdling root, stem wound at base, lean, broken branches 51 G G G F F F - 92 Bowed, canker 13, 32 F-G F-G G - 93 Union at 0.3m 27 F F-G F-G P F-G F , 49.5, 36.5, 39.5 F F F F F-G F G F F F F-G F F F F-G , 37 P-F F-G F , 25 F G G - 63 Lean, Cavities, coppice growth, hollow, hazard => REMOVE Fruiting bodies on small stem, bowed, broken branches V-union at 2m with included bark, fused stems, epicormic branching, broken branches Stem wound, poor form Poor form,, cavity (VL), broken branches Union at 0.5m, 1 stem hazard (has been painted) => REMOVE 1 STEM Union at base, stem wound ~52 G G F-G - Vine competition Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P704 8

10 45 Sugar Maple 46 Sugar Maple 47 Green Ash 48 Sugar Maple 49 Sugar Maple 50 Sugar Maple 51 Sugar Maple 52 Sugar Maple 53 Sugar Maple 54 Sugar Maple 55 Sugar Maple 56 Sugar Maple 57 Basswood 58 Basswood 59 Ironwood 60 Sugar Maple 61 Sugar Maple 62 Sugar Maple 63 Sugar Maple 64 Sugar Maple 65 Sugar Maple 66 Sugar Maple 67 Sugar Maple 68 Sugar Maple 69 Sugar Maple 70 Sugar Maple 71 Sugar Maple 72 Ironwood 73 Sugar Maple Ostrya virginiana Ostrya virginiana ~48 F-G G F-G - V-union at 6m ~33, 29 G F-G G - Union at base ~37 F F F - 23 G F G - 51 Pruning wounds, epicormic branching Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P F-G G F-G - 50 Lean (VL) 48.5 F-G F-G F Sweep (VL) 40 F G G - 27 Stem wound at base 42 F F-G F - 26 Crook, burl 17.5 F-G G F-G - 25 Sweep 40 G F-G F-G - 11 Poor form 32 G G G F F F-G G F-G F-G - 1 Stem wound from dead stem, 33 F-G G F-G - 2 Crook 27 P-F G F-G , 41, 34, 30 F F F-G G F G - 66 F F F - 36 F-G F F - Lean, stem wound (H) at base with rot => REMOVE Clump of 4, s, gypsy moth, gypsy moth Gypsy moth,, poor form, vertical scaffolding limbs, seam Suppressed, poor form 25 G G G - 21 G G G - 17 G G F-G - 20 F F F - 28 G F-G G - Suppressed, bowed away from subject property, poor form (H), seam Bowed, gypsy moth 29.5 G F G - bowed 28.5 F-G F-G F-G F F-G F - 21 G F-G F-G - 41 F-G F-G F-G - Lean, asymmetrical crown Target canker, 1 stem dead in crown with rot, asymmetrical crown Poor form, lean, gypsy moth

11 74 Sugar Maple 75 Sugar Maple 76 Sugar Maple 77 Sugar Maple 78 Sugar Maple 79 Sugar Maple 80 Black Cherry Sugar Maple 87 Black Cherry 88 Sugar Maple 89 Black Cherry Sugar Maple 92 Sugar Maple 93 Sugar Maple 94 Basswood 95 Black Cherry Sugar Maple Sugar Maple 100 Sugar Maple 49 F F F-G F F F - Spiral seam, fused stems in crown, target canker 23 G G G - 27 G F-G F-G - Bowed 40.5 F-G G G - Growth deficit 56.5 F-G F F-G - 48 F P-F F - 28 F P P F P P P P P , 29, 25 P P P P P P -, poor form 1 stem failed, bowed, gypsy moth, broken branches Lost leader, broken branches, sapsucker damaged (H), sapsucker damage Sapsucker damage (H), hollow, union at 1.5m Clump of 3, bowed, 1 stem split, poor form Hollow, poor form (H), lost leader 26 G G G - 35 G G F - 19 G F F - Suppressed 46 F F F - 40 P P P G F F - 39 G F-G F-G - 33 F F F - 22, 28.5 F G F-G F F F - 20 P P P - 59 F-G F-G F-G - 39 F P P F F F - Fluxing seam, stem wound (H) with rot, epicormic branching Hollow, sapsucker damage (H) Suppressed, poor form Gypsy moth, Suppressed, poor form Union at 0.2m, dry rot at base Lean towards subject property, Lifting root plate, lean (H) Poor form, gypsy moth Lean, sapsucker damage, poor form, gypsy moth 55 G G F - Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P704 10

