Project: Fairview Ecological Assessment Report

Transcription

1 Project: Fairview Ecological Assessment eport Lot 6 on CP Post Site-scout ealignment eport Project No Prepared for: Santos Ltd eport ref: October 20

2 Document Control ecord Document prepared by: Aurecon Australia Pty Ltd ABN Level 4, 32 Turbot Street Brisbane QLD 4000 Locked Bag 33 Brisbane QLD 400 Australia T F E w brisbane@aurecongroup.com aurecongroup.com A person using Aurecon documents or data accepts the risk of: a) Using the documents of data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version. b) Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Aurecon. eport Title Lot 6 on CP Post Site-scout ealignment eport Document ID Project Number File Path Client Santos Ltd Client Contact ev Date evision Details/Status Prepared by Author Verifier Approver 0 7 October 20 Draft for internal review SS SS CS Current evision 0 Approval Author Signature Approver Signature Name S Stone Name Jane Stark Title Ecologist Title Ecologist Project File Fairview Ecological Assessment - Lot 6 on CP (CS verification).docx 8 October 20 evision 0

3 Fairview Ecological Assessment eport Date 8 October 20 eference evision 0 Aurecon Australia Pty Ltd ABN Level 4, 32 Turbot Street Brisbane QLD 4000 Locked Bag 33 Brisbane QLD 400 Australia T F E W brisbane@aurecongroup.com aurecongroup.com

4 Contents Background. Project description.2 Purpose of report 2 Methodology 2 2. Desktop methodology Field methodology 2 3 Ecological assessment 3 3. Area A Area B Area C Area D Area E 3.6 Area F Area G 4 4 Conclusion 7 5 eferences 8 Appendices Appendix A Flora Species List Flora Species List i

5 Background. Project description Santos Ltd (Santos) have commissioned Aurecon Australia Pty Ltd (Aurecon) to undertake ecological investigations of proposed areas of development for the expansion of the Fairview Gas Fields. The Fairview Gas Fields are situated approximately 40km from Injune in southern Queensland. This area is characterised by elevated sandstone ranges including the Carnarvon and Expedition anges and part of the Mount Hutton and Kongabula anges. The Dawson iver and other smaller watercourses drain this area and the vegetation is dominated by Eucalyptus and White Cypress Pine woodland, Brigalow and Semi-evergreen Vine Thicket (Eddie, 2007). Much of this area has been subjected to cattle grazing and other agricultural practices as well as previous development associated with the gas fields. This report is specific to the post site-scout realignment development areas on Lot 6 on CP as shown in Figures through to 7. These areas are collectively referred to as the proposed development areas, and are located entirely within Lot 6 on CP Note that the subject of this report is solely related to Lot 6 on CP Where survey areas overlap additional properties, these sites will be further addressed in the report relevant to those properties/lots..2 Purpose of report The aim of this report is to provide an ecological assessment of the proposed development areas located on Lot 6 on CP (Figures to 7), and to identify areas and species of notable ecological or conservation value. This report does not make any recommendations regarding the development in relation to any Santos environmental authorities or other approvals. p Project File Fairview Ecological Assessment - Lot 6 on CP (CS verification).docx 8 October 20 evision 0

6 .0.3/ / /.3.2 6CP /.3.2 Fairview Gas Gathering System Area A.0.3/.3.25 oad Area C 6CP CP oad.3.39 Map by: PIC P:\GIS\Projects\25648FairviewEcoAssessment\25648Fairview080.mxd 4/0/20 5:20.0./.0.3a Legend EVNT and Type A Species Corridors - Ground Truth Geotech Borehole Cadastre Watercourse A scale: :4, ESA Mapping (Including Buffer Areas) Category A Category B Category C Date: 4/0/ Meters Version: Coordinate system: GDA994MGAZone55 egional Ecosystem (VM Act Status) Job No: Endangered - Dominant Endangered - Sub-dominant Of Concern - Dominant Of Concern - Sub-dominant Least Concern Source: Cadastre: DEM, 20. egional Ecosystems: Version 6., The State of Queensland (Department of Environment and esource Management), Sept 20. Santos Upstream Ecological Assessment Figure : Location of Proposed Amended Development Areas Investigated Area A

7 .0.3/ CP FV-FL FTY805 BEILBA STATE FOEST FV-FL Area B CP FV-FL P:\GIS\Projects\25648FairviewEcoAssessment\25648Fairview080.mxd 4/0/20 5:20 Area D 6CP /.3.2 CP FTY805 BEILBA STATE FOEST.0./.0.3a FV-GL Map by: PIC Legend EVNT and Type A Species Corridors - Ground Truth Geotech Borehole Cadastre Watercourse ESA Mapping (Including Buffer Areas) Category A Category B Category C egional Ecosystem (VM Act Status) Endangered - Dominant Endangered - Sub-dominant Of Concern - Dominant Of Concern - Sub-dominant Least Concern Source: Cadastre: DEM, 20. egional Ecosystems: Version 6., The State of Queensland (Department of Environment and esource Management), Sept A scale: :,600 Date: 4/0/20 Version: Meters Coordinate system: GDA994MGAZone55 Job No: Santos Upstream Ecological Assessment Figure 2: Location of Proposed Amended Development Areas Investigated Area B

8 .3.39/.3.2 5WT / / WT /.3.2 6CP WT Fairview Gas Gathering System Area A.3.39/ / oad.0./.0.3a 6CP / / / /.3.2 oad oad.3.39/.3.2 P:\GIS\Projects\25648FairviewEcoAssessment\25648Fairview080.mxd 4/0/20 5:20.0./.0.3a Powerline Area C oad.9.4a.0./.0.3a.0.7 6CP a 2 Map by: PIC.0./.0.3a.9.4a a.0.7 Legend EVNT and Type A Species Corridors - Ground Truth Geotech Borehole Cadastre Watercourse A scale: :7, ESA Mapping (Including Buffer Areas) Category A Category B Category C Date: 4/0/ Meters Version: Coordinate system: GDA994MGAZone55 egional Ecosystem (VM Act Status) Job No: Endangered - Dominant Endangered - Sub-dominant Of Concern - Dominant Of Concern - Sub-dominant Least Concern Source: Cadastre: DEM, 20. egional Ecosystems: Version 6., The State of Queensland (Department of Environment and esource Management), Sept 20. Santos Upstream Ecological Assessment Figure 3: Location of Proposed Amended Development Areas Investigated Area C

