TEXAS ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE COMMISSION WET-DRY STATUS OF TEXAS COUNTIES AS OF AUGUST 31, county (89) others dry in part (76)

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "TEXAS ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE COMMISSION WET-DRY STATUS OF TEXAS COUNTIES AS OF AUGUST 31, county (89) others dry in part (76)"

Henry Quinn
5 years ago
Views:

-85 WET-DRY STATUS OF TEXAS COUNTIES AS OF AUGUST 31, 1984 +Indicates sale of mixed beverages is legal in all or part of county (89) "'Indicates counties totally wet for distilled spirits (36);

1 -85 WET-DRY STATUS OF TEXAS COUNTIES AS OF AUGUST 31, Indicates sale of mixed beverages is legal in all or part of county (89) "'Indicates counties totally wet for distilled spirits (36); others dry in part (76) All COUNTIES IN WHICH DISTILLED SPIRITS ARE LEGAL: 174 Anderson +*Aransas Archer Atascosa +*Austin +Bandera "'Bastrop + Bee tbe 11 +"'Bexar +B 1anco Bosque +Brazod a + Brazos +*Brewster Brooks Brown Burleson +Burnet +Calhoun Callahan + Cameron tcamp Carson Cass Cas tra Char.t>ers Chi 1dress Clay Co \ el'\it n Col 11 n +*Colorado +*Canal Cananche Cooke Crane Cut berson Dal1am +Dallas Oeaf Smith +Denton +DeWitt Dickens +OilTlll;t +Donley + Duval Eastland tector Edwards +*E1 Paso El I; s +Falls Fannin +Fayette +*Fort Bend +Frio +Ga 1yes ton Garza +Gillespie +Goliad Gonld 1es Gray Grayson Gregg +Grimes +Guada 1upe Hall Hamilton Hardin +Harri s Harrison Haskell +Hays +Henderson +*Hidalgo Hill Hood Howard +*Hudspeth Hunt Hutchi nson +Jackson Jasper Jeff Davis +Jefferson +*Jim Hogg +Jim Wells *Karnes Kaufman +*Kenda 11 Kenedy +Kerr Kimble King +*K i nney +Kleberg +lama r +la Salle +lavaca +lee leon liberty l i psccmb li ve Oak +l1ano +*loving +lubbock Marion +Matagorda +Maverick +McCu1loch +Mclennan +Medi na Menard +Mi d1a nd Mi I am Mi 11 s Mi tchel1 +MontgOOlery +*Moore Nacogdoches +Navarro Newton Nolan +Nueces +Orange Palo Pinto Pecos +Po1k +Potter +*Presidio Rains +Randall *Reagan Red River +Reeves Refugl0 Robertson Runnels San Augustine San Jacinto +San Patricio San Saba *Schleicher Shelby +*Starr Stonewa 11 +*Sutton +Tarrant +Tay1or *Terrell +Titus +Tcm Green +*Travi s *Tri ni ty Upshur *Upton Uva 1de tva 1 Verde +Yictoria +Wal ker +Waller Ward +*Washi ngton +*Webb +Wharton Wichita +Wi11acy +Williamson +*Wi1soo *Winkler +*Zapata +Zavala Wi 1ba rger I

2 -86 "TIES IN WHICH ONLY 4~ BEER IS LEGAL: 14 Concho Hartley Dawson I ri on 1,1 dsscock Mason f~cmullen Oldham Sabi ne Stephens Wise COUNTIES IN WHICH 14~ REVERAGES ARE LEGAL: 2 Limestone SOI'lervell COUNTIES WHOLLY ORY: 64 Andrews Fisher Kent Angelina Floyd Knox Armstrong Foard Lamb Bail ey Frankl i n Lampasas Borden Freestone Lynn Bowie Gai nes Mad; son Briscoe Hale Martl n Cockran Hans ford Montague Coke Ha rdema n Morris Collingsworth Henphill Mot ley Corye 11 Hockley Ochiltree Cot t 1e Hopkins Panola Crock.ett Houston Parker Crosby Jack Panner Delta Johnson Real Erath Jones Roberts Rockwall Rusk Scurry Shackel ford Sherman Smith Sterl i 09 Swisher Terry Throckmorton Tyler Van Zandt Wheeler Wood Yoakum Young