12 101 Sugar Maple 102 Sugar Maple 103 Sugar Maple 104 Sugar Maple 105 Sugar Maple 106 Sugar Maple 107 Sugar Maple 108 Basswood 62 F F F - Union at 3m,, lean 31 F-G G F - Crook 52 F F F F F F - 71 F F F F F F G F F - 20 G F F - Canker, seam,, poor form, cavity, gypsy moth Gypsy moth, poor form, crooks (H) Gypsy moth, poor form, broken branches Suppressed, poor form Grapevine competition, understory tree, bowed (H) 109 Sugar Maple 16 G G F-G Black Walnut Juglans nigra 19 G G F-G Green Ash 112 Green Ash 113 Basswood 114 Apple species Malus sp G F-G F-G - 38 F-G F-G F-G - Cavity (VL), 20.5 G F F - Coppice growth (H) ~22, 21 F F F - Union at base, grapevine competition (H) 115 Apple species Malus sp. ~25 F F F - Vine competition 116 Scots Pine Pinus sylvestris ~17 G G G Black Cherry Main stem dead, poor ~58 P P P - form (H) 118 Green Ash 119 Green Ash ~65 G G G - 27 G G F-G Black Walnut Juglans nigra 32 G F-G F-G - Gypsy moth,, vine competition (H) 121 Black Walnut Juglans nigra 44 G G F-G - Union at 1.5m 122 Black Walnut Juglans nigra 15.5 G G F Black Walnut Juglans nigra 36 G G G - Vine competition 124 Basswood Union at base, canker F F F -, 7 stems, broken branches 125 Sugar Maple 27 G G F-G Sugar Maple 22 F-G G F-G - Crook F P P F F F F F F - Lean towards subject property Poor form, epicormic branching Lean towards subject property, Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P704 11

13 Basswood 135 Green Ash 136 Sugar Maple 137 Basswood 138 Sugar Maple 139 Basswood 140 Sugar Maple 141 White Ash 142 Sugar Maple 143 Sugar Maple 144 Sugar Maple 145 Sugar Maple 146 Sugar Maple 147 Sugar Maple 148 Sugar Maple 149 Sugar Maple 150 Sugar Maple 151 Sugar Maple 152 Sugar Maple 30.5 F F F - 42 P-F F P-F - 44 F G F - Crook, lean to subject property, stem wound at base Soil missing in root zone, lean to subject property, Lean to subject property, sapsucker damage 31 P P P 90 Lost leader ~9, 15 F P-F F - 30 F-G F F G F F - Union at base, poor form, lean away from subject property, vertical scaffolding limbs 30 G G G G F F - 43 G G F-G G G F - 35 F F F 15 Bowed 49 F F F - 62 F F F - 58 P F F - 80 F F F P-F F F - Coppice growth, union at 1.5m, lean, asymmetrical crown, gypsy moth Union at 2m, poor form, cavity, broken branches Hollow, stem wound (H) at base, lean, poor form, gypsy moth, broken branches, hazard =>REMOVE Lean, vertical scaffolding limbs, fused stems, pruning wounds, gypsy moth, broken branches Stem wound (H), broken branches,, gypsy moth ~37 F G F - Burl (H), union at 4m ~28 F G F - 50 G F-G F - 54 G F-G F G F-G F-G - 50 F F F - V-union at 4m, pruning wounds Union at 6m, epicormic branching, broken branches Gypsy moth, 1 pruned rotting stem at base, bowed crown Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P704 12