9 Area B.3.39/.3.2 6CP FV-GL Area D P:\GIS\Projects\25648FairviewEcoAssessment\25648Fairview080.mxd 4/0/20 5:20 6CP /.0.3a FV-GL CP FTY805 BEILBA STATE FOEST Map by: PIC.0./.0.3a Legend EVNT and Type A Species Corridors - Ground Truth Geotech Borehole Cadastre Watercourse ESA Mapping (Including Buffer Areas) Category A Category B Category C egional Ecosystem (VM Act Status) Endangered - Dominant Endangered - Sub-dominant Of Concern - Dominant Of Concern - Sub-dominant Least Concern Source: Cadastre: DEM, 20. egional Ecosystems: Version 6., The State of Queensland (Department of Environment and esource Management), Sept A scale: :,600 Date: 4/0/20 Version: Meters Coordinate system: GDA994MGAZone55 Job No: Santos Upstream Ecological Assessment Figure 4: Location of Proposed Amended Development Areas Investigated Area D

10 .9.4a.0./.0.3a Area F Water to Grade Flowline Water to Grade Flowline 5WT a 6CP Area E Water to Grade Flowline Water to Grade Flowline Map by: PIC P:\GIS\Projects\25648FairviewEcoAssessment\25648Fairview080.mxd 4/0/20 5: WT32 8AB200 Legend EVNT and Type A Species Corridors - Ground Truth Geotech Borehole Cadastre Watercourse A scale: :4, ESA Mapping (Including Buffer Areas) Category A Category B Category C Date: 4/0/ Meters Version: Coordinate system: GDA994MGAZone55 egional Ecosystem (VM Act Status) Job No: Endangered - Dominant Endangered - Sub-dominant Of Concern - Dominant Of Concern - Sub-dominant Least Concern Source: Cadastre: DEM, 20. egional Ecosystems: Version 6., The State of Queensland (Department of Environment and esource Management), Sept 20. Santos Upstream Ecological Assessment Figure 5: Location of Proposed Amended Development Areas Investigated Area E

11 .0./.0.3a.9.4a Water to Grade Flowline 6CP Area F P:\GIS\Projects\25648FairviewEcoAssessment\25648Fairview080.mxd 4/0/20 5: Map by: PIC Legend EVNT and Type A Species Corridors - Ground Truth Geotech Borehole Cadastre Watercourse A scale: :2, ESA Mapping (Including Buffer Areas) Category A Category B Category C Date: 4/0/ Meters Version: Coordinate system: GDA994MGAZone55 egional Ecosystem (VM Act Status) Job No: Endangered - Dominant Endangered - Sub-dominant Of Concern - Dominant Of Concern - Sub-dominant Least Concern Source: Cadastre: DEM, 20. egional Ecosystems: Version 6., The State of Queensland (Department of Environment and esource Management), Sept 20. Santos Upstream Ecological Assessment Figure 6: Location of Proposed Amended Development Areas Investigated Area F

12 a Powerline Powerline 6CP Powerline.9.5 Powerline Powerline Area G.9.5 Powerline.0. 6 Powerline 8AB200 P:\GIS\Projects\25648FairviewEcoAssessment\25648Fairview080.mxd 4/0/20 5:20 Fairview Water Gathering System.9.5 Water to Grade Flowline Fairview Water Gathering System AB Map by: PIC Legend EVNT and Type A Species Corridors - Ground Truth Geotech Borehole Cadastre Watercourse A scale: :6, ESA Mapping (Including Buffer Areas) Category A Category B Category C Date: 4/0/ Meters Version: Coordinate system: GDA994MGAZone55 egional Ecosystem (VM Act Status) Job No: Endangered - Dominant Endangered - Sub-dominant Of Concern - Dominant Of Concern - Sub-dominant Least Concern Source: Cadastre: DEM, 20. egional Ecosystems: Version 6., The State of Queensland (Department of Environment and esource Management), Sept 20. Santos Upstream Ecological Assessment Figure 7: Location of Proposed Amended Development Areas Investigated Area G

13 2 Methodology 2. Desktop methodology Proposed development areas have been projected onto a range of maps provided by Santos. These maps include DEM certified egional Ecosystem (E) Mapping (version 6.0; Department of Environment and esource Management DEM]), Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) mapping, drainage mapping and aerial photography. Where available ahead of time, these resources were reviewed to determine target areas for the field inspection. It is important to note that the E classifications used in this report are based on the biodiversity status of the vegetation and not the Vegetation Management Act 999 (VM Act) status of the vegetation. 2.2 Field methodology The proposed development areas were assessed by eight (8) Aurecon ecologists (Cassandra Arkinstall, Hayley Poole, Chris Schell, Luke Foster, Sarah Stone, and Matthew Bailey) in early October 20. These assessments were undertaken to determine the existing vegetation communities and habitat value of the areas of proposed clearing within the development areas as well as to verify the E Mapping as produced by DEM. GIS environmental constraints layers (eg DEM certified E Mapping, ESA mapping etc) and high resolution aerial photography were uploaded onto a toughbook (C5 mobile clinical assistant CFT-00 Motion computing), with an integrated GPS used to locate surveys areas. Handheld Garmin GPS units (GPS map 76) were also used during the field investigations. It should be noted that while efforts were made to ensure the GPS co-ordinates provided in this report are accurate, a margin of error approximately +/-5 m is expected due to the limitations of the devices used and the recording environment. The areas assessed were of varying widths and lengths as indicated in Figures through to 7. The ground-truthing of the proposed development areas included undertaking detailed flora species surveys including sampling of unknown flora, and recording all incidental fauna observations. Notes were also made regarding the potential fauna habitat values of all areas proposed for disturbance. All species known to be of significance (such as endangered, vulnerable, near threatened or Type A species under the provisions of the Nature Conservation Act 992 NC Act] or endangered, vulnerable or rare species under the provisions of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 999 EPBC Act]) were recorded using the toughbook. A list of flora species observed in the proposed development areas has been included in Appendix A. Incidental fauna observations are provided in the relevant sections of this report. p 2 Project File Fairview Ecological Assessment - Lot 6 on CP (CS verification).docx 8 October 20 evision 0