3 -87 LOCAL OPTION ELECTIONS There were twenty-three local option elections during the fiscal year ending August 31,1984. Seven elections were called to legalize the sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only; four rem~ined "dry" and three became "wet. 1I Two elections were called to 1ega 1; ze the sa1e of mi xed beye rages; bot h became "wet." Three el eclions were called to legalize the sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption only; all remained "dry." Six elections were called to legalize the stlle of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages; one remained "dry" and five became "wet." One election was called to legalize the sale of beer for on-premise consumption; one remained "dry." Four elections were called to legalize the sale of beer for off-premise consumption only; all became "wet." The voting for the fiscal year: CHEROKEE COUNTY City of Cuney. Cherokee County, on June ~. voted 55 for "the legal sa le of beer for of f -premi se consumpt 10n on Iy" and 23 aga i ns t "the 1ega1 sale of beer for off-premise consumption only." City of Cuney. Cherokee County. was "dry" before the election was held and became "wet" for the legal sale of beer for off-premise consumption only." CLAY COUNTY Precinct No.2. Clay County, on December 20, 1983, voted S5 for "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverges for off-premise consumption only" and 17 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for offpremise consumpt10n only." Precinct No.2. Clay County, was "dry" before the election was held and becarre "wet" for the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only.

LAS COUNTY toy of Buckingham. Dallas County. on January 18.1984. voted 55 for legal sale of all alcoholic beverages.

4 LAS COUNTY toy of Buckingham. Dallas County. on January voted 55 for legal sale of all alcoholic beverages. including mixed beverages II 27 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages, including xed beverages." City of Buckingham, Dallas County. was "dry" before election was held and became "wet" for the legal sale of all a1co.fi c beverages. ; nel udi"9 mixed beve rages. Precinct No.1. Deaf Smith County. on April , voted for -the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption oo1 yll and 2,441 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off prem;se consumption only." Precinct No. I. Deaf Smith County. was -dry" before the election was held and became "wet" for the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only. DI111HT COUNTY Precinct No.3, Dimmit County. on November , voted 49 for "the legal sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption only" and 62 against "the legal sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption only." Precinct No.3. Oimmit County. was "dry" before the election was held and remained "dry." GLASSCOCK COUNTY Precinct No. I. Glasscock County, on June 5, voted 76 for "the legal sale of beer for off-pr~ise consumption only" and 37 against "the legal sale of beer for off-premise consumption only." Precinct No. I, Glasscock County, was "dry" before the election was held and became "wet- for the legal sale of beer for off-premise consumption only. GRAYSON COUNTY Precinct No.8, Grayson County, on March 31, voted 677 for "the legal sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption only" and 804 against "the legal sale of beer and wine for off-premise consur.'lption only." Precinct No.8, Grayson County. was "dry" before the election was held and remained "dry."

5 -89 Local Option Elections (continued) HENOERSON COUNTY City of Seven Points, Henderson County. on October 8, 1983, voted 37 for "the legal sale of mixed beverages" and 7 against "the legal sale of mixed beverages." City of Seven Points, Henderson County, was "dry" before the election was held and became "wet" for the 1ega 1 sa1e of mhed beve rages. City of Seven Points. Henderson County. on April 2~. 1984, voted 20 for "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverges. including mixed beverages" and 49 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages. including mi xed beverages." Ci ty of Seven Poi nts, Henderson COllnty. was "dry" for the sale of all alcoholic beverages before the election was held and remained "dry." KLEBERG COUNTY Precinct No.3, Kleberg County. on August voted 196 for "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages" and 129 against "the legal sale of all alcoho11c beverages including nllxed beverages." Precinct No.3. K1eberg County. was "dry" before the election was held and became "wet" for the leljal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages. MAR ION COUNTY Precinct No.2, Marion County, on Septemher 6, 19"~3, voted 202 for Mthf' legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-prl"'llse r:i)nsijnptir>n only" and 247 against "the legal sale of all alcohollc bel/flra'1f>s for offpremise consumption only." Precinct No.2. Marion r.oljnty, WCiS "dr.,. before the election was held and rel1ained "dry." flcmullen COUNTY Precinct No. 3, r~cmullen County. on April 7. IQn4. voted 2'~ for "thp legal sale of beer for off-premlse consumption 0'11y" and 8 dljaifls!. "t:hp legal sale of beer for off-premise consuffiptlfjn only." Precinct ';0. 3. McMullen County. was "dry" before the election W"lS he11 and became "",e' for the legal sale of beer for off-premise cons'lnptiqn only. MEa INA COUNTY Precinct No.4, Medina County. on June 9, voted 2f)6 for "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverage,," and 231 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverdlj~s including,;xed beverages." Precinct ~o. 4. Medina County. was "dry" before the f~lection was held and became "wet" for the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages.