14 153 Sugar Maple 154 Bitternut Hickory 155 Sugar Maple 156 Sugar Maple 157 Sugar Maple 158 Sugar Maple 159 Sugar Maple 160 Sugar Maple 161 Sugar Maple 162 Sugar Maple 163 Sugar Maple 164 Sugar Maple 165 Sugar Maple 166 Sugar Maple 167 Sugar Maple 168 Sugar Maple 169 Sugar Maple 170 Sugar Maple 171 Sugar Maple 172 Sugar Maple 173 Sugar Maple 174 Sugar Maple 175 Bitternut Hickory 176 Sugar Maple 177 Sugar Maple 178 Sugar Maple 179 Sugar Maple Carya cordiformis Carya cordiformis 49 G F F-G - 41 G G G -, gypsy moth, broken branches Gypsy moth, Gypsy moth, broken branches Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P G F F - Partial understory tree 25.5 G G G - 21 G F F - Partial understory tree 36.5 G G F - Gypsy moth 40 G G F - ~48 P F F - Stem wound (H) in crown, seams, girdling wire, hazard => REMOVE ~36 G G F - 40 F-G F F - ~26, 32 F F-G F - 40 F F F F-G G F-G - 33 F G F - Bowed, gypsy moth, pruning wounds, lean V-union at 1m with included bark Bowed, target canker, broken branches Bowed, gypsy moth Stem wound with seam 21.5 G G F-G - 39 P F F - Hollow, stem wound (H) at base, canker, asymmetrical crown, hazard => REMOVE 18.5 G G F-G - 43 G F F - Gypsy moth, poor form, broken branches 34.5 G F F - Poor form 32 P G F - Stem wound (H) at base, eutypella canker, hazard => REMOVE ~27 G G F-G - ~37 F-G G F-G - Lean ~48 G F-G F-G - 32 F G F-G - 43 F F F - 44 F-G F F-G - 60 G F-G F - Cavity at base with rot column Seam, deadwood, broken branches, gypsy moth, pruning wounds

15 180 Sugar Maple 181 Sugar Maple 182 Sugar Maple 183 Sugar Maple 184 Sugar Maple 185 Sugar Maple 186 Sugar Maple 187 Sugar Maple 188 Sugar Maple 189 Sugar Maple 190 Sugar Maple 191 Sugar Maple 192 Sugar Maple 193 Sugar Maple 194 Sugar Maple 195 Sugar Maple 196 Sugar Maple 197 Sugar Maple 198 Sugar Maple 199 Sugar Maple 200 Sugar Maple 201 Sugar Maple 202 Sugar Maple 40 F F F-G - Bowed,, pruned at rotting stem, gypsy moth, broken branches 25 G G F-G - 36 P P P - 57 F F F - Lost leader, hollow, poor form (H), gypsy moth Bowed,, broken branches 43.5 G G F-G G F-G F-G - Bowed 33 G G G - 29 G G G - Gypsy moth 27 G G G - 48 F P-F F - 54 F F F P-F G F - 41 F-G F F - Lean south, poor form Pruning wounds, gypsy moth, poor form Lean, fruiting bodies at base, crook, lean, gypsy moth 18 G F F - Understory tree 37 F G G - Gypsy moth, lean 45 F F F - 46 F-G F F - 44 F-G F F - 34 F-G F F - 52 F-G F-G F-G - 23 F P-F F - Crook with 1 dead stem, gypsy moth Poor form,, gypsy moth, broken branches Poor form,, gypsy moth Bowed, poor form, gypsy moth Bowed, gypsy moth Lost leader, cavity, gypsy moth 26.5 G G G - Lean, gypsy moth 25 F F-G F - Stem wound (H), 203 Sugar Maple ~65 F F F - Poor form 204 White Spruce Picea glauca ~15 G G G - P Scots Pine Pinus sylvestris ~ White Pine Pinus strobus 65 F-G F-G F-G - G F-G F-G - 7 trees, hedgerow 46 G F F - Poor form Lean, pruning wounds, crook in crown Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P704 14

16 208 White Pine Pinus strobus ~35, 42 F F F White Pine Pinus strobus 42.5 G F-G G White Pine Pinus strobus 44, 46 F F F-G Green Ash 212 Green Ash 213 Green Ash 214 Green Ash 215 Green Ash 216 Green Ash 217 Green Ash 218 Green Ash 219 Green Ash 220 Green Ash 221 Green Ash 222 Green Ash 223 Green Ash 224 Green Ash 225 Green Ash 226 Green Ash 227 Green Ash 228 Norway Maple 229 Norway Maple 230 Norway Maple 231 Norway Maple 232 Norway Maple platanoides platanoides platanoides platanoides platanoides Union at 0.1m, stem wound at base, pruning wounds, crook in crown, poor form (H), broken branches Crowded, pruning wounds V-union at 1m, crook 22 G G F - 23 G F-G F - Coppice growth 25.5 G F-G F-G - Coppice growth 25 G G F-G - 28 G G G - 22 G G G - 24 G F-G F-G - Poor form 26 G F-G F-G - Coppice growth 25 G G F-G - 33 G F-G F-G - Coppice growth 24 G G G , 15.5 F F F - 20 F P-F P-F - 20 F-G F F - Union at 1m, poor form, 1 stem dead Coppice growth (H), union at 1.2m, poor form (H) Epicormic branching 25 G F-G F - Coppice growth 23.5 G G F-G - 20 F F F - 30 F-G F F - Epicormic branching Union at 1m, poor form, epicormic branching Epicormic branching, union at 2m, vertical scaffolding limbs, poor form 31 G G F - Pruning wounds 22.5 F F F F-G F F - Seam, vertical scaffolding limbs, vertical scaffolding limbs, poor form 22 F F F - Stem wound Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P704 15