14 3 Ecological assessment 3. Area A 3.. General The Area A proposed development area is situated along Fairview oad, within Lot 6 on CP (Figure ). This proposed development area is currently mapped as non-remnant vegetation on the DEM certified E Mapping, and this was confirmed during field investigations. This proposed development area has been previously cleared/disturbed, with scattered canopy cover persisting throughout this proposed development area. Brachychiton spp and Acacia harpophylla (Brigalow) dominate this area. No mapped ESAs occur within this proposed development area, however a Category C ESA (associated with an Of Concern E community) is mapped approximately 260 m to the east. One () mapped watercourse (stream order ) occurs within this proposed development area, adjacent to 6399-TP Floristics This proposed development area has been subject to historical clearing associated with the construction and operation of Fairview oad, and for agricultural purposes (ie grazing). A sparse canopy cover occurs within this proposed development area, and is represented by scattered Brachychiton spp and Acacia harpophylla (Brigalow). Woody regrowth (approximately 5-6 m) is present throughout this proposed development area, and is typically represented by Eucalyptus populnea (Poplar box), Eucalyptus melanophloia (Silver-leaved ironbark), and Acacia salicina (Sally wattle). The ground cover is dominated by Pennisetum ciliare (Buffel grass), with a mosaic of native grasses and exotic weeds occurring in various areas. Indicative species recorded within this proposed development area include Eragrostis brownii (Brown s Lovegrass), Heteropogon contortus (Black spear grass), Melinis repens (ed Natal grass), and Cheilanthes sieberi (Mulga fern). p 3 Project File Fairview Ecological Assessment - Lot 6 on CP (CS verification).docx 8 October 20 evision 0

15 No species of conservation significance (ie endangered, vulnerable or near threatened EVNT] species) protected under the provisions of the NC Act and/or EPBC Act were recorded within or directly adjacent to this proposed development area. Furthermore, no species of harvestable importance (ie Type A restricted plants as listed under the provisions of the NC Act) were recorded during these investigations. A flora species list for this proposed development area is provided in Appendix A Habitat values Habitat features associated with this proposed development area include: Canopy cover suitable for shelter, foraging and perching (limited) Fissured tree bark (limited) Dense groundcover vegetation (ie grassy tussocks) Limited large course woody debris (ie fallen/felled timber, including hollow-bearing logs) The habitat value of this proposed development area considered is low overall, as it contains limited woody vegetation and has been disturbed by grazing stock, previous vegetation clearing and the invasion of exotic pasture species. Species utilising resources in this area are most likely to be limited to common, generalist species that are able to adapt to significant habitat disturbances. Squatter pigeon (Geophaps scripta scripta) was detected within close proximity (200 m) to this proposed development area. This species is listed as Vulnerable under the provisions of the EPBC Act and NC Act. The location of the Squatter pigeon is presented in Table, below. Table Location of Endangered, Vulnerable or Near Threatened Species observed (Nature Conservation Act 992, EPBC Act 999) Species Easting (GDA 94, Zone 55J) Squatter pigeon Northing (GDA 94, Zone 55J) In total, fifteen (5) incidental fauna species were recorded within this proposed development area, as indicated in Table 2. All species detected (excluding Squatter pigeon) are listed as Least Concern under the provisions of the NC Act, and are not listed under the provisions of the EPBC Act. Table 2 Incidental fauna species recorded during field investigations Common Australian magpie Brown quail Crested pigeon European rabbit* Nankeen kestrel Magpie lark Pale-headed rosella Pied butcherbird Gymnorhina tibicen Coturnix ypsilophora Ocyphaps lophotes Oryctolagus cuniculus Falco cenchroides Grallina cyanoleuca Platycercus adscitus Cracticus nigrogularis Species p 4 Project File Fairview Ecological Assessment - Lot 6 on CP (CS verification).docx 8 October 20 evision 0

16 Pied currawong ed kangaroo Striated pardalote Torresian crow Weebill Western gerygone Willie wagtail Common Strepera graculina Macropus rufus Pardalotus striatus Pardalotus striatus Smicrornis brevirostris Gerygone fusca hipidura leucophrys Species Table note: * Evidence of this species in the form of a warren was detected 3.2 Area B 3.2. General The Area B proposed development area is situated along Fairview oad, within Lot 6 on CP (Figure 2). This proposed development area is currently mapped as non-remnant vegetation on the DEM certified E Mapping, and this was confirmed during field investigations. This proposed development area has been subject to previous clearing activities and as a result, is dominated by dense ground cover stratum with shrubby re-growth present. No mapped ESAs occur within this proposed development area. However a Category C ESA (associated with an Of Concern E community) is mapped approximately 85 m to the south-east. No watercourses are mapped by DEM as occurring within this proposed development area. The closest mapped watercourse occurs 250 m to the north Floristics This proposed development area is considered to occur within a highly modified environment. The very sparse canopy cover is represented by a single Brachychiton populneus (Kurrajong). This species is listed as a Type A restricted species under the provisions of the NC Act. The location of this individual is illustrated in Figure 2 and indicated in Table 3. Scattered shrubs recorded within this proposed development area include Acacia decora (Pretty wattle), Acacia leiocalyx (Black wattle) and Dodonaea viscosa (Sticky hopbush), and Eucalyptus melanophloia (Silver-leaved ironbark) regrowth. The ground stratum is dominated by Pennisetum ciliare (Buffel grass), with occurrences of Cymbopogon refractus (Barbwire grass) and Verbena tenuisecta (Mayne s curse), Wahlenbergia communis (Large blubells), Wahlenbergia gracilis (Sprawling bluebells), and Maytenus cunninghamii (Yellow berry bush). p 5 Project File Fairview Ecological Assessment - Lot 6 on CP (CS verification).docx 8 October 20 evision 0