-90 IlAM COUNTY of Milano, Milam County, on March 10, 1984, voted 46 for "the legal ale of beer for on-premise consur:lption" and 135 against "the legal ~e of beer for on-premise consumption.

6 -90 IlAM COUNTY of Milano, Milam County, on March 10, 1984, voted 46 for "the legal ale of beer for on-premise consur:lption" and 135 against "the legal ~e of beer for on-premise consumption." City of Milano, Milam County, was "dry" before the election was held and remained "dry." Precinct No.2, fh'am County, on May 8,1984, voted 161 for "the legal sale of beer for off-premi se consumption only" and 122 agai nst" the legal sale of beer for off-premise consumption only." Precinct No.2, Milam County, was "dryll before the election was held and became wet" for the legal sale of beer for off-premise consumption only. NACOGDOCHES COUNTY Preci nct No. 1\, Nacogdoches County, on August 4, 1984, voted 268 for "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only" and 540 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premi se consumpt i on only." Preci nct No.4, Nacogdoches County. was "dry" before the election was held and remained "dry." NAVARRO COUNTY City of Navarro) Navarro County, on June 11, 1984, voted 18 for "the legal sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption only" and 51 against "the legal sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption only." City of Navarro, Navarro County, was "dry" before the election was held and remained "dry." ORANGE COUNTY City of Orange, Orange County, on August 11, voted 1,654 for "the legal sale of all a)coholic beverages including mixed beversges" and 1,253 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages." Ci ty of Orange, Orange County was "dry" before the el ect i on was held and became "wet" for the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages.

-91 Local Option Elections (concluded) REEVES COUNTY City of Balmorhea, Reeves County. on February 4. 1984.

7 -91 Local Option Elections (concluded) REEVES COUNTY City of Balmorhea, Reeves County. on February voted 81 for "the 1ega1 sa1e of all a1coho11 c beve rages inc1udi ng mixed beverages" and 45 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages including mixed beverages." City of Balmorhea. Reeves County, was "dry" before the election was held and became "wet" for the legal sale of all alcoho11c beverages including mixed beverages. SAN SABA COUNTY Precinct No.3. San Saba County. on October voted 74 for "the legal sale of all alcohollc beverages for off-premise consumption only" and 179 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only." Precinct No. 3 was "dry" before the election was held and remained "dry." STONEWALL COUNTY Precinct No. 4. Stonewall County. on August 4, 1984, voted 44 for "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consu!'1ptlon only" and 47 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-pren1ise consumpt i on. " Preci nct No.4, Stonewa 11 County, we, S "dry" before the election was held and renained "dry." TOM GREEN COUNTY City of San Angelo. Tom Green County. on Novenber voted 11,09~ for "the legal sale of r.\ixed beverages" and 6,032 against "the legal sale of mixed beverages." City of San Angelo. Tom Green County, was "dry" before the election was held and became "wet" for the legal sal", of mixed beverages. WILBARGER COUNTY Precinct No.3. Wilbarger County. on November 19, voted 140 for "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consultlptian only" and 133 against "the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption only." Precinct No.3. Wilbarger County, was "dry" before the election was held and became "wet" for the legal sale of all alcoholic beverages for off-pr~nise consumption only.

Academic Year Texas Public High School Graduates Enrolled in Texas Higher Education, Academic Year

Academic Year Texas Public High School Graduates Enrolled in Texas Higher Education, Academic Year Higher, Academic Year 2003-2004 STATEWIDE 59,014 70,550 108,545 238,109 following their graduation are counted in the " " column. Higher, Academic Year 2003-2004 following their graduation are counted