17 233 Norway Maple 234 Norway Maple 235 Sugar Maple 236 Sugar Maple 237 Sugar Maple 238 Sugar Maple 239 Sugar Maple 240 Sugar Maple 241 Sugar Maple 242 Sugar Maple 243 Sugar Maple 244 Sugar Maple 245 Sugar Maple 246 Sugar Maple 247 Sugar Maple 248 Sugar Maple 249 Sugar Maple 250 Sugar Maple 251 Sugar Maple 252 White Ash 253 White Ash 254 Sugar Maple 255 Sugar Maple 256 Sugar Maple platanoides platanoides 22 F F F - 26 G F F - Seam, epicormic branching, vertical scaffolding limbs Union at 2m, vertical scaffolding limbs Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P F F P-F P-F F F - ~101 F P P 70 Stem wound (H) with heartrot, possibly struck by lightning, lean, asymmetrical crown, gypsy moth, hazard => REMOVE Hollow, stem wound (H), broken branches hazard => REMOVE 30 G G G - Bowed, gypsy moth 56 Tree has failed ~55 Tree has failed 56 F F-G F - 44 G F-G F - Hollow, asymmetrical crown, gypsy moth, broken branches 73 P P P Lost leader 57.5 F G F-G - Broken branches 69 P-F F F - 85 P-F P-F P-F 50 Cavity (H) on 1 limb, vertical scaffolding limbs, deadwood, 1 stem 80% dead, hazard => REMOVE Cavity with rot on stem, broken branches 79 F F P-F 30 Broken branches 81.5 F P P 65 Broken branches 77 P-F P P 60 1 stem mostly dead with rot, broken branches, hazard => REMOVE 63 F P-F P-F 40 Gypsy moth 76 P P P 75 Stem wound (H) with rot, broken branches, hazard => REMOVE 18.5 G F F 30 ~92 P-F P-F P-F 50 Stem wound (H) at base with rot,, hazard => REMOVE ~85 F F F 20 On subject property ~83 P P P 80 ~95 P F P-F 30 Lost leader, hollow stem, right-of-way tree, hazard => REMOVE Hollow stem, rot (H), right-of-way tree, hazard => REMOVE

18 257 Sugar Maple 258 Sugar Maple 259 Sugar Maple 260 Apple species Malus sp. 261 Sugar Maple 262 Apple species Malus sp. 263 Apple species Malus sp. 264 Green Ash 67 F P-F F - 63 F F F - Dead leader, burls, branch wounds (H), right-of-way tree Right-of-way tree, poor form, natural pruning wounds, seam Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P F G F - Bowed, barrelling 24.5, 25.5 F F F - Union at 0.6m, cavity, epicormic branching, broken branches 32 G G F-G , 22, 26, 23 25, 15, 19.5, 25, 14.5 P-F P-F P-F 30 P-F P-F F Apple species Malus sp. 27, 40 P-F P-F F Apple species Malus sp. 267 Green Ash 268 Silver Maple P26 9 Silver Maple 270 Green Ash P27 1 saccharinum saccharinum Union at 1m, cavity (H) with rot, epicormic branching, seams, deadwood, broken branches Union at 0.2m cavity (H) with rot (H), epicormic branching, broken branches, 1 stem pruned at 2m 19.5 F F F - Bowed, lean 33, 11, 39 P-F F-G P-F - Union at 1m, fruiting bodes, natural pruning wounds cavities, deadwood, broken branches, 1 stem pruned near base Union at 0.6m, cavity (H) with rot, deadwood, stem wounds (H), heavily pruned 15 G G F - Broken branches ~26, 32 ~42-65 F F F-G - F F-G F-G - Union at 1.2m with included bark, poor form 4 trees, cavity at base of largest tree 24 G G G - Polygon contains standing snags, buckthorn, Green Ash, and Sugar Maple regeneration Sugar Maple Green Ash G G F-G - 5 trees 16.5 G F-G F-G - 1 tree, asymmetrical crown Cherry species sp. ~15 F P-F P-F - 1 tree, bowed 272 White Spruce Picea glauca 29 G F F 10 Sparse crown 273 White Spruce Picea glauca 29 F-G F F - Sparse crown, crowded, debris in root zone 274 White Spruce Picea glauca ~38 F-G G G - Debris in root zone 275 White Spruce Picea glauca 30.5 F-G F F - Sparse crown, debris in root zone, lean 276 Scots Pine Pinus sylvestris 18.5 F-G G F-G - Stem wound 277 Scots Pine Pinus Stem wound, 23 F G F - sylvestris growth deficit