17 Table 3 Location of Type A estricted Plants (Nature Conservation Act 992) Species Easting (GDA 94, Zone 55J) Northing (GDA 94, Zone 55J) Brachychiton populneus A flora species list for this proposed development area is provided in Appendix A Habitat values Habitat features associated with the proposed disturbance area include: Dense groundcover vegetation dominated by exotic pasture species (ie grassy tussocks) Limited woody debris (ie fallen/felled timber, including hollow-bearing logs) The habitat value of this proposed development area is low overall, as it contains limited woody vegetation and has been disturbed by grazing stock, previous vegetation clearing and the invasion of exotic pasture species. Species utilising resources in this area are most likely to be limited to common, generalist species that are able to adapt to significant habitat disturbances. No incidental fauna species were recorded during field investigations of this proposed development area. 3.3 Area C 3.3. General The Area C proposed development area largely follows and existing access track to the south of Fairview oad, within Lot 6 on CP (Figure 3). This proposed development area is mapped as partially occurring within No Concern at Present E.0./.0.3a on the DEM certified E mapping. Field investigations have confirmed that this mapping is accurate. E.3.39/.3.2 (Of Concern) is also mapped as occurring within this proposed development area (0.4 ha, 46 m wide). However, field investigations have indicated that the landzone has been incorrectly mapped for this area, and the designation of landzone 0 (medium to course-grained sedimentary rock) would better characterize this area. Approximately 0.4 ha of Category C ESA (associated with the Of Concern E mapping) is intercepted by this proposed development area, in close proximity to 6399-TP-96). One () stream order watercourse is mapped as occurring within this proposed development area, in the north Floristics The initial section of this proposed development area (ie north western leg) is located within an actively grazed area that is predominately cleared, with shrubby regrowth. This area is typically dominated by Pennisetum ciliare (Buffel grass), Maireana microphylla (Small-leaf bluebush) and Heteropogon contortus (Black spear grass). p 6 Project File Fairview Ecological Assessment - Lot 6 on CP (CS verification).docx 8 October 20 evision 0

18 A small patch (0.3 ha) of Acacia harpophylla (Brigalow) has been identified as occurring partially within this proposed development area, within the non-remnant region (Figure 3). This vegetation community may be considered analogous to a Threatened Ecological Community (including Brigalow egrowth community) under the provisions of the EPBC Act, and may therefore be referable. The vegetation recorded in association with the stream order watercourse is dominated by Acacia salicina (Sally wattle), Lomandra longifolia (Spiny-headed mat rush), Dodonaea viscosa (Sticky hopbush) and regrowth Eucalyptus chloroclada (Dirty gum) and Eucalyptus melanophloia (Silverleaved ironbark). The remnant areas of this proposed development area (E.0./.0.3a) is represented by Eucalyptus crebra (Narrow leaved ironbark), Eucalyptus fibrosa subsp. nubila (Blue-leave ironbark), and Callitris glaucophylla (White cypress pine). The dominant shrubs recorded within these areas include Acacia leiocalyx (Black Wattle), Psydrax oleifolia (Canthium), Notelaea microcarpa var. microcarpa (Velvet mock olive) and Acacia longispicata (Slender flowered wattle). Scattered Gonocarpus urceolatus (asp weed) were detected within this proposed development area from 6399-TP-96 and extended within the roadside corridor, east to Corridor F52. This species is listed as Vulnerable under the provisions of the NC Act. The location of this species is illustrated in Figure 3 and is provided in Table 4. Twenty-two (22) Type A restricted plants of two difference species (listed under the provisions of the NC Act) were recorded during these investigations, ie Brachychiton rupestris (Narrow-leaved bottle tree), and Brachychiton populneus (Kurrajong). The location of these individuals are illustrated on Figure 3, and presented in Table 4. Table 4 Location of Type A estricted Plants (Nature Conservation Act 992) Species Easting (GDA 94, Zone 55J) Gonocarpus urceolatus Gonocarpus urceolatus Gonocarpus urceolatus Northing (GDA 94, Zone 55J) Brachychiton populneus Brachychiton populneus Brachychiton populneus Brachychiton populneus Brachychiton rupestris Brachychiton rupestris Brachychiton populneus Brachychiton populneus Brachychiton populneus Brachychiton populneus Brachychiton populneus p 7 Project File Fairview Ecological Assessment - Lot 6 on CP (CS verification).docx 8 October 20 evision 0

19 Species Easting (GDA 94, Zone 55J) Northing (GDA 94, Zone 55J) Brachychiton populneus Brachychiton populneus Brachychiton populneus Brachychiton populneus Brachychiton populneus Brachychiton populneus Brachychiton populneus Brachychiton populneus Brachychiton populneus Brachychiton populneus Brachychiton populneus Habitat values Habitat features associated with this proposed development area include: Canopy cover suitable for shelter, foraging and perching Fissured/exfoliating tree bark Dense ground cover vegetation Limited woody debris (ie fallen/felled timber) Ephemeral watercourse habitat The habitat values associated with this proposed development area are considered moderate, overall. The remnant vegetation within this proposed development area offers a relatively undisturbed environment and therefore retains the intrinsic habitat values associated with that E. Mature trees and shrubby understorey provides a high level of cover and possible nesting hollows. The areas of non-remnant regrowth and open pasture land within the remaining areas of this proposed development area are considered very limited in habitat value due to the lack of cover and high prevalence of exotic species. Eight (8) incidental fauna species were recorded within this proposed development area, as indicated in Table 5. Squatter pigeon (Geophaps scripta scripta) was detected, and is listed as Vulnerable under the provisions of the EPBC Act and NC Act. The location of this species is presented in Table 7. All other species detected are listed as Least Concern under the provisions of the NC Act, and are not listed under the provisions of the EPBC Act. p 8 Project File Fairview Ecological Assessment - Lot 6 on CP (CS verification).docx 8 October 20 evision 0

20 Table 5 Incidental fauna species recorded during field investigations Common Eastern grey kangaroo European rabbit Noisy miner Pale-headed rosella Pied currawong ed-backed fairy wren Squatter pigeon Striated pardalote Species Macropus giganteus Oryctolagus cuniculus Manorina melanocephala Platycercus adscitus Strepera graculina Malurus melanocephalus Geophaps scripta scripta Pardalotus striatus Table 6 Location of Endangered, Vulnerable or Near Threatened Species observed (Nature Conservation Act 992, EPBC Act 999) Species Easting (GDA 94, Zone 55J) Squatter pigeon Area D 3.4. General Northing (GDA 94, Zone 55J) The Area D proposed development area is located to the immediate west of the proposed Corridor F252 (Figure 4). This proposed development area is largely mapped as remnant vegetation on the DEM certified E mapping. The majority of this proposed development area occurs within mapped E.3.39/.3.2 (Of Concern), with E.0./.0.3a occurring within the southern region. Field investigations within Area D have confirmed that DEM certified E mapping is inaccurate with regards to the land zone classification and species composition. The vegetation community assessed within this proposed development area is considered analogous to E.0.7a (No Concern at Present). This E is described by DEM as Eucalyptus crebra +/- Callitris glaucophylla +/- Angophora leiocarpa +/- Eucalyptus spp. Woodland (EDD Version 6.). As a result of inaccurate E mapping, the majority of this proposed development area is mapped as occurring within a Category C ESA. No watercourses are mapped as occurring within this proposed development area. The closest watercourse (stream order ) is mapped approximately 85 m to the north-east. p 9 Project File Fairview Ecological Assessment - Lot 6 on CP (CS verification).docx 8 October 20 evision 0

21 3.4.2 Floristics This proposed development area occurs largely within remnant vegetation analogous to E.0.7a (No Concern at Present). The canopy cover is dominated by Eucalyptus crebra (Narrow-leaved ironbark), with occurrences of Angophora leiocarpa (Smooth-bark apple), Corymbia tessellaris (Moreton Bay ash), and Callitris glaucophylla (White cypress pine). Flindersia australis (Crows ash) and Flindersia collina (Leopard ash) were recorded on the slopes along with Brachychiton populneus (Kurrajong). Eucalyptus melanophloia (Silver-leaved ironbark) dominates the lower slopes of this proposed development area. Incidental shrub species recorded within this proposed development area include Callitris glaucophylla (White cypress pine), Alphitonia excelsa (ed ash), Geijera parviflora (Wilga), and Acacia decora (Pretty wattle). The ground stratum is characterised by a mosaic of native grasses including Aristida caput-medusae (Many-headed wire grass), Themeda triandra (Kangaroo grass), and Panicum effusum (Hairy panic). No species of conservation significance (ie endangered, vulnerable or near threatened EVNT] species) protected under the provisions of the NC Act and/or EPBC Act were recorded within or directly adjacent to this proposed development area. Five (5) plants of two different species as listed under the provisions of the NC Act were recorded during field investigations (ie Brachychiton populneus Kurrajong] and Brachychiton bidwillii Little kurrajong]). The location of these individuals are illustrated on Figure 4, and presented in Table 7. Table 7 Location of Type A estricted Plants (Nature Conservation Act 992) Species Easting (GDA 94, Zone 55J) Northing (GDA 94, Zone 55J) Brachychiton populneus Brachychiton populneus Brachychiton populneus Brachychiton bidwillii Brachychiton bidwillii A flora species list for this proposed development area is provided in Appendix A Habitat values Habitat features associated with the proposed disturbance area include: Canopy cover suitable for perching, nesting and shelter Hollow-bearing trees and stags Exfoliating/ fissured bark Dense groundcover vegetation (ie grassy tussocks) Woody debris (ie fallen/felled timber, including hollow-bearing logs) p 0 Project File Fairview Ecological Assessment - Lot 6 on CP (CS verification).docx 8 October 20 evision 0

22 The habitat values associated with the Area D proposed development area is considered moderate, overall. The remnant vegetation within this proposed development area offers a relatively undisturbed environment and therefore retains the intrinsic habitat values associated with that E. Mature trees, stags and shrubby understorey provides a high level of cover and possible nesting hollows. Seven (7) incidental fauna species were recorded within this proposed development area, as indicated in Table 8. All of these species (except for the European rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus]) are listed as least concern under the provisions of the NC Act and not listed under the provisions of the EPBC Act. The European rabbit is listed as a Class 2 declared animal under the provisions of the Land Protection (Pest and Stock oute Management) Act 2002 (LP Act). Table 8 Incidental fauna species recorded during field investigations Common Australian magpie Eastern grey kangaroo European rabbit* Noisy miner Pale-headed rosella Pied currawong Striated pardalote Species Gymnorhina tibicen Macropus giganteus Oryctolagus cuniculus Manorina melanocephala Platycercus adscitus Strepera graculina Pardalotus striatus Table notes: *LPA Class 2 declared animal 3.5 Area E 3.5. General The Area E proposed development area is located to the immediate south of the proposed Corridor F3 (Figure 5). This proposed development area is largely mapped as remnant vegetation (E.0.7; No Concern at Present) on the DEM certified E mapping. This E is described by DEM as Eucalyptus crebra +/- Callitris glaucophylla +/- Angophora leiocarpa +/- Eucalyptus spp. Woodland (EDD Version 6.). Ground-truthing of this vegetation community has confirmed that the E mapping is accurate. No ESAs are mapped as occurring within this proposed development area. However, a Category B ESA is mapped as occurring approximately 75 m to the north, in association with an Endangered E community. One () stream order watercourse is mapped within this proposed development area Floristics This proposed development area occurs largely within remnant vegetation analogous to E.0.7 (No Concern at Present). The canopy cover is represented by Eucalyptus melanophloia (Silver-leaved ironbark), Eucalyptus crebra (Narrow-leaved ironbark), Corymbia trachyphloia (Brown bloodwood), and Callitris glaucophylla (White cypress pine). Eucalyptus chloroclada (Dirty gum) is present along the slopes of this proposed development area. p Project File Fairview Ecological Assessment - Lot 6 on CP (CS verification).docx 8 October 20 evision 0