19 278 Scots Pine Pinus Co-dominant in crown, 26 F F F - sylvestris poor form 279 Scots Pine Pinus sylvestris 25.5 F-G F F - Poor form 280 Scots Pine Pinus Union at 0.1m, fused 25, 17 F F F-G - sylvestris stems 281 Scots Pine Pinus 21.5 G F-G F-G - sylvestris 282 Scots Pine Pinus sylvestris 25.5 F-G F-G F-G - Sweep, crooks 283 Scots Pine Pinus sylvestris 21, 18 F-G F F-G - Union at 0.1m 284 White Spruce Picea glauca ~21 G F F - Crowded 285 Scots Pine Bowed, Pinus 21 F-G F F-G - sylvestris 286 White Spruce Picea glauca 19.5 G F F - Crowded 287 Scots Pine Pinus sylvestris 24 F-G F-G F-G - Crook 288 White Pine Pinus strobus 33 F-G F-G F-G - Bowed, crowded 289 White Pine Pinus strobus 39 G F-G F-G - Crowded 290 Scots Pine Pinus 23 G F F-G - sylvestris 291 White Pine Pinus strobus 26 F-G F F-G - Crook, crowded 292 White Spruce Picea glauca 31.5 G F F - Sparse crown, crowded 293 Scots Pine Pinus sylvestris 18 G F F - Bowed 294 White Pine Pinus strobus ~19 G F-G F-G Manitoba Maple negundo 14.5, ~51 F F F-G White Pine Pinus strobus ~23 G F-G F-G Silver Maple saccharinum ~85 F F-G F-G - Union at 0.3m, stem wound with rot, poor form, broken branches Union at 2m, poor form 298 White Spruce Picea glauca 28 F-G F F - Sparse crown, lean 299 White Spruce Picea glauca 21.5 G F F White Spruce Picea glauca 38.5 G F F Sugar Maple Stem wound, union 71 F-G F-G F - at 2m, poor form, broken branches 302 Sugar Maple 303 Sugar Maple 304 Sugar Maple 305 Sugar Maple 306 Sugar Maple 53.5 F F F - 62 F F F F F F F F F F F-G F - V-union in crown, poor form, seam, Vertical scaffolding limbs, poor form, broken branches Stem wound (H) with rot, asymmetrical crown, poor form, gypsy moth Fruiting bodies, sapsucker damage, main stem dead, gypsy moth Union at 2m, seam, gypsy moth, natural pruning wounds Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P704 18