23 Indicative shrub species recorded within this proposed development area include Callitris glaucophylla (White cypress pine), Alphitonia excelsa (ed ash), Bursaria spinosa (Prickly pine), Eremophila mitchelli (False sandalwood), and Acacia decora (Pretty wattle). The ground stratum is characterised by a mosaic of grasses including Aristida caput-medusae (Manyheaded wire grass), Themeda triandra (Kangaroo grass), Eragrostis brownii (Brown s love grass), Entolasia stricta (Wiry panic), and Aristida holathera (Tall wire grass). No species of conservation significance (ie endangered, vulnerable or near threatened EVNT] species) protected under the provisions of the NC Act and/or EPBC Act were recorded within or directly adjacent to this proposed development area. Two (2) Type A restricted plants (as listed under the provisions of the NC Act) (ie Brachychiton populneus Kurrajong]) were recorded during field investigations. The location of these individuals are illustrated on Figure 5, and presented in Table 9. Table 9 Location of Type A estricted Plants (Nature Conservation Act 992) Species Easting (GDA 94, Zone 55J) Northing (GDA 94, Zone 55J) Brachychiton populneus Brachychiton populneus A flora species list for this proposed development area is provided in Appendix A Habitat values Habitat features associated with the proposed disturbance area include: Canopy cover suitable for perching, nesting and shelter Hollow-bearing trees and stags Exfoliating/ fissured bark Dense groundcover vegetation (ie grassy tussocks) Woody debris (ie fallen/felled timber, including hollow-bearing logs) The habitat values associated with the Area E proposed development area are considered moderate to high. The remnant vegetation within this proposed development area offers a relatively undisturbed environment and therefore retains the intrinsic habitat values associated with that E. Mature trees, stags and shrubby understorey provides a high level of cover and possible nesting hollows. Seventeen (7) incidental fauna species were recorded within this proposed development area, as indicated in Table 0. All of these species are listed as Least Concern under the provisions of the NC Act, and are not listed under the provisions of the EPBC Act. p 2 Project File Fairview Ecological Assessment - Lot 6 on CP (CS verification).docx 8 October 20 evision 0

24 Table 0 Incidental fauna species recorded during field investigations Common Australasian figbird Australian magpie Grey strike thrush Laughing kookaburra Noisy friarbird Noisy miner Oriental cuckoo Pale-headed rosella Pied butcherbird Pied currawong ufous whistler Striated pardalote Torresian crow Weebill Yellow-tail black cockatoo Species Sphecotheres vieilloti Gymnorhina tibicen Colluricincla harmonica Dacelo novaeguineae Philemon corniculatus Manorina melanocephala Cuculus optatus Platycercus adscitus Cracticus nigrogularis Strepera graculina Pachycephala rufiventris Pardalotus striatus Corvus orru Smicrornis brevirostris Calyptorhynchus funereus 3.6 Area F 3.6. General The Area F proposed development area is situated along the proposed Corridor F, within Lot 6 on CP (Figure 6). This proposed development area is currently mapped as non-remnant vegetation on the DEM certified E Mapping, and this was confirmed during field investigations. This proposed development area has been previously cleared/disturbed, and is largely devoid of a canopy layer. No mapped ESAs occur within this proposed development area, however a Category B ESA (associated with an Endangered E community) is mapped approximately 360 m to the north. No watercourses are mapped as occurring within this proposed development area. The closest watercourse (stream order ) is mapped approximately 430 m to the north-east Floristics This proposed development area occurs entirely within non-remnant vegetation, as mapped by the DEM certified E mapping. This proposed development area is devoid of a canopy layer. The shrub layer is largely dominated by Acacia decora (Pretty wattle), with occurrences of Acacia leiocalyx (Black wattle), Acacia excelsa (Ironwood), Eucalyptus melanophloia (Silver-leaved ironbark), and Corymbia tessellaris (Moreton Bay ash). p 3 Project File Fairview Ecological Assessment - Lot 6 on CP (CS verification).docx 8 October 20 evision 0

25 The ground stratum is dominated by Pennisetum ciliare (Buffel grass), with occurrences of Aristida caput-medusae (Many-headed wire grass), Themeda triandra (Kangaroo grass), Aristida holathera (Tall wire grass), Dichanthium sericeum (Queensland blue grass), and Bothriochloa ewartiana (Desert blue grass). No species of conservation significance (ie endangered, vulnerable or near threatened EVNT] species) protected under the provisions of the NC Act and/or EPBC Act were recorded within or directly adjacent to this proposed development area. Furthermore, no Type A restricted plants (as listed under the provisions of the NC Act) were recorded during field investigations. A flora species list for this proposed development area is provided in Appendix A Habitat values Habitat features associated with the proposed disturbance area include: Dense groundcover vegetation (ie grassy tussocks) Limited coarse woody debris (ie fallen/felled timber, including hollow-bearing logs) The habitat value of this proposed development area is low overall, as it contains limited woody vegetation and has been disturbed by grazing stock, previous vegetation clearing and the invasion of exotic pasture species. Species utilising resources in this area are most likely to be limited to common, generalist species that are able to adapt to significant habitat disturbances. No incidental fauna species were recorded during field investigations of this proposed development area. 3.7 Area G 3.7. General The Area G proposed development area is located within the southern region of Lot 6 on CP (Figure 7). This proposed development area is predominately mapped as non-remnant on the DEM certified E mapping. Ground-truthing of this proposed development area has determined that the mapping is largely correct, although some inaccuracies regarding the extent of remnant communities were apparent. This will be discussed further in Section This proposed development area intercepts approximately 0. ha of mapped Category B ESA, associated with a mapped Endangered E community (.9.5). However, field investigations have detected approximately.45 ha of vegetation analogous to E.9.5 within this proposed development area. Two (2) watercourses are mapped within this proposed development area (stream order 6 Hutton Creek] and stream order ) Floristics Most of this proposed development area is located within non-remnant vegetation. ecent bushfires, particularly on the slopes of the mid to northern portion of this proposed development area has resulted in a low level of species diversity. p 4 Project File Fairview Ecological Assessment - Lot 6 on CP (CS verification).docx 8 October 20 evision 0

26 DEM certified E mapping indicates that approximately 0. ha of E.9.5 (Endangered) occurs within this proposed development area. Ground-truthing has indicated that the DEM certified E mapping is not a true reflection of the current extent of E.9.5 at this location. Field investigations have resulted in the detection of E.9.5 exclusively within the northern and southern extremities of this proposed development area, equating to approximately.45 ha (.25 ha north; 0.2 ha south) of vegetation. The 0.2 ha portion of E.9.5 identified in the south is currently inaccurately mapped as No Concern at Present E.0.7). E.9.5 is described by DEM as Acacia harpophylla and/or Casuarina cristata open forest on finegrained sedimentary rocks (EDD Version 6.). This E community is analogous to a Threatened Ecological Community under the provisions of the EPBC Act, and may therefore be referable. These areas are characterised by a dominance of Acacia harpophylla (Brigalow) (approximately 5-8 m high), with occurrences of Brachychiton rupestris (Narrow-leaved bottle tree), and Eucalyptus populnea (Poplar box). Scattered Eucalyptus orgadophila (Mountain coolabah) occurs within the northern portion of this proposed development areas on the slopes. A small (.7 ha) area of No Concern at Present E (.0.7; Eucalyptus crebra woodland on coarsegrained sedimentary rocks) is intercepted by this proposed development area within the southern region in association with the Fairview Water Gathering System and Water to Grade Flowline. The vegetation associated with E.0.7 is characterised by a canopy of Eucalyptus populnea (Poplar box) and Eucalyptus melanophloia (Silver-leaved ironbark), with Eucalyptus chloroclada (Dirty gum), Allocasuarina cunninghamii (iver she-oak) and Angophora floribunda (ough-bark apple) occurring along the lower slopes towards the watercourse. No species of conservation significance, under the provisions of the NC Act and/or EPBC Act were detected during field investigations. Two (2) Type A restricted plants of a single species (as listed under the provisions of the NC Act) (ie Brachychiton rupestris Narrow-leaved bottle tree]) were recorded during field investigations. The location of these individuals are illustrated on Figure 7, and presented in Table. Table Location of Type A estricted Plants (Nature Conservation Act 992) Species Easting (GDA 94, Zone 55J) Northing (GDA 94, Zone 55J) Brachychiton rupestris Brachychiton rupestris A flora species list for this proposed development area is provided in Appendix A Habitat values Habitat features associated with the proposed disturbance area include: Canopy cover suitable for perching, nesting and shelter Hollow-bearing trees and stags Exfoliating/ fissured bark Dense groundcover vegetation (ie grassy tussocks) (excluding burnt areas) Woody debris (ie fallen/felled timber, including hollow-bearing logs) Watercourse habitat p 5 Project File Fairview Ecological Assessment - Lot 6 on CP (CS verification).docx 8 October 20 evision 0

27 The habitat values of this proposed development area are considered moderate. The remnant vegetation within this proposed development area offers a relatively undisturbed environment and therefore retains the intrinsic habitat values associated with that E. Mature trees, stags and shrubby understorey provides a high level of cover and possible nesting hollows. The non-remnant vegetation communities generally lack important habitat features such hollowbearing trees/logs and leaf litter. Accordingly, the fauna utilising resources in this area are most likely to be limited to common, generalist species that are able to adapt to significant habitat disturbances (eg House mouse Mus musculus], macropods). Common birds of prey known from the area (eg Wedge-tailed eagle Aquila audax] and Nankeen kestrel Falco cenchroides]) would also be expected to utilise this proposed development area for foraging purposes. Eleven () incidental fauna species were recorded within this proposed development area, as indicated in Table 2. These species are listed as Least Concern under the provisions of the NC Act and are not listed under the provisions of the EPBC Act. Table 2 Incidental fauna species recorded during field investigations Common Australian magpie Noisy friarbird Noisy miner Pheasant coucal Pied currawong ainbow lorikeet Striated pardalote Sulphur-crested cockatoo Torresian crow Willie wagtail Species Gymnorhina tibicen Philemon corniculatus Manorina melanocephala Centropus phasianinus Strepera graculina Trichoglossus haematodus Pardalotus striatus Cacatua galerita Corvus orru hipidura leucophrys p 6 Project File Fairview Ecological Assessment - Lot 6 on CP (CS verification).docx 8 October 20 evision 0

28 4 Conclusion The post site-scout realignments are located within both previously disturbed areas and within remnant vegetation communities. The areas proposed for development traverse areas mapped on DEM certified E mapping as Endangered, Of Concern, No Concern at Present and non-remnant. Some inaccuracies have been detected with E mapping and are discussed within the relevant sections of this report. Multiple Type A restricted plant species were observed within the proposed development areas. Furthermore, Gonocarpus urceolatus (asp Weed) was recorded within the proposed development area (refer to Section 3.3.2). This species is listed as Vulnerable under the provisions of the NC Act but has not been listed under the provisions of the EPBC Act. The Squatter pigeon (Geophaps scripta scripta) was detected within the proposed development area, and is listed as Vulnerable under the provisions of the EPBC Act and the NC Act. All other species observed are listed as Least Concern under the provisions of the NC Act, and are not listed under the provisions of the EPBC Act. A number of mapped watercourses (stream orders and 6) occur within the proposed development area. p 7 Project File Fairview Ecological Assessment - Lot 6 on CP (CS verification).docx 8 October 20 evision 0