20 307 Sugar Maple 308 Sugar Maple 309 Sugar Maple 310 Norway Maple 311 Sugar Maple platanoides 54.5 P P-F P-F P P-F P 60 ~85 F F P-F 30 Hollow, base of stem rotted, gypsy moth, hazard => REMOVE Stem wound (H), hollow, hazard => REMOVE Gypsy moth, stem wound, broken branches 21 G G F-G - Gypsy moth 89.5 F-G F F - V-union at 3m, multiple branch attachments, gypsy moth 312 White Spruce Picea glauca ~34 G G G White Spruce Picea glauca ~32, 21 F-G F-G G - Co-dominant at 1m 314 Norway Spruce Picea abies ~48 G G G Blue Spruce Picea pungens ~20 G G G Blue Spruce Picea pungens ~22 G G G Blue Spruce Picea pungens ~26 G G G - 31, 3 trees, poor form, P31 Sugar Maple 36.5, F-G F F-G - vertical scaffolding 8 31 limbs Coppice growth, 319 Sugar Maple 39 F-G F-G F-G Sugar Maple Green Ash Trembling Aspen Trembling Aspen 326 Green Ash 327 Trembling Aspen 328 Sugar Maple Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides Populus tremuloides ~100 P P P , 16.5 F-G F F - poor form Lost leader, broken branches, union at 0.6m 23.5 F G G - Stem wound 24, 15 F-G G F-G - Union at 1m 43 F-G F-G F - 24, 33.5 F F F - 50 F F F F-G F F Black Walnut Juglans nigra 24 G F G Green Ash 331 Sugar Maple 332 Green Ash 333 Black Cherry Lean (VL), broken branches V-union at 0.1m,, broken branches Lean, asymmetrical crown, broken branches 20.5 G G F - Gypsy moth 17 F-G P-F F - 62 F-G F F-G , 23 F-G F F F P-F P-F 50 Gypsy moth, Bowed crown, crook (H), epicormic branching Union at 2m, vertical scaffolding limbs, included bark in crown, seam Union at 0.3m,, gypsy moth, 1 main stem dead => PRUNE OR REMOVE Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P704 19

21 334 White Ash 335 Black Cherry 336 Manitoba Maple 337 Black Cherry 338 Sugar Maple 339 Black Cherry 340 Black Cherry 341 Horsechestnut 342 Sugar Maple 343 Basswood P34 4 Black Cherry Black Cherry Black Cherry Basswood 345 Basswood 346 Black Cherry 347 Black Cherry 348 Black Cherry 349 Green Ash negundo Aesculus hippocastanu m 52 G G G - 85 F F F - Poor form 15, 14, 13 G F G F F F F-G F-G F Failed at 2m Union at base, stem wound Union at 3m, lean,, stem wound Poor form, Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P F P-F P-F 60 38, 63 F F-G F-G - ~60, 44 26, ~21, 13, 48 P-F F F - F P-F F - 64 F F F P P P F-G G F - Lean 37.5 F-G F-G F-G - ~112 P P P - Union at 0.7m, fluxing seam on smaller stem, poor form Poor union at base, stem wound (H) at base, vertical scaffolding limbs, poor form, gypsy moth, hazard => REMOVE Union at base, main stem dead, lost leaders Clump of 4, broken branches, 1 stem dead in crown => PRUNE Stem wounds (H), bowed (H) Coppice growth, bowed Hollow, most of stem rotted, gypsy moth, hazard => REMOVE 33 G G F-G - Broken branches 60 F F F 30 Broken branches 79 P-F F F Black Walnut Juglans nigra 51 G F-G F-G White Elm 352 Sugar Maple 353 Sugar Maple 354 Sugar Maple 355 Basswood 356 Basswood Ulmus Stem wound (H), deadwood, broken branches, hazard => REMOVE 45.5 G G F-G - 27 F-G F-G F - 87 F F F , 30 63, 18, 19 ~38, 32, 21, , ~72, 31, 52 F F-G F-G - F F F - F F-G F - P-F F F - Poor form, deadwood, seam with fruiting bodies Possible girdling root, poor form Union at base, coppice growth Canker, broken branches 1 stem dead and rotted, stem wound (H)