29 5 eferences Eddie, C (2007) Field Guide to Trees and Shrubs of Eastern Queensland Oil and Gas Fields, First Edition, Santos Ltd, Adelaide. egional Ecosystem Mapping, Version 6., Queensland Government Department of Environment and esource Management (DEM). egional Ecosystem Description Database (EDD), Queensland Government Department of Environment and esource Management (DEM) x.php p 8 Project File Fairview Ecological Assessment - Lot 6 on CP (CS verification).docx 8 October 20 evision 0

30 Appendix A Flora Species List

31 Flora Species List Family Name Scientific Name Common Name A B C D E F G Adiantaceae Cheilanthes sieberi Mulga Fern x x x x Amaranthaceae Achyranthes aspera two spine burr x Amaranthaceae Alternanthera dentata Joy Weed x Anthericaceae Thysanotus tuberosus Fringed Lilly x Apiaceae Hydrocotyle laxiflora Pennywort x Apocynaceae Alstonia constricta Bitter Bark x x x Apocynaceae Carissa lanceolata Currant Bush x Apocynaceae Carissa ovata Currant Bush x x x Apocynaceae Marsdenia viridiflora subsp. viridiflora Marsdenia x x Asteraceae Bidens pilosa Cobblers Pegs x x Asteraceae Calocephalus platycephalus Billy Buttons x Asteraceae Calotis cuneifolia Purple Burr Daisy x x x Asteraceae Calotis lappulacea Yellow Burr Daisy x x x Asteraceae Cassinia laevis Cough Bush x x x x Asteraceae Chrysocephalum apiculatum Yellow Buttons x x x x Asteraceae Cirsium vulgare Spear Thistle, Black Thistle x x x x x Asteraceae Conyza bonariensis Fleabane x x Asteraceae Cotula australis Carrot Weed x x Asteraceae Gnaphalium sp. Cudweed x x x x Asteraceae Ixiolaena brevicompta Yellow Daisy x Asteraceae Podolepis jaceoides Showy Copper Wire Daisy x 3 Project File FAIVIEW Ecological Assessment - Lot 6 on CP (CS verification).docx 8 October 20 Current evision 0

32 Family Name Scientific Name Common Name A B C D E F G Asteraceae Pterocaulon sphacelatum Apple Bush x x Asteraceae Senecio lautus Fire Weed x Asteraceae Sonchus oleraceus Sow Thistle x Asteraceae Xerochrysum bracteatum Everlasting Daisy x x x x Asteraceae Zinnia multiflora Zinnia x Bignoniaceae Pandorea pandorana Wonga Vine x Boraginaceae Heliotropium amplexicaule Blue Heliotrope x Brassicaceae Brassica rapa apeseed x Brassicaceae Brassica sp. Turnip Weed x Brassicaceae Lepidium sagittulatum Pepper Cress x x Brassicaceae Sisymbrium thellungii African Turnip Weed x Cactaceae Opuntia tomentosa Velvety Tree Pear x x Caesalpinioideae Senna artemisioides Senna x Caesalpinioideae Senna artemisioides subsp artemisioides Silver Cassia x Caesalpinioideae Senna planticola Ant Senna x x Campanulaceae Wahlenbergia communis Large Bluebells x Campanulaceae Wahlenbergia gracilis Sprawling Bluebell x Campanulaceae Wahlenbergia sp Blue Bell x Capparaceae Apophyllum anomalum Warrior bush x Capparaceae Capparis lasiantha Native Orange x x Capparaceae Capparis loranthifolia Nipan, Wait a while x x x x Capparaceae Capparis mitchellii Bumble fruit x x Capparaceae Capparis spinosa Capparis midsize x 4 Project File FAIVIEW Ecological Assessment - Lot 6 on CP (CS verification).docx 8 October 20 Current evision 0

33 Family Name Scientific Name Common Name A B C D E F G Casuarinaceae Allocasuarina inophloia Stringybark She-oak x x Casuarinaceae Allocasuarina leuhmannii Bull Oak x Casuarinaceae Casuarina cristata Belah x Chenopodiaceae Einadia hastans Saltbush x Chenopodiaceae Einadia nutans Climbing Saltbush x Chenopodiaceae Maireana microphylla Small-leaf Bluebush x Chenopodiaceae Maireana villosa Silky Bluebush x Chenopodiaceae Neobassia proceriflora Soda Bush x Chenopodiaceae Salsola kali oly Poly x x Chenopodiaceae Sclerolaena muricata Black rolly-polly x x Commelinaceae Commelina sp. Wandering Jew x Cucurbitaceae Sicyos australis Wild Cucumber x x x Cupressaceae Callitris glaucophylla White Cypress Pine x x x x Cyperaceae Bulbostylis sp Bulbostylis x Cyperaceae Carex inversa Nut Sedge x Cyperaceae Cyperus gracilis Bunchy Sedge x Cyperaceae Cyperus ira Variable sedge x Cyperaceae Cyperus polystachyos Bunchy Sedge x x Ericaceae Melichrus urceolatus Urn-heath x x Euphorbiaceae Acalypha sp. Turkey Bush x Euphorbiaceae Chamaesyce drummondii Caustic Weed x Euphorbiaceae Croton insularis Silver Croton x x Euphorbiaceae Sauropus sp Sauropus x 5 Project File FAIVIEW Ecological Assessment - Lot 6 on CP (CS verification).docx 8 October 20 Current evision 0