22 357 Basswood 358 Basswood 359 Black Cherry 360 Green Ash 361 White Elm 362 Hawthorne species Ulmus Crateagus sp. 40, ~97 P-F P-F F - ~45 F P-F F - 82 F G F - Union at 0.2m, 1 stem dead, possible rot, cavity, one lost leader Sweep, broken branches, lost leader Union at 1.2m, cavity, vine competition, broken branches ~58 G F-G F 20 ~47 F-G F P-F - ~15, 15, 13 Vine competition, broken branches F-G F-G F - Union at base 363 Black Walnut Juglans nigra 57 G G F-G Black Walnut Juglans nigra 16 G F-G F-G Black Walnut Juglans nigra 19 G G G Black Walnut Juglans nigra 22.5 G G G - Stem wound, 367 Sugar Maple 15.5 F G F-G - gypsy moth 368 Ironwood 369 White Ash P37 0 See tally sheet 371 Basswood 372 Sugar Maple 373 Sugar Maple 374 Sugar Maple 375 Sugar Maple 376 Sugar Maple 377 Sugar Maple 378 Sugar Maple 379 Sugar Maple 380 Sugar Maple 381 Basswood 382 Sugar Maple Ostrya virginiana 34, 35, 27.5, 30.5, 29 F F F 20 Union at 0.5m, seam, broken branches 106 G G F-G - 59 F F F F F F-G 3 73 P F P-F 4 64 F F F 5 50 F-G F F-G 6 43 G F F-G G F-G F-G F-G F F-G 103 ~42, 47 F F-G F-G G F-G F-G 105 Broken branches, canker V-union at 3.5m, Lean, target canker (H), asymmetrical crown, hazard => REMOVE, poor form, fused limbs Union at 2m, poor form, natural pruning wounds, Bowed,, previously tagged 103 V-union at 1m with included bark, bowed (VL) 44 F-G F F-G 116 Broken branches 38, 25 F F F-G 95 V-union at 1m, broken branches Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P704 21

23 383 Sugar Maple 384 Sugar Maple 385 Sugar Maple 386 Sugar Maple 387 Sugar Maple 388 Sugar Maple 389 Sugar Maple 390 Ironwood 391 Sugar Maple 392 Sugar Maple 393 Sugar Maple P Norway Maple 396 Sugar Maple 397 Sugar Maple 398 Sugar Maple 399 Basswood Sugar Maple 400 Sugar Maple 401 Sugar Maple 402 Sugar Maple 403 Sugar Maple 404 Sugar Maple 405 Sugar Maple 406 Sugar Maple 407 Sugar Maple 408 Sugar Maple 409 Sugar Maple 410 Sugar Maple Ostrya virginiana platanoides 32.5, , 31.5 F-G F-G F-G 94 Union at 0.8m F-G F-G F-G G F G F-G F-G F-G 85 Union at 1m, broken branches Stem wounds, 31 G G G 67 40, 46 F F-G F F F-G F F-G F-G F F-G F-G F-G 60 Poor union at 1m with cavity, stem wound, cavity at base Crook, broken branches Lean, asymmetrical crown Crook, 41.5 F-G G F 57 Lean 15.5 G F G 53 ~15-27 G G G 9 trees, multi-stemmed 47 F-G G F-G Girdling root 53 G G F-G 23, 9 F-G F F 38, 35 F F-G F-G Union at 0.1m, partial understory to 396, stem wound V-union at 1m, broken branches, 49 F-G G F-G Clump of 2, sweep 18.5, 20, 9 40, 28, 26.5, 30 F-G F F Bowed F-G F F-G 24.5 G F-G F-G 18.5 F-G F-G F-G 54 Clump of 2, union at base and v-union at 1m, poor form, fused limb, broken branches Lean, asymmetrical crown 22 G F-G G 55 Broken branches 22.5 G G G 56 Growth deficit 41.5 G G G G G G F-G G G 44 Lean 17 G F F-G F G G F-G F-G G 40 Broken branches, Stem wound with rot at base Stem wound at base, co-dominant in crown Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P704 22

24 411 Bitternut Hickory 412 Sugar Maple 413 Sugar Maple 414 Sugar Maple 415 Sugar Maple 416 Sugar Maple 417 Sugar Maple 418 Sugar Maple 419 Sugar Maple 420 Sugar Maple 421 Sugar Maple 422 Sugar Maple 423 Sugar Maple 424 Sugar Maple 425 Sugar Maple 426 Sugar Maple 427 Sugar Maple 428 Sugar Maple 429 Sugar Maple 430 Sugar Maple 431 Sugar Maple 432 Bitternut Hickory 433 Sugar Maple 434 Sugar Maple 435 Sugar Maple 436 Sugar Maple 437 Sugar Maple 438 Sugar Maple 439 Sugar Maple 440 Sugar Maple 441 Sugar Maple 442 Sugar Maple Carya cordiformis Carya cordiformis 36 F-G F-G F-G 39 Epicormic branching, asymmetrical crown 37 G G F-G F F F-G F F-G F-G F F F-G G F-G F-G G G G 58 Lean, poor union with fused stems in crown Crook, codominant in crown Co-dominant in crown with fused stems, broken branches Epicormic branching 25.5 F G G 59 Lean 41 F F-G F-G 71 Co-dominant in crown, seam in crown 29.5 F-G G G 72 Lean 38.5 G G G 73 Stem wounds 49.5 F-G G G 74 Lean, stem wound 22 G G G F-G F-G F-G 33 Lean, deadwood, asymmetrical crown 25 G G F-G 32 Stem wound 32 G G G F F F 30 Lost leader, cavity at top 38 F-G F-G G 29 Co-dominant in crown 31 G G G G G G G G F G G G G G G G G G F-G F-G F-G G F-G G 21 Union in crown with included bark 24 G G G G G G G G F-G F F-G G 78 Lean, poor form 36 G G F-G 79 Lean 27.5 G G G 80 Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P704 23

25 443 Sugar Maple 444 Sugar Maple 445 Sugar Maple 446 Sugar Maple 447 Sugar Maple 448 Sugar Maple 449 Sugar Maple 450 Sugar Maple 451 Sugar Maple 452 Sugar Maple 453 Sugar Maple 454 Sugar Maple 455 Sugar Maple 456 Sugar Maple 457 Bitternut Hickory 458 Sugar Maple 459 Sugar Maple 460 Basswood 461 Sugar Maple 462 Green Ash 463 Green Ash Carya cordiformis 22.5 G G G F-G G G 83 Lean 40 F G F 82 Canker 31 F G F-G 81 Growth deficit with callous at base, crook 43 G G F-G G F-G G 18 Broken branches 18 G G G G G F-G G G G 16 Broken branches 21.5 F-G F F-G 15 57, 18.5 F G F 14 Cavity, Union at base and 7m, cavities 36 G F-G G 13 Poor form 38 F-G G F-G 12 Union at 4m 47 F F F 8 Cavity with seam, poor form 43 G G G F F-G F F F P-F 100 Union at 3m with included bark (H), lean Bowed, stem wounds 49 F F F 99 Burl, bowed crown 26 F G F-G 97 Growth deficit with callous (H) at base, crook ~21 F-G G F-G 167 Sweep ~15 G G G 168 P46 4 Sugar Maple ~15-62 F-G F-G F-G , trees 465 Sugar Maple Union at 1.2m, ~73 F-G F F-G 133 Asymmetric crown 466 Sugar Maple ~122 F F F 134 "V" union at 1.2m 467 Black Walnut Juglans nigra ~62 G G G Sugar Maple Broken branches, ~84 F F F 361 Poor Form, Asymmetric Crown DBH Codes Diameter at Breast Height (cm) TI Trunk Integrity (G, F, P) Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P704 24

26 CS Crown Structure (G, F, P) CV Crown Vigor (G, F, P) CDB Crown dieback % PT Previously tagged P = poor, F = fair, G = good, ~ = estimate, (VL) = very light, = light, = moderate, (H) = heavy Table % Tally Location: Date: Surveyor: Compartment Number: Stations Tallied: Innis Lake and Old Church 18-Jul-13 CB P % Tally Stand Analysis Tally (by Species, Size Class and Quality Class) Tree Size Class >>>> Polewood cm Small cm Sawtimber Sizes Medium cm Large 50 cm + Total All Sizes Species AGS UGS AGS UGS AGS UGS AGS UGS AGS UGS Black Walnut (Juglans nigra ) Green Ash ( ) ( ) Total Number of Trees Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P704 25

27 Appendix A. Stand Analysis of Northcentral Woodlot Location: Innis Lake Road and Old Church Road Date: 08-Jul-13 Surveyor: CB Compartment Number: Northcentral Woodlot Stations Tallied: 6 Stand Analysis Tally (by Species, Size Class and Quality Class) Tree Size Class >>>> Polewood cm Small cm Sawtimber Sizes Medium cm Large 50 cm + Total All Sizes Species AGS UGS AGS UGS AGS UGS AGS UGS AGS UGS Sugar Maple ( ) Total Number of Trees BA (m 2 /ha) Total BA (m 2 /ha) Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P704 26

28 Appendix B. Photographs of Northwest Woodlot Image 1. View of canopy gap within the northwest corner of the woodlot, facing north. Image 2. View of southeast corner of woodlot, facing southeast. Kuntz Forestry Consulting Inc. P704 27